The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店预订软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #8 7 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #5 24 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #3 10 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #4 3 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #6 18 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #6 17 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #4 16 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #6 5 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #5 13 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #5 12 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #4 4 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #3 4 条评价 | — |
When selecting a central reservations system (CRS) for your hotel, your main goal is to automate reservations, improve distribution, and boost revenue. Both Amadeus iHotelier® and Xotels offer solutions designed to streamline these processes, but they diverge significantly in scope, market presence, and user engagement. With Amadeus’s larger footprint, more features, and robust review base, it’s the more reliable choice for hotels seeking a proven, comprehensive CRS.
Are you looking for an established platform with extensive integration options and a global presence? Or do you prefer a smaller, specialized system tailored for independent hotels? Let's compare both options across several key factors.
Amadeus iHotelier® provides a full-featured CRS that automates distribution across web, mobile, voice, OTAs, GDS, and metasearch channels, aiming to centralize revenue management. It’s designed to serve hotels of all sizes, from independents to mid-scale chains, with a focus on maximizing reach and simplifying operations.
Xotels, by contrast, is a smaller player primarily known for its hotel management consulting and yield techniques, with a specialized CRS that emphasizes real-time reservation synchronization and occupancy management. It’s best suited for independent hotels and resorts that want a straightforward system to reduce overbooking and improve distribution.
Does your hotel need a comprehensive, enterprise-level platform or a targeted solution for independent properties? The choice hinges on your hotel’s size, complexity, and growth ambitions.
If your hotel requires a mature, feature-rich CRS with extensive integrations and global reach, Amadeus is the clear choice. Its 52 reviews, 4.57/5 overall rating, and 79-point score reflect consistent user satisfaction. It’s suited for properties that need a sophisticated system capable of handling complex distribution channels and revenue management, especially if you operate across multiple regions.
If your focus is on streamlining reservations and maximizing occupancy for a single property or resort, Xotels offers a simpler, more direct approach. However, with no reviews or ratings available, it’s difficult to determine its effectiveness or user satisfaction. For hotels prioritizing proven performance, Amadeus’s established reputation makes it the safer option.
In summary, choose Amadeus if you want a proven, feature-packed CRS with global support. Choose Xotels if you prefer a lightweight, niche solution for independent properties, but be aware of the limited independent review data.
Amadeus iHotelier® scores 4.43/5 for ease of use, with many reviewers highlighting its user-friendly design after initial training. Its onboarding process averages 4.1/5, and users describe it as manageable once familiarized, though some note a steep learning curve at first.
Xotels does not have any published review scores or detailed user feedback on usability, making it impossible to objectively compare their user experience. Given Amadeus’s established user base and high ratings, it’s the more reliable choice for ease of adoption.
Edge: Amadeus.
Amadeus offers 18 unique features, including a booking engine, channel management, metasearch connectivity, content management, RMS, geotargeted pricing, dynamic pricing, multi-property management, PMS connectivity, guest profiles, and more. These capabilities allow your team to manage reservations, rates, and distribution from a single platform.
Xotels provides no detailed feature list or additional functionalities beyond its core reservation synchronization, which limits its scope. Without a comparable feature set, Amadeus’s comprehensive offerings clearly outshine Xotels.
Edge: Amadeus.
Amadeus’s customer support scores 4.15/5, with reviews praising its helpfulness and responsiveness. Users appreciate the detailed training, although some mention delays in support responses and a steep initial learning curve.
Xotels does not have publicly available reviews or ratings on support services, making it difficult to assess its customer care quality. Given Amadeus’s longstanding presence and documented support ratings, it’s the safer choice for reliable assistance.
Edge: Amadeus.
Amadeus integrates with 104 verified partners, including major OTAs, GDS, and PMS systems such as Opera, Mews, and Hotelchamp. This vast network facilitates seamless distribution and data sharing across channels.
Xotels offers only 6 verified integrations, including Xotels and Cloudbeds, with limited scope compared to Amadeus. For hotels relying on extensive, proven connections, Amadeus’s broad partner network provides a clear advantage.
