The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
Samenvatting
We hebben 167 geverifieerde hotelierbeoordelingen geanalyseerd, functiesets, prijzen en praktijkcasestudies vergeleken om te bepalen waar elk platform uitblinkt. De juiste keuze hangt af van uw type accommodatie en prioriteiten:
Guestnet blinkt uit als het gaat om user-friendly interface , met exclusieve functies zoals Mobile Checkin and Mobile Checkout.
Orana Software blinkt uit in ROI and onboarding .
Zij-aan-zij beoordelingen op basis van 167 geverifieerde hotelierbeoordelingen op HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Waarschijnlijkheid om aan te bevelen |
|
|
| Gebruiksgemak |
|
|
| Klantenondersteuning |
|
|
| Prijs-kwaliteitverhouding |
|
|
| Vanafprijs | From $500/mo | From $400/mo |
| Geverifieerde beoordelingen | 165 | 2 |
Na analyse van 167 geverifieerde beoordelingen waarderen Guestnet-gebruikers vooral de user-friendly interface, seamless information dissemination, positieve gastervaring, terwijl Orana Software-gebruikers de benadrukken. Klik op een thema om te zien wat beoordelaars zeggen.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Voordelen | |
|
+
User-Friendly Interface
▾
|
|
|
+
Seamless Information Dissemination
▾
|
|
|
+
Positieve gastervaring
▾
|
|
|
+
Aanpassing en flexibiliteit
▾
|
|
| Nadelen | |
|
−
Technical Issues and Performance
▾
|
|
|
−
Integratie met externe systemen
▾
|
|
|
−
Pushmeldingen en waarschuwingen
▾
|
|
Hoe elk product scoort onder Hotelgast-apps-leveranciers voor verschillende accommodatiegroottes, -typen en regio's — op basis van geverifieerde beoordelingen van hoteliers in elk segment.
Op hotelgrootte
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Klein (10-24 kamers) ▾ | #2 56 beoordelingen | #24 1 beoordelingen |
| Middelgroot (25-74 kamers) ▾ | #2 85 beoordelingen | — |
| Groot (75-199 kamers) | #17 2 beoordelingen | — |
| Extra groot (200+ kamers) | #23 0 beoordelingen | — |
Op accommodatietype
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #3 52 beoordelingen | #29 2 beoordelingen |
| Luxe ▾ | #3 66 beoordelingen | — |
| Merk / Keten ▾ | #7 18 beoordelingen | — |
| Langverblijf ▾ | #3 14 beoordelingen | — |
Op regio
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Noord-Amerika | #13 3 beoordelingen | — |
| Europa ▾ | #2 158 beoordelingen | — |
| Azië-Pacific | #16 0 beoordelingen | — |
Choosing between Guestnet by Guestnet and Orana Stay by Orana Software hinges on your hotel’s specific needs and operational scale. Both products aim to enhance guest communication and streamline services, but they do so with different strengths, user bases, and feature sets. Your team’s priorities—whether it's comprehensive integrations, recent reviews, or feature depth—will guide the best fit for your property.
Guestnet stands out with its extensive review count, recent feedback, and high overall ratings, making it the more proven choice in the current market. Orana Stay, despite fewer reviews, offers a highly rated and straightforward platform, particularly suited for boutique properties aiming for simplicity.
Guestnet and Orana Stay are designed to improve guest engagement through digital communication, but they diverge in their approach and maturity. Guestnet is a well-established platform with a global footprint, integrating with numerous systems and serving a variety of hotel segments. Its reviews highlight a high level of satisfaction, especially among larger hotels and resorts, with a 152 review count and recent feedback from 51 users in the last six months.
Orana Stay, by contrast, is a newer, smaller platform with only 2 reviews, none recent. Its focus is on boutique hotels and small properties, emphasizing ease of use and personalized guest interaction. While its reviews are positive, the lack of recent data makes assessing its current performance more challenging.
