The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 预订引擎 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
GRBROOMS |
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #22 11 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #15 36 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #7 26 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #9 6 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
GRBROOMS |
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #17 32 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #12 41 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #10 34 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #14 11 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
GRBROOMS |
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #7 39 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #19 14 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 ▾ | #16 10 条评价 | — |
| 中东 ▾ | #7 8 条评价 | — |
When choosing a booking engine, your hotel needs a solution that increases direct bookings, integrates smoothly with your existing systems, and provides a great user experience for your guests. Amadeus’ iHotelier® Booking Engine and GRBROOMS both aim to meet these goals, but their approaches and strengths differ significantly. Amadeus, with its extensive feature set and broad market presence, is a well-established player. Conversely, GRBROOMS, although less proven at scale, emphasizes simplicity and operational efficiency. Which one aligns best with your hotel’s priorities?
Amadeus’ iHotelier Booking Engine offers a comprehensive suite of features designed to maximize revenue and streamline booking processes. It’s built around proven e-commerce best practices, delivering personalized, device-responsive experiences that encourage guest conversions. In contrast, GRBROOMS provides a straightforward property management-focused system with automated workflows and real-time updates, but it lacks the extensive features of Amadeus.
Amadeus’s large user base, with over 93 reviews, demonstrates its widespread acceptance and ongoing improvements, especially in recent months. GRBROOMS, with no recent reviews or measurable market presence, remains an untested option at scale. Do you prioritize a feature-rich platform with proven market success, or a more streamlined system with less market presence?
If your hotel needs a robust, feature-rich booking engine capable of handling multi-currency, multi-lingual environments, and integrating with a large ecosystem of partners, Amadeus is the clear choice. Its 36 unique features, including pre- and post-stay emails, loyalty program integration, and advanced rate management tools, make it suitable for mid to large hotels with complex needs.
On the other hand, if your hotel or property management team values simplicity, ease of use, and operational automation without needing extensive customization, GRBROOMS may better fit your needs. Its focus on automated workflows and straightforward management makes it ideal for small properties or operators seeking efficiency with minimal complexity.
For hoteliers aiming to boost direct bookings with an experienced, globally supported platform, Amadeus remains the stronger option. Conversely, hotel operators looking for simplicity and automation should consider GRBROOMS, but be aware of its limited market presence.
Amadeus’s iHotelier Booking Engine has an ease-of-use rating of 4.25/5 based on user reviews, with many praising its intuitive interface and responsive design. Its onboarding process, rated 4.01/5, indicates that most hotels find it manageable, though some note the platform can be complicated initially. Support is somewhat inconsistent, with a customer support rating of 3.22/5, and some users report slow responses.
GRBROOMS, with no review data, cannot be assessed on usability. Given its focus on automation and simplicity, it is likely easier for staff to navigate and operate. However, the lack of detailed user feedback means this remains an educated assumption.
Edge: Amadeus.
Amadeus offers 36 unique features, including mobile responsiveness, multi-currency support, loyalty integrations, and advanced marketing tools like A/B testing and conversion rate reports. Its features are designed to boost revenue, engagement, and operational flexibility.
GRBROOMS, on the other hand, provides no detailed feature list or unique tools. Its core strengths appear to lie in automated workflows and guest communication, but it lacks the breadth and depth of Amadeus’s feature set.
Edge: Amadeus.
Amadeus’s customer support ratings are moderate, at 3.22/5, with mixed reviews. Some users appreciate the dedicated account management and responsiveness, while others cite slow support and challenges resolving issues promptly. Common complaints include delays in technical updates and inconsistent training.
With no available data, it’s impossible to assess GRBROOMS customer support. Given its smaller size and limited market presence, it’s likely to have less structured support resources.
Edge: Amadeus.
Amadeus boasts 104 verified integration partners, including major hotel technology providers, channel managers, and payment gateways. This extensive network enables seamless connectivity across many systems, simplifying management and data flow.
