项目面板是一款免费工具,仅向已认证的酒店从业者开放。它通过简化调研流程和沟通环节,让采用新技术变得更轻松。
各产品在不同酒店规模、类型和区域的 酒店管理软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店经营者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #2 675 条评价 | #42 1 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #1 235 条评价 | #48 0 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #1 51 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #4 5 条评价 | — |
按酒店类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #1 546 条评价 | #36 1 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #3 245 条评价 | #38 1 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #2 145 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #2 96 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #2 532 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #4 166 条评价 | #29 1 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #3 201 条评价 | — |
| 中东 ▾ | #3 13 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Cloudbeds HMS and Zonal PMS hinges on your hotel’s size, operational needs, and growth ambitions. Both solutions aim to streamline hotel management, but Cloudbeds’ comprehensive features and extensive global presence give it a significant edge, especially given its larger review base and recent user feedback.
Cloudbeds offers an all-in-one platform with robust integrations, automations, and a user-friendly interface, while Zonal’s cloud PMS emphasizes real-time OTA connectivity and operational simplicity. The key question is: which system aligns better with your hotel’s current operations and future plans?
Cloudbeds and Zonal both serve as core management tools, but they approach hotel operations differently. Cloudbeds integrates reservation management, revenue tools, channel management, guest experience, and reporting into a single platform, aiming to reduce manual work and improve efficiency across diverse property types.
Zonal, on the other hand, focuses heavily on real-time OTA connectivity, front desk operations, and operational streamlining, primarily targeting independent hotels and multi-property groups. While Cloudbeds emphasizes automation and guest-centric tools, Zonal’s strength lies in its real-time distribution and simple management interface.
Do you need an all-in-one growth engine, or is a streamlined, OTA-focused system enough for your hotel?
If your hotel requires a scalable, feature-rich platform that centralizes operations—especially if you operate multiple properties or want to automate revenue management—go with Cloudbeds. Its 1,219 reviews and recent 76 reviews in the last six months reinforce its credibility and ongoing user satisfaction.
If your hotel prioritizes real-time OTA distribution, easy front desk management, and minimal operational complexity—particularly if you’re a smaller independent property—Zonal might seem appealing. However, with only 1 review and limited recent feedback, Zonal’s community and product development appear more limited.
For growth-driven hotels, Cloudbeds’ broader feature set and global presence make it the stronger choice. Smaller hotels seeking straightforward OTA management may find Zonal sufficient, but the limited recent reviews reduce confidence in its current support and innovation.
Cloudbeds currently holds a high ease-of-use rating of 4.58/5, with positive reviews emphasizing its intuitive, user-friendly interface. New users report quick onboarding (average 4.41/5) and minimal training hurdles, with many praising its straightforward navigation.
Zonal scores a perfect 5/5 for ease of use, reflecting its simple, clean interface tailored for operational efficiency. Support and onboarding are also highly rated, with users appreciating the UK-based support team that facilitates quick setup.
Edge: Zonal.
Cloudbeds vastly outpaces Zonal in features, boasting over 90 unique functionalities—including PMS connectivity, analytics dashboards, revenue management, multi-lingual and multi-currency support, automation tools, and integrated payment processing. These enable a holistic management environment adaptable to various hotel sizes.
Zonal offers essential features like real-time OTA channel management, a responsive booking engine, mobile check-in/out, digital room keys, and basic operational modules. While effective for streamlining day-to-day tasks, it lacks the extensive automation, detailed analytics, and revenue tools Cloudbeds provides.
Conclusion: Cloudbeds’ feature set is far more comprehensive, supporting scaling and advanced revenue strategies. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds holds a customer support rating of 4.38/5, with reviews citing fast response times and attentive service, although some users report occasional delays during peak periods. Their support team is generally seen as responsive and friendly.
