The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 预订引擎 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #22 11 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #15 36 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #7 26 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #9 6 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #17 32 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #12 41 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #10 34 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #14 11 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #7 39 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #19 14 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 ▾ | #16 10 条评价 | — |
| 中东 ▾ | #7 8 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine and Olive hinges on your hotel's specific needs, budget, and strategic priorities. Both products aim to boost direct bookings but differ significantly in market presence, features, and user feedback. Your decision should focus on the level of integration, customization, and support your team requires, as well as the importance of recent reviews and proven track records.
Amadeus offers a robust, globally recognized platform with extensive integrations and a longstanding market presence. Olive, by contrast, is newer, with a focus on AI-driven guest experiences, but lacks the extensive review data and integration footprint. Which aligns better with your hotel’s growth aspirations?
Amadeus dominates in review volume and recency, with 93 reviews in the last six months and a 4.39/5 overall rating, signaling strong current user satisfaction. Olive has no recent reviews or ratings, making it difficult to evaluate its current performance or user sentiment.
Amadeus provides a comprehensive set of features, including multi-language support, multi-currency, and integrations with 104 partners. Olive offers only one unique feature—room substitutions—and lacks the broader feature set, which raises questions about its scalability and versatility.
Are you prioritizing a well-established platform with proven features and widespread support, or are you exploring newer solutions with innovative guest engagement tools but limited feedback?
If your hotel needs a proven, feature-rich booking engine with extensive integrations, go with Amadeus. It suits mid-to-large properties that prioritize reliability, market intelligence, and a broad ecosystem of partners, especially if you value features like multi-currency, multi-lingual support, and targeted marketing tools.
If your hotel is a smaller operation testing AI-driven guest experiences or seeking a straightforward, innovative booking platform without a large support ecosystem, Olive might appeal. However, without recent reviews, its long-term reliability and support remain uncertain.
For established hotels aiming for revenue growth through advanced integrations and analytics, Amadeus is the clearer choice. For startups or boutique hotels experimenting with guest personalization, Olive presents an intriguing but unproven option.
Amadeus scores 4.25/5 for ease of use and offers a well-rated onboarding process at 4.01/5, reflecting its polished UI and comprehensive training options. Users praise its intuitive reservation handling, though some mention complexity in advanced features.
Olive has no publicly available review scores or user feedback, making it impossible to assess usability. Given its status as a newer product with limited user feedback, confidence in its ease of use remains low.
Edge: Amadeus.
Amadeus boasts 21 shared features with other booking engines plus 15 unique functionalities, such as pre- and post-stay emails, multi-room bookings, GDPR compliance, and integrations with Google Hotel Ads and TripAdvisor. Its feature set supports complex revenue management and guest engagement strategies.
Olive offers only one distinct feature—room substitutions—focusing on a simplified, AI-enhanced guest experience. However, it lacks the depth and variety found in Amadeus, which could limit its applicability for hotels requiring advanced marketing, multi-language, or multi-currency support.
Edge: Amadeus.
Amadeus has a customer support rating of 3.22/5, with mixed reviews. Some hoteliers praise the responsiveness, but many report slow responses and inconsistent support quality, which can hinder operations.
Olive provides no recent reviews or support ratings, making it impossible to evaluate its customer service. The lack of feedback is a concern for hoteliers who depend on reliable support for operational continuity.
Edge: Amadeus.
Amadeus integrates with 104 verified partners, including major PMS, GDS, and channel management systems, offering extensive connectivity and flexibility. Shared partners include Oracle Hospitality and Stayntouch, ensuring compatibility with most hotel tech stacks.
Olive has only 2 verified integrations, with no evidence of a broad ecosystem. This limited integration capacity may restrict your hotel’s ability to connect with other operational systems or leverage existing technology investments.
Edge: Amadeus.
Amadeus’s overall rating of 4.39/5 is based on substantial recent reviews, with an 87% likelihood to recommend. Independent, boutique, and branded hotels rate it highly, often citing its functionality and revenue growth potential.
Olive lacks recent reviews altogether, making meaningful comparison impossible. Its undisclosed user sentiment means you cannot confidently gauge user satisfaction or property segment suitability.
Edge: Amadeus.
Amadeus does not publicly disclose pricing details; generally, it operates on a quote-based model, often requiring a setup fee and monthly charges per room or site. Its enterprise-level solutions tend to be more costly but offer extensive features.
Olive’s pricing is similarly undisclosed, with no trial or freemium options available, suggesting a potentially high investment threshold for a newer product lacking proven performance metrics.
In both cases, you'll need direct vendor engagement to determine exact costs.
Not ideal if your hotel is very small, budget-focused, or prefers a simple, minimal solution without extensive support.
Not ideal if you require proven scalability, extensive integrations, or comprehensive support, or if you prefer a platform with significant user feedback.
Amadeus offers an established, feature-packed booking engine with a large market presence, extensive integrations, and a track record of positive reviews. Its weaknesses include some customer support inconsistencies and a complex interface for advanced features, but its proven reliability and depth make it suitable for larger or growth-oriented hotels.
Olive, by contrast, is a newer entrant focusing on AI-driven guest experiences and personalization. Its lack of recent reviews, limited integrations, and untested support make it a riskier choice for hotels seeking stability and proven performance. It might appeal to innovative properties eager to experiment but isn't recommended for those valuing support and reliability.
If your hotel needs a dependable, well-supported platform with extensive features, Amadeus is the clearer choice. For hotels prioritizing cutting-edge guest engagement and willing to accept the uncertainty, Olive could be worth exploring, though caution is advised.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
TravelClick 因其易用性而受到酒店员工和最终用户的一致好评。其预订引擎被描述为直观的,有助于顺利处理预订和价格管理。这种用户友好性是一个关键的卖点。
许多酒店经营者称赞 TravelClick 能够通过先进的定价引擎、促销工具以及与各种渠道的更好整合来增加收入。他们提到了多费率显示、限时抢购和新的 Web 4.0 平台等... 许多酒店经营者称赞 TravelClick 能够通过先进的定价引擎、促销工具以及与各种渠道的更好整合来增加收入。他们提到了多费率显示、限时抢购和新的 Web 4.0 平台等功能,这些功能显著提高了直接预订量和总体收入。
人们对客户服务的看法褒贬不一。虽然一些用户称赞客户服务周到且乐于助人,但也有很多人抱怨响应速度慢、解决问题困难。这种不一致是潜在买家需要考虑的重要因素... 人们对客户服务的看法褒贬不一。虽然一些用户称赞客户服务周到且乐于助人,但也有很多人抱怨响应速度慢、解决问题困难。这种不一致是潜在买家需要考虑的重要因素。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
TravelClick 与各种系统(包括 PMS 和支付网关)的强大集成受到高度赞赏。许多评论都强调无缝连接支持各种功能,并通过统一界面简化管理。
尽管该系统具有诸多优势,但一些用户仍表示其可用性存在挑战,他们指出界面复杂,某些功能的学习难度较大。这种复杂性可能会妨碍系统的最佳使用,尤其是对于经验... 尽管该系统具有诸多优势,但一些用户仍表示其可用性存在挑战,他们指出界面复杂,某些功能的学习难度较大。这种复杂性可能会妨碍系统的最佳使用,尤其是对于经验不足的用户而言。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine 和 Olive Booking Engine 共享许多核心 Booking Engine 功能,但各有独特的能力。Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine 提供 104 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Olive Booking Engine 提供 2 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.3/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine:否。Olive Booking Engine:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Booking Engine 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Amadeus 的 HT Score 为 72,Olive 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问