The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
まとめ
11件の認証済みホテル経営者レビューを分析し、機能セット、料金、実際の導入事例を比較して、各プラットフォームの強みを明らかにしました。最適な選択は、施設の種類と優先事項によって異なります:
GET IT Corporation 優れています .
Premium Parking 優れています ease of use and customer supportにおいて 、Access Gate Hardware and Virtual Parking Permitsなどの独自機能を備えています.
HTRの11件の認証済みホテル経営者レビューに基づく並列評価。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推奨度 |
|
|
| 使いやすさ |
|
|
| カスタマーサポート |
|
|
| コストパフォーマンス |
|
|
| 開始価格 | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| 認証済みレビュー | 0 | 11 |
各セグメントのホテル経営者による認証済みレビューに基づく、施設規模・タイプ・地域別の駐車場管理ベンダー内ランキング。
ホテル規模別
| セグメント |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 中規模(25〜74室) | — | #2 2件のレビュー |
| 大規模(75〜199室) ▾ | — | #1 7件のレビュー |
| 特大規模(200室以上) | — | #2 1件のレビュー |
施設タイプ別
| セグメント |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| ブティック | — | #2 1件のレビュー |
| ラグジュアリー | — | #2 1件のレビュー |
| ブランド/チェーン ▾ | — | #2 10件のレビュー |
| 長期滞在型 ▾ | — | #1 6件のレビュー |
地域別
| セグメント |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北米 ▾ | — | #2 10件のレビュー |
Choosing a parking management system for your hotel hinges on understanding what each solution offers and how well it aligns with your operational needs. Product A, Get Parking by GET IT Corporation, is a driver-centric, digital self-parking platform aimed at providing a frictionless parking experience. Product B, GLIDEPARCS by Premium Parking, is a full-stack, gateless parking management system designed to optimize revenue and enhance customer satisfaction. Both address parking efficiency, but do they serve the same hotel type or operational scale?
While Get Parking emphasizes remote payments, flexible configurations, and integration with management systems, GLIDEPARCS offers comprehensive PARCS, digital payments, reservations, enforcement, and analytics. The key question remains: which aligns better with your hotel's size, guest expectations, and operational complexity?
Get Parking and GLIDEPARCS both aim to streamline your parking operations, but they approach the problem differently. Get Parking focuses on driver engagement through SMS, remote payments, and customizable workflows, making it suitable if your hotel prioritizes a digital, contactless experience. In contrast, GLIDEPARCS delivers a robust, gateless system with integrated revenue control, reservations, and enforcement features, ideal if your hotel seeks a comprehensive, all-in-one parking solution.
The main divergence is in scope: Get Parking excels at simplifying guest interactions and managing multiple locations, whereas GLIDEPARCS emphasizes operational control and revenue management through advanced hardware and analytics. Do you need a user-friendly, guest-facing platform or an enterprise-level management system? That decision determines the better fit.
If your hotel needs a driver-focused platform that enhances guest convenience with mobile payments, remote notifications, and easy configuration, go with Get Parking. It is particularly suited for properties that want to integrate parking seamlessly into the guest journey without heavy hardware investments.
If your hotel requires a full-stack, gateless management system with features like PARCS, reservations, enforcement, and extensive analytics, choose GLIDEPARCS. It is best for larger hotels or resorts aiming to maximize operational efficiency and revenue control with minimal manual intervention.
For boutique hotels or properties with a high emphasis on guest experience and digital engagement, Get Parking is the stronger choice. Conversely, for hotels with complex operations needing detailed analytics and integrated enforcement, GLIDEPARCS offers a comprehensive platform.
Get Parking has a limited but highly rated onboarding process, with a perfect 5/5 score for onboarding and a 4.73/5 ease of use rating. Users commend its straightforward setup, simple SMS link delivery, and intuitive guest interface, making staff adoption simple and quick.