Zonal scores a perfect 5/5, with users praising their dedicated UK-based support, quick issue resolution, and smooth onboarding process. While Zonal’s support appears highly rated, the limited number of recent reviews restricts full comparison.
Edge: Zonal.
Cloudbeds integrates with 190 verified partners, including popular OTAs, payment gateways, revenue management, and POS systems. This extensive network allows for a unified operation environment, reducing manual data entry and errors.
Zonal’s PMS offers just 2 verified integrations, primarily with its own F&B systems and a handful of external partners like OTAs. Its limited integration ecosystem restricts flexibility, especially for hotels seeking a fully connected tech stack.
Conclusion: Cloudbeds’ extensive integrations position it as the more adaptable, future-proof choice. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds’ overall rating of 4.62/5 is based on 1,219 reviews, with recent positive feedback emphasizing its ease of use, automation, and support. Hotels across various segments, especially boutique and Hostel properties, rate it highly, with an NPS of 8.94/10.
Zonal’s current rating is 0/5, with only 1 review, and no recent feedback available. This lack of community input makes it difficult to assess user satisfaction confidently.
Conclusion: Cloudbeds’ well-established reputation and recent reviews make it the favored system. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds charges a fixed monthly fee of $500, with no additional implementation or trial costs. The pricing reflects its comprehensive feature set and global support infrastructure.
Zonal’s base price is $600 per month, with similar no-trial policies. While slightly higher, Zonal’s pricing may be justified by its focused features for specific markets, but the lack of transparent additional costs limits precise comparison.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Cloudbeds and Zonal serve different hotel management needs. Cloudbeds provides a full-featured, integrated platform with a strong customer base, ongoing innovation, and a global reach, making it ideal for growth-oriented and multi-property hotels.
Zonal delivers a straightforward, reliable solution with excellent support, best suited for independent hotels or properties that prioritize OTA connectivity and operational simplicity.
If your hotel aims to scale, optimize revenue, and benefit from automation, Cloudbeds is the clear choice. If operational simplicity and local support are your priorities, Zonal could suffice, but limited recent community feedback is a concern.
In conclusion, Cloudbeds’ larger review base, recent user satisfaction, and extensive feature set make it the recommended choice for most hotels looking to grow and modernize.
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
会计与金融
|
|
|
| 多币种 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 直接计费 | ||
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、账单等) | ||
| 自动化夜间审计 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
|
▾
营销与电子商务
|
|
|
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 团体预订引擎 | ||
| 网站开发 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、账单等) | ||
| 宾客沟通(短信) | ||
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 宾客资料 | ||
| 客户关系管理 | ||
|
▾
管理和配置
|
|
|
| 多种语言 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 集中用户和角色管理 | ||
|
▾
用户管理
|
|
|
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 客人反馈管理 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、账单等) | ||
| 宾客资料 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
|
▾
前台
|
|
|
| 客人反馈管理 | ||
| 家政 | ||
| 物业管理系统 | ||
| 自动化夜间审计 | ||
