项目面板是一款免费工具,仅向已认证的酒店从业者开放。它通过简化调研流程和沟通环节,让采用新技术变得更轻松。
各产品在不同酒店规模、类型和区域的 预订引擎 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店经营者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #25 12 条评价 | #35 2 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #16 32 条评价 | #18 16 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #9 30 条评价 | #16 4 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #10 5 条评价 | #17 1 条评价 |
按酒店类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #18 33 条评价 | #24 9 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #14 41 条评价 | #20 9 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #13 34 条评价 | #20 7 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #15 11 条评价 | #26 2 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #7 39 条评价 | #27 1 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #22 14 条评价 | #49 0 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #15 10 条评价 | #8 15 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | #8 8 条评价 | #5 6 条评价 |
Amadeus iHotelier and RateGain Hotel Booking Engine both serve the direct booking needs of hotels but diverge notably in user segments and feature sophistication. Amadeus iHotelier fits best with medium to large hotels, branded chains, and city-center properties that benefit from its advanced reporting, loyalty program integration, and multi-rate display capabilities. RateGain caters more to luxury and branded hotels, especially in Asia Pacific and Middle East, emphasizing ease of use and faster onboarding for properties aiming for quick deployment.
Both platforms address the core challenge of converting website visitors into direct bookers while maximizing revenue. They improve guest booking experience through responsive design and real-time availability but differ on integration depth and specific merchandising features. Amadeus targets a comprehensive revenue strategy with add-ons and urgency messaging, while RateGain focuses on straightforward guest journeys and direct booking uplift.
If your hotel operates in North America, Europe, or a multi-property branded environment and values advanced automated reporting, loyalty program integration, and ADA compliance, Amadeus iHotelier is the better choice. This is supported by its 95 reviews with a 4.4/5 rating and specific strength in city-center and branded hotels (4.5/5 across 34 reviews).
Conversely, if your property is a luxury hotel or boutique brand in Asia Pacific or the Middle East, RateGain’s higher ease of use (4.7/5) and customer support (4.8/5) ratings from 23 reviews recommend it. RateGain’s strength in luxury hotels (4.5/5) and branded hotels (4.8/5) with a smaller but highly positive review base suits hotels prioritizing fast onboarding and direct booking uplift.
Data on smaller independent or budget properties is limited for RateGain, making Amadeus the safer bet for diverse hotel types with complex requirements. The lack of recent reviews for both systems suggests decision-makers should verify current support and feature roadmaps before purchase.
RateGain has a clear edge in ease of use and onboarding, scoring 4.7/5 on both metrics compared to Amadeus’s 4.3/5 ease of use and 4.0/5 onboarding. Reviewers praise RateGain for its intuitive interface and quick adoption by staff, with comments highlighting “easy to navigate” and “quick response” as operational benefits.
Amadeus, while generally considered user-friendly, has more mixed feedback regarding complexity in certain functions and a steeper learning curve for advanced features. Some users cite the booking engine console as easy to configure, but others mention challenges in managing packages and photo uploads.
This difference affects front desk and revenue teams: RateGain’s simpler interface reduces training time and speeds up daily rate updates, whereas Amadeus’s complexity may require dedicated staff or consultants for optimization.
Edge: RateGain.
Amadeus offers a broader set of hotel-specific features with 11 unique functions versus RateGain’s 3. Amadeus’s exclusive features include automated reporting, urgency messaging that drives conversion by highlighting limited availability, booking abandonment recapture to recover lost reservations, loyalty program integration, and compliance with ADA standards. These features empower revenue managers to drive direct bookings strategically and improve guest experience through personalized offers and payment flexibility (Apple Pay, PayU).
RateGain’s unique features—Facebook conversion tracking, meal plans, and gift vouchers—support marketing attribution and guest upselling but add less operational depth than Amadeus’s advanced revenue tools.
Both share 25 features, including responsive website integration and multiple payment options, but Amadeus’s richer feature set transforms how hotels manage bookings, guest engagement, and revenue reporting.
Edge: Amadeus.
