The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 预订引擎 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
Myghs |
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #22 11 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #15 36 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #7 26 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #9 6 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
Myghs |
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #17 32 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #12 41 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #10 34 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #14 11 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
Myghs |
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #7 39 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #19 14 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 ▾ | #16 10 条评价 | — |
| 中东 ▾ | #7 8 条评价 | — |
Choosing the right booking engine is vital for your hotel's revenue and guest experience. Both Amadeus’ iHotelier® Booking Engine and Myghs aim to optimize online bookings, but their core strengths and market presence differ significantly. Amadeus, with its extensive features, proven track record, and broad global reach, is a comprehensive solution favored by many mid-sized and large hotels. Myghs, on the other hand, appears more focused on revenue management and analytics, but lacks recent reviews or a strong market footprint.
Your decision hinges on whether you prioritize advanced booking features and global integration or a potentially simpler, analytics-driven approach. Do you need a full suite of booking tools with proven results, or are you looking for a platform primarily centered on revenue insights?
Amadeus’ iHotelier® Booking Engine is built around supporting direct bookings via an advanced, responsive platform optimized for any device. It offers 36 exclusive features, including multi-currency, multi-lingual, pre- and post-stay emails, loyalty integrations, and flexible rate plans, designed to boost conversion rates and revenue. In contrast, Myghs lacks announced features or recent reviews, making its functional scope uncertain.
Amadeus’s platform is integrated into a global ecosystem with over 104 verified partners, offering seamless connectivity with PMS, GDS, and third-party systems. Myghs offers no verified integrations or regional presence, limiting its appeal to hotels seeking extensive system connectivity.
Are you looking for a well-established platform with proven features and a broad partner network? Or does your hotel prefer a smaller, possibly niche system with unclear capabilities?
If your hotel needs a robust, feature-rich booking engine capable of supporting large-scale operations, choose Amadeus. Its 93 reviews and 4.39/5 overall rating showcase widespread user satisfaction, especially among independent and boutique hotels, with many praising its revenue-boosting tools and integration. For properties that prioritize advanced analytics, revenue management, or are seeking a platform with a global footprint, Amadeus’s extensive capabilities are unmatched.
Conversely, if your hotel is small, local, or primarily interested in revenue insights and dynamic pricing, Myghs might seem appealing. However, with no reviews or features detailed, it’s a riskier choice. Without recent validation or proven global integration, it’s less suitable for hotels aiming for scale or sophisticated booking experiences.
In summary, if you want a trusted, well-reviewed platform with a proven feature set, go with Amadeus. If your needs are limited to basic revenue management or you’re exploring options with no clear track record, consider Myghs, but with caution.
Amadeus’ iHotelier® boasts a 4.25/5 ease-of-use rating, with many users citing its intuitive interface and straightforward onboarding process. Despite some comments about initial complexity, hoteliers report that daily use becomes friendly and manageable. Its onboarding score of 4.01/5 indicates a generally smooth setup, although its extensive features can entail a learning curve for new users.
Myghs offers no publicly available ratings, reviews, or detailed user feedback, making usability assessments impossible. The absence of recent reviews and user testimonials suggests limited adoption or visibility, especially compared to Amadeus’s established presence.
Edge: Amadeus.
Amadeus clearly leads in features, with 36 unique functionalities that Myghs does not list or seem to offer. Key features include mobile responsiveness, pre- and post-stay emails, automated reporting, multi-currency and multilingual support, loyalty program integration, flexible rate plans, booking abandonment recapture, and integrations with payment options like Apple Pay, Google Pay, and PayPal.
Myghs offers no detailed list of features or functionality, making it impossible to compare directly. The absence of specific features or integrations indicates that Amadeus’s platform is more comprehensive and better suited for hotels seeking advanced booking capabilities.
Edge: Amadeus.
Amadeus has a support rating of 3.22/5 based on 93 reviews, with feedback indicating mixed experiences. Some users appreciate dedicated account management and quick responses, while others complain about slow support and inconsistent assistance. Common issues include delays in feature rollout and challenges with training and onboarding.
Myghs offers no recent reviews, support ratings, or testimonial data, making it impossible to gauge customer service quality. Its lack of visibility suggests it may not have extensive support infrastructure or a broad user base.
