Blastness AI Booking Engine vs. Olive Booking Engine:
Welke past bij u?

The Decision

Choosing between Blastness AI Booking Engine and Olive Booking Engine hinges on your hotel’s specific needs. Both platforms aim to boost online direct bookings but diverge significantly in features, market presence, and customer feedback. Blastness offers a well-established, feature-rich solution with a strong reputation backed by extensive reviews and recent user feedback. Olive, on the other hand, is newer, with no reviews, and less proven in the hotel industry. Are you ready to rely on a trusted leader or explore a less tested alternative?

Is Blastness or Olive Better for Hotels?

Blastness and Olive serve the core purpose of increasing direct bookings but differ markedly in maturity and scope. Blastness is a dedicated, AI-powered booking engine with a broad feature set, extensive integrations, and proven results, especially in Europe and North America. Olive, launched in 2021, emphasizes guest experience with AI-driven personalization and embedded e-commerce, but lacks user feedback or market presence data to validate its claims. Which aligns better with your hotel’s priorities?

While Blastness boasts a comprehensive suite of features, including multi-lingual support, multi-currency, and integrations with major PMS and RMS systems, Olive offers a handful of features focusing on guest engagement and payment options like Apple Pay and Google Pay. The depth of Blastness’s integrations and features makes it a safer choice if your goal is to maximize direct bookings through proven technology. Are you comfortable adopting a newer platform without user reviews, or do you prefer a mature solution with tangible performance data?

Blastness vs Olive: Which Should Your Hotel Choose?

If your hotel needs an established booking engine with extensive integrations, real-world reviews, and proven results, Blastness is the clear choice. Its high rating of 87.88 on the HT Score, over 118 reviews, and a near-perfect 98% likelihood to recommend demonstrate its industry trustworthiness. It’s suitable for hotels of all sizes, especially those seeking a comprehensive, revenue-boosting platform.

If your hotel prioritizes guest experience and innovative guest engagement features, Olive might appeal, but it’s untested at scale. Its focus on AI-driven personalization and embedded e-commerce could work for boutique or luxury hotels seeking to differentiate, provided you’re comfortable with the lack of user feedback and market validation.

For most hoteliers wanting reliability, proven performance, and a robust feature set, Blastness is the stronger choice. Olive remains a riskier, less validated option without any reviews or proven track record. Which aligns better with your risk appetite and goals?

Is Blastness or Olive Easier to Use?

Blastness scores a 4.89/5 for ease of use, with most users praising its intuitive interface, smooth onboarding, and reliable performance. The platform’s recent reviews highlight a well-designed UI that simplifies daily operations, although some users mention that faster navigation could improve the experience. Support responsiveness is high but still falls short of 24/7 availability, with some comments about response times taking a few days.

Olive offers no user ratings or reviews, making it impossible to assess its usability or onboarding experience. Given its new market entry and lack of feedback, it’s uncertain how user-friendly or stable the platform is. Edge: Blastness.

Which Has Better Features: Blastness or Olive?

Blastness offers an impressive 20 features exclusive to its platform, including multi-room bookings, price comparison widgets, multi-lingual options, GDPR compliance, post-stay emails, gift vouchers, and integrations with Google and TripAdvisor bookings. Its total feature count stands at 38, making it a highly versatile engine capable of supporting complex hotel needs.

Olive provides just four unique features, such as Apple Pay, Google Pay, ADA compliance, and loyalty program integration, with a total of 18 features shared with Blastness. Its narrower scope suggests a focus on guest experience rather than extensive booking management or distribution tools.

Edge: Blastness.

Which Has Better Customer Support: Blastness or Olive?

Blastness earns a 4.89/5 rating for customer support, with reviews emphasizing its responsive, helpful team. Users praise their onboarding experience and ongoing support, though some mention the desire for 24/7 availability, especially for weekend issues. The support staff’s responsiveness is generally seen as a key strength, contributing to high satisfaction.

Olive has no available reviews or ratings on support quality, making it impossible to assess its responsiveness or service quality at this stage. Given the absence of feedback, Blastness’s proven support system clearly outperforms Olive’s unknown status. Edge: Blastness.

Which Do Hoteliers Rate Higher: Blastness or Olive?

Blastness’s 118 reviews, with more recent feedback from the last six months, point to a highly satisfied user base. It boasts a 98% likelihood to recommend, with high ratings across ease of use, support, and value. Property types such as city center hotels, resorts, and boutique hotels frequently rate it highly, especially for its integration, reporting, and revenue management capabilities.

Olive, with no reviews or ratings, offers no data on user satisfaction or hotel segment preferences. Its market presence is limited to North America and Europe, with no publicly available user feedback to support claims of performance or satisfaction.

Edge: Blastness.

How Much Do Blastness and Olive Cost?

Pricing details for Blastness are not publicly available, but it’s generally understood as a paid, subscription-based platform, with no freemium or trial options disclosed. Its value for money is rated highly at 4.76/5, implying solid ROI based on user feedback.

Olive also does not publish pricing details, but given its newer market entry and lack of reviews, pricing remains uncertain. It’s likely to be a paid solution, but without concrete figures, cost comparison is impossible.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Blastness?

• Hotels seeking a proven, feature-rich booking engine capable of increasing direct bookings.
• Properties that value integrations with PMS, RMS, and distribution channels like Google Hotel Ads and TripAdvisor.
• Hotels of all sizes, especially those in city centers, resorts, or boutique segments.
• Teams that prefer a platform with extensive management tools, reporting, and dynamic pricing capabilities.

Not ideal if you:

• Require a simple, no-frills booking solution.
• Have a very tight budget without room for investment.
• Seek a platform with minimal integration needs or limited complexity.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Olive?

• Hotels prioritizing guest experience with embedded e-commerce and AI-driven personalization.
• Boutique or luxury properties aiming to differentiate through smart merchandising.
• Hotels looking for integrated payment options like Apple Pay and Google Pay.
• Teams interested in a platform that emphasizes guest communications and real-time booking data.

Not ideal if you:

• Require a well-established, proven platform with extensive reviews.
• Need comprehensive distribution management or advanced revenue tools.
• Are wary of adopting a platform without user feedback or proven industry track record.

Blastness vs Olive: The Bottom Line for Hotels

Blastness stands out as the more reliable, feature-complete, and well-reviewed booking engine. Its extensive integrations, proven performance, and recent user feedback make it the clear favorite for most hoteliers seeking to maximize direct bookings and revenue.

Olive’s focus on guest experience and AI-driven personalization could appeal to niche markets or boutique hotels, but its lack of reviews and proven track record make it a risky choice for most.

If your priority is a trusted, tested platform with a broad feature set, go with Blastness. If you’re experimenting with guest engagement and willing to accept the unknowns, Olive might be worth exploring, but proceed cautiously.