The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 407 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Amadeus 表现出色 在 易于使用 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (4.5/5) ,拥有独特功能如 ADA Compliant and Paypal.
Net Affinity 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (5.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Multi-currency and Multi-lingual.
基于 HTR 上 407 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $800/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 95 | 312 |
在分析了 407 条经验证的评价后,Amadeus 用户最看重其 易于使用, 增加收入, 客户服务,而 Net Affinity 用户则强调 用户友好的预订引擎, 主动账户管理, 技术问题和支持。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
易于使用
▾
|
+
用户友好的预订引擎
▾
|
|
+
增加收入
▾
|
+
主动账户管理
▾
|
|
+
客户服务
▾
|
+
技术问题和支持
▾
|
|
+
高级报告和分析
▾
|
+
持续改进
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
集成能力
▾
|
−
CMS 挑战
▾
|
|
−
复杂性和可用性问题
▾
|
|
|
−
功能实现滞后
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 预订引擎 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #22 11 条评价 | #7 98 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #15 36 条评价 | #5 178 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #7 26 条评价 | #12 12 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #9 6 条评价 | #11 5 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #17 32 条评价 | #7 131 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #12 41 条评价 | #6 146 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #10 34 条评价 | #5 92 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #14 11 条评价 | #5 27 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #7 39 条评价 | #15 7 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #19 14 条评价 | #4 287 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #16 10 条评价 | #17 7 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | #7 8 条评价 | #13 4 条评价 |
Choosing the right booking engine is crucial for your hotel’s revenue growth and guest experience. Amadeus’ iHotelier® Booking Engine and Net Affinity’s Booking Engine both aim to boost direct bookings but differ significantly in features, support, and market presence. With Amadeus’s larger global footprint and extensive feature set, and Net Affinity’s high customer satisfaction and modern design, your decision hinges on your hotel’s specific needs.
Are you prioritizing a trusted, feature-rich platform with broad integrations or a sleek, user-friendly system with superior support? Let’s compare both to find the best fit.
Amadeus’s iHotelier® Booking Engine, built around e-commerce best practices, emphasizes delivering a personalized booking experience across devices. It integrates directly with Amadeus’ website solution to streamline conversions, especially for hotels focused on maximizing revenue through targeted add-ons and merchandising.
Net Affinity’s offering, on the other hand, is a newer, cloud-based platform designed with a mobile-first approach, emphasizing speed, simplicity, and a highly responsive interface. Its focus on seamless integrations and digital marketing makes it ideal for hotels wanting a modern, growth-oriented booking solution.
Both products aim to increase direct bookings, but Amadeus’s platform is more established with a deeper feature set, whereas Net Affinity offers a more streamlined, easy-to-use experience. The key question: do you need extensive features or straightforward usability?
If your hotel needs a comprehensive, multi-channel booking engine with robust integrations, go with Amadeus. Its global presence, extensive partner network, and advanced features like ADA compliance and multiple payment options cater well to larger or internationally focused hotels.
If your hotel values a user-friendly interface, fast deployment, and proactive support, Net Affinity is the better choice. Its high customer satisfaction ratings (4.82/5 overall and 4.79/5 support) and mobile-first design are especially suited for boutique hotels or properties emphasizing digital marketing and direct bookings.
For properties seeking deep analytics, advanced merchandising, and broad regional reach, Amadeus stands out. Conversely, if you prioritize ease of use, quick onboarding, and personalized service, Net Affinity offers a more accessible solution.
Amadeus’s ease of use score is 4.25/5, with reviews acknowledging its complexity and steep learning curve, especially for new users. While many hotel teams find the platform powerful once mastered, initial onboarding and navigation can be challenging.
Net Affinity’s platform scores higher at 4.59/5, with users praising its intuitive design, straightforward navigation, and responsive backend. Customer reviews highlight how easy it is to make text changes and manage content, with shorter learning curves and proactive support.
Edge: Net Affinity.
Amadeus offers 36 shared features with the industry, with 3 exclusive to its platform: ADA compliance, Paypal, and PayU. Its unique features focus on complex merchandising, promotional tools, and integration with its broader ecosystem, including advanced pricing engines and market intelligence like Demand360.
