项目面板是一款免费工具,仅向已认证的酒店从业者开放。它通过简化调研流程和沟通环节,让采用新技术变得更轻松。
摘要
我们分析了 404 条经验证的酒店经营者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的酒店类型和优先事项:
Acomos 表现出色 ,拥有独特功能如 Guest CRM and Guest profiles.
Stayntouch 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的住宿设施 (4.9/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Mobile App and Tablet/Kiosk Check-in.
基于 HTR 上 404 条经验证的酒店经营者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | 联系销售 | 起价 $800/月 |
| 经验证的评价 | 5 | 399 |
在分析了 404 条经验证的评价后,Acomos 用户最看重其 ,而 Stayntouch 用户则强调 smooth transition and training, user experience and interface, 客房服务和运营效率。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
Smooth Transition and Training
▾
|
|
|
+
User Experience and Interface
▾
|
|
|
+
客房服务和运营效率
▾
|
|
|
+
预订和价格管理
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
报告和分析
▾
|
|
|
−
有限公司和发票管理
▾
|
|
各产品在不同酒店规模、类型和区域的 酒店运营软件(PMS) 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店经营者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #46 5 条评价 | #18 51 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #5 208 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #7 29 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | — | #2 58 条评价 |
按酒店类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #56 2 条评价 | #6 220 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #60 1 条评价 | #6 180 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #55 1 条评价 | #3 152 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #47 1 条评价 | #14 17 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #4 262 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #33 5 条评价 | #12 64 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #21 3 条评价 |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) for your hotel can significantly impact your daily operations, guest experience, and revenue. Both Acomos by Acomos and Stayntouch by Stayntouch aim to serve this purpose, but they diverge in features, user experience, and market presence. Your decision hinges on which product aligns best with your hotel's size, complexity, and growth ambitions.
While Acomos has a long-standing presence and a focus on simplicity, Stayntouch offers a modern, cloud-based platform with extensive integrations and advanced features. With more recent reviews and a larger user base, Stayntouch’s platform appears to be the more robust choice for most hotels.
Both Acomos and Stayntouch are designed to streamline hotel operations, but they cater to different hotel types and operational needs. Acomos, with its focus on small to medium properties, emphasizes ease of use and operational clarity. Conversely, Stayntouch targets hotels seeking scalability, multi-property management, and advanced technological features.
Acomos’s limited review count (only 5 reviews) and its sole recent feedback make it harder to assess current performance confidently. In contrast, Stayntouch boasts over 300 reviews, with 26 in the last six months, indicating ongoing user engagement and recent product stability.
The core problem both aim to solve is simplifying reservations, check-ins, and daily management. However, Acomos’s ratings are modest (overall 3.1/5), with notable issues in customer support and onboarding. Stayntouch, rated 4.56/5 overall, impresses with its ease of use, support, and continuous updates.
Are you willing to prioritize recent, active user feedback over legacy stability? If so, Stayntouch’s current momentum makes it the more compelling option.
If your hotel needs a scalable, multi-property system with extensive integrations, go with Stayntouch. Its broad feature set (30 unique features) and high user ratings in large, independent, and branded hotels make it ideal for growth-focused properties.
If your hotel is small, seeks straightforward reservation management, and prioritizes simplicity, Acomos might suffice—assuming your team values the ease of use over advanced capabilities. However, with only five reviews and a low recent review count, its relevance diminishes unless your operation is very basic.
For hotels aiming for a modern, flexible platform with remote access, contactless features, and strong third-party integrations, Stayntouch is the definitive choice. Conversely, if you prefer a traditional, uncomplicated PMS with core functionalities and minimal complexity, Acomos could be suitable—though it’s less supported by recent feedback.
Stayntouch’s user interface scores 4.7/5, praised for its intuitive screens, mobile app, and ease of onboarding. Reviewers indicate new staff learn the system quickly, and support is rated 4.68/5, highlighting effective training and responsiveness.
