Booking Engine by HotelRunner vs. STAAH Booking Engine:
Welke past bij u?

The Decision

Choosing the right booking engine is crucial for your hotel’s online sales, operational efficiency, and guest satisfaction. HotelRunner and STAAH both aim to streamline reservations and increase revenue, but their strengths and weaknesses differ notably. Your decision hinges on the specific needs of your property, your preferred features, and the level of support you require. Which platform aligns better with your hotel’s goals?

Is HotelRunner or STAAH Better for Hotels?

HotelRunner and STAAH serve similar core functions—managing reservations, synchronizing with OTAs, and offering direct booking options. HotelRunner, founded in 2011 in the UK, has developed a robust feature set with a focus on customization and integration, but it has a smaller review base (40 reviews) with recent activity—4 reviews in the last six months—indicating current usability insights. Meanwhile, STAAH, established in 2008 in New Zealand, boasts a higher overall rating (4.81/5 vs. HotelRunner’s 4.5/5), and a significantly larger review count (13 recent reviews), making its reputation more reliably recent and validated.

HotelRunner’s platform excels in customization and marketing tools, offering unique features like social media booking integration and GDPR compliance. STAAH emphasizes ease of use, detailed analytics, and a broad network of integrations. Both address core booking needs well, but your choice depends on whether you prioritize extensive customization or straightforward analytics. Are you looking for a flexible, feature-rich platform or one with proven reliability and broad integrations?

HotelRunner vs STAAH: Which Should Your Hotel Choose?

If your hotel needs highly customizable booking options, integrated marketing tools, and advanced content management, HotelRunner is the better fit. Its features like social media integration, booking abandonment recovery, and A/B testing—absent in STAAH—support dynamic marketing strategies. On the other hand, if your priority is a highly rated, reliable platform with extensive OTA integrations and strong customer support, STAAH is preferable, especially for properties looking for straightforward operations and detailed analytics.

For boutique hotels, B&Bs, and smaller properties emphasizing marketing flexibility, HotelRunner’s more granular customization makes it a compelling choice. Larger hotels or chains that value broad OTA connectivity and proven support should lean toward STAAH. Your property profile and operational priorities will determine the best fit.

Is HotelRunner or STAAH Easier to Use?

HotelRunner scores slightly higher in ease of use (4.73/5 vs. 4.69/5) and onboarding (4.79/5 vs. 4.63/5), with reviews praising its user-friendly interface and quick setup. Users highlight that HotelRunner’s platform is intuitive for managing rates, availability, and content, with support accessible through multiple channels, including WhatsApp, for rapid assistance. Conversely, STAAH also receives high marks for usability, with a focus on simplicity and helpful customer service.

While both platforms are rated as easy to navigate, HotelRunner’s more recent positive reviews suggest it currently offers a smoother onboarding experience. Edge: HotelRunner.

Which Has Better Features: HotelRunner or STAAH?

HotelRunner offers 16 features exclusive to its platform, including social media booking, GDPR compliance, booking abandonment recovery, Google Analytics tracking, and multiple rate types like flat or floating rates. It also supports advanced promotional modules like wedding and corporate bookings, which STAAH does not provide. STAAH, however, boasts a unique feature—Facebook conversion tracking—that HotelRunner lacks.

Both platforms share 24 features, but HotelRunner’s additional customization and marketing options give it an edge. For hoteliers aiming for extensive control over guest experience and marketing, HotelRunner’s feature set is superior. Edge: HotelRunner.

Which Has Better Customer Support: HotelRunner or STAAH?

Support quality is a key factor, and recent reviews indicate that STAAH slightly outperforms HotelRunner. STAAH’s customer service is praised as “amazing,” with many reviews mentioning their team’s professionalism, quick responses, and helpful guidance. HotelRunner also receives high marks, with a 4.8/5 customer support rating, and users appreciate the support via WhatsApp and other channels.

However, given the more recent reviews for STAAH (all within the last 6 months), its support reputation appears stronger. For properties seeking responsive, dependable assistance, Edge: STAAH.

Which Has More Integrations: HotelRunner or STAAH?

STAAH significantly leads in platform integrations, with 54 verified partners compared to HotelRunner’s 17. Shared integrations include major names like Airbnb, Expedia, and Stripe. HotelRunner’s integrations focus on hotel-specific systems such as protel and Hotelogix, but STAAH’s broader network covers more OTAs, PMS, and revenue management tools, offering greater flexibility.

If your hotel depends on numerous third-party tools or plans to expand its online distribution, STAAH’s extensive integration portfolio makes it the clear choice. Edge: STAAH.

Which Do Hoteliers Rate Higher: HotelRunner or STAAH?

STAAH enjoys a higher overall rating (4.81/5 vs. HotelRunner’s 4.5/5), with recent reviews reinforcing its reputation for reliability and support. Hoteliers in boutique and resort segments particularly favor STAAH, citing its excellent support and intuitive interface. HotelRunner’s ratings are strong across the board but are based on fewer recent reviews, which slightly diminishes its current credibility.

For properties valuing recent, consistent positive feedback, STAAH is the more highly rated platform. Edge: STAAH.

How Much Do HotelRunner and STAAH Cost?

HotelRunner’s pricing starts at $100 per month, with no free trial or freemium option, positioning it as an accessible yet premium solution. STAAH’s pricing is not publicly available, indicating it may offer custom quotes or tiered packages, often typical for larger or more complex systems.

Given the transparency, HotelRunner’s cost is straightforward, but STAAH might be more flexible in pricing based on property size or needs. For budget-conscious hotels that prefer clear upfront costs, HotelRunner is preferable.

What Type of Hotel Should Use HotelRunner?

• Hotels that need extensive customization of their booking and website experience, such as boutique hotels, B&Bs, or those with complex promotions.
• Teams that want integrated marketing tools like social media booking and GDPR compliance.
• Properties that value advanced reporting, A/B testing, and content control.
• Hotels prioritizing multi-channel content distribution, including trip planning and corporate bookings.

Not ideal if your hotel:

• Prefers a simple, plug-and-play solution without complex customization.
• Needs broad OTA integration without demanding a high level of marketing flexibility.
• Has limited technical support capacity and prefers a more straightforward platform.

What Type of Hotel Should Use STAAH?

• Hotels and chains seeking a highly rated, reliable booking system with proven customer support.
• Properties that want extensive OTA integrations, especially if they rely heavily on third-party platforms.
• Hotels prioritizing detailed analytics, easy inventory management, and a straightforward user interface.
• Larger hotels or chains looking for scalable solutions with broad geographic coverage.

Not ideal if your hotel:

• Requires advanced marketing automation or custom website features.
• Seeks a platform with extensive content customization options.
• Prefers a system with transparent, fixed pricing from the outset.

STAAH vs HotelRunner: The Bottom Line for Hotels

HotelRunner offers a broad suite of customization and marketing features, making it suitable for boutique hotels, B&Bs, and properties that want control over their branding and guest experience. Its smaller review base and recent activity suggest it might be better suited for hotels comfortable with a platform that emphasizes flexibility over simplicity.

STAAH, however, has more recent reviews, a higher overall rating, and a larger network of integrations, making it the more dependable choice for hotels prioritizing seamless operations, extensive OTA connectivity, and strong support. Its proven track record and recent positive feedback favor larger properties or those with complex distribution needs.

If your hotel values extensive customization and marketing tools, choose HotelRunner. If reliability, broad integrations, and strong support matter most, STAAH is the better option.