Sorry, this functionality is only available for verified hoteliers
The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
Clock PMS vs. Stayntouch:
哪个更适合您？
摘要
我们分析了 698 条经验证的酒店从业者评价，比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究，以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项：
Clock 表现出色 在 功能丰富 方面 — 尤其适合 independent 类型的物业 (4.8/5) ，拥有独特功能如 Guest profiles and Guest CRM.
Stayntouch 表现出色 在 用户友好界面 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (4.9/5) ，拥有独特功能如 Guest Communication (SMS Messaging).
Clock PMS 与 Stayntouch 相比如何？
基于 HTR 上 698 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $600/mo | From $800/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 328 | 370 |
Clock PMS 与 Stayntouch 的优缺点是什么？
在分析了 698 条经验证的评价后，Clock 用户最看重其 功能丰富, 运营效率, 响应式支持和定期更新，而 Stayntouch 用户则强调 用户友好界面, 整合与入职, 系统性能和可靠性。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
功能丰富
▾
|
+
用户友好界面
▾
|
|
+
运营效率
▾
|
+
整合与入职
▾
|
|
+
响应式支持和定期更新
▾
|
+
系统性能和可靠性
▾
|
|
+
易于培训使用
▾
|
+
预订管理
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
错误消息
▾
|
−
报告和分析
▾
|
|
−
报告功能
▾
|
−
客房管理和客房服务
▾
|
|
−
预订管理
▾
|
|
Clock 对比 Stayntouch：按酒店细分市场排名
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型（10-24 间客房） ▾ | #11 117 条评价 | #18 51 条评价 |
| 中型（25-74 间客房） ▾ | #7 157 条评价 | #5 208 条评价 |
| 大型（75-199 间客房） ▾ | #17 9 条评价 | #7 29 条评价 |
| 超大型（200+ 间客房） ▾ | #11 5 条评价 | #2 58 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #8 165 条评价 | #6 220 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #11 80 条评价 | #6 180 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #8 62 条评价 | #3 152 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #9 27 条评价 | #14 17 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #17 30 条评价 | #4 262 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #3 228 条评价 | #12 64 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #11 13 条评价 | #21 3 条评价 |
| 中东 | #17 2 条评价 | — |
The Decision
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) can significantly impact your hotel's operational efficiency and guest satisfaction. Both Clock PMS by Clock and Stayntouch by Stayntouch aim to simplify hotel management, but they differ in their approach, features, and market presence. Your decision hinges on whether you prioritize a comprehensive, feature-rich platform or a highly intuitive, scalable solution. Which system aligns better with your hotel's specific needs and growth plans?
Is Clock PMS or Stayntouch Better for Hotels?
Both Clock and Stayntouch address core hotel management challenges—reservations, check-ins, billing, and guest communication. Clock offers a broad set of features that integrate operations like housekeeping, event booking, and POS, making it a solid choice for hotels seeking an all-in-one platform with extensive functionalities. Conversely, Stayntouch emphasizes ease of use, mobile accessibility, and scalability, catering to properties looking for a flexible, cloud-based solution that can grow alongside their business.
While Clock boasts a higher overall rating (4.8/5) with 251 reviews and recent feedback from six months ago, Stayntouch has a slightly lower rating (4.56/5) but more recent reviews from 26 users in the past six months. The higher review count and fresher feedback for Stayntouch give it the edge in current customer satisfaction data. Do you need a system that covers every operational detail or one that prioritizes simplicity and mobility?
Clock PMS vs Stayntouch: Which Should Your Hotel Choose?
If your hotel requires a feature-rich, all-in-one platform that handles reservations, rates, invoicing, and front desk operations, Clock PMS is the optimal choice. Its extensive functionalities—including guest profiles, multi-currency support, gift vouchers, native email marketing, and employee messaging—make it suitable for hotels seeking deep operational control.
On the other hand, if your hotel values an intuitive interface, seamless multi-property management, and mobile functionalities, Stayntouch is the better fit. Its strengths lie in ease of use, rapid onboarding, and extensive third-party integrations, ideal for properties aiming for digital innovation and scalability. For small to medium hotels prioritizing guest experience and staff efficiency, Stayntouch’s simplicity is compelling.
Is Clock PMS or Stayntouch Easier to Use?
Ease of use is critical for staff adoption and operational efficiency. Clock PMS scores a high 4.78/5 for usability, with users praising its straightforward interface that simplifies training and daily tasks. Reviewers highlight that Clock’s intuitive design reduces onboarding time and improves department coordination, despite its extensive features.