If your hotel values proven stability, extensive integrations, and a broad market presence, Guestnet is the stronger option. If simplicity and a boutique feel are your priorities, Orana Stay might suffice, but the limited recent feedback suggests less confidence in its current capabilities.
If your hotel needs a robust, scalable guest app with proven success and extensive integrations, go with Guestnet. Its critical mass of reviews and recent positive feedback show it adapts well to large and complex operations, providing features like mobile check-in, room service ordering, and digital compendiums.
If your hotel is a boutique property seeking a straightforward, branded digital concierge with basic guest communication and booking features, Orana Stay could be suitable. Its lower cost and simplicity appeal to small properties, but it lacks the extensive integrations and recent reviews of Guestnet.
For large hotels or resorts prioritizing proven reliability and comprehensive features, Guestnet is the clear choice. For small, independent hotels with minimal digital needs, Orana Stay may suffice, though caution is advised due to limited recent feedback.
Guestnet boasts a high ease-of-use rating of 4.74/5 from its users, with onboarding rated at 4.66/5. Reviewers praise its intuitive interface, clear information layout, and automation capabilities, which reduce staff training time and speed up adoption. Many highlight how quickly their teams embraced the platform and how guests appreciated straightforward access to services.
Orana Stay scores a perfect 5/5 in ease of use, with reviews emphasizing its simple, branded app design and straightforward setup. However, the limited sample size and absence of recent reviews mean less data on actual staff and guest adoption over time.
Edge: Guestnet, with its more extensive and recent user feedback, demonstrates more consistent ease of use across diverse hotel types.
Guestnet offers 8 shared features plus 4 exclusive to it, including mobile check-in, mobile checkout, room service ordering, and app downloads—features that directly enhance operational efficiency and guest satisfaction. Its ability to integrate with systems like ASA Hotelsoftware, Mews, and Hotelkit provides a high level of flexibility.
Orana Stay provides core features such as messaging, maps, weather updates, and booking capabilities but lacks the extensive feature set seen in Guestnet. It does not offer mobile check-in or room service options, limiting its utility for larger, more complex properties.
Edge: Guestnet, with more features and integrations, delivers a broader toolkit to elevate guest experience and streamline operations.
Guestnet’s support ratings are very high at 4.82/5, with reviewers citing helpful, responsive teams and seamless onboarding. Users appreciate the support’s availability and the platform’s ongoing development, which aligns with their operational needs.
Orana Stay, rated at 5/5, indicates excellent support, especially given its small team of five. However, the absence of recent reviews and a limited user base makes it difficult to gauge support consistency across all users.
Edge: Guestnet, with more recent reviews and a larger customer base, demonstrates a more reliable and proven support experience.
Guestnet integrates with 20 verified partners, including major PMS and POS systems like ASA Hotelsoftware, Mews, and Websline, ensuring compatibility with a wide variety of hotel management tools. This extensive network supports smoother operations across diverse hotel types and sizes.
Orana Stay has six verified integrations, including Sirvoy, Guesty, and Cloudbeds, offering decent options for boutique hotels. However, its smaller integration network may limit scalability or automation for larger properties.
Edge: Guestnet, with a far broader array of verified integrations, is better suited for hotels seeking extensive system connectivity.
Guestnet’s reviews are plentiful and recent, with a 95% likelihood to recommend and a 9.51/10 NPS score, indicating strong satisfaction across hotel segments, especially luxury and resort hotels. Larger hotels value its flexibility, automation, and integration capabilities.
Orana Stay, with only two reviews and no recent feedback, has a perfect 10/10 NPS but lacks enough data to assess broader hotel satisfaction. Boutique hotels have expressed appreciation for its simplicity, but the limited sample size makes this less conclusive.
Therefore, Guestnet has the edge thanks to its extensive, recent review data and high ratings.
Guestnet’s pricing begins at $500 per month with no freemium model or trial period, reflecting its enterprise-level capabilities. Its pricing structure suggests a focus on larger hotels or chains that need comprehensive features and integration.