GRBROOMS reports zero verified integrations and no shared partners. Its limited integration options could restrict scalability or require manual processes as your hotel grows.
Edge: Amadeus.
Amadeus has an overall rating of 4.39/5 based on 93 reviews, with recent feedback emphasizing its ability to drive revenue and streamline booking processes. Users from various segments, especially independent and boutique hotels, rate it highly—4.36/5 and 4.61/5 respectively.
GRBROOMS, with no reviews available, cannot be rated. The lack of recent or any feedback suggests it’s less proven and less trusted among hoteliers.
Edge: Amadeus.
Pricing details for Amadeus’s booking engine are not publicly disclosed, but it is typically priced via custom quotes, often with no implementation fees or monthly flat rates. Its high-value feature set indicates it’s aimed at hotels with higher budgets for technology.
GRBROOMS also does not list explicit pricing info or trial options. Its lack of transparency and minimal market presence suggest it’s likely more affordable but less comprehensive.
Not ideal if your hotel is small and prefers a simple, low-cost solution with minimal integrations.
Not ideal if your hotel requires extensive integrations, advanced marketing tools, or detailed analytics.
Amadeus offers a comprehensive, well-supported booking engine with proven success across multiple markets. It excels in features, integrations, and scalability, making it suitable for hotels looking to maximize direct bookings and revenue.
GRBROOMS, while simpler and possibly more affordable, lacks the extensive features, recent reviews, and market presence of Amadeus. It might serve small or straightforward properties better but leaves significant gaps in scalability and support.
Choose Amadeus if you need a proven, feature-rich platform with broad integrations and a large user base. Opt for GRBROOMS only if your hotel prioritizes simplicity and automation over advanced capabilities, and you are comfortable with less support and fewer integrations.
This comparison is based on the latest available data, emphasizing recent reviews and market presence to guide your decision.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
TravelClick 因其易用性而受到酒店员工和最终用户的一致好评。其预订引擎被描述为直观的,有助于顺利处理预订和价格管理。这种用户友好性是一个关键的卖点。
许多酒店经营者称赞 TravelClick 能够通过先进的定价引擎、促销工具以及与各种渠道的更好整合来增加收入。他们提到了多费率显示、限时抢购和新的 Web 4.0 平台等... 许多酒店经营者称赞 TravelClick 能够通过先进的定价引擎、促销工具以及与各种渠道的更好整合来增加收入。他们提到了多费率显示、限时抢购和新的 Web 4.0 平台等功能,这些功能显著提高了直接预订量和总体收入。
人们对客户服务的看法褒贬不一。虽然一些用户称赞客户服务周到且乐于助人,但也有很多人抱怨响应速度慢、解决问题困难。这种不一致是潜在买家需要考虑的重要因素... 人们对客户服务的看法褒贬不一。虽然一些用户称赞客户服务周到且乐于助人,但也有很多人抱怨响应速度慢、解决问题困难。这种不一致是潜在买家需要考虑的重要因素。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
TravelClick 与各种系统(包括 PMS 和支付网关)的强大集成受到高度赞赏。许多评论都强调无缝连接支持各种功能,并通过统一界面简化管理。
尽管该系统具有诸多优势,但一些用户仍表示其可用性存在挑战,他们指出界面复杂,某些功能的学习难度较大。这种复杂性可能会妨碍系统的最佳使用,尤其是对于经验... 尽管该系统具有诸多优势,但一些用户仍表示其可用性存在挑战,他们指出界面复杂,某些功能的学习难度较大。这种复杂性可能会妨碍系统的最佳使用,尤其是对于经验不足的用户而言。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine 和 GRBROOMS 共享许多核心 Booking Engine 功能,但各有独特的能力。Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine 提供 104 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 GRBROOMS 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.3/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine:否。GRBROOMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Booking Engine 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Amadeus 的 HT Score 为 72,GRBROOMS 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问