The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
まとめ
13件の認証済みホテル経営者レビューを分析し、機能セット、料金、実際の導入事例を比較して、各プラットフォームの強みを明らかにしました。最適な選択は、施設の種類と優先事項によって異なります:
Amadeus 優れています .
Hotelchamp 優れています ease of use and ROIにおいて 、Meta search marketing and Metasearch connectivityなどの独自機能を備えています.
HTRの13件の認証済みホテル経営者レビューに基づく並列評価。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推奨度 |
|
|
| 使いやすさ |
|
|
| カスタマーサポート |
|
|
| コストパフォーマンス |
|
|
| 開始価格 | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| 認証済みレビュー | 2 | 11 |
各セグメントのホテル経営者による認証済みレビューに基づく、施設規模・タイプ・地域別のホテルメタサーチ管理ソフトウェアベンダー内ランキング。
ホテル規模別
| セグメント |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小規模(10〜24室) | #16 0件のレビュー | #14 0件のレビュー |
| 中規模(25〜74室) ▾ | #13 1件のレビュー | #9 7件のレビュー |
| 大規模(75〜199室) | #14 1件のレビュー | #11 0件のレビュー |
| 特大規模(200室以上) | #11 0件のレビュー | #6 2件のレビュー |
施設タイプ別
| セグメント |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| ブティック ▾ | #14 2件のレビュー | #10 5件のレビュー |
| ラグジュアリー ▾ | #13 2件のレビュー | #8 6件のレビュー |
| ブランド/チェーン | #12 1件のレビュー | #10 1件のレビュー |
| 長期滞在型 | #15 0件のレビュー | #10 0件のレビュー |
地域別
| セグメント |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北米 | #10 0件のレビュー | #9 0件のレビュー |
| ヨーロッパ ▾ | #14 1件のレビュー | #6 6件のレビュー |
| アジア太平洋 | #13 0件のレビュー | #8 1件のレビュー |
| 中東 | — | #5 1件のレビュー |
Choosing between Amadeus Travel Seller Media and Hotelchamp Metasearch hinges on your hotel’s core needs. Both aim to boost your visibility and bookings through metasearch management, but they approach it differently. Amadeus specializes in GDS advertising, targeting travel agents across multiple regions, while Hotelchamp focuses on controlling your direct traffic via metasearch platforms like Google Hotel Ads. Your decision should depend on whether you prioritize GDS exposure or direct channel growth.
While both products address hotel distribution challenges, their target audiences and primary functionalities diverge significantly. Amadeus’s strength lies in influencing travel sellers via traditional distribution channels, whereas Hotelchamp is designed to minimize reliance on third-party bookings by optimizing direct visibility. Which aligns better with your hotel’s strategic goals?
Amadeus offers a solution rooted in GDS advertising, making it ideal if your hotel relies heavily on global distribution systems and travel agents. Its core strength is capturing the attention of travel sellers across major GDSs and influencing their bookings, particularly for luxury hotels with a global reach. Conversely, Hotelchamp emphasizes increasing direct bookings through metasearch channels, attracting highly qualified traffic on platforms like Google Hotel Ads.
Amadeus’s platform is suited for hotels wanting to expand their reach within the traditional distribution ecosystem, especially those targeting international luxury markets. Hotelchamp, with its focus on direct-to-guest traffic, is better for hotels aiming to lower commission costs and build recurring guest relationships. Are you more interested in broadening your GDS influence or strengthening your direct channel?
If your hotel needs to increase visibility among travel agents and leverage global distribution channels, Amadeus is the clear choice. It boasts a robust partner network of 104 verified integrations, including major booking platforms and PMS systems, making it well-suited for hotels that prioritize international sales. It’s especially beneficial if your hotel exclusively targets the luxury segment and wants to influence travel sellers directly.
However, if your goal is to lower distribution costs and accelerate direct bookings, Hotelchamp’s metasearch management is more advantageous. It has 45 verified integrations, including Google Hotel Ads, and offers features like metasearch connectivity and surveillance, which Amadeus does not. Hotels seeking to build a strong direct channel should opt for Hotelchamp, which has 10 recent, highly-rated reviews with a 95% likelihood to recommend.
