The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 375 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Acomos 表现出色 ,拥有独特功能如 Guest CRM and Guest profiles.
Stayntouch 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (4.9/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Mobile App and Tablet/Kiosk Check-in.
基于 HTR 上 375 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $800/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 5 | 370 |
在分析了 375 条经验证的评价后,Acomos 用户最看重其 ,而 Stayntouch 用户则强调 用户友好界面, 整合与入职, 系统性能和可靠性。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
用户友好界面
▾
|
|
|
+
整合与入职
▾
|
|
|
+
系统性能和可靠性
▾
|
|
|
+
预订管理
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
报告和分析
▾
|
|
|
−
客房管理和客房服务
▾
|
|
|
−
预订管理
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #46 5 条评价 | #18 51 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #5 208 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #7 29 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | — | #2 58 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #56 2 条评价 | #6 220 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #60 1 条评价 | #6 180 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #55 1 条评价 | #3 152 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #47 1 条评价 | #14 17 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #4 262 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #33 5 条评价 | #12 64 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #21 3 条评价 |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) for your hotel can significantly impact your daily operations, guest experience, and revenue. Both Acomos by Acomos and Stayntouch by Stayntouch aim to serve this purpose, but they diverge in features, user experience, and market presence. Your decision hinges on which product aligns best with your hotel's size, complexity, and growth ambitions.
While Acomos has a long-standing presence and a focus on simplicity, Stayntouch offers a modern, cloud-based platform with extensive integrations and advanced features. With more recent reviews and a larger user base, Stayntouch’s platform appears to be the more robust choice for most hotels.
Both Acomos and Stayntouch are designed to streamline hotel operations, but they cater to different hotel types and operational needs. Acomos, with its focus on small to medium properties, emphasizes ease of use and operational clarity. Conversely, Stayntouch targets hotels seeking scalability, multi-property management, and advanced technological features.
Acomos’s limited review count (only 5 reviews) and its sole recent feedback make it harder to assess current performance confidently. In contrast, Stayntouch boasts over 300 reviews, with 26 in the last six months, indicating ongoing user engagement and recent product stability.
The core problem both aim to solve is simplifying reservations, check-ins, and daily management. However, Acomos’s ratings are modest (overall 3.1/5), with notable issues in customer support and onboarding. Stayntouch, rated 4.56/5 overall, impresses with its ease of use, support, and continuous updates.
Are you willing to prioritize recent, active user feedback over legacy stability? If so, Stayntouch’s current momentum makes it the more compelling option.
If your hotel needs a scalable, multi-property system with extensive integrations, go with Stayntouch. Its broad feature set (30 unique features) and high user ratings in large, independent, and branded hotels make it ideal for growth-focused properties.
If your hotel is small, seeks straightforward reservation management, and prioritizes simplicity, Acomos might suffice—assuming your team values the ease of use over advanced capabilities. However, with only five reviews and a low recent review count, its relevance diminishes unless your operation is very basic.
For hotels aiming for a modern, flexible platform with remote access, contactless features, and strong third-party integrations, Stayntouch is the definitive choice. Conversely, if you prefer a traditional, uncomplicated PMS with core functionalities and minimal complexity, Acomos could be suitable—though it’s less supported by recent feedback.
Stayntouch’s user interface scores 4.7/5, praised for its intuitive screens, mobile app, and ease of onboarding. Reviewers indicate new staff learn the system quickly, and support is rated 4.68/5, highlighting effective training and responsiveness.
Acomos’s ease of use is rated 3.5/5, with reviews describing it as “very easy to learn and use,” but some users mention limitations like the inability to copy bookings easily. Its onboarding ratings are low at 2.63/5, with one reviewer criticizing its support attitude and system bugs.
Edge: Stayntouch.
Stayntouch offers 30 features exclusive to its platform, including mobile check-in, guest app, real-time reporting, and automated space optimization—features vital for modern, guest-centric hotels. Its shared features total 19, with some overlap in reservation and housekeeping management.
Acomos provides 6 unique features such as guest CRM, guest profiles, EPoS, gift vouchers, native email marketing, and online booking integrations—useful for small hotels with specific needs. However, its feature set falls short of the breadth and depth of Stayntouch’s solutions.
Given the larger feature set and focus on mobile, automation, and multi-property management, Stayntouch holds the advantage for hotels seeking comprehensive, scalable tech.
Edge: Stayntouch.
Stayntouch’s support is rated 4.68/5, with reviews emphasizing quick, friendly, and thorough assistance. Users mention that onboarding was smooth, and the support team goes above and beyond to help resolve issues efficiently.