Acomos’s ease of use is rated 3.5/5, with reviews describing it as “very easy to learn and use,” but some users mention limitations like the inability to copy bookings easily. Its onboarding ratings are low at 2.63/5, with one reviewer criticizing its support attitude and system bugs.
Edge: Stayntouch.
Stayntouch offers 30 features exclusive to its platform, including mobile check-in, guest app, real-time reporting, and automated space optimization—features vital for modern, guest-centric hotels. Its shared features total 19, with some overlap in reservation and housekeeping management.
Acomos provides 6 unique features such as guest CRM, guest profiles, EPoS, gift vouchers, native email marketing, and online booking integrations—useful for small hotels with specific needs. However, its feature set falls short of the breadth and depth of Stayntouch’s solutions.
Given the larger feature set and focus on mobile, automation, and multi-property management, Stayntouch holds the advantage for hotels seeking comprehensive, scalable tech.
Edge: Stayntouch.
Stayntouch’s support is rated 4.68/5, with reviews emphasizing quick, friendly, and thorough assistance. Users mention that onboarding was smooth, and the support team goes above and beyond to help resolve issues efficiently.
Acomos’s support scores 3.3/5, with a notable negative review citing poor attitude, system bugs, and delayed historical data delivery. Some users report frustration with customer service responsiveness and system reliability.
Based on recent reviews, Stayntouch consistently delivers superior support, critical for operational stability and staff training.
Edge: Stayntouch.
Stayntouch integrates with 188 verified partners, including major players like RoomPriceGenie, STAAH, and SiteMinder. Its open API and extensive third-party ecosystem enable hotels to tailor their tech stack easily.
Acomos’s integrations are limited to just 2 verified partners, including SiteMinder, and a few others. Its narrower ecosystem constrains how much your hotel can customize or expand its technology.
If integrations are a priority—especially with leading revenue management, channel management, and guest experience tools—Stayntouch’s expansive partner network clearly wins.
Edge: Stayntouch.
Stayntouch impresses with a 9.35/10 NPS score and a 94% likelihood to recommend, reflecting high hotel satisfaction. The reviews highlight its ease of use, strong support, and positive impact on guest satisfaction, exemplified by a hotel that saw a 20-point surge in guest satisfaction.
In contrast, Acomos’s NPS is just 6.4/5, and only five reviews exist, with some very negative feedback about customer support and system bugs. Its limited recent review activity suggests less active user engagement.
Given the volume and recency of reviews, Stayntouch’s higher ratings make it the preferred choice.
Edge: Stayntouch.
Acomos does not publish explicit pricing details, implying a customized quote approach. Its lack of a free trial or transparent pricing model may deter smaller hotels or those seeking clear cost expectations.
Stayntouch charges a flat $800 monthly fee, with no implementation or setup charges, and offers a straightforward pricing model. This transparency simplifies budgeting, especially for mid-sized and larger properties.
If predictable, transparent pricing is a priority, Stayntouch offers a clear advantage.
Not ideal if:
Acomos suits smaller, independent hotels focused on core reservation and operational functions without the need for extensive customization.
Not ideal if:
Stayntouch is best for hotels aiming to modernize operations, enhance guest interaction, and grow across multiple locations.
The core difference lies in their technological maturity and market focus: Acomos offers a more traditional, limited feature set with less recent user engagement, while Stayntouch emphasizes modern, cloud-based solutions with extensive integrations and high user satisfaction.
For hotels prioritizing ease of use, recent positive reviews, and scalable features, Stayntouch is the clear choice. It consistently outperforms Acomos in recent ratings, support, and functionality, making it more suitable for most hotels aiming to grow and deliver superior guest experiences.
Choose Acomos if you need a basic, straightforward PMS for a small property with minimal tech requirements. However, for future-proof, feature-rich management and better user support, Stayntouch is the better investment.
