Blastness CRS vs. eResHub:
あなたに最適なのはどちら？

The Decision

Choosing between Blastness CRS by Blastness and eResHub by Gijima hinges on your hotel’s specific needs and the support each platform offers. Both aim to streamline reservations and revenue management, but Blastness is a dedicated hotel-focused system with a strong recent review base, while Gijima’s offering appears less developed and lacks recent feedback.

Blastness provides a comprehensive, feature-rich platform designed for independent hotels seeking control and growth in direct bookings. Gijima’s product, based on limited available data, seems less targeted and less supported in the current hotel tech landscape.

Are you prioritizing a proven, well-reviewed system with extensive features or a less-established alternative? Let’s examine both solutions in detail.

Is Blastness or Gijima Better for Hotels?

Blastness stands out with a perfect 100 HTR Score and 72 reviews, 15 of which are recent and highly positive, including a 99% likelihood to recommend. Gijima, by contrast, has no reviews or ratings, making it impossible to assess its performance or customer satisfaction.

Blastness’s reviews highlight its ease of use, professional support, and robust features, with users describing it as “a game-changer” and praising its intuitive interface and detailed revenue tools. Gijima, however, offers no user feedback, leaving its effectiveness and usability unverified.

Given the recent, detailed reviews, Blastness clearly leads in credibility. Does Gijima’s lack of feedback suggest unproven reliability, or does it indicate a niche product with limited adoption? The data favors Blastness as the more trustworthy choice.

Blastness vs Gijima: Which Should Your Hotel Choose?

If your hotel needs a proven, full-featured reservation system with strong revenue management capabilities, go with Blastness. Its extensive feature set—including RMS connectivity, channel management, geotargeted pricing, and a mobile app—suits independent hotels aiming to maximize direct bookings and revenue.

If your hotel is seeking a simple, possibly less supported solution without recent reviews or verifiable features, Gijima might be an option. However, without user feedback or a clear feature list, Blastness remains the safer, more reliable choice, especially for hotels serious about digital transformation.

For hotels prioritizing proven performance, Blastness’s near-perfect ratings and recent reviews make it the clear winner. Gijima’s lack of data diminishes its viability for decision-making today.

Is Blastness or Gijima Easier to Use?

Blastness’s ease-of-use rating stands at an impressive 4.89/5, supported by an onboarding score of 4.94/5 and numerous positive reviews praising its intuitive interface and quick setup. Users mention that the platform simplifies daily operations and offers seamless integration with existing systems.

Gijima, however, has no available ratings or recent reviews, making usability assessments impossible. Its lack of feedback indicates it may not have been widely adopted or tested in real hotel environments.

Edge: Blastness.

Which Has Better Features: Blastness or Gijima?

Blastness features 18 unique capabilities, including RMS connectivity, PMS integration, metasearch connectivity, geotargeted pricing, support for weekly and monthly rates, dynamic pricing, availability management, booking rules, cancellation policies, TMC management, a mobile app, and multi-property management. These cover most needs for independent hotels aiming to control every aspect of reservations and revenue.

Gijima offers no feature information or integrations, leaving its capabilities unknown. Its lack of a feature set makes Blastness clearly superior for hoteliers seeking a comprehensive, actionable reservation system.

Edge: Blastness.

Which Has Better Customer Support: Blastness or Gijima?

Blastness’s support ratings are outstanding, with a 4.9/5 score and reviews emphasizing professional, responsive assistance, and ongoing training. Users praise the support team’s quick responses and the value of personalized guidance, describing it as “excellent” and “helpful in navigating complex scenarios.”

Gijima offers no support ratings or user feedback, making it impossible to evaluate its customer service quality. The absence of recent reviews or case studies suggests limited support infrastructure.

Edge: Blastness.

Which Has More Integrations: Blastness or Gijima?

Blastness boasts 15 verified partners, including Upsellguru Gmbh, Oracle Hospitality, and Channel manager solutions, facilitating seamless connectivity with a variety of hotel tech tools. Its integrations cover revenue management, PMS, content management, and distribution channels.

Gijima provides no information on integrations or partner networks, leaving its compatibility with existing hotel systems uncertain. For a hotel looking for a flexible, connected platform, Blastness clearly leads.

Edge: Blastness.

Which Do Hoteliers Rate Higher: Blastness or Gijima?

Blastness’s recent reviews and high ratings—especially the 4.89/5 ease of use and 4.9/5 customer support—indicate strong user satisfaction. Hotels of varying sizes, including boutique and city-center properties, find it highly effective and easy to adopt.

Gijima’s lack of reviews or ratings prevents a comparison. Without user feedback, it’s impossible to gauge hotel satisfaction or property-specific effectiveness.

Edge: Blastness.

How Much Do Blastness and Gijima Cost?

Blastness charges a flat fee of $600 per month, with no free tier or trial available, positioning it as an investment for hotels seeking comprehensive features. Gijima’s pricing is not publicly available, limiting direct comparison and potentially indicating less transparency or a different sales approach.

Given the transparent pricing and proven value of Blastness, it offers a clear cost-benefit pathway for hotels prioritizing revenue optimization. The unknown pricing of Gijima makes it a less predictable choice.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Blastness?

• Hotels that want a proven, feature-rich reservation platform with strong revenue management tools.
• Independent hotels aiming to boost direct bookings and streamline distribution.
• Hotels seeking seamless integration with PMS, RMS, and OTAs.
• Properties that value customer support and ongoing performance monitoring.
• Hotels with a focus on dynamic pricing and market responsiveness.

Not ideal if you prefer a minimal setup or only basic reservation functions without the need for detailed revenue controls.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Gijima?

• Hotels open to testing systems with limited or no available user feedback.
• Smaller properties or startups willing to take a risk on an unproven platform.
• Hotels with very basic reservation needs, not requiring extensive integrations.
• Hotels in regions where Gijima has a presence or local support.

Not ideal if you need a proven, well-supported system with a strong user community or recent reviews.

Gijima vs Blastness: The Bottom Line for Hotels

Blastness is a dedicated, highly-rated hotel reservation and revenue management platform with a proven track record, extensive features, and strong recent feedback. Its high user ratings and detailed reviews demonstrate reliability, ease of use, and excellent support, making it ideal for hotels committed to growth.

Gijima, on the other hand, offers no current reviews, features, or support data, making it a risky choice. Unless you’re exploring untested solutions or have very minimal reservation needs, Blastness is the clear option.

In summary, if your hotel values proven functionality, a broad feature set, and ongoing support, Blastness is the platform to choose. Gijima’s lack of evidence leaves it behind for hotels serious about investing in their reservation experience today.