Orana Stay costs $400 per month, with no mention of a trial or freemium options. Its lower price point and smaller scale suggest it is aimed at boutique hotels or small properties with basic needs.
Not ideal if your property is very small, with minimal digital infrastructure, or if budget constraints are tight without flexibility.
Not ideal if you need advanced features like mobile check-in, room service ordering, or wide-ranging PMS integrations.
Guestnet excels in serving mid-sized to large hotels and resorts with its broad feature set, proven reliability, and extensive integrations. Its recent reviews and high ratings confirm it’s a well-established, trusted platform capable of managing complex operations.
Orana Stay offers a lighter, user-friendly experience tailored to boutique hotels and small properties, with a focus on simplicity and direct guest communication. Its cost-effectiveness and ease of use make it suitable for hotels with limited digital infrastructure, but its lack of recent reviews warrants caution.
If your hotel values a comprehensive, proven solution with ongoing support, Guestnet is the clear choice. If your property is small, boutique, and looking for a basic, easy-to-deploy app, Orana Stay may serve your needs—though more recent feedback is needed to confirm its current performance.
Prijzen voor Hotelgast-apps zijn zelden eenvoudig. Dit is wat we weten op basis van de openbare prijsgegevens van elke leverancier. Vraag altijd een offerte op maat aan voor uw accommodatie.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $500/mo | From $400/mo |
Volgens de productdatabase van HTR delen Guestnet en Orana Stay 8 functies. Dit zijn de belangrijkste verschillen — functies die de een wel heeft en de ander niet.
| Functie |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| App downloaden | ||
| Mobiel afrekenen | ||
| Mobiel inchecken | ||
| Roomservice bestellen |
We hebben 7 geverifieerde casestudies geanalyseerd om te vergelijken wat hotels daadwerkelijk bereiken met elk platform op vier belangrijke bedrijfsdoelstellingen.
"The tools allow us to reduce paper and manual workflows. At the same time, the optimized communication saves time that we can now invest directly in our guests."
Nog geen gepubliceerde casestudy voor dit doel.
"Guestnet allows us to provide guests with all important information 24/7, which significantly increases satisfaction. At the same time, the platform reduces our team’s workload thr..."
Nog geen gepubliceerde casestudy voor dit doel.
Wat hoteliers waarderen
Customers consistently praise Guestnet for its intuitive and user-friendly design that makes information easily accessible for both guests and hotel s... Customers consistently praise Guestnet for its intuitive and user-friendly design that makes information easily accessible for both guests and hotel staff. This feature is crucial for fast adoption and smooth operation, minimizing training time and error occurrence.
Reviews highlight that Guestnet effectively allows hotels to provide guests with all needed information, including local activities and accommodations... Reviews highlight that Guestnet effectively allows hotels to provide guests with all needed information, including local activities and accommodations, without the need for paper-based resources, enhancing operational efficiency.
Veel recensenten melden een grotere tevredenheid onder gasten door de snelle toegang tot hoteldiensten en -voorzieningen via Guestnet. Dit leidt tot p... Veel recensenten melden een grotere tevredenheid onder gasten door de snelle toegang tot hoteldiensten en -voorzieningen via Guestnet. Dit leidt tot positieve feedback en mogelijk tot meer terugkerende gasten.
Waar hoteliers kritiek op hebben
While generally reliable, several users pointed out occasional technical performance issues such as slow loading times when used by multiple users, wh... While generally reliable, several users pointed out occasional technical performance issues such as slow loading times when used by multiple users, which could be improved for a better experience.
Reviewers zijn positief over de integratie van Guestnet met lokale toerismegegevens en hotelbeheersystemen. Sommigen geven echter aan dat er behoefte... Reviewers zijn positief over de integratie van Guestnet met lokale toerismegegevens en hotelbeheersystemen. Sommigen geven echter aan dat er behoefte is aan verdere integratie om de automatisering te verbeteren en handmatige taken te verminderen.