GLIDEPARCS, with a 4.73/5 ease of use rating and a strong support score of 4.95/5, is also highly rated in user-friendliness. Its platform is designed to integrate hardware and software smoothly, but it may require more initial training due to its broader feature set.
Edge: GLIDEPARCS — Its slightly higher review count and recent positive feedback suggest a more established, proven ease of use at scale.
Get Parking offers three core features, including SMS-based payments, remote notifications, and multi-location configurations, making it flexible for digital-first hotels. It lacks hardware integration or virtual permits, limiting its scope to digital management.
GLIDEPARCS provides five key features: PARCS, digital payments, reservations, validations, and enforcement with online marketing. It also introduces access gate hardware and virtual parking permits—features absent in Get Parking, enabling broader operational control and revenue management.
The feature count favors GLIDEPARCS, especially with hardware integration and permit management.
Edge: GLIDEPARCS — Its additional hardware and permit features give it a more complete suite for complex operations.
Get Parking's support ratings are not available, but user reviews highlight the flexibility and reliability of the platform. The limited review data makes support harder to evaluate definitively.
GLIDEPARCS boasts a 4.95/5 customer support rating, with users praising its rapid response times and proactive engagement. Its onboarding is rated 5/5, indicating excellent support during implementation and ongoing operations.
Edge: GLIDEPARCS — The consistently high reviews and recent positive feedback make its support stand out.
Get Parking connects with three verified partners, including Oracle Hospitality and Premium Parking, giving it a broader integration ecosystem. This flexibility allows hotels to link with existing management, POS, and revenue systems.
GLIDEPARCS has only one verified partner, but this includes core parking management and enforcement tools. Its limited integrations may restrict cross-platform connectivity, but it ensures tight, tested compatibility.
Edge: Get Parking — More verified partners enhance flexibility and integration options.
Get Parking has no recent reviews or ratings, which limits confidence in its current performance. Its lack of recent data suggests less market traction or recent updates.
GLIDEPARCS, by comparison, has 11 reviews within the last six months, all with high satisfaction scores. Its 4.91/5 overall rating and 9.73/10 NPS indicate strong, recent approval from users across various hotel segments.
Edge: GLIDEPARCS — More recent reviews and higher ratings make it the more trusted choice today.
Pricing for Get Parking is not publicly available, which may suggest custom quotes based on property size or features. The lack of transparent pricing could be a barrier for some hotels.
GLIDEPARCS also does not publish specific prices but emphasizes a no-trial, no-implementation fee model, implying custom quotes. Both solutions likely require direct consultation to determine costs, making comparison difficult.
Not ideal if your hotel requires integrated gate hardware, enforcement, or detailed analytics.
Not ideal if your hotel prefers a simple, mobile-first solution with minimal hardware or extensive analytics.
Get Parking offers a streamlined, digital-focused parking experience, emphasizing guest convenience and configuration flexibility, making it ideal for boutique hotels or properties prioritizing guest engagement. Its limited hardware and analytics features mean it's better suited for hotels with straightforward needs and a digital-first approach.
GLIDEPARCS provides a comprehensive, hardware-enabled parking management system with enforcement, reservations, and detailed analytics, making it suitable for larger, complex properties seeking operational control and revenue maximization. Its strong recent reviews and high support ratings reinforce its reliability for enterprise-level hotels.
If your hotel values ease of use and recent positive feedback, GLIDEPARCS is the safer bet, especially given its broader feature set and proven market presence. However, if your focus is on digital guest engagement with minimal hardware, Get Parking could meet your needs—just be aware of its limited recent review data.
In conclusion, for modern, larger hotels or resorts seeking an all-in-one solution with extensive operational features, GLIDEPARCS is the clear choice. For properties emphasizing guest experience and digital simplicity, Get Parking is worth considering, but verify current support and feature updates first.
