The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 166 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Amadeus 表现出色 在 易于使用 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (4.5/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Confirmation emails and Referral Reporting.
GuestCentric 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 independent 类型的物业 (4.8/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Pooled inventory and Special offers & discounts.
基于 HTR 上 166 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $600/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 95 | 71 |
在分析了 166 条经验证的评价后,Amadeus 用户最看重其 易于使用, 增加收入, 高级报告和分析,而 GuestCentric 用户则强调 客户服务, 预订引擎效率, 营销工具和报告。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
易于使用
▾
|
+
客户服务
▾
|
|
+
增加收入
▾
|
+
预订引擎效率
▾
|
|
+
高级报告和分析
▾
|
+
营销工具和报告
▾
|
|
+
市场情报
▾
|
+
用户培训和知识库
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
集成能力
▾
|
−
可定制性
▾
|
|
−
复杂性和可用性问题
▾
|
−
库存和费率管理
▾
|
|
−
功能实现滞后
▾
|
−
促销灵活性
▾
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 预订引擎 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #22 11 条评价 | #12 28 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #15 36 条评价 | #16 24 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #7 26 条评价 | #28 0 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #9 6 条评价 | #13 3 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #17 32 条评价 | #12 37 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #12 41 条评价 | #14 21 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #10 34 条评价 | #17 12 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #14 11 条评价 | #6 15 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #7 39 条评价 | #11 13 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #19 14 条评价 | #10 53 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #16 10 条评价 | #29 0 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | #7 8 条评价 | #22 0 条评价 |
Choosing the right booking engine for your hotel involves balancing features, ease of use, support, and price. Both Amadeus’ iHotelier® Booking Engine and GuestCentric aim to boost direct bookings, but they approach these goals differently. Your decision should hinge on your hotel’s size, market focus, and specific needs for integration and user experience.
Amadeus has a longer market presence with a larger user base, especially among larger and chain hotels. GuestCentric, on the other hand, has a reputation for intuitive interfaces and strong support, with a smaller but highly engaged client list. Which platform aligns better with your hotel’s operations and growth plans?
Both products aim to increase direct bookings and improve revenue management. Amadeus’s iHotelier® offers a robust set of features built around e-commerce best practices, focusing on personalized guest experiences, targeted merchandising, and extensive integration options. GuestCentric emphasizes simplicity, speed, and a seamless customer journey, with an interface designed for quick adoption.
While Amadeus boasts 18 unique features like multi-room bookings, price comparison widgets, and advanced analytics, GuestCentric’s core strength lies in its user-friendly platform with features like instant promotion updates and a marketing engine. The choice boils down to whether you prioritize depth of features or ease of use. Do you want a platform that offers extensive customization and integrations, or one that simplifies the booking experience for your guests?
If your hotel needs a comprehensive, enterprise-ready booking system with advanced pricing, detailed reporting, and extensive integrations, go with Amadeus. It’s especially suitable for mid-sized to large hotels or those with complex distribution channels. If your priority is a straightforward, quick-to-deploy system that maximizes conversions with minimal fuss, GuestCentric is the better choice.
Hotels that value in-depth analytics, multi-channel distribution, and a proven global presence will find Amadeus more aligned with their needs. Smaller hotels or boutique properties seeking an intuitive platform with strong support and fast setup should lean toward GuestCentric.
GuestCentric outperforms Amadeus in ease of use, with a user rating of 4.55/5 compared to Amadeus’ 4.25/5. GuestCentric’s interface receives praise for speed, simplicity, and intuitive design, making staff onboarding and daily operations smoother. Users highlight that GuestCentric’s platform requires fewer clicks and is easier to navigate, especially on mobile.
Amadeus’s platform, while feature-rich, is often described as complex, with some users mentioning a steep learning curve. Its onboarding rating is slightly lower at 4.01/5, suggesting it may take more time for staff to become proficient.
Edge: GuestCentric.
Amadeus offers 18 exclusive features, including multi-room bookings, rate plan comparisons, Google Hotel Ads bookings, and GDPR compliance, elevating its appeal for larger operations. GuestCentric has 5 unique features such as pooled inventory, gift vouchers, and social media integrations that focus on marketing and guest engagement.
Amadeus’s extensive feature set supports complex pricing strategies, detailed analytics, and broader distribution management. GuestCentric’s standout features revolve around simplicity and marketing, ideal for properties emphasizing guest experience and direct sales.
Edge: Amadeus.
GuestCentric’s support scores significantly higher at 4.76/5, with reviews praising the team’s helpfulness, quick responses, and dedicated account management. Hoteliers often mention that GuestCentric proactively reaches out and offers strategic assistance, making onboarding and ongoing support less stressful.
Amadeus’s support scores 3.22/5, with reviews citing inconsistent response times and challenges in resolving issues swiftly. Some users find Amadeus’s support less responsive, which can hinder rapid problem resolution.
Edge: GuestCentric.
Amadeus boasts 104 verified integrations, including major partners like SiteMinder, Oracle Hospitality, and RevControl. This extensive network enables seamless connectivity with PMS, GDS, payment gateways, and distribution channels, making it suitable for hotels with complex systems.
GuestCentric offers 44 verified integrations, including popular partners like WebRezPro, Triptease, and The Hotels Network. While fewer in number, its integrations focus on marketing, digital channels, and core PMS systems. Both platforms support shared partners, but Amadeus’s larger ecosystem provides broader options.
Edge: Amadeus.
