Bokun vs. CiHMS:
Welke past bij u?

The Decision

Your team is evaluating two property management systems—Bokun by Bokun and CiHMS by CiHMS—to streamline operations and enhance guest experiences. Both aim to address hotel management needs but diverge in scope, features, and market presence. Bokun primarily serves tourism and activity providers, while CiHMS targets hotel operations across various segments. With limited recent reviews for Bokun and a rich set for CiHMS, which solution aligns better with your hotel’s needs?

Is Bokun or CiHMS Better for Hotels?

Bokun specializes in booking management for tours, activities, and travel providers, offering a platform that simplifies reservations and distribution. CiHMS, on the other hand, is a comprehensive hotel property management system designed to automate daily operations, from reservations to billing.

While Bokun’s core strengths lie in activity bookings and integrations with travel channels, CiHMS excels at operational automation, guest management, and multi-channel reservations. Both systems aim to improve efficiency, but their target markets are different—are you looking for a versatile hotel management tool, or a solution focused on activity and tour bookings?

The key difference is coverage: Bokun does not have any verified integrations or regional presence, whereas CiHMS offers 33 features, including channel management and revenue modules, and operates across five countries. Given these distinctions, which platform best supports your specific hotel operations?

Bokun vs CiHMS: Which Should Your Hotel Choose?

If your hotel primarily needs a system to manage tour and activity reservations, Bokun would be appropriate due to its focus on booking management and integrations with distribution channels. It’s suitable for small to medium-sized operators looking for a user-friendly interface and inventory control, especially if you already have other hotel systems in place.

If your hotel requires a broader property management solution that automates operations, supports multi-channel reservations, and offers detailed reporting, CiHMS is the clear choice. Its extensive feature set, including a booking engine, housekeeping, revenue management, and multi-lingual support, makes it better suited for hotels aiming to streamline daily tasks and boost revenue.

For large resorts or hotels in regions like Asia Pacific, CiHMS’s regional presence and diverse features are particularly valuable. Conversely, if you need a lightweight booking tool for tours or activities, Bokun’s platform might suffice. Which profile matches your hotel’s scale and operational focus?

Is Bokun or CiHMS Easier to Use?

Bokun lacks recent reviews, so its usability is unclear. CiHMS, with a 4.9/5 ease of use rating based on 101 reviews, is highly praised for its intuitive, simple interface and straightforward onboarding process. Customers mention that new users find CiHMS easy to navigate and quickly adopt its features, with some noting the system is stable and responsive during daily use.

In contrast, Bokun’s 0/5 rating indicates no recent feedback, making it hard to assess. Given CiHMS’s near-perfect score and positive comments on its user-friendly design, it’s safe to say it offers a smoother experience. Edge: CiHMS.

Which Has Better Features: Bokun or CiHMS?

Bokun offers a handful of core features focused on booking management but lacks advanced modules. CiHMS provides 33 features, including a channel manager, revenue management, integrated CRS, booking engine, housekeeping, online support, guest profiles, multi-currency, and automated night audits.

Notably, CiHMS supports real-time reporting, task management, digital registration, and ancillary revenue tracking—features absent in Bokun. The breadth of capabilities in CiHMS makes it more suitable for hotels seeking operational automation and detailed control. Edge: CiHMS.

Which Has Better Customer Support: Bokun or CiHMS?

Bokun’s support information is limited, and no recent reviews or ratings are available. CiHMS, with a 4.92/5 customer support rating from 101 reviews, is highly regarded for its responsiveness and professional service. Customers emphasize quick issue resolution and helpful onboarding, making it easier for staff to get started and troubleshoot.

Given the extensive positive feedback, CiHMS’s support is clearly superior. Edge: CiHMS.

Which Has More Integrations: Bokun or CiHMS?

Bokun currently has no verified partner integrations, limiting its connectivity options. CiHMS, however, offers 3 verified partners, including SiteMinder, DerbySoft, and Easyway, along with support for multiple channels and systems.

While Bokun’s lack of integrations may restrict automation, CiHMS’s integrations facilitate a unified management environment, reducing manual work and data silos. For hotels seeking connected systems, CiHMS’s ecosystem gives it an edge. Edge: CiHMS.

Which Do Hoteliers Rate Higher: Bokun or CiHMS?

Bokun has no recent reviews, so no current ratings are available for hotel segments. CiHMS, with 101 reviews and a 9.8/5 NPS score, is highly favored, especially in the resorts and city center hotel segments, which comprise much of its user base.

Hotels that want a well-supported, feature-rich PMS are more likely to rate CiHMS higher. Smaller or activity-focused businesses may find Bokun’s niche less competitive given the lack of recent feedback. Edge: CiHMS.

How Much Do Bokun and CiHMS Cost?

Bokun's pricing details are not publicly available, suggesting it might be customized or based on usage. CiHMS charges a flat $900 monthly base fee, with no mention of additional implementation or per-room charges.

The clear transparency and straightforward pricing of CiHMS make budgeting easier, especially for larger properties. Without published pricing for Bokun, it's difficult to compare value directly, but CiHMS’s features justify its cost for most mid- to large-sized hotels.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Bokun?

• Hotels that primarily operate activities, tours, or experiences, and need a booking management system.
• Teams that want an easy-to-use platform to handle reservations and distribution channels.
• Small to medium-sized tour operators and travel agencies seeking straightforward booking tools.
• Hotels with limited operational automation needs.

Not ideal if your hotel requires extensive property management features, multi-channel reservation management, or revenue modules. Bokun’s niche focus makes it less suitable for large or complex hotel operations.

What Type of Hotel Should Use CiHMS?

• Hotels seeking a full-featured property management system with automation.
• Resorts and large hotels that operate across multiple channels and regions.
• Hotels wanting advanced reporting, revenue management, and task automation.
• Properties in the Asia Pacific, Middle East, or Africa with regional needs.

Not ideal if your hotel is small, only needs basic booking tools, or operates solely in markets with minimal regional support. CiHMS’s extensive feature set suits complex operations better than simple reservation systems.

The Bottom Line for Hotels

CiHMS is the more complete property management system, with a broad feature set, strong user ratings, and verified integrations. Bokun excels in its niche—booking management for tours and activities—and may be suitable if that’s your sole focus.

If your hotel needs a flexible, scalable PMS with automation, real-time reporting, and dedicated support, choosing CiHMS is the safer bet. Bokun might suit smaller operations or activity providers, but for most hotels, CiHMS’s comprehensive approach offers better value and reliability.

In conclusion, for hotels prioritizing operational efficiency and growth, CiHMS is the recommended choice. Bokun remains a niche tool best suited for specific activity booking needs.