The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 预订引擎 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #22 11 条评价 | #47 0 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #15 36 条评价 | #47 0 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #7 26 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #9 6 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #17 32 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #12 41 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #10 34 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #14 11 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #7 39 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #19 14 条评价 | #44 0 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #16 10 条评价 | — |
| 中东 ▾ | #7 8 条评价 | — |
Choosing the right booking engine is critical for your hotel’s revenue, guest experience, and operational efficiency. Both Amadeus’ iHotelier® Booking Engine and Bookolo aim to simplify reservations and boost direct bookings, but they differ significantly in scale, features, and market presence. Your decision should hinge on whether you prioritize a well-established platform with extensive integrations and proven success, or a newer, flexible system that offers ease of use and modularity.
Amadeus’s iHotelier stands out with a large user base, high review volume, and a comprehensive feature set, whereas Bookolo's platform lacks recent reviews and a broader market footprint. Do you need a robust, globally proven solution, or a more straightforward, flexible system?
Amadeus iHotelier is a mature booking engine with over 93 recent reviews, a high overall rating of 4.39/5, and an active presence across multiple continents. Its extensive feature set of 36 unique functionalities, including multi-currency, loyalty integrations, and advanced reporting, caters to large and complex properties. Conversely, Bookolo's offering appears minimal with no recent reviews, and its feature count is unlisted, raising questions about its maturity and market adoption.
Amadeus’s platform is built to support diverse hotel types, from independent boutique hotels to large chains, offering extensive integrations and regional support. Bookolo, with a limited verified partner count of 7, seems more suited for smaller or less complex operations. Are you looking for a proven, feature-rich system or a newer, less tested solution?
If your hotel needs a globally recognized platform with proven reliability, extensive integrations, and advanced marketing tools, Amadeus is the clear choice. Its strong user reviews emphasize its ability to boost revenue through dynamic pricing, pre- and post-stay emails, and loyalty integrations—features that directly impact profitability.
If your hotel is smaller, tech-savvy, and values simplicity, ease of integration, and modularity, Bookolo might appeal. However, the absence of recent reviews and limited market presence suggest it’s less tested in diverse hotel environments. In most cases, Amadeus’s solid reputation and proven success tips the scale.
Amadeus scores 4.25/5 for ease of use, with many hotel staff praising its intuitive interface and onboarding process rated at 4.01/5. Despite some complaints about complexity, most users find it manageable after initial training. In contrast, Bookolo’s usability ratings are unavailable, and there is no recent user feedback to gauge its learning curve or interface friendliness.
Given Amadeus’s established presence and positive reviews, it demonstrates a clear advantage in user friendliness. Its extensive onboarding support and documented ease of navigation make it the safer bet for teams seeking quick adoption.
Edge: Amadeus.
Amadeus offers 36 unique features, including mobile responsiveness, pre- and post-stay emails, automated reporting, multi-currency, multi-lingual capabilities, loyalty program integration, and advanced marketing tools like Google Hotel Ads and Tripadvisor bookings. Bookolo, on the other hand, has no publicly listed features, which raises questions about its capabilities and scope.
Amadeus’s rich feature set supports complex pricing strategies, targeted merchandising, and detailed analytics—elements crucial for revenue growth and operational control. Bookolo’s modular approach may offer flexibility but lacks detailed feature disclosures or proven advanced functionalities.
Edge: Amadeus.
Amadeus’s customer support scores 3.22/5, with reviews highlighting both responsiveness and significant delays. Some hoteliers report helpful personal care, while others mention slow responses and difficulty resolving issues, indicating inconsistency. Conversely, Bookolo’s support ratings and reviews are unavailable, making it impossible to assess support quality or responsiveness.
Given Amadeus’s large global support team and documented support challenges, it remains the more transparent and established option. If support quality is a priority, be prepared for potential delays with Amadeus, but at least you have access to a structured support system.
Edge: Amadeus.
