项目面板是一款免费工具,仅向已认证的酒店从业者开放。它通过简化调研流程和沟通环节,让采用新技术变得更轻松。
摘要
我们分析了 1,519 条经验证的酒店经营者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的酒店类型和优先事项:
Amadeus 表现出色 在 易于使用 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的住宿设施 (4.5/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Confirmation emails and Referral Reporting.
SiteMinder 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的住宿设施 (4.3/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Performance Reporting.
基于 HTR 上 1,519 条经验证的酒店经营者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | 联系销售 | 起价 $500/月 |
| 经验证的评价 | 95 | 1,424 |
在分析了 1,519 条经验证的评价后,Amadeus 用户最看重其 易于使用, 增加收入, 客户服务,而 SiteMinder 用户则强调 渠道管理软件 / ota同步, 支持、培训与入职引导, 直销预订引擎和预订网站。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
易于使用
▾
|
+
渠道管理软件 / OTA同步
▾
|
|
+
增加收入
▾
|
+
支持、培训与入职引导
▾
|
|
+
客户服务
▾
|
+
直销预订引擎和预订网站
▾
|
|
+
高级报告和分析
▾
|
+
报告、洞察与分析
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
集成能力
▾
|
−
预订引擎的定制和品牌化
▾
|
|
−
复杂性和可用性问题
▾
|
−
支付网关与支付处理
▾
|
|
−
功能实现滞后
▾
|
|
各产品在不同酒店规模、类型和区域的 预订引擎 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店经营者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #25 12 条评价 | #1 507 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #16 32 条评价 | #1 535 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #9 30 条评价 | #1 117 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #10 5 条评价 | #1 46 条评价 |
按酒店类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #18 33 条评价 | #1 591 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #14 41 条评价 | #1 436 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #13 34 条评价 | #1 239 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #15 11 条评价 | #1 177 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #7 39 条评价 | #2 170 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #22 14 条评价 | #4 278 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #15 10 条评价 | #1 438 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | #8 8 条评价 | #3 14 条评价 |
Choosing the right booking engine can significantly impact your hotel's revenue, guest experience, and operational efficiency. Both Amadeus’ iHotelier® Booking Engine and SiteMinder’s Booking Engine aim to improve direct bookings and streamline distribution, but they approach these goals differently. Your decision hinges on your hotel’s size, location, and specific needs—so let's explore how they compare.
While Amadeus offers a solid, feature-rich platform with a strong market presence, SiteMinder’s solution is more extensive in integrations and global reach. Which one aligns best with your hotel's ambitions and operational style?
Both platforms target hotels looking to increase direct bookings and simplify distribution. Amadeus focuses on integrating a personalized booking experience with advanced analytics and revenue management tools, making it ideal for hotels that prioritize detailed data and customization.
SiteMinder emphasizes broad connectivity, real-time channel management, and scalability, making it well-suited for hotels with multiple properties or those operating in multiple markets. Do you need a platform with extensive distribution reach or a system with in-depth revenue tools?
If your hotel needs a highly customizable booking engine with advanced reporting, conversion optimization, and targeted merchandising, go with Amadeus. Its platform is designed for hotels that want to fine-tune their online booking process and maximize revenue through detailed analytics.
On the other hand, if your hotel values extensive channel management, seamless PMS integration, and a global distribution network, SiteMinder is your best choice. Its scalable solution is ideal for properties aiming to grow their online presence across multiple channels with minimal manual work.
For boutique or independent hotels prioritizing conversion tools, Amadeus is the way to go. Larger hotels or chains seeking broad market reach and operational efficiency should choose SiteMinder.
SiteMinder receives higher usability ratings, with a 4.6/5 compared to Amadeus’s 4.25/5. Users praise SiteMinder’s intuitive interface, quick onboarding, and simple management, which results in faster staff adoption.
Amadeus’s platform, rated at 4.25/5, offers extensive features that can sometimes feel overwhelming, especially for new users. While both platforms provide onboarding support, SiteMinder’s streamlined design makes daily management less complicated.
Edge: SiteMinder.
Amadeus offers unique features such as conversion rate reports, A/B testing, GDPR compliance, and integrations with Google Hotel Ads, Google Analytics, and Apple Pay, totaling 18 exclusive functionalities. These tools empower hoteliers to optimize their booking funnels and personalize guest interactions effectively.
SiteMinder boasts 21 features, including room & rate filtering, rate intelligence, PMS connectivity, multi-currency support, and social media booking integrations—focusing heavily on operational efficiency and distribution management.
While Amadeus excels in conversion and analytics, SiteMinder’s broad suite supports multi-property scalability and extensive channel management.
Edge: SiteMinder.
SiteMinder’s support ratings are significantly higher, with a 4.43/5 versus Amadeus’s 3.22/5. Users frequently mention fast, helpful responses, especially in crisis moments, and appreciate their multilingual support and dedicated account management.
