The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 预订引擎 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
Pegipegi |
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #22 11 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #15 36 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #7 26 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #9 6 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
Pegipegi |
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #17 32 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #12 41 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #10 34 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #14 11 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
Pegipegi |
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #7 39 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #19 14 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 ▾ | #16 10 条评价 | — |
| 中东 ▾ | #7 8 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Amadeus’s iHotelier® Booking Engine and Pegipegi hinges on your hotel’s specific needs. Both aim to facilitate online bookings, but Amadeus offers a robust, feature-rich platform with extensive integration and global reach, while Pegipegi appears more suited to broader travel arrangements without specialized hotel booking features. Your team must consider whether you prioritize a dedicated hotel booking solution or a multi-service travel platform.
Amadeus’s iHotelier® boasts a comprehensive set of features, a substantial review base, and a global footprint, making it a compelling choice for hotels focused on direct bookings. Pegipegi, however, has no reviews or feature set listed, indicating a less mature, less tailored solution for hotel-specific booking needs. So, which platform aligns better with your hotel’s operational goals?
Amadeus leads in overall ratings, with a score of 72.2 out of 100 based on 93 reviews, including recent feedback, and an 87% likelihood to recommend. It scores 4.39 out of 5 for overall satisfaction, with notable praise for its ability to increase revenue and integrate with other systems. Conversely, Pegipegi’s profile shows no reviews or ratings, indicating a lack of recent user feedback or a smaller, less established presence.
Amadeus’s reviews highlight its capacity to boost direct bookings through advanced pricing, marketing, and multi-channel integrations. Pegipegi’s lack of detailed reviews or user feedback makes it difficult to assess its effectiveness or suitability for hotel use. Given the data, Amadeus clearly has the more tested and proven track record for hotels seeking a booking engine that drives revenue and integrates widely. The question remains: Are you willing to depend on an unreviewed platform, or do you prefer the tried-and-true leader?
If your hotel needs a feature-rich, globally integrated booking engine with extensive marketing and reporting tools, go with Amadeus. Its 36 exclusive features, including multi-lingual support, loyalty integrations, and Google Hotel Ads, make it ideal for mid-sized to large hotels aiming to optimize direct bookings and revenue management.
If, however, your focus is on a simple, potentially broader travel platform that offers aggregated booking services without hotel-specific features or a solid review base, Pegipegi might seem appealing. But with no user feedback or feature list, it’s less suitable for hotels prioritizing reliable, proven booking solutions. Given the data, Amadeus is the clear choice if your goal is to maximize hotel-specific booking efficiency.
Amadeus’s iHotelier® scores 4.25 out of 5 for ease of use, with many users citing its intuitive interface and strong onboarding process rated at 4.01 out of 5. Some reviews mention initial complexity but highlight that dedicated support helps staff adapt quickly. Support responsiveness, however, is mixed, with some hotel teams expressing frustration with slow responses.
Pegipegi provides no available ratings or review comments, making it impossible to assess its usability or onboarding experience. Its platform’s simplicity or complexity cannot be determined from the available data. Therefore, the edge goes to Amadeus, which, despite some learning curve, has a proven, rated onboarding and usability experience.
Amadeus’s iHotelier® offers 36 exclusive features, including mobile responsiveness, pre- and post-stay emails, automated reporting, multi-currency, multi-lingual support, loyalty programs, and integration with Google Hotel Ads and TripAdvisor. These features support a full-fledged hotel booking operation and revenue optimization.
Pegipegi offers no listed features, making it impossible to compare specific functionalities or determine its capability to meet hotel booking demands. Based on available information, Amadeus’s extensive feature set clearly positions it as the superior product for hotels seeking a comprehensive booking engine. Edge: Amadeus.
Amadeus’s customer support scores 3.22 out of 5, with reviews indicating mixed experiences—some praising responsiveness, others noting slow responses and unresolved issues. Many hoteliers value the dedicated account management and consultative approach but wish for more consistent support quality.
Pegipegi provides no reviews or ratings, so customer support quality cannot be assessed. Given the data, Amadeus’s support structure, despite some flaws, is the better-supported option. The lack of support data for Pegipegi makes it the less reliable choice for hotels needing dependable assistance.