Stayntouch also scores well at 4.7/5, with reviewers emphasizing its user-friendly screens, especially for mobile operations. Its quick training curve and seamless onboarding process make it attractive for teams that need to get up to speed fast.
Edge: Clock PMS.
Which Has Better Features: Clock or Stayntouch?
Clock offers 58 features, including unique functionalities like EPoS, guest CRM, multi-lingual support, gift vouchers, automated reminders, and employee messaging—none of which are available in Stayntouch. Its integrated booking engine, online check-in, and analytics provide a comprehensive toolset for busy hotels managing multiple operational facets.
Stayntouch provides 48 shared features, with the standout being its robust multi-property management and contactless check-in solutions. It also offers extensive third-party integrations like RoomPriceGenie and STAAH, facilitating customized workflows. However, it lacks some of Clock’s specialized features, especially in guest engagement and automation.
Edge: Clock PMS.
Which Has Better Customer Support: Clock or Stayntouch?
Customer support influences your ability to resolve issues swiftly and keep operations running smoothly. Clock’s support scores a 4.75/5, with reviewers citing prompt, knowledgeable assistance and regular updates that improve system reliability. One user states, “Clock’s support team is very responsive and always helpful during onboarding and troubleshooting.”
Stayntouch’s support ranks slightly lower at 4.68/5, but reviews praise its onboarding process and the availability of comprehensive training and support materials. Users mention that the team is friendly and highly supportive, although some note occasional delays in addressing complex issues.
Edge: Clock PMS.
Which Has More Integrations: Clock or Stayntouch?
Clock PMS connects with 111 verified partners, including key integrations like Customer Alliance, RateBoard, and yieldPlanet. Its open API and no connection fees on integrations offer flexibility for hotels seeking a tailored tech ecosystem.
Stayntouch has 188 verified integrations, including popular systems like Juyo Analytics, Zaplox, and Tripleseat, giving it broader connectivity. Its extensive third-party partnerships facilitate seamless workflows across revenue management, contactless check-in, and event management.
Edge: Stayntouch.
Which Do Hoteliers Rate Higher: Clock or Stayntouch?
Clock’s reviews are more recent, with a high overall rating of 4.8/5 based on 251 reviews and a 95% likelihood to recommend. Independent hotels and boutique properties rate Clock especially highly, with average scores of 4.83/5 and 4.84/5 respectively.
Stayntouch’s 317 reviews yield a slightly lower rating of 4.56/5, though larger chains and branded hotels rate it very highly at 4.93/5. Its recent reviews from a broader user base suggest strong satisfaction among diverse hotel types.
Edge: Clock PMS.
How Much Do Clock and Stayntouch Cost?
Clock’s pricing is a flat monthly fee of $600, with no implementation, setup, or hidden fees. There’s no trial available, but its straightforward pricing appeals to hotels seeking predictable costs.
Stayntouch charges a higher base fee of $800 per month, also with no implementation fees or trial options. Its pricing structure may be better suited for larger properties or those needing extensive multi-property management.
What Type of Hotel Should Use Clock PMS?
- Hotels that need an all-in-one platform covering reservations, billing, housekeeping, and guest messaging.
- Properties with busy operational schedules requiring automation and integration.
- Hotels seeking a scalable solution that supports events, restaurants, and online check-in.
- Teams that prefer a customizable system with features like guest CRM and multi-currency support.
Not ideal if your hotel prioritizes mobile-first, contactless guest interactions or has a smaller operation that values a simpler interface.
Not ideal if: You need a lightweight solution solely for reservation management or a mobile-centric platform.
What Type of Hotel Should Use Stayntouch?
- Hotels that prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding.
- Properties managing multiple locations or brands with a need for robust multi-property features.
- Hotels seeking extensive third-party integrations and open APIs.
- Teams that want a mobile-friendly interface for staff working on the go.
Not ideal if your hotel relies heavily on in-person check-in without mobile or contactless options.
Not ideal if: Your property seeks a system with deep customization in reporting or automation beyond the core features.
Stayntouch vs Clock: The Bottom Line for Hotels
Clock PMS provides a broad, comprehensive platform designed to handle nearly every aspect of hotel operations, from reservations to POS and analytics. Its extensive feature set and robust support make it ideal for hotels looking for a one-stop-shop that can adapt to complex, high-volume environments.
Stayntouch focuses on simplicity, mobility, and scalability, making it suitable for hotels aiming for fast onboarding and modern guest experiences. Its extensive integrations and user-friendly design are key advantages for properties that need flexible, cloud-based management.
