The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
887件の認証済みレビューを分析した結果、Athenaのユーザーはを最も評価し、Mewsのユーザーはease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibilityを高く評価しています。各テーマをクリックすると、レビュー投稿者の声をご覧いただけます。
| Athena |
|
|---|---|
| 長所 | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
オンボーディングとサポート
▾
|
|
| 短所 | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
レポート作成と分析
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
各セグメントのホテル経営者による認証済みレビューに基づく、施設規模・タイプ・地域別の不動産管理システムベンダー内ランキング。
ホテル規模別
| セグメント | Athena |
|
|---|---|---|
| 小規模(10〜24室) ▾ | — | #3 329件のレビュー |
| 中規模(25〜74室) ▾ | — | #1 397件のレビュー |
| 大規模(75〜199室) ▾ | — | #3 45件のレビュー |
| 特大規模(200室以上) ▾ | — | #3 49件のレビュー |
施設タイプ別
| セグメント | Athena |
|
|---|---|---|
| ブティック ▾ | — | #1 483件のレビュー |
| ラグジュアリー ▾ | — | #5 220件のレビュー |
| ブランド/チェーン ▾ | — | #2 170件のレビュー |
| 長期滞在型 ▾ | — | #1 130件のレビュー |
地域別
| セグメント | Athena |
|
|---|---|---|
| 北米 ▾ | — | #8 106件のレビュー |
| ヨーロッパ ▾ | — | #1 660件のレビュー |
| アジア太平洋 ▾ | — | #10 17件のレビュー |
| 中東 ▾ | — | #28 8件のレビュー |
Choosing a property management system (PMS) can feel overwhelming, especially when evaluating two leading options like Athena by Athena and Mews PMS by Mews. Both aim to streamline hotel operations, but they diverge significantly in capabilities, user experience, and market presence. Your team needs a solution that not only solves your immediate operational challenges but also scales with your hotel’s growth.
Given the recent reviews and the sheer volume of user feedback, Mews PMS stands out as the more proven and well-supported platform. Are you ready to prioritize a system with extensive real-world validation?
Athena by Athena offers a broad AI-powered revenue management tool, designed to optimize pricing and profitability through advanced algorithms. However, with no recent reviews or ratings, its effectiveness and user satisfaction remain uncertain compared to Mews.
Mews PMS, on the other hand, has over 750 reviews in the past six months alone, with a 4.62-star rating and a 93% likelihood to recommend. Its ease of use, customer support, and feature richness are consistently praised. Does your hotel need a system backed by recent, high-volume user feedback?
If your hotel needs a flexible, highly integrated PMS that supports automation, extensive third-party integrations, and a scalable cloud platform, go with Mews. Its broad feature set (over 59 unique functionalities) and proven track record make it ideal for mid-sized to large hotels, boutique properties, and multi-property groups.
If your team is focused solely on revenue automation and AI-driven pricing without a need for extensive integrations or operational automation, Athena might seem appealing. But, with no recent reviews or active user base, it’s a riskier choice for hotels seeking reliable, ongoing support and proven functionality.
Mews boasts a 4.7/5 ease-of-use rating based on recent reviews, with users praising its modern, intuitive interface and straightforward onboarding process. Many hotel staff mention that even non-technical users find it simple to navigate, with quick setup and minimal training required.
Athena, however, has no recent review data or user feedback available, leaving its usability and onboarding experience uncertain. Without recent user validation, it’s difficult to recommend Athena as the easier system to adopt.
Edge: Mews.
Mews offers a comprehensive set of over 59 features, including multi-lingual and multi-currency support, revenue management modules, booking engine, guest CRM, mobile check-in, integrated POS, automation tools, and advanced reporting. Many features that are essential for modern hotels are included, with continuous updates driven by user feedback.
Athena provides no documented features or third-party integrations, focusing mainly on AI-powered revenue management. Its lack of detailed functionality and recent feature rollout data makes it difficult to compare directly, but clearly, Mews has a more complete and versatile feature set.
Edge: Mews.
Mews consistently receives high marks for customer support, with a 4.27/5 rating and recent reviews praising its quick responsiveness and proactive onboarding. Clients mention that the support team is helpful, with 24/7 availability and effective problem resolution.
Athena has no recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to assess support quality. Given Mews’s strong recent support reputation, it’s the safer choice for hotel teams that prioritize reliable assistance.
Edge: Mews.
Mews boasts 336 verified integrations, including popular channels, POS systems, revenue tools, and more. Its open API and extensive marketplace empower hotels to customize their tech ecosystem with over 1,000 available third-party apps.
Athena has no verified partners or integrations listed. For hotels that rely on a connected tech stack, Mews’s robust ecosystem provides a clear advantage.
Edge: Mews.
Mews’s recent ratings reflect a 4.62/5 overall score from 758 reviews, with the most recent feedback highlighting its ease of use, support, and feature depth. Hotel segments such as boutique hotels, independents, and city-center properties all rate Mews highly, with many reviews emphasizing operational efficiency and guest experience improvements.
Athena’s ratings are nonexistent, but the lack of recent reviews indicates minimal current user engagement. For hoteliers seeking validated, current user satisfaction, Mews dominates.
Edge: Mews.