RateGain outperforms Amadeus in customer support with a 4.8/5 rating compared to Amadeus’s 4.1/5. Onboarding scores reflect a similar gap: 4.7/5 for RateGain versus 4.0/5 for Amadeus. RateGain reviewers consistently highlight “very helpful” and “easy to communicate with” support teams who guide users thoroughly from setup to daily operations.
Amadeus’s support reviews are more mixed. While some users appreciate attentive service, others report slow response times and difficulty resolving complex issues. This variance can impact hotels relying on prompt assistance, especially during seasonal peaks or technical challenges.
For hotels prioritizing dependable, fast customer service, RateGain offers a more consistent experience.
Edge: RateGain.
Amadeus leads with 107 verified integrations versus RateGain’s 96, sharing 28 common partners including key PMS and marketing platforms such as Profitroom, Fairmas, and Cendyn. Amadeus’s exclusives include integrations with Priority Software, Orange Hotel Marketing, and RevControl, which provide more in-depth marketing automation and revenue control tools.
RateGain’s unique integrations include apaleo GmbH and RoomRaccoon, which may benefit hotels using newer or regional PMS systems in Asia or Europe. For multi-property operators requiring extensive third-party connectivity, Amadeus’s broader ecosystem supports complex workflows better.
Hotels with simpler setups or regional needs might find RateGain’s integrations sufficient, but larger properties gain more operational flexibility with Amadeus.
Edge: Amadeus.
RateGain holds a slight overall rating advantage at 4.6/5 across 23 reviews compared to Amadeus’s 4.4/5 from 95 reviews. However, the larger sample for Amadeus provides a more stable rating profile. Both products lack recent reviews, which limits confidence in rating recency.
Segment ratings show Amadeus performs well with boutique hotels (4.6/5) and bed & breakfasts (4.6/5), while RateGain scores highest with luxury hotels (4.5/5), branded hotels (4.8/5), and airport/conference hotels (4.9/5). RateGain’s higher scores in luxury and branded segments reflect its focus on user experience and support.
Amadeus’s ratings for city center hotels (4.5/5) and resorts (4.4/5) also suggest strong appeal in standard and midscale segments.
Overall, rating data favors RateGain in segments with fewer reviews but with higher satisfaction; Amadeus’s extensive review base supports its credibility across diverse property types.
Edge: Even.
Amadeus does not publish pricing, with no base price, per-room fees, or monthly flat rates disclosed. Its cost structure is opaque, requiring direct vendor inquiry for accurate quotes.
RateGain has a published base price of $400.00 but does not offer freemium, monthly flat, or per-room pricing models. No implementation fees or trial options are listed for either product.
Hotels seeking transparent pricing may find RateGain easier to assess upfront, while Amadeus requires more negotiation and budget planning.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Amadeus iHotelier Booking Engine and RateGain Hotel Booking Engine both improve direct booking conversion but diverge in complexity, support, and market focus. Amadeus provides a broader, more feature-rich platform with advanced revenue management tools and extensive integrations, making it suitable for branded, city center, and boutique hotels with complex needs. RateGain excels in user experience, faster onboarding, and customer support, appealing to luxury and branded hotels in Asia Pacific and Middle East looking for a straightforward, well-supported solution.
Choose Amadeus if you need features like booking abandonment recapture, loyalty program integration, and ADA compliance plus access to 107 verified integrations that support complex workflows. Choose RateGain if you prioritize ease of use, strong customer support, and published pricing, especially if your hotel is a luxury or branded property operating in RateGain’s primary regions.
This comparison reflects review-backed ratings, feature counts, and integration breadth, providing operators with clarity on which booking engine matches their operational priorities and growth strategies.