If your hotel requires a feature-heavy, all-in-one system with detailed operational control, Clock is the clear choice. For properties emphasizing ease of use, mobile access, and seamless multi-property management, Stayntouch stands out as the better option.
In conclusion, your decision should depend on whether operational depth or usability and mobility are your top priorities. Both products are highly rated, but Clock’s larger recent review base and broader feature set give it the edge for most hotels seeking comprehensive management.
Clock PMS 和 Stayntouch 的价格是多少？
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | From $800/mo |
Clock PMS 有哪些 Stayntouch 没有的功能（反之亦然）？
根据 HTR 的产品数据库，Clock PMS 和 Stayntouch 共享 48 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| EPoS | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 礼品券和预付体验 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 访客通信（短信） |
实际成果：Clock 对比 Stayntouch（按业务目标）
我们分析了 11 个经验证的案例研究，比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"Clock is best all-in-one platform for managing hotel and event operations in one connected environment. It makes it easy to track bookings, organize group reservations, and handle..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Elegancia selected Clock for its flexibility, strong integration capabilities, and robust multi-property management—an essential requirement for a growing hotel group. The ability..."
"Before leveraging Stayntouch PMS and Owner Relations, much of our old accounting processes were completed manually, including printing and hand-delivering statements to units, and..."
"Quicker service, reduced request errors, and more consistent operations, resulting in higher guest satisfaction"
"As an independent hotel that runs above 100% occupancy on many nights, the TWA Hotel finds Stayntouch integral to our operations."
Clock 对比 Stayntouch：总结
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Clock PMS+ 提供丰富的功能，有助于管理酒店运营和活动。然而，一些用户发现功能繁多，难以管理，建议改进其组织方式。
该软件通过节省时间并简化部门之间的沟通和协调，显著提高了运营效率，为员工和客人带来更顺畅的体验。
用户对响应式支持服务和定期更新表示赞赏，这些更新引入了新功能和改进，确保了系统的可靠性和与用户需求的相关性。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户偶尔会遇到以代码形式显示的错误消息，这让他们难以快速解决问题。直接从错误消息导航到问题可以提升用户体验。
报告功能虽然全面，但速度较慢，限制了其目前的有效性。用户建议进行优化，以解锁更多强大的功能。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
该系统直观的设计便于操作，非常适合快速培训新员工。其醒目的视觉和组织元素有助于加快任务执行速度，提升员工能力，从而改善与顾客的互动体验。
Stayntouch 以其无缝集成和流畅的上手流程而著称，这得益于 David 和 Julia 等员工提供的个性化支持。这些员工提供的指导被认为非常宝贵，尤其是在系统过渡和设... Stayntouch 以其无缝集成和流畅的上手流程而著称，这得益于 David 和 Julia 等员工提供的个性化支持。这些员工提供的指导被认为非常宝贵，尤其是在系统过渡和设置方面。
Stayntouch 的服务总体可靠，很少出现重大故障，并通过云端提供持续支持。尽管总体评价良好，但一些用户也对公司快速发展背景下解决复杂问题的速度表示担忧。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
虽然用户普遍称赞其易于访问且支持运营的报告，但他们也指出需要更具适应性的报告功能。一些报告缺乏细节或难以操作，凸显了可定制分析解决方案的必要性。
客房分配和客房服务功能因提升运营效率而获得积极反馈。然而，用户希望客房日志查看和任务安排功能能够得到改进，以满足特定的管理需求。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
关于 Clock PMS 与 Stayntouch 的常见问题
Clock PMS 能否替代 Stayntouch？
这取决于您的需求。Clock PMS 和 Stayntouch 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能，但各有独特的能力。Clock PMS 提供 111 个经验证的集成合作伙伴，而 Stayntouch 提供 187 个。在切换之前，请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
哪个更适合小型或独立酒店？
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Clock PMS 在易用性方面领先，评分为 4.8/5 对比 4.7/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价，了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Clock PMS 或 Stayntouch 是否提供免费方案？
Clock PMS：否。Stayntouch：否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前，请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HTR 如何评估和排名 Clock PMS 和 Stayntouch？
HT Score 是一个综合排名，考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量，帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Clock 的 HT Score 为 84，Stayntouch 的为 91。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何？ 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分（推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率）、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性（最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价）以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何？ 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何？ 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集（反馈驱动文化的指标）以及产品资料是否完整，包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛？ 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖（服务的国家和区域）、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标，以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
酒店从业者还在阅读哪些 物业管理系统 对比？
探索更多基于经验证酒店从业者评价的一对一对比。
获取个性化的产品推荐
产品推荐顾问