Acomos’s support scores 3.3/5, with a notable negative review citing poor attitude, system bugs, and delayed historical data delivery. Some users report frustration with customer service responsiveness and system reliability.
Based on recent reviews, Stayntouch consistently delivers superior support, critical for operational stability and staff training.
Edge: Stayntouch.
Stayntouch integrates with 188 verified partners, including major players like RoomPriceGenie, STAAH, and SiteMinder. Its open API and extensive third-party ecosystem enable hotels to tailor their tech stack easily.
Acomos’s integrations are limited to just 2 verified partners, including SiteMinder, and a few others. Its narrower ecosystem constrains how much your hotel can customize or expand its technology.
If integrations are a priority—especially with leading revenue management, channel management, and guest experience tools—Stayntouch’s expansive partner network clearly wins.
Edge: Stayntouch.
Stayntouch impresses with a 9.35/10 NPS score and a 94% likelihood to recommend, reflecting high hotel satisfaction. The reviews highlight its ease of use, strong support, and positive impact on guest satisfaction, exemplified by a hotel that saw a 20-point surge in guest satisfaction.
In contrast, Acomos’s NPS is just 6.4/5, and only five reviews exist, with some very negative feedback about customer support and system bugs. Its limited recent review activity suggests less active user engagement.
Given the volume and recency of reviews, Stayntouch’s higher ratings make it the preferred choice.
Edge: Stayntouch.
Acomos does not publish explicit pricing details, implying a customized quote approach. Its lack of a free trial or transparent pricing model may deter smaller hotels or those seeking clear cost expectations.
Stayntouch charges a flat $800 monthly fee, with no implementation or setup charges, and offers a straightforward pricing model. This transparency simplifies budgeting, especially for mid-sized and larger properties.
If predictable, transparent pricing is a priority, Stayntouch offers a clear advantage.
Not ideal if:
Acomos suits smaller, independent hotels focused on core reservation and operational functions without the need for extensive customization.
Not ideal if:
Stayntouch is best for hotels aiming to modernize operations, enhance guest interaction, and grow across multiple locations.
The core difference lies in their technological maturity and market focus: Acomos offers a more traditional, limited feature set with less recent user engagement, while Stayntouch emphasizes modern, cloud-based solutions with extensive integrations and high user satisfaction.
For hotels prioritizing ease of use, recent positive reviews, and scalable features, Stayntouch is the clear choice. It consistently outperforms Acomos in recent ratings, support, and functionality, making it more suitable for most hotels aiming to grow and deliver superior guest experiences.
Choose Acomos if you need a basic, straightforward PMS for a small property with minimal tech requirements. However, for future-proof, feature-rich management and better user support, Stayntouch is the better investment.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $800/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Acomos 和 Stayntouch 共享 19 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| EPoS | ||
| 任务管理 | ||
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 客户关系管理 | ||
| 客户关系管理 | ||
| 平板电脑/自助服务终端值机 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 移动应用 | ||
| 集中的用户和角色管理 | ||
| 集成身份证和护照扫描仪 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 24 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 5 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Before leveraging Stayntouch PMS and Owner Relations, much of our old accounting processes were completed manually, including printing and hand-delivering statements to units, and..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"As an independent hotel that runs above 100% occupancy on many nights, the TWA Hotel finds Stayntouch integral to our operations."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
该系统直观的设计便于操作,非常适合快速培训新员工。其醒目的视觉和组织元素有助于加快任务执行速度,提升员工能力,从而改善与顾客的互动体验。
Stayntouch 以其无缝集成和流畅的上手流程而著称,这得益于 David 和 Julia 等员工提供的个性化支持。这些员工提供的指导被认为非常宝贵,尤其是在系统过渡和设... Stayntouch 以其无缝集成和流畅的上手流程而著称,这得益于 David 和 Julia 等员工提供的个性化支持。这些员工提供的指导被认为非常宝贵,尤其是在系统过渡和设置方面。
Stayntouch 的服务总体可靠,很少出现重大故障,并通过云端提供持续支持。尽管总体评价良好,但一些用户也对公司快速发展背景下解决复杂问题的速度表示担忧。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
虽然用户普遍称赞其易于访问且支持运营的报告,但他们也指出需要更具适应性的报告功能。一些报告缺乏细节或难以操作,凸显了可定制分析解决方案的必要性。
客房分配和客房服务功能因提升运营效率而获得积极反馈。然而,用户希望客房日志查看和任务安排功能能够得到改进,以满足特定的管理需求。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Acomos 和 Stayntouch 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Acomos 提供 2 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Stayntouch 提供 187 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Stayntouch 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 3.5/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Acomos:否。Stayntouch:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Acomos 的 HT Score 为 0,Stayntouch 的为 91。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问