Amadeus boasts 104 verified partners, including prominent travel systems like Priority Software, Orange Hotel Marketing, and RevControl. These integrations cover PMS, payment gateways, distribution channels, and marketing tools, facilitating a connected hotel operation.
Pegipegi has no listed integrations or verified partners, limiting its appeal for hotels requiring seamless connectivity. Therefore, Amadeus holds the edge in ecosystem connectivity, essential for hotels with complex operational needs. Edge: Amadeus.
Amadeus enjoys a high overall rating of 4.39/5, with positive feedback from diverse hotel segments, especially independent properties (4.36/5) and boutique hotels (4.61/5). Recent reviews reinforce its reputation for improving revenue and user experience.
Pegipegi has no reviews or rating data, making it impossible to gauge user satisfaction. Based on the available ratings, Amadeus is the preferred choice for high-rated, hotel-specific booking solutions. Its broad acceptance among hoteliers affirms its value.
Pricing details for Amadeus are not publicly available, but it typically involves a custom quote based on property size and needs, indicating a potentially higher investment level. Pegipegi also does not list pricing, suggesting it may operate on a different, possibly less transparent model.
Given the absence of specific pricing info, your team should expect to negotiate directly with providers. However, the high ratings and extensive features of Amadeus suggest it is a premium product aligning with larger or more revenue-focused hotels.
Not ideal if your hotel operates on a very tight budget, prefers a less complex platform, or requires a system with minimal setup and straightforward features.
Not ideal if your hotel requires advanced hotel-specific booking features, extensive integrations, or proven support and user feedback.
Amadeus’s iHotelier® Booking Engine offers a comprehensive, well-rated solution with extensive features, high user satisfaction, and broad integration. Its focus on direct hotel bookings makes it a suitable choice for hotels aiming to boost revenue through a proven platform.
If your hotel needs a feature-rich, globally supported booking engine with reliable support, Amadeus is the clear winner. Its large review base and recent positive feedback underscore its effectiveness and reliability.
Pegipegi, lacking reviews, features, and support data, remains an untested option. It may serve well for travel agencies or businesses requiring broader travel booking capabilities but is less suitable as a dedicated hotel booking engine.
In conclusion, for hoteliers prioritizing proven performance, advanced features, and extensive integrations, Amadeus’s iHotelier® Booking Engine stands out as the superior choice.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
TravelClick 因其易用性而受到酒店员工和最终用户的一致好评。其预订引擎被描述为直观的,有助于顺利处理预订和价格管理。这种用户友好性是一个关键的卖点。
许多酒店经营者称赞 TravelClick 能够通过先进的定价引擎、促销工具以及与各种渠道的更好整合来增加收入。他们提到了多费率显示、限时抢购和新的 Web 4.0 平台等... 许多酒店经营者称赞 TravelClick 能够通过先进的定价引擎、促销工具以及与各种渠道的更好整合来增加收入。他们提到了多费率显示、限时抢购和新的 Web 4.0 平台等功能,这些功能显著提高了直接预订量和总体收入。
人们对客户服务的看法褒贬不一。虽然一些用户称赞客户服务周到且乐于助人,但也有很多人抱怨响应速度慢、解决问题困难。这种不一致是潜在买家需要考虑的重要因素... 人们对客户服务的看法褒贬不一。虽然一些用户称赞客户服务周到且乐于助人,但也有很多人抱怨响应速度慢、解决问题困难。这种不一致是潜在买家需要考虑的重要因素。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
TravelClick 与各种系统(包括 PMS 和支付网关)的强大集成受到高度赞赏。许多评论都强调无缝连接支持各种功能,并通过统一界面简化管理。
尽管该系统具有诸多优势,但一些用户仍表示其可用性存在挑战,他们指出界面复杂,某些功能的学习难度较大。这种复杂性可能会妨碍系统的最佳使用,尤其是对于经验... 尽管该系统具有诸多优势,但一些用户仍表示其可用性存在挑战,他们指出界面复杂,某些功能的学习难度较大。这种复杂性可能会妨碍系统的最佳使用,尤其是对于经验不足的用户而言。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine 和 Pegipegi 共享许多核心 Booking Engine 功能,但各有独特的能力。Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine 提供 104 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Pegipegi 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.3/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine:否。Pegipegi:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Booking Engine 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Amadeus 的 HT Score 为 72,Pegipegi 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问