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
商品和包装
|
|
|
| 房间替换 | ||
| 多房间和多费率计划预订 | ||
| 固定费率、浮动费率和折扣率 | ||
| 合并库存 | ||
| 特别优惠和折扣 | ||
| 可定制的附加组件 | ||
| 膳食计划 | ||
| 网站整合 | ||
| 社交媒体整合/预订 | ||
|
▾
追加销售和交叉销售
|
|
|
| 多房间和多费率计划预订 | ||
| 房间替换 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 预订放弃重新获得 | ||
| 可定制的附加组件 | ||
| 特别优惠和折扣 | ||
| 膳食计划 | ||
| 替代住宿建议(没有空房时) | ||
| 忠诚度计划整合 | ||
|
▾
转换
|
|
|
| 移动优化/响应式 | ||
| 特别优惠和折扣 | ||
| 紧急信息 | ||
| 预订放弃重新获得 | ||
| 多房间和多费率计划预订 | ||
| 房间替换 | ||
| 人工智能优化 | ||
| 价格对比 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 转化率报告 | ||
| Facebook 转化跟踪 | ||
| 可定制的退出意图模式 | ||
| 表单自动填充 | ||
| 灵活日期 | ||
| 费率计划比较 | ||
| Google 酒店广告预订 | ||
| Tripadvisor 预订 | ||
|
▾
支付
|
|
|
| 多币种 | ||
| 苹果支付 | ||
| Google Pay | ||
| 贝宝 | ||
| PCI合规性 | ||
| PayU | ||
| 条纹 | ||
|
▾
通知
|
|
|
| 预订放弃重新获得 | ||
| 入住后电子邮件 | ||
| 入住前电子邮件 | ||
| 确认电子邮件 | ||
|
▾
团体预订
|
|
|
| 婚礼和企业预订模块 | ||
| 可用性块 | ||
|
▾
报告与分析
|
|
|
| 自动报告 | ||
| 转化率报告 | ||
| 推荐报告 | ||
| Google Analytics 跟踪 | ||
|
▾
税务合规
|
|
|
| PCI合规性 | ||
| 符合 ADA 标准 | ||
| 关税 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 符合 GDPR 规定 |
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
TravelClick 因其易用性而受到酒店员工和最终用户的一致好评。其预订引擎被描述为直观的,有助于顺利处理预订和价格管理。这种用户友好性是一个关键的卖点。
许多酒店经营者称赞 TravelClick 能够通过先进的定价引擎、促销工具以及与各种渠道的更好整合来增加收入。他们提到了多费率显示、限时抢购和新的 Web 4.0 平台等... 许多酒店经营者称赞 TravelClick 能够通过先进的定价引擎、促销工具以及与各种渠道的更好整合来增加收入。他们提到了多费率显示、限时抢购和新的 Web 4.0 平台等功能,这些功能显著提高了直接预订量和总体收入。
人们对客户服务的看法褒贬不一。虽然一些用户称赞客户服务周到且乐于助人,但也有很多人抱怨响应速度慢、解决问题困难。这种不一致是潜在买家需要考虑的重要因素... 人们对客户服务的看法褒贬不一。虽然一些用户称赞客户服务周到且乐于助人,但也有很多人抱怨响应速度慢、解决问题困难。这种不一致是潜在买家需要考虑的重要因素。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
TravelClick 与各种系统(包括 PMS 和支付网关)的强大集成受到高度赞赏。许多评论都强调无缝连接支持各种功能,并通过统一界面简化管理。
尽管该系统具有诸多优势,但一些用户仍表示其可用性存在挑战,他们指出界面复杂,某些功能的学习难度较大。这种复杂性可能会妨碍系统的最佳使用,尤其是对于经验... 尽管该系统具有诸多优势,但一些用户仍表示其可用性存在挑战,他们指出界面复杂,某些功能的学习难度较大。这种复杂性可能会妨碍系统的最佳使用,尤其是对于经验不足的用户而言。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine 和 RateGain Hotel Booking Engine 共享许多核心 Booking Engine 功能,但各有独特的能力。Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine 提供 107 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 RateGain Hotel Booking Engine 提供 96 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速上手。RateGain Hotel Booking Engine 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 4.3/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按酒店规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine:否。RateGain Hotel Booking Engine:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Booking Engine 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店经营者客观比较酒店科技产品。Amadeus 的 HT Score 为 74,RateGain 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您酒店的情况量身定制的推荐