The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 预订引擎 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #22 11 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #15 36 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #7 26 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #9 6 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #17 32 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #12 41 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #10 34 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #14 11 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #7 39 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #19 14 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 ▾ | #16 10 条评价 | — |
| 中东 ▾ | #7 8 条评价 | — |
Choosing the right booking engine can transform your hotel's direct booking performance and revenue. Both Amadeus’ iHotelier® Booking Engine and Bookwize’s Booking Engine Interface aim to streamline reservations, but their features, market presence, and user feedback highlight clear differences. Your decision hinges on your specific needs—whether you prioritize advanced features and global reach or a straightforward, customizable system.
While both serve the core purpose of online reservations, Amadeus’s extensive experience and larger user base give it a distinct advantage—especially given its more recent reviews and broad feature set. But which product truly aligns with your hotel’s goals?
Amadeus’s iHotelier stands out as a comprehensive booking engine with a 4.39/5 overall rating based on 93 reviews, making it the more proven option. It offers 36 unique features, including multi-currency, multi-lingual, and integration with major online travel platforms, designed to maximize booking conversions and revenue. In contrast, Bookwize has no reviews or visible feature set, which limits confidence in its capabilities.
Amadeus’s user feedback emphasizes its ability to enhance revenue through advanced pricing, targeted merchandising, and detailed analytics, though some users note its complexity and occasional support delays. Meanwhile, Bookwize’s lack of reviews and market presence make it difficult to assess, which suggests it may not yet be suitable for hotels seeking reliability and proven results.
Given the lack of recent reviews or market presence for Bookwize, Amadeus’s established reputation and recent performance data make it the stronger choice for most hoteliers.
If your hotel needs a mature, feature-rich platform with extensive integration options and global support, go with Amadeus. Its wide array of features—including mobile optimization, automated reporting, and loyalty integrations—addresses complex revenue management and marketing needs, especially for larger or international properties.
If your hotel prioritizes a simple, easy-to-integrate system with a focus on direct bookings and minimal complexity, you might consider Bookwize. However, since no reviews or features are available for Bookwize, its suitability remains untested for most properties.
For most hotels, especially those looking to grow and differentiate in competitive markets, Amadeus’s proven track record and feature set make it the clearer choice.
Amadeus scores a solid 4.25/5 for ease of use, with many users praising its intuitive interface once familiarized. The onboarding process is rated 4.01/5, though some reviews mention a learning curve due to its extensive features. Support is somewhat inconsistent, with a 3.22/5 rating, and some users report delays in response times.
In comparison, Bookwize has no available review data, making it impossible to assess its usability. The absence of user feedback means you’d be venturing into uncharted territory regarding implementation or daily operation.
Edge: Amadeus.
Amadeus offers 36 exclusive features including mobile responsiveness, pre- and post-stay emails, automated reporting, multi-currency, multi-lingual capabilities, rate comparison widgets, and integration with Google Hotel Ads and Tripadvisor. These features support a sophisticated, personalized guest experience and advanced revenue strategies.
In contrast, Bookwize provides no publicly available feature list, which limits the ability to compare or verify its offerings. The lack of detailed features and reviews means it cannot compete with Amadeus’s comprehensive functionality.
Edge: Amadeus.
Amadeus’s support rating is 3.22/5, with reviews highlighting mixed experiences. Some users appreciate the responsiveness, but many criticize slow response times and inconsistent support quality. The onboarding rating of 4.01/5 indicates a relatively smooth initial setup.
No reviews or support ratings are available for Bookwize, making it impossible to gauge its customer service. Given Amadeus’s extensive user base and recent feedback, it remains the more transparent and tested option.
Edge: Amadeus.
Amadeus boasts 104 verified integration partners, connecting with PMS, point-of-sale, payment gateways, and marketing platforms like Profitroom and Juyo Analytics. Its extensive partner network supports seamless operations across systems and channels.
Bookwize has no verified integrations listed, which could limit its ability to connect with essential hotel technology stacks. This restricts its utility for hotels needing flexible, integrated management solutions.
Edge: Amadeus.