Amadeus’s support receives mixed reviews, with some users noting slow responses and ongoing issues that delay problem resolution. For hotels that depend on reliable, quick assistance, SiteMinder’s support is a decisive advantage.
Edge: SiteMinder.
SiteMinder leads with 245 verified partner integrations, including over 50 common partners, offering extensive connectivity with PMS, revenue management, and marketing tools. Its open API and broad partner network provide flexibility for diverse hotel systems.
Amadeus has 104 verified partners, with 56 shared with SiteMinder. Although it covers key integrations, its smaller partner ecosystem limits its reach compared to SiteMinder’s.
For hotels requiring maximum connectivity, SiteMinder’s integration options are superior.
Edge: SiteMinder.
SiteMinder’s overall rating (4.48/5) surpasses Amadeus’s (4.39/5), partly due to more recent reviews. Hoteliers in the mid-market and chain segments tend to rate SiteMinder higher, especially for its ease of use and support services.
Amadeus is more favored by boutique hotels and independents, rating it at 4.36/5, but with fewer latest reviews. Given current review activity, SiteMinder’s higher rating reflects stronger ongoing satisfaction.
Edge: SiteMinder.
Amadeus does not publicly list pricing; it typically offers customized quotes based on property size and needs. It often involves higher upfront costs, especially for larger hotels, with no free tier or trial.
SiteMinder costs $500/month for its basic plan, with no trial available. Its transparent pricing makes it accessible for small to mid-sized hotels wanting predictable expenses.
In general, SiteMinder offers clearer value for budget-conscious hotels seeking a scalable solution.
Not ideal if your hotel seeks a straightforward, easy-to-use platform or has limited technical resources.
Not ideal if your hotel prefers a more niche, analytics-focused platform or has very limited distribution needs.
Amadeus’s iHotelier offers detailed analytics, advanced revenue tools, and customizable booking experiences, making it ideal for hotels that prioritize data-driven growth and guest personalization. Its global presence and unique features support sophisticated marketing strategies but come with complexity and potentially higher costs.
SiteMinder’s solution excels in connectivity, ease of use, and scalability—perfect for hotels expanding their reach across multiple markets and distribution channels. Its extensive partner network and support services make it a robust choice for properties seeking operational efficiency and broad online visibility.
If your hotel values comprehensive analytics and personalized guest engagement, choose Amadeus. For hotels focused on distribution, automation, and ease of management, SiteMinder is the more suitable platform.
Given the higher volume of recent reviews and overall satisfaction, SiteMinder currently holds a clear advantage in reliability, support, and usability. If your hotel needs a proven, scalable, and well-supported booking engine, SiteMinder is the recommended choice.
预订引擎 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的酒店规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 起始价格 | — | 起价 $500/月 |
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
商品和包装
|
|
|
| 房间替换 | ||
| 多房间和多费率计划预订 | ||
| 固定费率、浮动费率和折扣率 | ||
| 合并库存 | ||
| 特别优惠和折扣 | ||
| 可定制的附加组件 | ||
| 膳食计划 | ||
| 网站整合 | ||
| 社交媒体整合/预订 | ||
|
▾
追加销售和交叉销售
|
|
|
| 多房间和多费率计划预订 | ||
| 房间替换 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 预订放弃重新获得 | ||
| 可定制的附加组件 | ||
| 特别优惠和折扣 | ||
| 膳食计划 | ||
| 替代住宿建议(没有空房时) | ||
| 忠诚度计划整合 | ||
|
▾
转换
|
|
|
| 移动优化/响应式 | ||
| 特别优惠和折扣 | ||
| 紧急信息 | ||
| 预订放弃重新获得 | ||
| 多房间和多费率计划预订 | ||
| 房间替换 | ||
| 人工智能优化 | ||
| 价格对比 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 转化率报告 | ||
| Facebook 转化跟踪 | ||
| 可定制的退出意图模式 | ||
| 表单自动填充 | ||
| 灵活日期 | ||
| 费率计划比较 | ||
| Google 酒店广告预订 | ||
| Tripadvisor 预订 | ||
|
▾
支付
|
|
|
| 多币种 | ||
| 苹果支付 | ||
| Google Pay | ||
| 贝宝 | ||
| PCI合规性 | ||
| PayU | ||
| 条纹 | ||
|
▾
通知
|
|
|
| 预订放弃重新获得 | ||
| 入住后电子邮件 | ||
| 入住前电子邮件 | ||
| 确认电子邮件 | ||
|
▾
团体预订
|
|
|
| 婚礼和企业预订模块 | ||
| 可用性块 | ||
|
▾
报告与分析
|
|
|
| 自动报告 | ||
| 转化率报告 | ||
| 推荐报告 | ||
| Google Analytics 跟踪 | ||
|
▾
税务合规
|
|
|
| PCI合规性 | ||
| 符合 ADA 标准 | ||
| 关税 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 符合 GDPR 规定 |
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"As mentioned by Jacqueline, efficiency is key in the daily runnings of a property. The fast-paced nature of hospitality means that when guests have a problem, it needs to be solved..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"The team understood our needs, and tweaked the interface to optimise performance accordingly."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We are a transformative business in the Southeast Asian market, in that guests can easily book stays of a varied length and be confident in the consistency of their experience. Thi..."
