Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine vs. SHR Booking Engine (BE): 哪个更适合您?

更新于 June 5, 2026  ·  已分析 607 条经验证的评价

摘要

我们分析了 607 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:

Amadeus 表现出色 在 易于使用 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (4.5/5) .

SHR Group 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 Boutique Hotels 类型的物业 (5.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Special offers & discounts and Pooled inventory.

查看下方完整分析 ↓

Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine 与 SHR Booking Engine (BE) 相比如何?

基于 HTR 上 607 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。

HTScore
72
44
推荐可能性
87%
96%
易用性
4.3/5
4.7/5
客户支持
4.1/5
4.9/5
性价比
4.1/5
4.6/5
起始价格 Contact sales Contact sales
经验证的评价 95 512

Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine 与 SHR Booking Engine (BE) 的优缺点是什么?

在分析了 607 条经验证的评价后,Amadeus 用户最看重其 易于使用, 增加收入, 客户服务,而 SHR Group 用户则强调 主动客户支持, 集成功能, 直观的界面。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。

Amadeus Amadeus SHR Group SHR Group
优点
+ 易于使用
+ 主动客户支持
+ 增加收入
+ 集成功能
+ 客户服务
+ 直观的界面
+ 高级报告和分析
+ 费率和库存管理
缺点
集成能力
后端导航改进
复杂性和可用性问题
视觉与美学设计
功能实现滞后
支持文档和培训

Amadeus 对比 SHR Group:按酒店细分市场排名

各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 预订引擎 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。

按酒店规模

细分市场 Amadeus Amadeus SHR Group SHR Group
小型(10-24 间客房) #22 11 条评价 #8 76 条评价
中型(25-74 间客房) #15 36 条评价 #2 369 条评价
大型(75-199 间客房) #7 26 条评价 #4 39 条评价
超大型(200+ 间客房) #9 6 条评价 #5 16 条评价

按物业类型

细分市场 Amadeus Amadeus SHR Group SHR Group
精品酒店 #17 32 条评价 #3 232 条评价
豪华酒店 #12 41 条评价 #2 320 条评价
品牌/连锁酒店 #10 34 条评价 #2 166 条评价
长住酒店 #14 11 条评价 #4 32 条评价

按区域

细分市场 Amadeus Amadeus SHR Group SHR Group
北美 #7 39 条评价 #8 39 条评价
欧洲 #19 14 条评价 #2 440 条评价
亚太 #16 10 条评价 #15 11 条评价
中东 #7 8 条评价 #16 3 条评价

The Decision

Choosing the right booking engine can significantly impact your hotel's revenue and guest experience. Both Amadeus’ iHotelier® Booking Engine and SHR Group’s SHR Booking Engine (BE) aim to convert website visitors into loyal guests, but they differ in market presence, features, and support. Your decision hinges on your hotel’s size, segment, and specific needs—so which platform better aligns with your goals?

Amadeus offers a more established global presence with a broader feature set, while SHR Group’s platform boasts higher recent review scores and more recent customer feedback. Which of these platforms will truly elevate your direct booking strategy?

Is Amadeus or SHR Group Better for Hotels?

Both platforms serve hotels seeking to boost direct bookings, but their core strengths diverge. Amadeus provides an integrated ecosystem, including its award-winning website and detailed market intelligence, making it ideal for properties looking for a comprehensive solution. SHR, by contrast, emphasizes simplicity and personalization, tailoring its offerings to smaller or independent hotels eager for an easy-to-use platform with strong support.

Amadeus's review count of 93, with all recent reviews being over six months old, indicates a stable but slightly outdated data set, whereas SHR boasts 339 reviews, all recent, making its ratings more reflective of current customer satisfaction. Are your priorities long-term stability or recent user experiences?

Amadeus vs SHR Group: Which Should Your Hotel Choose?

If your hotel operates in a competitive, global market with a need for integrated solutions—including website, market intelligence, and extensive PMS partnerships—Amadeus is the top pick. Its platform is well-suited for larger or branded hotels aiming to unify their digital presence and leverage advanced analytics.

