The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 136 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Amadeus 表现出色 在 易于使用 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (4.5/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Urgency messaging.
HotelRunner 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Pooled inventory and Gift Vouchers.
基于 HTR 上 136 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $100/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 95 | 41 |
在分析了 136 条经验证的评价后,Amadeus 用户最看重其 增加收入, 客户服务, 高级报告和分析,而 HotelRunner 用户则强调 客户支持, 渠道管理, 与 ota 集成。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
增加收入
▾
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
|
+
客户服务
▾
|
+
渠道管理
▾
|
|
+
高级报告和分析
▾
|
+
与 OTA 集成
▾
|
|
+
市场情报
▾
|
+
定制选项
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
集成能力
▾
|
−
预订引擎
▾
|
|
−
复杂性和可用性问题
▾
|
−
报告功能
▾
|
|
−
功能实现滞后
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 预订引擎 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #22 11 条评价 | #19 16 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #15 36 条评价 | #29 9 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #7 26 条评价 | #31 0 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #9 6 条评价 | #25 1 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #17 32 条评价 | #18 22 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #12 41 条评价 | #28 9 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #10 34 条评价 | #31 3 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #14 11 条评价 | #33 1 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #7 39 条评价 | #26 1 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #19 14 条评价 | #22 12 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #16 10 条评价 | #20 3 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | #7 8 条评价 | #1 16 条评价 |
Choosing a booking engine for your hotel involves balancing features, support, ease of use, and cost. Both Amadeus’ iHotelier® Booking Engine and HotelRunner’s Booking Engine aim to improve direct bookings and simplify management, but they diverge sharply in support, integrations, and recent user feedback.
Amadeus has a longer history and a broader global presence, especially in mature markets, but recent reviews reveal a decline in customer support and fewer updates. HotelRunner, on the other hand, boasts more recent positive reviews, especially around support and ease of use, making it a compelling choice for hotels prioritizing operational simplicity and support.
HotelRunner outperforms Amadeus in recent reviews, support, ease of use, and user satisfaction, with 4 recent reviews versus none for Amadeus in the last six months. If recent, supportive customer service and straightforward operation matter most, HotelRunner is the better option.
However, Amadeus’s extensive integrations and broader market reach might appeal if your hotel relies on complex systems or operates in regions where Amadeus is dominant. The decision ultimately hinges on your hotel’s priority: support and usability or integration depth and global presence.
Both products aim to maximize direct bookings and streamline operations but approach these goals differently. Amadeus’s iHotelier® offers a comprehensive, integrated platform built on years of industry experience, focusing heavily on advanced pricing, revenue management, and market intelligence. Conversely, HotelRunner emphasizes simplicity, rapid onboarding, and strong channel management, making daily management easier for hoteliers.
Recently, HotelRunner’s reviews highlight its user-friendly interface and support, receiving near-perfect ratings for ease of use (4.73/5) and customer support (4.8/5), with 4 new reviews in the last six months. Amadeus, meanwhile, maintains a solid overall rating (4.39/5) but has zero recent reviews, and support is rated much lower (3.22/5).
This contrast raises a key question: do you want a trusted, established platform with complex features or a modern, support-focused solution?
If your hotel needs robust integrations, especially with global OTAs, and extensive features like loyalty programs, urgency messaging, or Apple Pay, Amadeus is the better fit. Its large partner network (104 verified partners) and feature set—like loyalty program integration, urgency messaging, and Apple Pay—are advantageous for hotels seeking advanced marketing and operational tools.
On the other hand, if your hotel prioritizes ease of setup, quick onboarding, and responsive support, HotelRunner is the clear winner. Its high customer support rating (4.8/5), simple interface, and recent positive reviews suggest a smoother operational experience, especially for smaller or mid-sized properties.
For boutique hotels or properties seeking straightforward management with strong support, HotelRunner wins. For large, multi-property brands requiring extensive integrations and market tools, Amadeus remains relevant but may require patience with support issues.