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
TravelClick 因其易用性而受到酒店员工和最终用户的一致好评。其预订引擎被描述为直观的,有助于顺利处理预订和价格管理。这种用户友好性是一个关键的卖点。
许多酒店经营者称赞 TravelClick 能够通过先进的定价引擎、促销工具以及与各种渠道的更好整合来增加收入。他们提到了多费率显示、限时抢购和新的 Web 4.0 平台等... 许多酒店经营者称赞 TravelClick 能够通过先进的定价引擎、促销工具以及与各种渠道的更好整合来增加收入。他们提到了多费率显示、限时抢购和新的 Web 4.0 平台等功能,这些功能显著提高了直接预订量和总体收入。
人们对客户服务的看法褒贬不一。虽然一些用户称赞客户服务周到且乐于助人,但也有很多人抱怨响应速度慢、解决问题困难。这种不一致是潜在买家需要考虑的重要因素... 人们对客户服务的看法褒贬不一。虽然一些用户称赞客户服务周到且乐于助人,但也有很多人抱怨响应速度慢、解决问题困难。这种不一致是潜在买家需要考虑的重要因素。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
TravelClick 与各种系统(包括 PMS 和支付网关)的强大集成受到高度赞赏。许多评论都强调无缝连接支持各种功能,并通过统一界面简化管理。
尽管该系统具有诸多优势,但一些用户仍表示其可用性存在挑战,他们指出界面复杂,某些功能的学习难度较大。这种复杂性可能会妨碍系统的最佳使用,尤其是对于经验... 尽管该系统具有诸多优势,但一些用户仍表示其可用性存在挑战,他们指出界面复杂,某些功能的学习难度较大。这种复杂性可能会妨碍系统的最佳使用,尤其是对于经验不足的用户而言。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
用户通常称赞SiteMinder能够实现OTA之间的价格、房态和库存的实时同步。这种集中管理减少了手动更新,避免了超售,并节省了员工时间,酒店认为这带来了直接的运... 用户通常称赞SiteMinder能够实现OTA之间的价格、房态和库存的实时同步。这种集中管理减少了手动更新,避免了超售,并节省了员工时间,酒店认为这带来了直接的运营和收入提升。
虽然整体评价较为积极,但许多评论指出支持和培训是运营中的关键需求,尤其是针对新员工或规模较小的酒店。用户喜欢快速、专业的帮助,但也希望获得更本地化的指... 虽然整体评价较为积极,但许多评论指出支持和培训是运营中的关键需求,尤其是针对新员工或规模较小的酒店。用户喜欢快速、专业的帮助,但也希望获得更本地化的指导、更清晰的教程,以及更快的电话或工单响应。
许多评价提到SiteMinder的预订引擎能带来更多直销预订、更高的客人转化率,以及减少对OTA的依赖。酒店看重它与官网的集成,帮助将线上流量转化为收入,尽管一些... 许多评价提到SiteMinder的预订引擎能带来更多直销预订、更高的客人转化率,以及减少对OTA的依赖。酒店看重它与官网的集成,帮助将线上流量转化为收入,尽管一些酒店希望拥有更现代、更灵活的预订流程。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
酒店反复要求对预订引擎的外观、布局和促销展示拥有更多控制权。他们希望拥有更丰富的品牌元素、更现代的设计、更优质的小部件,以及更灵活的套餐或优惠,以使直... 酒店反复要求对预订引擎的外观、布局和促销展示拥有更多控制权。他们希望拥有更丰富的品牌元素、更现代的设计、更优质的小部件,以及更灵活的套餐或优惠,以使直销渠道更贴近酒店自有网站的体验。
支付收款一直是反复出现的问题,尤其是在不同市场的网关可用性和自动支付规则方面。用户希望获得更多本地支付网关支持,更好的卡验证流程,以及符合酒店政策的支... 支付收款一直是反复出现的问题,尤其是在不同市场的网关可用性和自动支付规则方面。用户希望获得更多本地支付网关支持,更好的卡验证流程,以及符合酒店政策的支付处理,以减少延误、暂停和未付款预订。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine 和 SiteMinder Booking Engine 共享许多核心 Booking Engine 功能,但各有独特的能力。Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine 提供 107 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 SiteMinder Booking Engine 提供 248 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速上手。SiteMinder Booking Engine 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 4.3/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按酒店规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine:否。SiteMinder Booking Engine:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Booking Engine 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店经营者客观比较酒店科技产品。Amadeus 的 HT Score 为 75,SiteMinder 的为 100。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您酒店的情况量身定制的推荐