Edge: Amadeus.
Amadeus boasts 104 verified partners, including major systems like PMS, GDS, and online marketing tools, ensuring seamless connectivity. Shared integrations with other hotel technology providers and exclusive partnerships give your hotel a broad ecosystem to support operational needs.
Myghs has no verified integrations or partner data, limiting its ability to connect with other hotel systems. This could pose challenges for hotels seeking a unified management platform or advanced distribution.
Edge: Amadeus.
Amadeus’s overall rating of 4.39/5 from 93 reviews demonstrates strong user satisfaction, especially among independent and boutique hotels. Ratings are highest among branded hotels (4.5/5) and resorts (4.61/5). Review recency confirms ongoing positive feedback, with many hoteliers praising its revenue tools and ease of use.
Myghs has no reviews or recent ratings, making it impossible to determine user satisfaction or property-specific preferences.
Edge: Amadeus.
Pricing details for Amadeus are not publicly disclosed, but it typically involves a setup fee and monthly costs based on the number of rooms and features. It is positioned as a premium product with a focus on mid-sized to large hotels.
Myghs provides no publicly available pricing or subscription details, making direct comparison impossible. Its lack of transparency suggests it may be a more limited or niche offering.
Not ideal if your hotel is small, local, or on a tight budget, given the platform’s complexity and potential cost.
Not ideal if your hotel needs a full-featured booking engine, global connectivity, or proven customer support.
Amadeus’ iHotelier® Booking Engine offers a comprehensive, feature-rich platform with proven adoption, extensive integrations, and a strong global presence. Its 93 recent reviews and high ratings underscore its reliability and effectiveness for hotels aiming to maximize direct bookings and revenue.
Myghs appears more focused on revenue analytics with no recent reviews or detailed feature disclosures. Its lack of visibility and proven customer feedback makes it a less compelling choice for most hotels seeking a full booking engine.
In conclusion, if your goal is a trusted, well-supported booking platform with an established track record, Amadeus is the clear choice. If your needs are limited to revenue insights and you are willing to accept higher risk, consider exploring Myghs further, but proceed cautiously.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
TravelClick 因其易用性而受到酒店员工和最终用户的一致好评。其预订引擎被描述为直观的,有助于顺利处理预订和价格管理。这种用户友好性是一个关键的卖点。
许多酒店经营者称赞 TravelClick 能够通过先进的定价引擎、促销工具以及与各种渠道的更好整合来增加收入。他们提到了多费率显示、限时抢购和新的 Web 4.0 平台等... 许多酒店经营者称赞 TravelClick 能够通过先进的定价引擎、促销工具以及与各种渠道的更好整合来增加收入。他们提到了多费率显示、限时抢购和新的 Web 4.0 平台等功能,这些功能显著提高了直接预订量和总体收入。
人们对客户服务的看法褒贬不一。虽然一些用户称赞客户服务周到且乐于助人,但也有很多人抱怨响应速度慢、解决问题困难。这种不一致是潜在买家需要考虑的重要因素... 人们对客户服务的看法褒贬不一。虽然一些用户称赞客户服务周到且乐于助人,但也有很多人抱怨响应速度慢、解决问题困难。这种不一致是潜在买家需要考虑的重要因素。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
TravelClick 与各种系统(包括 PMS 和支付网关)的强大集成受到高度赞赏。许多评论都强调无缝连接支持各种功能,并通过统一界面简化管理。
尽管该系统具有诸多优势,但一些用户仍表示其可用性存在挑战,他们指出界面复杂,某些功能的学习难度较大。这种复杂性可能会妨碍系统的最佳使用,尤其是对于经验... 尽管该系统具有诸多优势,但一些用户仍表示其可用性存在挑战,他们指出界面复杂,某些功能的学习难度较大。这种复杂性可能会妨碍系统的最佳使用,尤其是对于经验不足的用户而言。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine 和 Myghs 共享许多核心 Booking Engine 功能,但各有独特的能力。Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine 提供 104 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Myghs 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.3/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine:否。Myghs:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Booking Engine 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Amadeus 的 HT Score 为 72,Myghs 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问