The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 116 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Amadeus 表现出色 在 易于使用 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (4.5/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Automated reporting and Urgency messaging.
Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Room substitutions and Pooled inventory.
基于 HTR 上 116 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 95 | 21 |
在分析了 116 条经验证的评价后,Amadeus 用户最看重其 易于使用, 增加收入, 客户服务,而 Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
易于使用
▾
|
|
|
+
增加收入
▾
|
|
|
+
客户服务
▾
|
|
|
+
高级报告和分析
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
集成能力
▾
|
|
|
−
复杂性和可用性问题
▾
|
|
|
−
功能实现滞后
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 预订引擎 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #22 11 条评价 | #38 2 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #15 36 条评价 | #37 3 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #7 26 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #9 6 条评价 | #23 1 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #17 32 条评价 | #45 1 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #12 41 条评价 | #46 1 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #10 34 条评价 | #39 2 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #14 11 条评价 | #36 1 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #7 39 条评价 | #17 4 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #19 14 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 ▾ | #16 10 条评价 | #26 1 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | #7 8 条评价 | — |
As a hotelier choosing between Amadeus’ iHotelier® Booking Engine and Anand Systems Inc.’s (ASI) WebRes, your primary concern is which platform best aligns with your operational needs and revenue goals. Both products aim to increase direct bookings and streamline operations but approach these goals differently. Amadeus offers a robust, widely adopted booking engine with extensive integrations, while ASI provides a comprehensive property management and booking platform optimized for independent and multi-property hotels. Which solution makes the most sense for your property?
Both Amadeus and ASI focus on online reservations, but they serve different hotel profiles. Amadeus’s iHotelier® excels at driving direct bookings through its sophisticated, e-commerce-inspired booking engine with interactive messaging, targeted add-ons, and advanced merchandising tools. In contrast, ASI’s WebRes is part of a broader property management suite, offering reservation management, housekeeping, billing, and distribution in a single platform, making it ideal for properties seeking operational integration.
Amadeus’s platform is built for properties that want a dedicated, high-conversion booking engine with extensive customization, while ASI’s strength lies in its full hotel management system that includes booking, operations, and distribution. For properties prioritizing a seamless, guest-focused booking experience, Amadeus might be more appropriate. Conversely, if your hotel needs a unified system that manages day-to-day operations and online reservations, ASI is a strong contender. Are you prioritizing direct online revenue or operational efficiency?
If your hotel needs a powerful standalone booking engine to maximize direct reservations, go with Amadeus. Its platform, with a 4.39/5 overall rating based on 93 reviews, excels at increasing conversions through its responsive design, targeted messaging, and integrations with multiple payment options and merchandising features. It’s particularly suitable for hotels focused on digital marketing, revenue management, and competitive rate display.
On the other hand, if your hotel requires a comprehensive property management system that includes reservation handling, housekeeping, billing, and channel management, ASI’s WebRes is your best bet. With zero reviews in recent months but a history of robust multi-property management and real-time distribution, ASI is ideal for independent hotels or resort groups seeking operational control and online booking within one platform.
Amadeus’s iHotelier® boasts a user rating of 4.25/5, reflecting a generally intuitive interface with a learning curve. Reviewers appreciate its responsive design and detailed onboarding, but some mention it can be complicated initially, requiring ongoing support. The platform’s complexity can hinder staff adoption unless training is well-managed.
ASI’s WebRes, with a 4.95/5 rating, clearly stands out in ease of use, according to recent reviews. Users describe it as straightforward, organized, and quick to learn, emphasizing its simple workflow and minimal technical issues. The platform’s user-friendly interface results in faster onboarding and fewer support requests.
Edge: ASI.
Amadeus offers 14 features exclusive to its platform, including automated reporting, loyalty program integration, A/B testing, GDPR compliance, and multiple digital payment options like Apple Pay and PayPal. Its total of 22 shared features with ASI also includes advanced merchandising tools like booking abandonment recapture and price comparison widgets, making it feature-rich for direct booking optimization.
ASI’s unique features include room substitutions, pooled inventory, meal plans, social media integration, and gift vouchers—features tailored for flexible, multi-property, or independent hotel operations. While Amadeus’s feature set is broader and more advanced in marketing and analytics, ASI’s features support operational flexibility and guest engagement.
Edge: Amadeus.
Amadeus’s customer support ratings average around 3.22/5, with reviews citing inconsistent responsiveness and slow issue resolution. Some users mention that support can be lagging, impacting critical operational needs. However, others appreciate the dedicated account management and training programs when available.
In contrast, ASI receives a support rating of 4.85/5, with reviews emphasizing fast, knowledgeable, and courteous support. Guests highlight quick resolution times and seamless onboarding, which significantly reduces staff downtime and frustration.
Edge: ASI.