Mews costs $900 monthly as a base price, with no freemium or tiered pricing detailed. Athena’s pricing is not publicly available, making it difficult to compare value directly.
Given Mews’s transparent pricing and proven ROI through customer feedback, it offers better cost clarity and perceived value. Athena’s unclear cost structure adds risk to your decision-making.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Mews is a well-established, highly-rated platform with a proven track record evidenced by over 750 recent reviews. Its comprehensive feature set, extensive integrations, and responsive support make it a safe choice for modern hotels aiming for operational excellence and growth.
Athena offers an AI-powered revenue management focus but lacks recent validation, user feedback, and a broad ecosystem. Its limited information and unproven market presence suggest it’s best suited for niche revenue optimization rather than full hotel management.
If you need a reliable, scalable PMS with current market validation, go with Mews. If your core concern is AI-driven pricing and you’re comfortable with untested platforms, Athena might be worth exploring—but be aware of the risks.
In conclusion, for most hotels today, Mews offers a more comprehensive, validated, and supported solution.
8件の認証済みケーススタディを分析し、4つの主要ビジネス目標において各プラットフォームでホテルが実際に達成した成果を比較しました。
この目標に関するケーススタディはまだ公開されていません。
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
この目標に関するケーススタディはまだ公開されていません。
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
この目標に関するケーススタディはまだ公開されていません。
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
ホテル経営者が高く評価する点
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
ホテル経営者が指摘する課題
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Mewsは優れたレポート機能と分析機能を提供しているものの、よりカスタマイズ可能で柔軟なレポート機能の必要性を指摘するレビューが複数ある。特に予約状況や収... Mewsは優れたレポート機能と分析機能を提供しているものの、よりカスタマイズ可能で柔軟なレポート機能の必要性を指摘するレビューが複数ある。特に予約状況や収益分析において、より詳細なデータ分析を求める声がユーザーから上がっている。
独自の機能
評価が最も分かれる分野
お客様の要件次第です。AthenaとMews PMSは多くの主要なProperty Management Systems機能を共有していますが、それぞれに独自の機能があります。Athenaは0件の認証済み連携パートナーを持ち、Mews PMSは335件を持っています。切り替え前に、上記の機能比較で違いをご確認ください。
小規模ホテルは使いやすさと迅速なオンボーディングを優先すべきです。Mews PMSは使いやすさで4.7/5対0.0/5とリードしています。透明性のある料金設定とトライアルまたはデモのオプションを探しましょう。各製品ページで施設規模別にレビューをフィルタリングして、同様のホテルからの声を確認してください。
Athena:いいえ。Mews PMS:いいえ。 どちらの製品も現在無料ティアを提供していません。ほとんどのProperty Management Systemsベンダーはデモまたはトライアルを提供しています — コミットする前に各社にご依頼ください。
HT Scoreは、ホテル経営者がホテルテクノロジー製品を客観的に比較できるよう、4個の基準グループと十数の変数を考慮した総合ランキングです。AthenaのHT Scoreは0、Mewsは100です。以下がスコアの算出方法です。
| 基準グループ | ウェイト | 測定内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 顧客評価とレビュー |
|
ユーザーはこの製品をどの程度推奨していますか? 評価スコア、レビュー数、シェアオブボイス、レビューの深さ、レビューの新しさ、成功事例 ▾ 最も重みの大きい要素です。平均満足度評価(推奨度、使いやすさ、サポート、ROI)、カテゴリー内の競合に対するレビュー総数、レビューの新しさ(直近6か月間に20件以上のレビュー)、固有のホテルクライアント全体のシェアオブボイスを分析して選択バイアスを検出します。 |
| パートナーエコシステム |
|
テクノロジーパートナーはこの企業をどの程度推奨していますか? パートナー推奨、連携数、連携品質 ▾ パートナー推奨を専門家の信頼票として評価し、認証済み連携の数、エコシステムの品質 — 連携パートナーの平均HT Scoreを評価します。より高品質な連携エコシステムを持つ製品は、接続されたテックスタックを提供する可能性が高くなります。 |
| 顧客中心主義 |
|
この組織はどの程度顧客中心ですか? 認定サポート、レビューの一貫性、プロフィールの完全性 ▾ 企業がHTRカスタマーサポート認定を取得しているか、長期にわたり一貫したレビュー収集を維持しているか(フィードバック主導の文化の指標)、機能、スクリーンショット、料金、特徴を含む完全な製品プロフィールを維持しているかを評価します。 |
| リーチ、継続性、リソース |
|
この企業のリーチとリソースはどの程度広範ですか? 地理的リーチ、継続性、企業リソース、トレンドスコア ▾ グローバルプレゼンス(対応国・地域)、安定性の指標としての事業年数、リソースの指標としてのチーム人数、直近12か月の購入者からの問い合わせ・レビュー・パートナー推奨・プレス活動に基づくトレンドスコアを測定します。 |
顧客評価とレビューは、HT Scoreアルゴリズムにおいて最も重要な要素です。HTRはランキング向上のための支払いを受け付けていません。すべてのレビューは認証済みです — 所属が確認されたホテル業界の実務者のみが評価を投稿できます。 HT Scoreの詳細な算出方法を見る →
製品推奨アドバイザー