If your hotel is smaller, independent, or prioritizes ease of use and rapid support, SHR Group offers a more straightforward, highly-rated solution. Its flexibility, proactive support, and focus on direct booking growth make it ideal for properties seeking quick wins and personalized service.

In summary, choose Amadeus for a feature-rich, globally proven platform; opt for SHR Group if you want a user-friendly, support-driven solution that already has high customer satisfaction.

Is Amadeus or SHR Group Easier to Use?

Amadeus scores 4.25/5 for ease of use, with many users citing its complex interface as a challenge initially but praising its depth once mastered. Its onboarding process is rated 4.01/5, indicating decent support during implementation, but some reviews mention a learning curve and occasional complexity.

SHR Group, on the other hand, achieves a 4.67/5 rating for ease of use, with reviews highlighting its intuitive design and straightforward setup. Customers praise SHR for helping staff quickly adapt to the platform, boosting adoption and daily operations.

Edge: SHR Group.

Which Has Better Features: Amadeus or SHR Group?

Amadeus offers 36 shared features, including advanced pricing, promotional tools, and market intelligence, but no exclusive features. Conversely, SHR Group provides 10 unique functionalities—such as special offers, social media integrations, gift vouchers, and room substitution—that enhance customization and guest engagement.

While Amadeus’s broad feature base supports large-scale operations with complex needs, SHR’s specialized tools cater to properties emphasizing personalized experiences and flexible promotions. Which set of features aligns better with your hotel’s growth strategy?

Edge: Amadeus.

Which Has Better Customer Support: Amadeus or SHR Group?

Customer support ratings reveal a clear leader: SHR Group’s support scores 4.86/5, with reviews praising its responsiveness, proactive communication, and helpful account managers. Examples include comments like “the team at SHR is fantastic and always helpful,” highlighting consistent support quality.

Amadeus, with a 3.22/5 rating, receives mixed reviews, with some users noting slow responses and difficulties resolving issues promptly. Though its extensive network can provide resources, support responsiveness appears inconsistent.

Edge: SHR Group.

Which Has More Integrations: Amadeus or SHR Group?

Amadeus boasts 104 verified partners, including major PMS, channel managers, and digital marketing tools, with 39 shared integrations with SHR Group. Its extensive partner network, including industry giants like Cendyn and Stayntouch, supports complex operational needs.

SHR offers 81 verified integrations, including popular systems like Criton, OpenHotel, and HiJiffy, with many users citing seamless connectivity. However, Amadeus’s broader network may serve larger hotel chains better.

Edge: Amadeus.

Which Do Hoteliers Rate Higher: Amadeus or SHR Group?

Review data indicates SHR Group’s products have a higher overall rating (4.86/5) compared to Amadeus (4.39/5). SHR’s recent reviews emphasize excellent support and ease of use, especially among independent and boutique hotels.

Amadeus’s ratings are slightly lower, mainly due to support and complexity concerns, despite its extensive features. Larger properties and brands tend to rate Amadeus higher, but recent satisfaction leans toward SHR.

Edge: SHR Group.

How Much Do Amadeus and SHR Group Cost?

Pricing for both platforms is not publicly disclosed, and neither offers a freemium or trial version. Implementation fees and monthly charges are reportedly available upon inquiry, requiring direct negotiation with vendors.

This lack of transparent pricing means your hotel will need to request quotes tailored to your size and needs, emphasizing the importance of assessing value beyond upfront costs.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Amadeus?

  • Hotels that operate in competitive markets and need comprehensive solutions, including website, market intelligence, and global distribution.
  • Properties with larger or multiple locations, seeking deep integration with PMS and channel managers.
  • Hotels aiming to leverage detailed analytics and advanced revenue management tools.
  • Brands that value extensive partner networks and global presence.

Not ideal if your hotel is small, independent, or prefers simple onboarding and support.

What Type of Hotel Should Use SHR Group?

  • Independent hotels or boutique properties prioritizing a straightforward setup and excellent support.
  • Hotels seeking to optimize direct bookings with a user-friendly platform.
  • Properties interested in flexible promotions, social media integrations, and personalized guest messaging.
  • Hotels that value proactive, responsive customer service and ongoing support.

Not ideal if your hotel requires a highly integrated, enterprise-level system with complex analytics or multiple global locations.