Scoort hoger op
Unieke mogelijkheden
Waar de beoordelingen het meest uiteenlopen
Dat hangt af van uw eisen. Guestnet en Orana Stay delen veel kern-Hotel Guest Apps-functies, maar elk heeft unieke mogelijkheden. Guestnet biedt 20 geverifieerde integratiepartners, terwijl Orana Stay er 6 biedt. Bekijk de functievergelijking hierboven om te zien waar ze verschillen voordat u overstapt.
Kleine hotels moeten prioriteit geven aan gebruiksgemak en snelle onboarding. Orana Stay scoort het hoogst op gebruiksgemak met 5.0/5 vs 4.7/5. Let op transparante prijzen en de mogelijkheid van een proefperiode of demo. Filter beoordelingen op elke productpagina op accommodatiegrootte om te horen van hotels zoals het uwe.
Guestnet: Nee. Orana Stay: Nee. Geen van beide producten biedt momenteel een gratis abonnement aan. De meeste Hotel Guest Apps-leveranciers bieden demo's of proefperiodes aan — vraag er bij beide een aan om te evalueren voordat u zich vastlegt.
De HT Score is een samengestelde ranglijst die 4 criteriagroepen en meer dan tien variabelen meeweegt om hoteliers te helpen hoteltechnologieproducten objectief te vergelijken. Guestnet heeft een HT Score van 96 en Orana Software heeft 0. Zo wordt de score berekend.
| Criteriagroep | Weging | Wat het meet |
|---|---|---|
| Klantbeoordelingen & reviews |
|
Hoe hoog beoordelen gebruikers dit product? Beoordelingsscore, reviewvolume, marktaandeel, reviewdiepte, reviewrecentheid, succesverhalen ▾ De zwaarst gewogen factor. Analyseert gemiddelde tevredenheidsbeoordelingen (waarschijnlijkheid om aan te bevelen, gebruiksgemak, ondersteuning, ROI), het totale aantal reviews ten opzichte van categoriegenoten, recentheid van reviews (minimaal 20 reviews in de afgelopen 6 maanden) en marktaandeel over unieke hotelklanten om selectiebias te detecteren. |
| Partnerecosysteem |
|
Hoe hoog beoordelen technologiepartners dit bedrijf? Partneraanbevelingen, integratieaantal, integratiekwaliteit ▾ Evalueert partneraanbevelingen als expertstemmen van vertrouwen, het aantal geverifieerde integraties en ecosysteemkwaliteit — de gemiddelde HT Scores van integratiepartners. Producten met een kwalitatief beter integratie-ecosysteem leveren waarschijnlijker een verbonden technologiearchitectuur. |
| Klantgerichtheid |
|
Hoe klantgericht is deze organisatie? Gecertificeerde ondersteuning, reviewconsistentie, profielvolledigheid ▾ Beoordeelt of het bedrijf HTR Customer Support-certificering heeft verdiend, consistente reviewverzameling in de loop der tijd onderhoudt (een indicator van feedbackgedreven cultuur) en productprofielen compleet houdt met mogelijkheden, schermafbeeldingen, prijzen en functies. |
| Bereik, stabiliteit & middelen |
|
Hoe uitgebreid is het bereik en de middelen van dit bedrijf? Geografisch bereik, stabiliteit, bedrijfsmiddelen, trendscore ▾ Meet wereldwijde aanwezigheid (bediende landen en regio's), aantal jaren in bedrijf als stabiliteitsindicator, teamgrootte als middelenproxy en een trendscore op basis van kopersaanvragen, reviews, partneraanbevelingen en persactiviteit in de afgelopen twaalf maanden. |
Klantbeoordelingen en reviews zijn veruit de belangrijkste factor in het HT Score-algoritme. HTR accepteert geen betaling voor hogere ranglijstposities. Alle reviews zijn geverifieerd — alleen professionals uit de hotelbranche met bevestigde affiliaties kunnen beoordelingen indienen. Bekijk de volledige HT Score-methodologie →
Adviseur productaanbevelingen