Demand Calendar vs. Infor EzRMS:
Welke past bij u?

The Decision

Choosing the right revenue management system is crucial for your hotel's profitability. Both Demand Calendar AB and Infor EzRMS aim to optimize your revenue streams, but they approach this goal differently. Demand Calendar excels at providing quick, data-driven insights with a focus on multi-property views, while Infor EzRMS offers extensive automation and detailed forecasting capabilities. With the decision impacting your bottom line, which product truly fits your hotel’s needs?

Is Demand Calendar AB or Infor EzRMS Better for Hotels?

Demand Calendar AB and Infor EzRMS are both designed to improve revenue, but they do so through different features and strengths. Demand Calendar focuses on providing a clear, interactive dashboard that consolidates data from multiple sources, enabling hotels to make swift decisions. Infor EzRMS, on the other hand, automates complex pricing strategies based on deep learning algorithms, aiming to maximize yield with less manual intervention.

Demand Calendar AB has a modest review count of 7, with recent feedback emphasizing its ease of use and time-saving capabilities, while Infor EzRMS has 39 reviews, most of which highlight its advanced forecasting and automation features. Demand Calendar’s user-centered approach makes it attractive for boutique and city hotels, whereas Infor EzRMS’s extensive feature set appeals to larger hotel chains with complex revenue management needs. With more recent reviews for Infor, it’s the more reviewed and current choice.

Demand Calendar AB vs Infor EzRMS: Which Should Your Hotel Choose?

If your hotel needs straightforward, quick access to multi-property data and strategic insights, Demand Calendar AB is the better fit. Its intuitive interface and visual dashboards are ideal for boutique hotels, city centers, and properties that value fast, informed decisions without extensive technical training.

Conversely, if your hotel requires automated, dynamic pricing across multiple segments, with advanced forecasting and detailed revenue insights, Infor EzRMS is the superior option. Its ability to automate workflows and adjust prices in real time makes it suitable for large hotel groups and properties with complex revenue streams. The more recent reviews and higher user count support choosing Infor EzRMS for sophisticated revenue management.

Is Demand Calendar AB or Infor EzRMS Easier to Use?

Demand Calendar AB boasts a 4.71/5 ease of use rating based on its simple, Google-based platform that consolidates data into interactive dashboards. Users praise its minimal learning curve, with hotel teams quickly adopting its features, and onboarding rated at 4.33/5. Review quotes emphasize how it saves time and simplifies revenue tasks.

Infor EzRMS has a slightly lower 4.49/5 rating for ease of use, partly due to its extensive features that can require specific knowledge to navigate effectively. While intuitive for experienced revenue managers, some users note that mastering its advanced modules can be complex.

Edge: Demand Calendar AB.

Which Has Better Features: Demand Calendar AB or Infor EzRMS?

Demand Calendar AB offers 12 unique features, including STR Data, Market Intelligence Data, Multi-Property Dashboard, and Five-Year Forecasting. Its focus on property-specific analytics and market insights provides a robust yet streamlined experience.

Infor EzRMS, with 26 features, provides a comprehensive suite: Dynamic Pricing, Automated Revenue Management, Group Pricing, Channel Management, Mobile App, and Real-Time Price Optimization. Its broader array of features supports detailed, automated revenue strategies across diverse hotel operations.

Edge: Infor EzRMS.

Which Has Better Customer Support: Demand Calendar AB or Infor EzRMS?

Demand Calendar AB receives perfect 5/5 ratings for customer support, with reviews highlighting its quick, responsive assistance and excellent onboarding process. Hotelers describe support as “fantastic,” with direct contact and prompt problem resolution.

Infor EzRMS’s support, rated at 4.04/5, is generally praised for responsiveness but has mixed reviews about ongoing issues following system updates. Some users mention delays and occasional technical disruptions, though many appreciate the detailed help provided.

Edge: Demand Calendar AB.

Which Has More Integrations: Demand Calendar AB or Infor EzRMS?

Demand Calendar AB integrates with 5 verified partners, including PMS and revenue system links like Oracle, but its network is limited compared to Infor. It shares common integrations with major players such as Mews and IDeaS but lacks the extensive third-party options.

Infor EzRMS boasts 113 verified integrations, including PMS, CRM, Channel Managers, and other operational tools. Its wide network supports seamless data flow, automating workflows across various hotel systems.

Edge: Infor EzRMS.

Which Do Hoteliers Rate Higher: Demand Calendar AB or Infor EzRMS?

Demand Calendar AB has a small review pool with a perfect 5/5 rating, but no recent reviews or detailed ratings by segment. Its user base favors boutique and city hotels, valuing simplicity and quick insights.

Infor EzRMS, by contrast, enjoys an overall 4.46/5 rating from 39 reviews, with a particular strength in independent and branded hotels. Larger properties and chains tend to rate it higher, appreciating its automation and forecasting accuracy.

Edge: Infor EzRMS.

How Much Do Demand Calendar AB and Infor EzRMS Cost?

Demand Calendar AB charges a flat $600 monthly fee, with no freemium or trial options. Pricing appears straightforward but fixed, making budgeting predictable.

Infor EzRMS does not publicly list prices, as it offers different modules with custom quotes. Its higher complexity suggests a premium pricing structure, potentially making it more suitable for larger hotel operations with bigger budgets.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Demand Calendar AB?

• Hotels that manage multiple properties and need consolidated insights.
• Teams seeking quick, visual data to inform daily decisions.
• Boutique, city center, or small chain hotels prioritizing ease of use.
• Hotels looking to improve revenue through strategic market intelligence.

Not ideal if:

• Your property requires extensive automation or sophisticated forecasting.
• You need detailed rate management across multiple segments.
• Your hotel has complex operational workflows needing deep integrations.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Infor EzRMS?

• Large hotel groups and chains with multiple properties.
• Hotels that rely on automated, dynamic pricing and forecast models.
• Properties needing extensive integration with PMS, CRM, and channel managers.
• Teams that want detailed reports and real-time pricing adjustments.

Not ideal if:

• Your hotel prefers simple dashboards without extensive setup.
• You have a limited budget or smaller property.
• You need basic analytics or minimal automation.

Infor EzRMS vs Demand Calendar AB: The Bottom Line for Hotels

The core difference is scope: Demand Calendar AB offers a straightforward, user-friendly tool focused on multi-property insights, while Infor EzRMS provides a deeply automated, feature-rich platform for complex revenue management. Demand Calendar is better suited for boutique hotels and properties seeking quick, actionable insights. Infor EzRMS excels at automating revenue strategies for larger, multi-property operations.

If your hotel values simplicity, rapid data access, and strong support, choose Demand Calendar AB. Its recent reviews and high satisfaction ratings make it a clear winner for small to mid-sized hotels.

On the other hand, if your hotel needs comprehensive automation, extensive integrations, and advanced forecasting, go with Infor EzRMS. Its broader feature set and larger user base support its position as the more powerful, scalable choice for larger hotel portfolios.

In conclusion, your choice hinges on your hotel’s size, complexity, and operational priorities. Demand Calendar AB is ideal for quick insights and ease of use. Infor EzRMS is better for sophisticated, automated revenue management at scale.