HotelRunner’s ease of use is highlighted in reviews, boasting a 4.73/5 rating and positive comments about its user-friendly interface and quick onboarding process. Users appreciate the straightforward setup and minimal training required to start managing properties effectively. Many mention that ongoing support and training are top-notch, with prompt responses via WhatsApp and other channels.
Amadeus’s platform, rated 4.25/5 for ease of use, receives mixed reviews. Some find it complicated to understand initially, though it becomes manageable with daily use and support. Its complex features can be a barrier for new users or smaller teams.
Edge: HotelRunner.
Amadeus offers 33 shared features plus 3 exclusive features—urgency messaging, loyalty integration, and Apple Pay—targeted at enterprise-level hotels seeking sophisticated marketing and payment options. These features support advanced revenue strategies and customer engagement.
HotelRunner provides 33 shared features plus 7 unique ones, including pooled inventory, gift vouchers, social media integration, room substitutions, custom exit modals, meal plans, and Stripe payments. These cater well to hotels seeking customizable, flexible management solutions without complex infrastructure.
While both have strong feature sets, Amadeus’s advanced marketing features appeal to larger hotels, whereas HotelRunner’s high customization and social integrations are better for smaller or mid-sized properties.
Edge: HotelRunner.
Recent reviews clearly favor HotelRunner’s customer support, with a 4.8/5 rating, citing responsive, prompt assistance via multiple channels, including WhatsApp. Users praise the ongoing support and training, often mentioning fast responses and problem resolution.
Amadeus’s support, rated only 3.22/5, is criticized for slow responses, inconsistent service, and difficulty resolving issues. Several reviews mention frustration with customer service delays, impacting operational efficiency.
Edge: HotelRunner.
Amadeus boasts a significantly larger partner network with 104 verified integrations, including major systems like Oracle Hospitality, protel, and Expedia. Its extensive integration options support complex, multi-system management for large properties or chains.
HotelRunner has 17 verified partners, including prominent OTAs like Airbnb, Agoda, and Stripe. Its integrations are fewer but cover essential channels and payment options, making it suitable for properties looking for streamlined connectivity.
Amadeus’s wider selection offers more flexibility for complex operations, but HotelRunner’s targeted integrations might suffice for smaller hotels.
Edge: Amadeus.
HotelRunner’s reviews are more recent and highly positive, with a 4.5/5 overall rating and a 96% likelihood to recommend, especially among boutique and budget hotels. Property-specific scores are high, with boutique hotels rating it 5/5 and a general positive trend in recent feedback.
Amadeus’s overall rating is 4.39/5, but with zero recent reviews, its latest customer sentiment is less clear. Smaller properties and independent hotels tend to rate Amadeus lower (around 4.36/5), while larger or branded hotels give slightly higher scores.
Given the recency and volume of reviews, HotelRunner’s ratings reflect current user satisfaction better.
Edge: HotelRunner.
Amadeus does not publicly list its pricing, suggesting a custom quote based on hotel size and needs—likely making it more expensive and geared toward larger operations.
HotelRunner charges a straightforward monthly fee of $100, with no implementation fees or free tiers, making it accessible for small to mid-sized hotels seeking predictable costs.
Cost differences favor HotelRunner for properties with tighter budgets or those seeking transparency, but larger properties might find Amadeus’s custom pricing justified by its extensive features.
Not ideal if your team prefers straightforward, quick-to-implement solutions or if customer support quality is a priority, given recent feedback.
Not ideal if your hotel requires heavy-market intelligence, complex integrations, or enterprise-level features that go beyond basic operational needs.
Amadeus’ iHotelier® Booking Engine is a feature-rich, highly integrated platform suited for large, complex hotels or chains that need extensive systems connectivity and advanced marketing tools. Its broad global presence and partnership network make it a good fit for hotels operating in multiple regions with sophisticated demands.
