The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 预订引擎 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
CENTROTEL |
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #22 11 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #15 36 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #7 26 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #9 6 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
CENTROTEL |
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #17 32 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #12 41 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #10 34 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #14 11 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
CENTROTEL |
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #7 39 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #19 14 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 ▾ | #16 10 条评价 | — |
| 中东 ▾ | #7 8 条评价 | — |
Choosing the right booking engine for your hotel is crucial for driving direct bookings, increasing revenue, and providing a seamless user experience. Both Amadeus’ iHotelier® Booking Engine and CENTROTEL aim to streamline this process, but their capabilities and market presence differ significantly. While CENTROTEL has no recent reviews or market data, Amadeus’s established reputation, extensive feature set, and solid user feedback make it the clear choice for hotels prioritizing proven performance.
Are you looking for a robust, feature-rich platform backed by extensive reviews? Or are you considering a lesser-known solution with limited data? The decision hinges on your hotel’s scale, needs, and confidence in the solution’s proven success.
Amadeus’s iHotelier® Booking Engine solves the core problem of converting website visitors into guests through a responsive, feature-packed platform that integrates with other Amadeus solutions. CENTROTEL, on the other hand, offers no tangible features or recent reviews, making it difficult to assess if it addresses your hotel’s booking challenges.
Amadeus’s platform boasts 36 unique features, including multi-currency, multi-lingual, and guest personalization options. CENTROTEL provides no documented features, leaving its capabilities and suitability uncertain. Given the lack of recent feedback for CENTROTEL, Amadeus’s proven performance and comprehensive feature set make it the more reliable choice.
Would you prefer a platform with a proven track record and extensive user feedback? Or are you comfortable exploring an untested provider with no recent data?
If your hotel needs a trusted, well-supported booking engine that enhances direct bookings, go with Amadeus. Its 93 reviews and 4.39/5 overall rating reflect consistent user satisfaction and recent positive feedback, particularly emphasizing revenue growth and integration capabilities.
If your hotel is seeking an unknown, unreviewed product with no documented features or support, CENTROTEL might be an option. However, the absence of reviews, features, and market presence suggests increased risk and uncertainty.
For hoteliers focused on performance, reliability, and ongoing support, Amadeus remains the superior choice. CENTROTEL’s lack of recent reviews and data make it unsuitable for hotels prioritizing proven solutions.
Amadeus’s platform scores 4.25/5 for ease of use, with reviews praising its intuitive interface and straightforward onboarding process. Hoteliers report that, despite some initial complexity, daily use becomes friendly, supported by comprehensive help resources.
CENTROTEL offers no user feedback or ratings, making it impossible to assess its ease of use or how well staff can adopt it. The lack of data on usability suggests that potential users risk investing in a platform without understanding its learning curve or user experience.
Edge: Amadeus.
Amadeus’s booking engine includes 36 features, such as mobile responsiveness, pre- and post-stay emails, automated reporting, multi-currency support, loyalty program integration, and conversion rate reports. These features are designed to boost revenue, guest engagement, and operational insights.
CENTROTEL provides no documented features, integrations, or functionalities. Without specific capabilities, it’s impossible to compare its offering to Amadeus’s robust suite.
Given the extensive feature set and documented capabilities, Amadeus clearly has the edge here.
Edge: Amadeus.
Amadeus’s customer support scores 3.22/5, with reviews indicating mixed experiences. Some users praise their responsiveness and dedicated account management, while others cite slow responses and support delays. Recent reviews highlight the importance of ongoing training and responsive service in maximizing platform benefits.
CENTROTEL offers no recent reviews or support ratings, leaving hotel operators in the dark about its service quality. The lack of feedback significantly diminishes confidence in its support reliability.
Edge: Amadeus.
Amadeus boasts 104 verified integration partners, including well-known names like Priority Software, Orange Hotel Marketing, and RevControl. These integrations facilitate seamless connectivity with property management systems, payment gateways, and marketing tools.
CENTROTEL reports zero verified integrations, suggesting limited or no connectivity options. Without integrations, your hotel’s ability to streamline operations and synchronize data could be severely hampered.
Edge: Amadeus.
Amadeus has accumulated 93 recent reviews with an overall rating of 4.39/5. Users across various hotel segments, especially independent and boutique properties, rate it highly—often citing its revenue impact and feature richness. The latest reviews consistently reinforce its value in boosting direct bookings.
CENTROTEL, with no recent reviews or ratings, offers no data on user satisfaction. Its absence of feedback makes it impossible to determine how hoteliers perceive its performance or value.
Edge: Amadeus.
Both products do not publicly disclose pricing details. However, Amadeus does not charge implementation fees or offer a freemium model, implying a potentially significant investment aligned with its enterprise-grade features. CENTROTEL’s pricing remains undisclosed, which may be a concern for hotels seeking transparent costs.
Amadeus’s iHotelier® Booking Engine stands out as a proven, feature-packed solution trusted by hundreds of hotels worldwide. Its extensive reviews, high ratings, and broad integration network clearly demonstrate its reliability and value for properties seeking growth through direct bookings.
CENTROTEL, lacking recent reviews and documented features, presents a risky proposition. Without evidence of performance, support, or integrations, it is difficult to recommend for anything beyond basic or experimental use.
If your hotel needs a dependable platform with proven results, Amadeus offers a secure investment. For hotels willing to gamble on untested solutions without clear evidence, CENTROTEL might be worth exploring—but at your own risk.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
TravelClick 因其易用性而受到酒店员工和最终用户的一致好评。其预订引擎被描述为直观的,有助于顺利处理预订和价格管理。这种用户友好性是一个关键的卖点。
许多酒店经营者称赞 TravelClick 能够通过先进的定价引擎、促销工具以及与各种渠道的更好整合来增加收入。他们提到了多费率显示、限时抢购和新的 Web 4.0 平台等... 许多酒店经营者称赞 TravelClick 能够通过先进的定价引擎、促销工具以及与各种渠道的更好整合来增加收入。他们提到了多费率显示、限时抢购和新的 Web 4.0 平台等功能,这些功能显著提高了直接预订量和总体收入。
人们对客户服务的看法褒贬不一。虽然一些用户称赞客户服务周到且乐于助人,但也有很多人抱怨响应速度慢、解决问题困难。这种不一致是潜在买家需要考虑的重要因素... 人们对客户服务的看法褒贬不一。虽然一些用户称赞客户服务周到且乐于助人,但也有很多人抱怨响应速度慢、解决问题困难。这种不一致是潜在买家需要考虑的重要因素。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
TravelClick 与各种系统(包括 PMS 和支付网关)的强大集成受到高度赞赏。许多评论都强调无缝连接支持各种功能,并通过统一界面简化管理。
尽管该系统具有诸多优势,但一些用户仍表示其可用性存在挑战,他们指出界面复杂,某些功能的学习难度较大。这种复杂性可能会妨碍系统的最佳使用,尤其是对于经验... 尽管该系统具有诸多优势,但一些用户仍表示其可用性存在挑战,他们指出界面复杂,某些功能的学习难度较大。这种复杂性可能会妨碍系统的最佳使用,尤其是对于经验不足的用户而言。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine 和 CENTROTEL 共享许多核心 Booking Engine 功能,但各有独特的能力。Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine 提供 104 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 CENTROTEL 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.3/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine:否。CENTROTEL:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Booking Engine 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Amadeus 的 HT Score 为 72,CENTROTEL 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问