Amadeus boasts 104 verified integration partners, including major players like SiteMinder, D-Edge, and others, supporting a wide array of property management, channel management, and payment systems. Bookolo’s integration list includes only 7 verified partners, with some notable ones like The Hotels Network and yieldPlanet, but a much narrower ecosystem overall.
This extensive integration network makes Amadeus more adaptable for larger hotels needing seamless connections with existing systems. Bookolo’s limited integrations suggest it’s better suited for small-scale operations with minimal system complexity.
Edge: Amadeus.
With 93 reviews, Amadeus’s iHotelier has a strong overall rating of 4.39/5, with many property types, including independent and boutique hotels, rating it above 4.4. Recent reviews praise its revenue-boosting features and ease of use, though some mention support delays. Bookolo has no recent reviews, and without user feedback, its rating reliability is uncertain.
Given the volume and recency of reviews, Amadeus clearly maintains higher satisfaction levels across diverse hotel segments. This makes it the safer, more trusted choice for hoteliers seeking proven performance.
Edge: Amadeus.
Pricing details for both platforms are not publicly available. Amadeus’s model typically involves enterprise-level contracts, often with implementation fees, while Bookolo’s pricing remains undisclosed. The lack of transparent pricing makes direct comparison difficult.
In most cases, expect Amadeus to be a significant investment, reflecting its extensive features and support, while Bookolo’s costs might be more accessible but less defined. Clarify with vendors directly for accurate quotes.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Amadeus iHotelier is a comprehensive and well-established booking engine trusted by thousands of hotels worldwide. Its extensive features, integrations, and proven market presence make it ideal for larger, complex properties looking for reliability and advanced revenue tools.
Bookolo offers a modern, flexible reservation system that appeals to small or tech-forward hotels seeking simplicity and modularity. However, its lack of recent reviews and limited integrations suggest it’s less suitable for established brands or those with complex needs.
Choose Amadeus if your hotel values reliability, deep integrations, and proven revenue performance. Opt for Bookolo if you want a flexible, easy-to-adopt platform and are willing to accept a less tested solution.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
TravelClick 因其易用性而受到酒店员工和最终用户的一致好评。其预订引擎被描述为直观的,有助于顺利处理预订和价格管理。这种用户友好性是一个关键的卖点。
许多酒店经营者称赞 TravelClick 能够通过先进的定价引擎、促销工具以及与各种渠道的更好整合来增加收入。他们提到了多费率显示、限时抢购和新的 Web 4.0 平台等... 许多酒店经营者称赞 TravelClick 能够通过先进的定价引擎、促销工具以及与各种渠道的更好整合来增加收入。他们提到了多费率显示、限时抢购和新的 Web 4.0 平台等功能,这些功能显著提高了直接预订量和总体收入。
人们对客户服务的看法褒贬不一。虽然一些用户称赞客户服务周到且乐于助人,但也有很多人抱怨响应速度慢、解决问题困难。这种不一致是潜在买家需要考虑的重要因素... 人们对客户服务的看法褒贬不一。虽然一些用户称赞客户服务周到且乐于助人,但也有很多人抱怨响应速度慢、解决问题困难。这种不一致是潜在买家需要考虑的重要因素。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
TravelClick 与各种系统(包括 PMS 和支付网关)的强大集成受到高度赞赏。许多评论都强调无缝连接支持各种功能,并通过统一界面简化管理。
尽管该系统具有诸多优势,但一些用户仍表示其可用性存在挑战,他们指出界面复杂,某些功能的学习难度较大。这种复杂性可能会妨碍系统的最佳使用,尤其是对于经验... 尽管该系统具有诸多优势,但一些用户仍表示其可用性存在挑战,他们指出界面复杂,某些功能的学习难度较大。这种复杂性可能会妨碍系统的最佳使用,尤其是对于经验不足的用户而言。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine 和 Bookolo Booking Engine 共享许多核心 Booking Engine 功能,但各有独特的能力。Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine 提供 104 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Bookolo Booking Engine 提供 7 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.3/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine:否。Bookolo Booking Engine:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Booking Engine 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Amadeus 的 HT Score 为 72,Bookolo 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问