Net Affinity provides 33 shared features but has 12 features exclusive to its platform: Multi-currency, multi-lingual support, social media bookings, gift vouchers, room substitutions, and more. Its feature set emphasizes flexibility, digital marketing, and guest personalization, such as special offers, discounts, and a mobile-optimized experience.
In terms of sheer feature count and exclusives, Amadeus has the edge, especially for larger hotels needing complex merchandising and global integrations. For hotels prioritizing customization and guest engagement, Net Affinity’s unique features are compelling.
Edge: Amadeus.
Amadeus’s support rating is 3.22/5, with many reviews citing slow response times and inconsistent support quality. Some users appreciate dedicated account managers but report frustrations with responsiveness and technical issues.
Net Affinity’s support scores an impressive 4.79/5, with reviews emphasizing quick, knowledgeable, and proactive assistance. Clients describe the team as “always on hand,” providing detailed guidance and swift problem resolution, which significantly enhances user experience.
Given the recent review data and higher satisfaction scores, Net Affinity’s support outperforms Amadeus’s.
Edge: Net Affinity.
Amadeus boasts 104 verified partners, including major PMS, channel managers, and marketing tools, with 28 shared partners. Its extensive network supports complex integrations catering to large, multisystem hotel setups.
Net Affinity has 62 verified partners, with 28 shared, including PMS, CRS, and marketing platforms. Its integrations are optimized for fast, real-time updates and seamless workflows, with strong support for PMS systems like SiteMinder, Protel, and TrustYou.
Amadeus’s broader network makes it suitable for hotels with complex, multi-system needs. Net Affinity’s integrations, while fewer, are highly efficient and easier to manage.
Edge: Amadeus.
Amadeus has 93 reviews with an average rating of 4.39/5, mostly from independent and boutique hotels. Recent reviews are sparse, limiting insight into current user satisfaction.
Net Affinity, with 223 reviews and a rating of 4.82/5, is rated highly across hotel segments, especially boutiques and branded properties. Recent reviews consistently praise its ease of use, support, and impact on revenue.
Considering the volume and recency, Net Affinity’s higher ratings and more recent reviews give it a clear advantage.
Edge: Net Affinity.
Amadeus’s pricing is not publicly available; it typically involves a custom quote based on hotel size and needs, often with higher implementation costs given its enterprise nature.
Net Affinity charges a base price of $800 per month, with no upfront implementation fee, making it more transparent and accessible, especially for small to mid-sized hotels.
For hotels seeking predictable, straightforward pricing, Net Affinity’s model offers clear value, while Amadeus’s costs may be justified by its extensive features and global reach.
Not ideal if your hotel is small, locally focused, or prefers simple, quick-to-implement solutions. Limited support responsiveness and higher costs might also be drawbacks.
Not ideal if your hotel requires complex integrations, multi-currency support, or extensive merchandising options that are more suited to Amadeus’s platform. Smaller hotels with limited budgets might find the upfront costs challenging.
Amadeus’s iHotelier® Booking Engine offers a comprehensive, feature-rich platform designed for large, globally dispersed hotels with complex needs. Its broad integration network and advanced merchandising make it ideal for properties seeking maximum control and analytics, though support and usability can be concerns.
Net Affinity’s booking engine shines with its high user satisfaction, ease of use, and mobile-first design. It excels in boutique and mid-sized hotels aiming for quick onboarding, personalized guest experiences, and high conversion rates.
If your hotel demands advanced features, extensive integrations, and global reach, Amadeus is the clear choice. For hotels prioritizing simplicity, support, and rapid results, Net Affinity offers a more dependable, modern solution.
This comparison aims to clarify your choice based on your hotel’s size, needs, and strategic priorities. Both products are capable, but focusing on your unique requirements will ensure the best future ROI.