GuestCentric’s overall rating is higher at 4.78/5, with recent reviews praising its ease of use, support, and ability to increase direct bookings. Boutique hotels and properties with a focus on digital marketing particularly appreciate its straightforward setup and customer service.
Amadeus’s rating is slightly lower at 4.39/5, with some reviews praising its revenue-driving capabilities but criticizing its complexity and support delays. Larger hotels with more complex needs tend to rate Amadeus more favorably, but overall, GuestCentric’s client satisfaction is higher.
Edge: GuestCentric.
Amadeus does not publicly disclose its pricing; it typically offers custom quotes based on hotel size and needs. It is generally considered a premium product with higher costs associated with its extensive features.
GuestCentric charges a base fee of $600 per month, with no implementation or extra charges publicly listed. Its transparent pricing model appeals to hotels seeking predictable expenses and clear value.
Not ideal if you prefer a simpler, more streamlined platform or have a smaller property with limited tech infrastructure.
Not ideal if you require extensive integrations, complex revenue management, or advanced analytics.
Amadeus’s platform suits larger hotels and chains needing comprehensive distribution, detailed analytics, and extensive integrations. It’s a solid choice if your team has the capacity to handle its complexity and higher costs.
GuestCentric excels at providing smaller or boutique hotels with an intuitive, fast-to-implement booking engine that drives direct bookings through simplified user journeys and strong support. Its focus on marketing and ease make it ideal for properties looking to grow without heavy tech investments.
If your hotel prioritizes a feature-rich, globally supported system, and you can manage its complexity, go with Amadeus. For hotels seeking a straightforward, guest-focused booking platform with excellent support, GuestCentric is the clear choice.
预订引擎 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $600/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine 和 GuestCentric (Booking Engine) 共享 18 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 价格对比 | ||
| 合并库存 | ||
| 多房间和多费率计划预订 | ||
| 灵活日期 | ||
| 特别优惠和折扣 | ||
| 礼品券和预付体验 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 社交媒体整合/预订 | ||
| 表单自动填充 | ||
| 费率计划比较 | ||
| 转化率报告 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 11 项功能存在差异。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
TravelClick 因其易用性而受到酒店员工和最终用户的一致好评。其预订引擎被描述为直观的,有助于顺利处理预订和价格管理。这种用户友好性是一个关键的卖点。
许多酒店经营者称赞 TravelClick 能够通过先进的定价引擎、促销工具以及与各种渠道的更好整合来增加收入。他们提到了多费率显示、限时抢购和新的 Web 4.0 平台等... 许多酒店经营者称赞 TravelClick 能够通过先进的定价引擎、促销工具以及与各种渠道的更好整合来增加收入。他们提到了多费率显示、限时抢购和新的 Web 4.0 平台等功能,这些功能显著提高了直接预订量和总体收入。
人们对客户服务的看法褒贬不一。虽然一些用户称赞客户服务周到且乐于助人,但也有很多人抱怨响应速度慢、解决问题困难。这种不一致是潜在买家需要考虑的重要因素... 人们对客户服务的看法褒贬不一。虽然一些用户称赞客户服务周到且乐于助人,但也有很多人抱怨响应速度慢、解决问题困难。这种不一致是潜在买家需要考虑的重要因素。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
TravelClick 与各种系统(包括 PMS 和支付网关)的强大集成受到高度赞赏。许多评论都强调无缝连接支持各种功能,并通过统一界面简化管理。
尽管该系统具有诸多优势,但一些用户仍表示其可用性存在挑战,他们指出界面复杂,某些功能的学习难度较大。这种复杂性可能会妨碍系统的最佳使用,尤其是对于经验... 尽管该系统具有诸多优势,但一些用户仍表示其可用性存在挑战,他们指出界面复杂,某些功能的学习难度较大。这种复杂性可能会妨碍系统的最佳使用,尤其是对于经验不足的用户而言。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
GuestCentric 的支持团队以快速而有用的响应而著称。酒店经营者强调员工的专业精神和奉献精神,他们随时准备协助解决问题并提供战略建议。
GuestCentric 的预订引擎因其速度快、可靠性高和用户友好界面而广受好评。用户注意到直接预订量显著增加,客人的导航也更加方便。该引擎还具有即时促销更新和可... GuestCentric 的预订引擎因其速度快、可靠性高和用户友好界面而广受好评。用户注意到直接预订量显著增加,客人的导航也更加方便。该引擎还具有即时促销更新和可定制选项,可满足酒店的需求。
GuestCentric 提供一系列营销工具,包括 SEO 和数字营销服务,有助于提高知名度和直接预订量。报告和分析工具也因提供绩效洞察而广受好评。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
该平台具有高度的可定制性,可根据酒店需求进行独特设置,例如附加服务、最低入住时间和灵活的促销优惠。这有助于酒店优化其产品并简化预订流程。
尽管 GuestCentric 的系统包含高级价格和库存管理功能,但一些用户发现更新价格和管理库存有点麻烦。建议包括更直观的界面和与现有系统更好地集成。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine 和 GuestCentric (Booking Engine) 共享许多核心 Booking Engine 功能,但各有独特的能力。Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine 提供 104 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 GuestCentric (Booking Engine) 提供 44 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。GuestCentric (Booking Engine) 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 4.3/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine:否。GuestCentric (Booking Engine):否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Booking Engine 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Amadeus 的 HT Score 为 72,GuestCentric 的为 20。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问