| 移动设备笔记和任务(语音转文本) | ||
| 移动应用程序 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 任务管理 | ||
| 自动提醒 | ||
| 宾客资料 | ||
| 平板电脑/自助值机 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
群组管理
|
|
|
| 组功能 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
宾客体验
|
|
|
| 客人反馈管理 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 集成身份证和护照扫描仪 | ||
| 数字注册 | ||
| 访客应用程序 | ||
| 网上值机 | ||
| 网上结账 | ||
| 宾客留言 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、账单等) | ||
| 平板电脑/自助值机 | ||
|
▾
家政
|
|
|
| 家政 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
| 客房服务手机应用程序 | ||
| 实时状态更新 | ||
| 自动分配 | ||
| 实时报告 | ||
| 轮班规划 | ||
| 员工信息 | ||
| 网上结账 | ||
|
▾
付款
|
|
|
| 多币种 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
| 直接计费 | ||
| 自动提醒 | ||
| 集成支付终端和读卡器 | ||
|
▾
预订管理
|
|
|
| 评分购物模块 | ||
| 物业管理系统 | ||
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 综合 CRS | ||
| 拖放式磁带图 | ||
| 费率管理 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
| 自动分配 | ||
| 基于规则的房间分配 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、账单等) | ||
|
▾
收入管理
|
|
|
| 评分购物模块 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 定价情报 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 自定义费率 | ||
| 辅助收入跟踪 | ||
| 基本定价 | ||
|
▾
税务与合规
|
|
|
| 符合 PCI 标准 | ||
| 符合 GDPR 规定 | ||
| SOC2投诉 | ||
| 税务配置 | ||
|
▾
支持与培训
|
|
|
| 全天候在线支持 | ||
|
▾
食品与饮料
|
|
|
| 销售点 |
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"I have not worked with a company that has such good customer service as Cloudbeds has. It's miles ahead."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"The biggest benefit of Cloudbeds' platform is its flexibility. I can access reporting online from anywhere. Everything is smoother with Cloudbeds."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Cloudbeds is like if Apple made a property management system. The ease of use is super simple and straightforward for guests and our staff. It’s very intuitive and just makes sense..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
用户通常称赞Cloudbeds提供清晰的集中式日历视图,显示入住率、房态和即将到来的预订。它帮助前台和预订团队更快地处理预订、办理入住手续,并规划当天的工作,... 用户通常称赞Cloudbeds提供清晰的集中式日历视图,显示入住率、房态和即将到来的预订。它帮助前台和预订团队更快地处理预订、办理入住手续,并规划当天的工作,减少手动核查。
评审者经常使用 Cloudbeds 进行业务报告,特别是收入、入住率和绩效分析。他们重视数据集中在一个平台,但许多用户希望拥有更具可定制性、现代化的仪表盘式报告... 评审者经常使用 Cloudbeds 进行业务报告,特别是收入、入住率和绩效分析。他们重视数据集中在一个平台,但许多用户希望拥有更具可定制性、现代化的仪表盘式报告,更快的下载速度,以及更强的财务/会计视图。
许多评论者强调,Cloudbeds实现OTA管理的集中化,确保房态和价格更新在各渠道同步,减少手动操作。多人提到这带来了错误减少、超售减少以及多渠道控制更便捷的直... 许多评论者强调,Cloudbeds实现OTA管理的集中化,确保房态和价格更新在各渠道同步,减少手动操作。多人提到这带来了错误减少、超售减少以及多渠道控制更便捷的直接运营优势。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
支持通常被描述为一旦联系就很有帮助且知识丰富,但许多评价指出对于紧急运营问题,响应时间可能较慢。买家经常要求除聊天外,还能通过电话或视频获得支持,尤其... 支持通常被描述为一旦联系就很有帮助且知识丰富,但许多评价指出对于紧急运营问题,响应时间可能较慢。买家经常要求除聊天外,还能通过电话或视频获得支持,尤其是在影响现场入住或支付的问题时。
一个反复出现的负面主题是,移动应用通常被视为只读的辅助工具,而不是完整的操作工具。用户反复请求能够在移动端创建或编辑预订、关闭房间、接收推送通知,以及... 一个反复出现的负面主题是,移动应用通常被视为只读的辅助工具,而不是完整的操作工具。用户反复请求能够在移动端创建或编辑预订、关闭房间、接收推送通知,以及执行更多日常工作流程,而无需切换到网页版。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Cloudbeds HMS 和 Zonal PMS 共享许多核心 Hotel Management Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。Cloudbeds HMS 提供 203 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Zonal PMS 提供 2 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速上手。Zonal PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 5.0/5 对比 4.6/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按酒店规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Cloudbeds HMS:否。Zonal PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Management Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店经营者客观比较酒店科技产品。Cloudbeds 的 HT Score 为 100,Zonal 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您酒店的情况量身定制的推荐