Amadeus scores a 4.5/5 for ease of use, supported by onboarding ratings of 4.5/5. Its interface and onboarding process are designed for teams familiar with global distribution systems, emphasizing professionalism and support. However, some users find the platform could be more modern and intuitive, citing room for usability improvements.
Hotelchamp scores higher at 4.9/5 for ease of use, with onboarding rated at 4.9/5. Its platform is praised for being straightforward, with a very intuitive system that requires minimal learning time. Customer feedback highlights quick responses and effective support, making the system accessible even for hotels with limited technical resources. Edge: Hotelchamp.
Amadeus’s core offering is GDS advertising, but it lacks additional features such as metasearch-specific tools. It primarily focuses on influencing travel agents across major GDS networks, with no unique metasearch features.
Hotelchamp, on the other hand, provides three unique features: meta search marketing, metasearch connectivity, and metasearch surveillance. These tools help hotels monitor, optimize, and manage their presence across metasearch platforms directly, which Amadeus does not offer. When comparing feature breadth, Hotelchamp’s dedicated metasearch tools give it the edge in this category.
Amadeus receives perfect support ratings at 5/5, with reviews emphasizing their professionalism, consistent support, and dedicated account management. Customers praise their expertise and the high level of service, which has helped many hotels achieve remarkable results.
Hotelchamp also scores strongly with a 4.8/5 customer support rating. Clients highlight their responsiveness, proactive communication, and helpful support team. Recent reviews mention prompt assistance and ongoing updates, which keep hotels aligned with evolving metasearch trends. Edge: Amadeus, due to its longer-standing reputation for support excellence.
Amadeus leads with 104 verified partner integrations, including major PMS, booking engines, and marketing platforms, allowing deep distribution reach. Common partners include Booking.com, SiteMinder, and Revinate, facilitating a seamless flow of data and bookings.
Hotelchamp offers 45 verified integrations, including popular tools like Swayy, Customer Alliance, and WuBook. While fewer in number, these integrations are targeted at enhancing direct booking capabilities and metasearch management. When choosing based on integration breadth, Amadeus’s extensive network provides more flexibility for large, complex hotel tech stacks. Edge: Amadeus.
Hotelchamp’s recent reviews are significantly more numerous—10 compared to Amadeus’s 2—and more current, with recent feedback highlighting ease of use and support quality. Hotelchamp maintains a 95% likelihood to recommend, driven by high customer satisfaction.
Amadeus, with only 2 reviews, holds a 90% likelihood to recommend, but the reviews are older and less detailed. Given the volume and recency of reviews, Hotelchamp’s customer ratings are more reliable for assessing real-world performance. Edge: Hotelchamp.
Both products do not publicly disclose their pricing models, but neither offers a free tier or trial. Pricing is likely customized based on hotel size and scope, so expect negotiations rather than transparent rates.
If direct pricing is a decisive factor, consider contacting each vendor for tailored quotes. Absent publicly available data, your best approach is to evaluate value based on features, support, and integration quality.
Not ideal if your hotel’s primary goal is to increase direct bookings or reduce reliance on third-party channels.
Not ideal if your hotel’s primary focus is influencing traditional travel agents or GDS-focused distribution.
Amadeus is best suited for large, global hotels that depend on GDS channels and travel agents for their distribution strategy. Its extensive partner network and proven support make it a reliable choice for hotels with a significant international presence.
Hotelchamp offers a streamlined, user-friendly solution for hotels seeking to enhance their direct booking efforts. Its advanced metasearch tools and recent positive reviews make it ideal for properties focused on lowering distribution costs and building direct relationships.
If your hotel’s growth strategy is tied to influencing travel agents and expanding globally, Amadeus is the way to go. Conversely, if you want to maximize direct bookings while controlling your distribution costs, Hotelchamp is the more compelling option.
In conclusion, the decision depends on your hotel’s distribution focus: choose Amadeus for GDS influence and broad reach, or opt for Hotelchamp to strengthen your direct channel and lower commission fees.