駐車場管理 の料金はわかりにくいことが多いです。各ベンダーの公開料金データから判明している情報をまとめました。施設の規模に合わせたカスタム見積もりを必ずご依頼ください。
|
|
|
|---|
HTRの製品データベースによると、Get ParkingとGLIDEPARCS (by Premium Parking)は3個の機能を共有しています。以下は主な違い — 一方にあって他方にない機能です。
| 機能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| アクセスゲートハードウェア | ||
| 仮想駐車許可証 |
評価が最も分かれる分野
お客様の要件次第です。Get ParkingとGLIDEPARCS (by Premium Parking)は多くの主要なParking Management機能を共有していますが、それぞれに独自の機能があります。Get Parkingは3件の認証済み連携パートナーを持ち、GLIDEPARCS (by Premium Parking)は1件を持っています。切り替え前に、上記の機能比較で違いをご確認ください。
小規模ホテルは使いやすさと迅速なオンボーディングを優先すべきです。GLIDEPARCS (by Premium Parking)は使いやすさで4.7/5対0.0/5とリードしています。透明性のある料金設定とトライアルまたはデモのオプションを探しましょう。各製品ページで施設規模別にレビューをフィルタリングして、同様のホテルからの声を確認してください。
Get Parking:いいえ。GLIDEPARCS (by Premium Parking):いいえ。 どちらの製品も現在無料ティアを提供していません。ほとんどのParking Managementベンダーはデモまたはトライアルを提供しています — コミットする前に各社にご依頼ください。
HT Scoreは、ホテル経営者がホテルテクノロジー製品を客観的に比較できるよう、4個の基準グループと十数の変数を考慮した総合ランキングです。GET IT CorporationのHT Scoreは0、Premium Parkingは0です。以下がスコアの算出方法です。
| 基準グループ | ウェイト | 測定内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 顧客評価とレビュー |
|
ユーザーはこの製品をどの程度推奨していますか? 評価スコア、レビュー数、シェアオブボイス、レビューの深さ、レビューの新しさ、成功事例 ▾ 最も重みの大きい要素です。平均満足度評価(推奨度、使いやすさ、サポート、ROI)、カテゴリー内の競合に対するレビュー総数、レビューの新しさ(直近6か月間に20件以上のレビュー)、固有のホテルクライアント全体のシェアオブボイスを分析して選択バイアスを検出します。 |
| パートナーエコシステム |
|
テクノロジーパートナーはこの企業をどの程度推奨していますか? パートナー推奨、連携数、連携品質 ▾ パートナー推奨を専門家の信頼票として評価し、認証済み連携の数、エコシステムの品質 — 連携パートナーの平均HT Scoreを評価します。より高品質な連携エコシステムを持つ製品は、接続されたテックスタックを提供する可能性が高くなります。 |
| 顧客中心主義 |
|
この組織はどの程度顧客中心ですか? 認定サポート、レビューの一貫性、プロフィールの完全性 ▾ 企業がHTRカスタマーサポート認定を取得しているか、長期にわたり一貫したレビュー収集を維持しているか(フィードバック主導の文化の指標)、機能、スクリーンショット、料金、特徴を含む完全な製品プロフィールを維持しているかを評価します。 |
| リーチ、継続性、リソース |
|
この企業のリーチとリソースはどの程度広範ですか? 地理的リーチ、継続性、企業リソース、トレンドスコア ▾ グローバルプレゼンス(対応国・地域)、安定性の指標としての事業年数、リソースの指標としてのチーム人数、直近12か月の購入者からの問い合わせ・レビュー・パートナー推奨・プレス活動に基づくトレンドスコアを測定します。 |
顧客評価とレビューは、HT Scoreアルゴリズムにおいて最も重要な要素です。HTRはランキング向上のための支払いを受け付けていません。すべてのレビューは認証済みです — 所属が確認されたホテル業界の実務者のみが評価を投稿できます。 HT Scoreの詳細な算出方法を見る →
お客様の物件に合わせたカスタム提案