The Bottom Line for Hotels

Amadeus’ iHotelier is a well-established, feature-rich booking engine with extensive integrations, suited for larger, global hotel brands that need a unified platform. Its strengths lie in advanced pricing, market intelligence, and a broad partner network, making it suitable for properties with complex needs and larger teams.

SHR Group’s Booking Engine, however, excels in customer support, ease of use, and recent positive reviews, particularly among independent and boutique hotels. Its tailored features for personalization and flexible promotions, combined with high satisfaction scores, make it an attractive choice for properties seeking quick implementation and strong support.

If your hotel values global connectivity and advanced analytics, Amadeus is the logical choice. But if user experience, support, and recent customer satisfaction are your priorities, SHR Group is the better option.

Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine 和 SHR Booking Engine (BE) 的价格是多少?

预订引擎 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。

Amadeus Amadeus SHR Group SHR Group

Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine 有哪些 SHR Booking Engine (BE) 没有的功能(反之亦然)?

根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine 和 SHR Booking Engine (BE) 共享 36 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。

功能 Amadeus Amadeus SHR Group SHR Group
合并库存
房间替换
特别优惠和折扣
礼品券和预付体验
礼品卡
社交媒体整合/预订

实际成果:Amadeus 对比 SHR Group(按业务目标)

我们分析了 4 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。

增加收入和降低成本
Amadeus Amadeus

该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。

SHR Group Windward Management 中型
+ The paid campaigns accounted for 26% of all traffic to the website
+ Google Search Ads showed a return on investment of 131 :1
+ Metasearch return on investment was 58:1

"Our results and KPIs from booking engine to digital reinforce the effectiveness of our partnership and SHR Group's exceptional technology."

Stephen Williams
Stephen Williams
Group Sales and Marketing Director

Amadeus 对比 SHR Group:总结

Amadeus
Amadeus
4.4/5 来自 95 条评价

酒店从业者喜爱的方面

易于使用 91% 正面

TravelClick 因其易用性而受到酒店员工和最终用户的一致好评。其预订引擎被描述为直观的,有助于顺利处理预订和价格管理。这种用户友好性是一个关键的卖点。

增加收入 85% 正面

许多酒店经营者称赞 TravelClick 能够通过先进的定价引擎、促销工具以及与各种渠道的更好整合来增加收入。他们提到了多费率显示、限时抢购和新的 Web 4.0 平台等... 许多酒店经营者称赞 TravelClick 能够通过先进的定价引擎、促销工具以及与各种渠道的更好整合来增加收入。他们提到了多费率显示、限时抢购和新的 Web 4.0 平台等功能,这些功能显著提高了直接预订量和总体收入。

客户服务 76% 正面

人们对客户服务的看法褒贬不一。虽然一些用户称赞客户服务周到且乐于助人,但也有很多人抱怨响应速度慢、解决问题困难。这种不一致是潜在买家需要考虑的重要因素... 人们对客户服务的看法褒贬不一。虽然一些用户称赞客户服务周到且乐于助人,但也有很多人抱怨响应速度慢、解决问题困难。这种不一致是潜在买家需要考虑的重要因素。

酒店从业者提出异议的方面

集成能力 50% 负面

TravelClick 与各种系统(包括 PMS 和支付网关)的强大集成受到高度赞赏。许多评论都强调无缝连接支持各种功能,并通过统一界面简化管理。

复杂性和可用性问题 93% 负面

尽管该系统具有诸多优势,但一些用户仍表示其可用性存在挑战,他们指出界面复杂,某些功能的学习难度较大。这种复杂性可能会妨碍系统的最佳使用,尤其是对于经验... 尽管该系统具有诸多优势,但一些用户仍表示其可用性存在挑战,他们指出界面复杂,某些功能的学习难度较大。这种复杂性可能会妨碍系统的最佳使用,尤其是对于经验不足的用户而言。

排名更高的方面

超小型(少于 10 间客房) #23 vs #25
度假租赁与别墅 #18 vs #23
CA #7 vs #9
PH #6 vs #10
4.3/5 易用性 3.2/5 客户支持 104 个集成
访问官网
SHR Group
SHR Group
4.8/5 来自 512 条评价