HotelRunner excels in simplicity, support, and customization, making it ideal for boutique, independent, or mid-sized hotels that want quick setup, dedicated support, and flexible features. Its recent reviews and high satisfaction scores reflect a hotelier-friendly approach that can improve daily operations.
If your hotel values recent customer feedback, ease of use, and support, HotelRunner is the clear choice. If your hotel requires advanced integrations, market intelligence, and extensive feature sets, Amadeus remains relevant but may require patience with support issues.
In summary, for most small to mid-sized hotels emphasizing support and ease of management, HotelRunner stands out. For larger hotels or chains needing complex integrations and advanced revenue tools, Amadeus might still be the better choice, provided you’re prepared to navigate its complexity and support challenges.
预订引擎 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $100/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine 和 Booking Engine by HotelRunner 共享 33 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 可定制的退出意图模式 | ||
| 合并库存 | ||
| 忠诚度计划整合 | ||
| 房间替换 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 社交媒体整合/预订 | ||
| 紧急信息 | ||
| 膳食计划 | ||
| 苹果支付 |
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
TravelClick 因其易用性而受到酒店员工和最终用户的一致好评。其预订引擎被描述为直观的,有助于顺利处理预订和价格管理。这种用户友好性是一个关键的卖点。
许多酒店经营者称赞 TravelClick 能够通过先进的定价引擎、促销工具以及与各种渠道的更好整合来增加收入。他们提到了多费率显示、限时抢购和新的 Web 4.0 平台等... 许多酒店经营者称赞 TravelClick 能够通过先进的定价引擎、促销工具以及与各种渠道的更好整合来增加收入。他们提到了多费率显示、限时抢购和新的 Web 4.0 平台等功能,这些功能显著提高了直接预订量和总体收入。
人们对客户服务的看法褒贬不一。虽然一些用户称赞客户服务周到且乐于助人,但也有很多人抱怨响应速度慢、解决问题困难。这种不一致是潜在买家需要考虑的重要因素... 人们对客户服务的看法褒贬不一。虽然一些用户称赞客户服务周到且乐于助人,但也有很多人抱怨响应速度慢、解决问题困难。这种不一致是潜在买家需要考虑的重要因素。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
TravelClick 与各种系统(包括 PMS 和支付网关)的强大集成受到高度赞赏。许多评论都强调无缝连接支持各种功能,并通过统一界面简化管理。
尽管该系统具有诸多优势,但一些用户仍表示其可用性存在挑战,他们指出界面复杂,某些功能的学习难度较大。这种复杂性可能会妨碍系统的最佳使用,尤其是对于经验... 尽管该系统具有诸多优势,但一些用户仍表示其可用性存在挑战,他们指出界面复杂,某些功能的学习难度较大。这种复杂性可能会妨碍系统的最佳使用,尤其是对于经验不足的用户而言。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
客户支持因其响应迅速和高效而受到赞誉。用户对通过各种沟通渠道(包括 WhatsApp)提供的及时帮助表示赞赏。
该平台以其用户友好的界面和易于导航而闻名,使得具有不同技术专长的酒店经营者可以轻松进行设置和管理。
用户称赞 Hotelrunner 拥有强大的渠道管理功能,可与众多 OTA 无缝同步。这可消除重复预订并简化库存管理。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
集成预订引擎因推动直接预订和允许定制套餐而备受好评。许多用户欣赏创建 OTA 列表的便捷性,这有助于提高入住率和收入。
用户强调需要更加强大和可定制的报告工具来帮助制定利率策略决策,这反映了未来改进的一个关键领域。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine 和 Booking Engine by HotelRunner 共享许多核心 Booking Engine 功能,但各有独特的能力。Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine 提供 104 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Booking Engine by HotelRunner 提供 17 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Booking Engine by HotelRunner 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 4.3/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine:否。Booking Engine by HotelRunner:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Booking Engine 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Amadeus 的 HT Score 为 72,HotelRunner 的为 74。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问