Amadeus’s booking engine integrates with 104 verified partners, including major channel managers, PMS, and payment providers. Notably, it supports integrations with platforms like SiteMinder, Duetto, and Becurious, offering extensive connectivity options to extend functionality and streamline data flow.
ASI’s WebRes has 19 verified integrations, including popular systems like SHR Group, Sojern, and Vertical Booking. It also shares common partners with Amadeus, such as SiteMinder and Duetto, but offers fewer overall integrations.
Edge: Amadeus.
Amadeus has a total review count of 93, with recent reviews in the last six months, and an overall rating of 4.39/5. Hotels in diverse segments, including independent and boutique hotels, rate the platform highly (averaging 4.36-4.67/5). Property types like branded and resort hotels also give strong scores, reflecting satisfaction with its revenue tools and integration capabilities.
ASI’s reviews are limited and lack recent data, but with a 4.95/5 rating from 20 reviews, it is highly rated by its users. Its clients are primarily independent hotels and resorts, who praise its ease of use and operational support, though the review base is smaller and less current.
Edge: Amadeus.
Pricing details are not publicly available for either product. Both operate on custom quotes based on property size, features needed, and integration requirements, so your hotel should request a tailored proposal to determine total cost.
Not ideal if your hotel prefers a simple, all-in-one PMS or has limited resources for complex setup.
Not ideal if your property relies heavily on third-party booking engines or requires advanced marketing functions.
Amadeus’s iHotelier® Booking Engine stands out as a comprehensive, feature-rich platform for properties aiming to boost direct bookings and revenue through sophisticated merchandising and integrations. Its extensive partner network and advanced tools make it ideal for hotels focused on digital marketing and revenue management.
ASI’s WebRes offers a streamlined, easy-to-use booking and property management system tailored for independent or multi-property hotels. Its rapid onboarding, excellent support, and operational focus make it well-suited for hotels prioritizing efficiency and seamless daily operations.
Choose Amadeus if you need a market-leading booking engine with advanced marketing features and extensive integrations. Opt for ASI if your hotel needs a user-friendly, operationally integrated platform that simplifies daily hotel management and drives direct bookings without complexity.
In conclusion, if recent reviews and integration breadth matter most, Amadeus’s platform is the stronger choice. However, if ease of use and support quality are your top priorities, ASI’s WebRes offers significant advantages.
预订引擎 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|---|
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine 和 ASI WebRes 共享 22 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 人工智能优化 | ||
| 价格对比 | ||
| 合并库存 | ||
| 忠诚度计划整合 | ||
| 房间替换 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 社交媒体整合/预订 | ||
| 紧急信息 | ||
| 膳食计划 | ||
| 自动报告 | ||
| 预订放弃重新获得 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 7 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 1 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We needed a system that removed our dependency on remote desktop and made daily operations simpler for the team. ASI 7.0 gave us direct access, a familiar setup, and a much smoothe..."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
TravelClick 因其易用性而受到酒店员工和最终用户的一致好评。其预订引擎被描述为直观的,有助于顺利处理预订和价格管理。这种用户友好性是一个关键的卖点。
许多酒店经营者称赞 TravelClick 能够通过先进的定价引擎、促销工具以及与各种渠道的更好整合来增加收入。他们提到了多费率显示、限时抢购和新的 Web 4.0 平台等... 许多酒店经营者称赞 TravelClick 能够通过先进的定价引擎、促销工具以及与各种渠道的更好整合来增加收入。他们提到了多费率显示、限时抢购和新的 Web 4.0 平台等功能,这些功能显著提高了直接预订量和总体收入。
人们对客户服务的看法褒贬不一。虽然一些用户称赞客户服务周到且乐于助人,但也有很多人抱怨响应速度慢、解决问题困难。这种不一致是潜在买家需要考虑的重要因素... 人们对客户服务的看法褒贬不一。虽然一些用户称赞客户服务周到且乐于助人,但也有很多人抱怨响应速度慢、解决问题困难。这种不一致是潜在买家需要考虑的重要因素。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
TravelClick 与各种系统(包括 PMS 和支付网关)的强大集成受到高度赞赏。许多评论都强调无缝连接支持各种功能,并通过统一界面简化管理。
尽管该系统具有诸多优势,但一些用户仍表示其可用性存在挑战,他们指出界面复杂,某些功能的学习难度较大。这种复杂性可能会妨碍系统的最佳使用,尤其是对于经验... 尽管该系统具有诸多优势,但一些用户仍表示其可用性存在挑战,他们指出界面复杂,某些功能的学习难度较大。这种复杂性可能会妨碍系统的最佳使用,尤其是对于经验不足的用户而言。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine 和 ASI WebRes 共享许多核心 Booking Engine 功能,但各有独特的能力。Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine 提供 104 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 ASI WebRes 提供 19 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。ASI WebRes 在易用性方面领先,评分为 5.0/5 对比 4.3/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine:否。ASI WebRes:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Booking Engine 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Amadeus 的 HT Score 为 72,Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问