Citadel vs. RMS:
Welke past bij u?

The Decision

When selecting a property management system (PMS), your hotel needs to streamline operations, improve guest experience, and support growth. Citadel and RMS are two options that aim to address these priorities, but they do so very differently. Citadel appears to be a very limited solution with no recent reviews or user feedback, while RMS boasts a strong track record, extensive features, and a large, recent user base.

Given the data, RMS is clearly the more proven choice, especially considering its 293 reviews and recent activity. Do you want a platform with a track record of customer satisfaction and ongoing development, or are you comfortable with a platform that’s virtually unreviewed and appears not to be actively supported?

Is Citadel or RMS Better for Hotels?

Citadel by Citadel is essentially an untested and unreviewed product in the hotel property management space. It has no recent reviews, no ratings, and no visible customer feedback, making it impossible to assess its effectiveness or reliability. RMS, on the other hand, is used by over 7,000 hotels across 70 countries, with 20 recent reviews in the last six months alone, and a high NPS score of 8.51 out of 10.

While RMS provides an extensive array of features—from reservations and housekeeping to revenue management and integrated channel management—Citadel offers no proven features or integrations. RMS’s global presence and active use suggest it’s a more reliable tool for hotels seeking operational efficiency and guest satisfaction. Given this, RMS is the far stronger choice for most hotels.

RMS vs Citadel: Which Should Your Hotel Choose?

If your hotel needs a full-featured, scalable PMS with proven reliability, RMS is the clear winner. It supports complex operations, integrates with over 112 partners, and has a broad hotel segment reach, including resorts, boutique hotels, and motels. RMS’s 4.56/5 overall rating and 86% likelihood to recommend reflect high user satisfaction.

If your hotel just wants to experiment with a PMS that may or may not work or has minimal operational needs, Citadel’s lack of reviews and features make it a poor pick. RMS’s extensive feature set, including online booking, revenue management, and guest CRM, is crucial for modern hotel management. For serious hotels, RMS is the definitive choice.

Is Citadel or RMS Easier to Use?

RMS scores a 4.28/5 for ease of use, with many users praising its user-friendly interface and helpful onboarding process, supported by an active support team. Customers highlight fast, responsive support that helps them get up and running quickly, with reviews mentioning "very helpful" staff and no major complaints about usability.

Citadel, in contrast, has no reviews or user feedback available, making it impossible to gauge its ease of use or onboarding process. With RMS’s proven usability and support infrastructure, it clearly has the edge here.

Which Has Better Features: Citadel or RMS?

RMS offers 74 features, including integrated CRS, online 24/7 support, booking engine, revenue management, guest CRM, real-time reporting, automated night audits, multi-lingual and multi-currency support, channel management, POS, and a guest portal. It’s an all-in-one platform designed to handle complex hotel operations and guest interactions.

Citadel provides no features or integrations documented or reviewed. For a hotel seeking a comprehensive, reliable system with a broad feature set, RMS’s 74 features give it a decisive advantage. Edge: RMS.

Which Has Better Customer Support: Citadel or RMS?

RMS scores 4.48/5 for customer support, with recent reviews praising its proactive, helpful, and fast support team. Customers like Makiko and Tara are praised for quick response times and knowledgeable assistance, which are critical for smooth operations.

Citadel offers no reviews or support ratings, making its support quality impossible to evaluate. RMS’s established support reputation strongly favors it for hotels prioritizing dependable assistance. Edge: RMS.

Which Has More Integrations: Citadel or RMS?

RMS boasts 112 verified integrations, including major OTA partners, payment platforms, POS systems, and marketing tools. Its extensive integration network allows hotels to connect most of their operational systems effortlessly.

Citadel has no verified integrations listed or reviewed, suggesting it’s either very limited or nonexistent. For hotels relying on multiple tools and systems, RMS’s integrations are a significant advantage. Edge: RMS.

Which Do Hoteliers Rate Higher: Citadel or RMS?

RMS’s recent reviews feature a 4.56/5 rating and an 86% likelihood to recommend, with many users praising its features, support, and ease of use. Hotels of various sizes and segments, including independent and boutique hotels, rate it highly, with some reviews noting a 70% increase in direct bookings and improved operational efficiency.

Citadel has no reviews, ratings, or recent user feedback. With no data supporting its performance or satisfaction levels, RMS’s user ratings are a clear indicator of its value. Edge: RMS.

How Much Do Citadel and RMS Cost?

Citadel’s pricing is not available publicly, and it appears to be a non-commercial or placeholder product. RMS is priced at $800 per month, with no free trial or freemium model. It’s a straightforward subscription-based pricing structure suited to hotels with predictable budgets.

If your hotel is considering RMS, be prepared for the $800/month fee, which reflects its comprehensive feature set. Citadel’s lack of pricing info makes it a risky choice without further vendor clarification.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Citadel?

• Hotels that are testing new software solutions without serious operational needs.
• Properties with minimal guest management requirements.
• Small, informal operations or niche markets where robust PMS features aren’t necessary.
• Teams that prefer to avoid complex onboarding or extensive training.
• Not ideal if your hotel needs reliable support, integrations, or features for high guest volumes.

Given the lack of reviews and features, Citadel seems unsuitable for hotels that require proven operational tools or growth support.

What Type of Hotel Should Use RMS?

• Hotels seeking a reliable, feature-rich PMS capable of supporting multiple properties.
• Hotels aiming to grow rapidly, with standardized processes across locations.
• Properties needing integrations with channel managers, POS, guest portals, and revenue tools.
• Hotels that prioritize real-time reporting and automations to reduce manual work.
• Teams that value active support and continuous software updates.

RMS’s extensive capabilities and proven customer satisfaction make it suitable for hotels of all sizes aiming for operational excellence.

RMS vs Citadel: The Bottom Line for Hotels

RMS is a mature, well-supported platform with a broad feature set, extensive integrations, and a large, recent user base. Its high ratings and active customer feedback show it reliably meets hotel operational needs.

Citadel, by contrast, offers no recent reviews, features, or proven support, making it an unsuitable choice for most hotels serious about their PMS. If you want a system backed by a large community and proven performance, RMS is the clear choice.

In summary:

• Choose RMS if you need a reliable, feature-rich PMS with extensive integrations and proven support.
• Avoid Citadel unless your hotel operates on a very minimal scale or just wants to trial a system with no guarantees of support or functionality.

Given the data, RMS is the clear winner for hotels looking for operational stability, growth potential, and guest satisfaction.