Amadeus receives a 4.36/5 rating from independent hotels and 4.61/5 from branded properties, based on recent reviews. Hotels in segments like boutique, city center, and resorts praise its revenue and booking capabilities.
There are no reviews or ratings for Bookwize, leaving its user satisfaction unverified. For reliability and proven performance, Amadeus’s higher and recent ratings clearly favor it.
Edge: Amadeus.
Pricing details for Amadeus are not publicly available, but it does not offer a free plan or trial, indicating a likely subscription or implementation fee. Due to its scale and enterprise focus, costs are typically higher but variable based on hotel size and needs.
Bookwize’s pricing is also undisclosed, with no trial or free options listed. Without transparent costs or trial access, evaluating value becomes difficult.
In general, expect both to require direct vendor negotiations—Amadeus likely at a premium based on features and support.
Not ideal if you prefer a simple, plug-and-play solution with minimal setup or support concerns.
Not ideal if your hotel requires extensive features, global support, or proven integration.
Amadeus’s iHotelier Booking Engine is a mature, feature-rich platform with a proven track record and extensive integration options. Its broad user base, recent reviews, and large feature set make it well-suited for hotels seeking to maximize revenue and streamline operations, especially larger or internationally-focused properties.
Bookwize, lacking reviews, features, and market presence, remains an untested option. Its suitability is uncertain, and it likely best fits very small hotels or those with minimal tech needs.
For most hoteliers, especially those aiming for growth and better guest engagement, Amadeus offers a more reliable, scalable solution. Its ongoing development, support, and proven results make it the preferred choice.
Note: This comparison emphasizes the proven, review-backed strengths of Amadeus. The absence of reviews and feature data for Bookwize suggests caution and a need for further testing before making a decision.
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine 和 Bookwize Booking Engine Interface 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 入住前电子邮件 | ||
| 入住后电子邮件 | ||
| 固定费率、浮动费率和折扣率 | ||
| 移动优化/响应式 | ||
| 紧急信息 | ||
| 自动报告 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 24 项功能存在差异。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
TravelClick 因其易用性而受到酒店员工和最终用户的一致好评。其预订引擎被描述为直观的,有助于顺利处理预订和价格管理。这种用户友好性是一个关键的卖点。
许多酒店经营者称赞 TravelClick 能够通过先进的定价引擎、促销工具以及与各种渠道的更好整合来增加收入。他们提到了多费率显示、限时抢购和新的 Web 4.0 平台等... 许多酒店经营者称赞 TravelClick 能够通过先进的定价引擎、促销工具以及与各种渠道的更好整合来增加收入。他们提到了多费率显示、限时抢购和新的 Web 4.0 平台等功能,这些功能显著提高了直接预订量和总体收入。
人们对客户服务的看法褒贬不一。虽然一些用户称赞客户服务周到且乐于助人,但也有很多人抱怨响应速度慢、解决问题困难。这种不一致是潜在买家需要考虑的重要因素... 人们对客户服务的看法褒贬不一。虽然一些用户称赞客户服务周到且乐于助人,但也有很多人抱怨响应速度慢、解决问题困难。这种不一致是潜在买家需要考虑的重要因素。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
TravelClick 与各种系统(包括 PMS 和支付网关)的强大集成受到高度赞赏。许多评论都强调无缝连接支持各种功能,并通过统一界面简化管理。
尽管该系统具有诸多优势,但一些用户仍表示其可用性存在挑战,他们指出界面复杂,某些功能的学习难度较大。这种复杂性可能会妨碍系统的最佳使用,尤其是对于经验... 尽管该系统具有诸多优势,但一些用户仍表示其可用性存在挑战,他们指出界面复杂,某些功能的学习难度较大。这种复杂性可能会妨碍系统的最佳使用,尤其是对于经验不足的用户而言。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine 和 Bookwize Booking Engine Interface 共享许多核心 Booking Engine 功能,但各有独特的能力。Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine 提供 104 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Bookwize Booking Engine Interface 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.3/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine:否。Bookwize Booking Engine Interface:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Booking Engine 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Amadeus 的 HT Score 为 72,Bookwize 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问