酒店从业者喜爱的方面

主动客户支持 97% 正面

用户经常称赞 SHR 积极主动且反应迅速的客户支持。客户经理和支持团队被认为非常乐于助人、知识渊博,并且能够快速响应问题。客户成功团队提供的指导对于优化软... 用户经常称赞 SHR 积极主动且反应迅速的客户支持。客户经理和支持团队被认为非常乐于助人、知识渊博,并且能够快速响应问题。客户成功团队提供的指导对于优化软件的使用非常有价值。30 篇评论涵盖了此主题。

集成功能 71% 正面

经常被强调的一个关键特性是平台强大的集成能力。Windsurfer CRS 可以高效地与各种 PMS、渠道经理和 CRM 工具进行通信,确保跨系统的无缝操作和最新信息。但是,... 经常被强调的一个关键特性是平台强大的集成能力。Windsurfer CRS 可以高效地与各种 PMS、渠道经理和 CRM 工具进行通信,确保跨系统的无缝操作和最新信息。但是,一些用户希望改进与其他系统和平台的集成。此主题出现在 18 篇评论中。

直观的界面 88% 正面

用户对 Windsurfer CRS 的直观界面表示赞赏,它使客人的预订流程变得顺畅,酒店员工的管理也变得轻松。轻松设置和管理房价计划、灵活地自定义预订页面以及简单的... 用户对 Windsurfer CRS 的直观界面表示赞赏,它使客人的预订流程变得顺畅,酒店员工的管理也变得轻松。轻松设置和管理房价计划、灵活地自定义预订页面以及简单的导航有助于提高整体效率。此主题在 20 条评论中被提及。

酒店从业者提出异议的方面

后端导航改进 56% 负面

一些用户指出,虽然前端很人性化,但后端导航和过滤选项可以更加直观和人性化。这些方面的改进可以显著提高效率和用户满意度。此主题在 12 条评论中被提及。

视觉与美学设计 50% 负面

一些用户建议可以改进预订引擎的视觉美感。增强用户界面的精致和现代设计可以进一步提升整体预订体验,并使其更具视觉吸引力。6 篇评论讨论了此主题。

排名更高的方面

大型(75-199 间客房) #4 vs #7
中型(25-74 间客房) #2 vs #15
小型(10-24 间客房) #8 vs #22
超大型(200+ 间客房) #5 vs #9

独特功能

特别优惠和折扣 合并库存 礼品券和预付体验 房间替换 礼品卡
4.7/5 易用性 4.9/5 客户支持 81 个集成
查看资料

评分差异最大的方面

综合评分 SHR Group 4.9 vs 4.4 (+0.5)
易用性 SHR Group 4.7 vs 4.3 (+0.4)
客户支持 SHR Group 4.9 vs 3.2 (+1.6)
性价比 SHR Group 4.6 vs 4.0 (+0.6)
入职培训 SHR Group 4.6 vs 4.0 (+0.6)

关于 Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine 与 SHR Booking Engine (BE) 的常见问题

Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine 能否替代 SHR Booking Engine (BE)?

这取决于您的需求。Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine 和 SHR Booking Engine (BE) 共享许多核心 Booking Engine 功能,但各有独特的能力。Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine 提供 104 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 SHR Booking Engine (BE) 提供 81 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。

哪个更适合小型或独立酒店?

小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。SHR Booking Engine (BE) 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 4.3/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。

Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine 或 SHR Booking Engine (BE) 是否提供免费方案?

Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine:否。SHR Booking Engine (BE):否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Booking Engine 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。

HTR 如何评估和排名 Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine 和 SHR Booking Engine (BE)?

HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Amadeus 的 HT Score 为 72,SHR Group 的为 44。以下是评分的计算方式。

标准组 权重 衡量内容
客户评分与评价

用户对该产品的推荐度如何?

评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例

权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。

合作伙伴生态系统

技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何?

合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量

评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。

以客户为中心

该组织以客户为中心的程度如何?

认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性

评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。

覆盖范围、持久力与资源

该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛?

地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分

衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。

客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →

获取个性化的产品推荐

产品推荐顾问

Ghostel icon

让我们查找您的酒店信息