酒店运营软件(PMS) 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的酒店规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 起始价格 | — | 起价 $800/月 |
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
会计与金融
|
|
|
| 直接计费 | ||
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
|
▾
营销与电子商务
|
|
|
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 客户关系管理 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
管理和配置
|
|
|
| 集中的用户和角色管理 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 基于云 | ||
| 在前提 | ||
|
▾
用户管理
|
|
|
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
前台
|
|
|
| 移动设备笔记和任务(语音转文本) | ||
| 移动应用 | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 任务管理 | ||
| 自动提醒 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 平板电脑/自助服务终端值机 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
群组管理
|
|
|
| 组功能 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
宾客体验
|
|
|
| 集成身份证和护照扫描仪 | ||
| 数字注册 | ||
| 访客应用 | ||
| 网上值机 | ||
| 在线结帐 | ||
| 来宾消息 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 身份证扫描和注册预填 | ||
| 大堂售货亭 | ||
|
▾
家政
|
|
|
| 管家模块 | ||
| 家政移动应用程序 | ||
| 实时状态更新 | ||
| 自动分配 | ||
| 实时报告 | ||
| 轮班计划 | ||
| 员工信息 | ||
| 在线结帐 | ||
|
▾
付款
|
|
|
| 集成支付终端和读卡器 | ||
| 直接计费 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 交付过程 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
|
▾
预订管理
|
|
|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 综合 CRS | ||
| 拖放磁带图 | ||
| 费率管理 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
| 基于规则的房间分配 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
收入管理
|
|
|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 自定义费率 | ||
| 辅助收入跟踪 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 基本定价 | ||
|
▾
税务与合规
|
|
|
| 符合 PCI 标准 | ||
| 符合 GDPR | ||
| SOC2 投诉 | ||
| 税务配置 | ||
|
▾
支持与培训
|
|
|
| 在线 24/7 支持 | ||
|
▾
食品与饮料
|
|
|
| EPoS | ||
|
▾
温泉
|
|
|
| 水疗和健康模块 |
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We really like the ability to customize our setups as much as possible, and that was pretty important to us. Being able to have a lot of those main features already at our fingerti..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Before leveraging Stayntouch PMS and Owner Relations, much of our old accounting processes were completed manually, including printing and hand-delivering statements to units, and..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"As an independent hotel that runs above 100% occupancy on many nights, the TWA Hotel finds Stayntouch integral to our operations."
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
Stayntouch receives high praise for its seamless transition and training processes, greatly aided by trainers like David and Julia, who are consistent... Stayntouch receives high praise for its seamless transition and training processes, greatly aided by trainers like David and Julia, who are consistently mentioned for their support and comprehensive guidance. Many reviews highlight the ease of moving from previous systems, an aspect noted particularly for its stress-reduction during onboarding.
The software is largely favored for its intuitive and user-friendly design, supporting efficient training and ease of user adoption, especially for st... The software is largely favored for its intuitive and user-friendly design, supporting efficient training and ease of user adoption, especially for staff with varying technical proficiencies. This contributes significantly to positive front-desk and operational performances.
Stayntouch的客房管理功能因其简化房间分配和跟踪客房服务状态而备受赞誉。这些功能通过提供实时更新来提升运营效率,从而优化日常工作流程。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
虽然报告功能因其全面性和有助于运营监督而受到赞赏,但多项评论指出,报告的自定义程度和清晰度仍有提升空间。生成详细报告方面的困难也成为部分用户遇到的难题... 虽然报告功能因其全面性和有助于运营监督而受到赞赏,但多项评论指出,报告的自定义程度和清晰度仍有提升空间。生成详细报告方面的困难也成为部分用户遇到的难题。
一些评论指出,在管理团体预订和开票方面存在困难,并指出某些流程可以更加精简和直观。客户账户转移和历史数据访问方面的问题也表明,该功能仍有扩展空间。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Acomos 和 Stayntouch 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Acomos 提供 2 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Stayntouch 提供 199 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速上手。Stayntouch 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 3.5/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按酒店规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Acomos:否。Stayntouch:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店经营者客观比较酒店科技产品。Acomos 的 HT Score 为 0,Stayntouch 的为 93。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您酒店的情况量身定制的推荐