The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 预订引擎 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
Orbitz |
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #22 11 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #15 36 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #7 26 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #9 6 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
Orbitz |
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #17 32 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #12 41 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #10 34 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #14 11 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
Orbitz |
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #7 39 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #19 14 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 ▾ | #16 10 条评价 | — |
| 中东 ▾ | #7 8 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Amadeus’ iHotelier® Booking Engine and Orbitz can significantly impact your hotel’s direct booking performance and operational efficiency. Both products aim to streamline reservations, but they serve distinctly different purposes: Amadeus focuses on integrated, customizable booking solutions for hotels, while Orbitz is primarily a broad travel platform for consumers.
Amadeus offers a feature-rich system designed specifically for hotels seeking advanced booking tools and market intelligence. Orbitz, on the other hand, functions as a third-party OTA aggregator, providing a wide-ranging travel booking experience. Which solution aligns better with your hotel’s goals?
Amadeus stands out with its dedicated hotel booking engine that emphasizes direct bookings, personalization, and revenue enhancement through targeted features. Orbitz, by contrast, is a travel aggregator that emphasizes broad accessibility and consumer-focused search and booking options.
Hoteliers value Amadeus for its 93 recent reviews, a solid overall rating of 4.39/5, and an active user base across multiple regions. Orbitz, with zero recent reviews, lacks the recent user feedback that can inform your decision-making process.
Are you looking for a direct, hotel-specific booking engine with proven features, or a broad travel platform that fits multiple travel needs? The answer will determine which product better suits your hotel.
If your hotel needs a comprehensive, customizable booking engine that integrates with your website, increases direct bookings, and offers advanced reporting, go with Amadeus. Its 36 unique features—like multi-currency support, loyalty integrations, and special offer modules—make it ideal for mid-sized to large hotels aiming to boost revenue through direct channels.
If your hotel seeks a broad travel platform primarily targeting consumers and not focused on direct booking optimization, Orbitz might seem appealing. However, with no recent reviews or verified integrations, it’s a less proven solution for hotel-specific booking needs.
For hotels prioritizing direct revenue growth and data-driven decision-making, Amadeus clearly leads. Orbitz’s focus on consumer travel booking does not match the specialized needs of hoteliers.
Amadeus’ iHotelier® Booking Engine boasts a high usability score of 4.25/5, with many reviews praising its intuitive interface and responsive design across devices. The platform’s onboarding process scores 4.01/5, reflecting steady ease of adoption, although some users mention a learning curve due to its feature set.
Orbitz, with no recent reviews or ratings, provides no current data on usability or onboarding. Its broader consumer platform may be simple for travelers but offers no hotel-specific usability insights.
Edge: Amadeus.
Amadeus offers 36 unique features tailored for hotel bookings—such as mobile optimization, pre- and post-stay emails, automation, multi-language support, loyalty integrations, and flexible rate options. These features enable personalized guest experiences and revenue opportunities.
Orbitz, lacking verified features for hotels, does not provide comparable functionalities. Its platform is designed for consumer travel booking rather than hotel management.
In terms of feature depth and hotel-specific tools, Amadeus dominates. Its suite of functionalities supports revenue growth and operational efficiency.
Edge: Amadeus.
Amadeus has a customer support rating of 3.22/5, with reviews noting responsiveness issues and inconsistent support quality. Some hoteliers report slow responses and difficulties resolving technical challenges, which could hinder your team’s operations.
Orbitz, with no recent reviews, offers no recent data on support quality. This lack of recent feedback makes it harder to assess support reliability.
Given Amadeus’ larger footprint and review volume, support may be variable, but it’s better documented than Orbitz’s. Your team should consider whether reliable support is critical to your operations.
Edge: Amadeus.
Amadeus boasts 104 verified partner integrations, including PMS, GDS, payment gateways, and marketing platforms. These integrations streamline management tasks and enhance functionality.
Orbitz shows no verified integrations, limiting its compatibility with existing hotel systems. Its lack of connectivity could impose additional manual work.
For seamless operation and expanded capabilities, Amadeus provides a clear advantage with its extensive integration network.
Edge: Amadeus.
With 93 recent reviews, Amadeus scores 4.39/5 overall, reflecting strong satisfaction across various hotel segments, including independent, branded, and resort hotels. Smaller and boutique hotels especially appreciate its revenue tools and usability.
Orbitz has no recent reviews or ratings from hoteliers, making it impossible to gauge user satisfaction or property-specific feedback.
For current, experience-backed ratings, Amadeus outperforms Orbitz in reliability and hotel satisfaction.
Edge: Amadeus.
Pricing details for Amadeus’ iHotelier® Booking Engine are not publicly disclosed, although there is no mention of implementation fees or monthly flat rates. Costs are likely customized based on hotel size and needs.
Orbitz provides no transparent pricing or trial options, suggesting it may be more suitable for consumers than hotels seeking direct booking solutions.
Given the lack of transparent pricing for Orbitz and the absence of recent hotel reviews, Amadeus’s value proposition is clearer for hotel investments.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Amadeus’ iHotelier® Booking Engine offers a comprehensive, hotel-focused solution with proven features, extensive integrations, and a strong user base. Its 93 recent reviews and 4.39/5 rating emphasize its relevance and reliability for hotels aiming to improve direct bookings and revenue.
Orbitz, lacking recent hotel-specific reviews and integrations, is better suited for consumer travel needs rather than hotel management. Its absence of detailed features and support data makes it a less attractive choice for hoteliers.
If your priority is a trusted, feature-rich booking engine to boost direct reservations, Amadeus remains the clear leader. Orbitz does not currently provide the hotel-specific tools or recent positive feedback necessary for a confident investment.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
TravelClick 因其易用性而受到酒店员工和最终用户的一致好评。其预订引擎被描述为直观的,有助于顺利处理预订和价格管理。这种用户友好性是一个关键的卖点。
许多酒店经营者称赞 TravelClick 能够通过先进的定价引擎、促销工具以及与各种渠道的更好整合来增加收入。他们提到了多费率显示、限时抢购和新的 Web 4.0 平台等... 许多酒店经营者称赞 TravelClick 能够通过先进的定价引擎、促销工具以及与各种渠道的更好整合来增加收入。他们提到了多费率显示、限时抢购和新的 Web 4.0 平台等功能,这些功能显著提高了直接预订量和总体收入。
人们对客户服务的看法褒贬不一。虽然一些用户称赞客户服务周到且乐于助人,但也有很多人抱怨响应速度慢、解决问题困难。这种不一致是潜在买家需要考虑的重要因素... 人们对客户服务的看法褒贬不一。虽然一些用户称赞客户服务周到且乐于助人,但也有很多人抱怨响应速度慢、解决问题困难。这种不一致是潜在买家需要考虑的重要因素。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
TravelClick 与各种系统(包括 PMS 和支付网关)的强大集成受到高度赞赏。许多评论都强调无缝连接支持各种功能,并通过统一界面简化管理。
尽管该系统具有诸多优势,但一些用户仍表示其可用性存在挑战,他们指出界面复杂,某些功能的学习难度较大。这种复杂性可能会妨碍系统的最佳使用,尤其是对于经验... 尽管该系统具有诸多优势,但一些用户仍表示其可用性存在挑战,他们指出界面复杂,某些功能的学习难度较大。这种复杂性可能会妨碍系统的最佳使用,尤其是对于经验不足的用户而言。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine 和 Orbitz 共享许多核心 Booking Engine 功能,但各有独特的能力。Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine 提供 104 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Orbitz 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.3/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine:否。Orbitz:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Booking Engine 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Amadeus 的 HT Score 为 72,Orbitz 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问