ホテルメタサーチ管理ソフトウェア の料金はわかりにくいことが多いです。各ベンダーの公開料金データから判明している情報をまとめました。施設の規模に合わせたカスタム見積もりを必ずご依頼ください。
|
|
|
|---|
HTRの製品データベースによると、Amadeus- Travel Seller MediaとHotelchamp Metasearchは1個の機能を共有しています。以下は主な違い — 一方にあって他方にない機能です。
| 機能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| メタサーチ接続 | ||
| メタサーチ監視 | ||
| メタ検索マーケティング |
高評価の分野
独自の機能
評価が最も分かれる分野
お客様の要件次第です。Amadeus- Travel Seller MediaとHotelchamp Metasearchは多くの主要なHotel Metasearch Management Software機能を共有していますが、それぞれに独自の機能があります。Amadeus- Travel Seller Mediaは104件の認証済み連携パートナーを持ち、Hotelchamp Metasearchは45件を持っています。切り替え前に、上記の機能比較で違いをご確認ください。
小規模ホテルは使いやすさと迅速なオンボーディングを優先すべきです。Hotelchamp Metasearchは使いやすさで4.9/5対4.5/5とリードしています。透明性のある料金設定とトライアルまたはデモのオプションを探しましょう。各製品ページで施設規模別にレビューをフィルタリングして、同様のホテルからの声を確認してください。
Amadeus- Travel Seller Media:いいえ。Hotelchamp Metasearch:いいえ。 どちらの製品も現在無料ティアを提供していません。ほとんどのHotel Metasearch Management Softwareベンダーはデモまたはトライアルを提供しています — コミットする前に各社にご依頼ください。
HT Scoreは、ホテル経営者がホテルテクノロジー製品を客観的に比較できるよう、4個の基準グループと十数の変数を考慮した総合ランキングです。AmadeusのHT Scoreは0、Hotelchampは0です。以下がスコアの算出方法です。
| 基準グループ | ウェイト | 測定内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 顧客評価とレビュー |
|
ユーザーはこの製品をどの程度推奨していますか? 評価スコア、レビュー数、シェアオブボイス、レビューの深さ、レビューの新しさ、成功事例 ▾ 最も重みの大きい要素です。平均満足度評価(推奨度、使いやすさ、サポート、ROI)、カテゴリー内の競合に対するレビュー総数、レビューの新しさ(直近6か月間に20件以上のレビュー)、固有のホテルクライアント全体のシェアオブボイスを分析して選択バイアスを検出します。 |
| パートナーエコシステム |
|
テクノロジーパートナーはこの企業をどの程度推奨していますか? パートナー推奨、連携数、連携品質 ▾ パートナー推奨を専門家の信頼票として評価し、認証済み連携の数、エコシステムの品質 — 連携パートナーの平均HT Scoreを評価します。より高品質な連携エコシステムを持つ製品は、接続されたテックスタックを提供する可能性が高くなります。 |
| 顧客中心主義 |
|
この組織はどの程度顧客中心ですか? 認定サポート、レビューの一貫性、プロフィールの完全性 ▾ 企業がHTRカスタマーサポート認定を取得しているか、長期にわたり一貫したレビュー収集を維持しているか(フィードバック主導の文化の指標)、機能、スクリーンショット、料金、特徴を含む完全な製品プロフィールを維持しているかを評価します。 |
| リーチ、継続性、リソース |
|
この企業のリーチとリソースはどの程度広範ですか? 地理的リーチ、継続性、企業リソース、トレンドスコア ▾ グローバルプレゼンス(対応国・地域)、安定性の指標としての事業年数、リソースの指標としてのチーム人数、直近12か月の購入者からの問い合わせ・レビュー・パートナー推奨・プレス活動に基づくトレンドスコアを測定します。 |
顧客評価とレビューは、HT Scoreアルゴリズムにおいて最も重要な要素です。HTRはランキング向上のための支払いを受け付けていません。すべてのレビューは認証済みです — 所属が確認されたホテル業界の実務者のみが評価を投稿できます。 HT Scoreの詳細な算出方法を見る →
お客様の物件に合わせたカスタム提案