预订引擎 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $800/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine 和 Net Affinity (Booking Engine) 共享 33 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| PayU | ||
| 合并库存 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 特别优惠和折扣 | ||
| 礼品券和预付体验 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 符合 ADA 标准 | ||
| 贝宝 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 3 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 3 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"I am very happy with the collaborative relationship we have with Net Affinity and the results we have seen together. There reporting on both marketing and e-commerce give us great..."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
TravelClick 因其易用性而受到酒店员工和最终用户的一致好评。其预订引擎被描述为直观的,有助于顺利处理预订和价格管理。这种用户友好性是一个关键的卖点。
许多酒店经营者称赞 TravelClick 能够通过先进的定价引擎、促销工具以及与各种渠道的更好整合来增加收入。他们提到了多费率显示、限时抢购和新的 Web 4.0 平台等... 许多酒店经营者称赞 TravelClick 能够通过先进的定价引擎、促销工具以及与各种渠道的更好整合来增加收入。他们提到了多费率显示、限时抢购和新的 Web 4.0 平台等功能,这些功能显著提高了直接预订量和总体收入。
人们对客户服务的看法褒贬不一。虽然一些用户称赞客户服务周到且乐于助人,但也有很多人抱怨响应速度慢、解决问题困难。这种不一致是潜在买家需要考虑的重要因素... 人们对客户服务的看法褒贬不一。虽然一些用户称赞客户服务周到且乐于助人,但也有很多人抱怨响应速度慢、解决问题困难。这种不一致是潜在买家需要考虑的重要因素。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
TravelClick 与各种系统(包括 PMS 和支付网关)的强大集成受到高度赞赏。许多评论都强调无缝连接支持各种功能,并通过统一界面简化管理。
尽管该系统具有诸多优势,但一些用户仍表示其可用性存在挑战,他们指出界面复杂,某些功能的学习难度较大。这种复杂性可能会妨碍系统的最佳使用,尤其是对于经验... 尽管该系统具有诸多优势,但一些用户仍表示其可用性存在挑战,他们指出界面复杂,某些功能的学习难度较大。这种复杂性可能会妨碍系统的最佳使用,尤其是对于经验不足的用户而言。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
许多用户称赞 Netaffinity 预订引擎简单易用,能够有效增加直接预订量。它可以轻松创建和编辑价格和套餐。不过,一些用户提到学习难度高,搜索功能和链接集成方... 许多用户称赞 Netaffinity 预订引擎简单易用,能够有效增加直接预订量。它可以轻松创建和编辑价格和套餐。不过,一些用户提到学习难度高,搜索功能和链接集成方面还有待改进。
许多评论都强调了 Netaffinity 客户经理的积极性和支持性作用。他们因及时的帮助、建设性的反馈和个性化的支持而受到赞扬,用户认为这些有助于提高他们的在线表... 许多评论都强调了 Netaffinity 客户经理的积极性和支持性作用。他们因及时的帮助、建设性的反馈和个性化的支持而受到赞扬,用户认为这些有助于提高他们的在线表现。定期沟通和详细的每月评论受到赞赏。
一些评论提到预订引擎和其他功能偶尔会出现技术问题。但是,用户也强调 Netaffinity 技术团队在解决这些问题时提供的快速高效支持。改进建议包括提前通知问题和... 一些评论提到预订引擎和其他功能偶尔会出现技术问题。但是,用户也强调 Netaffinity 技术团队在解决这些问题时提供的快速高效支持。改进建议包括提前通知问题和提供更好的支持文档。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
虽然许多人一旦习惯了 Netaffinity 的 CMS 就觉得它很人性化,但也有人抱怨它最初的复杂性和功能性。用户建议改进导航、内容管理和系统的整体直观性。他们经常建... 虽然许多人一旦习惯了 Netaffinity 的 CMS 就觉得它很人性化,但也有人抱怨它最初的复杂性和功能性。用户建议改进导航、内容管理和系统的整体直观性。他们经常建议定期更新系统和提供更好的培训材料。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine 和 Net Affinity (Booking Engine) 共享许多核心 Booking Engine 功能,但各有独特的能力。Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine 提供 104 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Net Affinity (Booking Engine) 提供 62 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Net Affinity (Booking Engine) 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 4.3/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine:否。Net Affinity (Booking Engine):否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Booking Engine 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Amadeus 的 HT Score 为 72,Net Affinity 的为 42。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问