Edge: Amadeus.
With 52 recent reviews and a 4.57/5 overall rating, Amadeus is highly regarded by hoteliers across hotel segments, including independent and branded properties. Reviews highlight its comprehensive features, ease of use after training, and strong support.
Xotels has no reviews or ratings available, so its reputation remains unverified. Given the established user feedback for Amadeus, it’s clearly the more trusted choice among hoteliers.
Edge: Amadeus.
Pricing information for both products is not publicly available, which is common in enterprise solutions. Typically, Amadeus’s CRS involves a licensing fee, implementation costs, and possibly ongoing fees, reflecting its scope and integrations.
Xotels does not disclose pricing details, but as a smaller provider, it may offer more flexible or lower-cost options suited for independent hotels. However, without transparent pricing, your decision should focus on features and support.
Not ideal if your hotel is small, local-only, or has minimal distribution channels.
Not ideal if you require advanced features, global integrations, or detailed analytics.
Amadeus iHotelier® is a well-established CRS with a proven track record, extensive features, and a broad global presence. Its 52 recent reviews and high ratings from hoteliers affirm its reliability for properties of all sizes seeking a comprehensive, integrated solution.
Xotels offers a more limited, less documented platform that may suit small independent hotels or resorts needing basic reservation and distribution management. However, the lack of reviews and detailed features makes it a riskier choice for hotels prioritizing proven performance.
If your hotel values a mature, feature-rich platform with extensive support and integrations, Amadeus is the clear winner. For smaller, less complex properties, Xotels could be sufficient but warrants further direct evaluation.
In conclusion: for most hotels, especially those looking for a dependable, widely adopted CRS, Amadeus remains the superior choice based on current review data and feature set.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
TravelClick 因与各种渠道、GDS 和 Opera 等 PMS 系统无缝集成而受到称赞。然而,人们对复杂的 OTA Sync 实现以及平台需要变得更加用户友好表示担忧。一些评论强... TravelClick 因与各种渠道、GDS 和 Opera 等 PMS 系统无缝集成而受到称赞。然而,人们对复杂的 OTA Sync 实现以及平台需要变得更加用户友好表示担忧。一些评论强调了较长的集成时间和一些需要改进的可用性挑战。
对于平台的创新和持续更新,人们的评价褒贬不一。一些用户对平台频繁的改进和新功能表示赞赏,而另一些人则认为,某些方面(如 iHotelier CRS)需要进行更重大的... 对于平台的创新和持续更新,人们的评价褒贬不一。一些用户对平台频繁的改进和新功能表示赞赏,而另一些人则认为,某些方面(如 iHotelier CRS)需要进行更重大的更新,才能保持与时俱进和直观。
TravelClick 中的分析和报告工具因其跟踪绩效和做出明智决策的能力而受到酒店经营者的高度重视。用户强调详细的商业智能报告和市场情报功能是战略制定的关键组成... TravelClick 中的分析和报告工具因其跟踪绩效和做出明智决策的能力而受到酒店经营者的高度重视。用户强调详细的商业智能报告和市场情报功能是战略制定的关键组成部分。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
TravelClick 的客户支持普遍受到好评,因为它乐于助人、专业且高效。一些评论指出了支持团队的响应能力和乐于助人,但也提到了回复延迟和培训不足。评论还强调了... TravelClick 的客户支持普遍受到好评,因为它乐于助人、专业且高效。一些评论指出了支持团队的响应能力和乐于助人,但也提到了回复延迟和培训不足。评论还强调了在各个地区提供本地支持和更多培训选项的必要性。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Amadeus – iHotelier® Central Reservations System (CRS) 和 Xotels (CRS) 共享许多核心 Hotel Reservations Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。Amadeus – iHotelier® Central Reservations System (CRS) 提供 104 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Xotels (CRS) 提供 6 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Amadeus – iHotelier® Central Reservations System (CRS) 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.4/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Amadeus – iHotelier® Central Reservations System (CRS):否。Xotels (CRS):否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Reservations Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Amadeus 的 HT Score 为 79,Xotels 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问