The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 预订引擎 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #22 11 条评价 | #32 2 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #15 36 条评价 | #18 17 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #7 26 条评价 | #17 2 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #9 6 条评价 | #15 2 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #17 32 条评价 | #23 9 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #12 41 条评价 | #22 8 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #10 34 条评价 | #19 7 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #14 11 条评价 | #26 2 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #7 39 条评价 | #38 1 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #19 14 条评价 | #47 0 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #16 10 条评价 | #9 15 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | #7 8 条评价 | #5 6 条评价 |
Choosing the right booking engine is central to increasing your direct bookings, improving revenue, and providing a seamless guest experience. Both Amadeus’ iHotelier® Booking Engine and RateGain’s Hotel Booking Engine aim to fulfill these goals but differ significantly in market presence, feature sets, and support quality. Your decision hinges on understanding these differences and aligning them with your hotel’s size, segment, and strategic priorities.
Amadeus, with its extensive review base and recent positive feedback, offers a more proven solution, especially for properties seeking robust integrations and advanced revenue tools. RateGain, while less reviewed, emphasizes ease of use and a straightforward approach, appealing to hotels prioritizing simplicity. The question is: which aligns better with your hotel’s needs?
Both products address the core problem of converting website visitors into confirmed guests, but they diverge in scope and sophistication. Amadeus’s solution integrates deeply with its broader ecosystem, offering 25 shared features plus 11 exclusive ones like loyalty programs, ADA compliance, and website integration, making it a comprehensive tool for larger or more complex hotels. RateGain’s platform focuses on ease of use, fast updates, and customer friendliness, with only 3 unique features, suitable for smaller properties or those new to digital booking.
Amadeus’s more extensive feature set and global market presence suggest it’s better suited for hotels with complex needs or those aiming to maximize revenue through advanced tools. RateGain’s streamlined interface and high ease-of-use scores point toward a quick, less resource-intensive implementation. Which of these priorities aligns with your hotel’s strategic goals?
If your hotel needs a comprehensive, multi-feature platform with extensive integrations, go with Amadeus. Its 93 reviews and a high 4.39/5 overall rating highlight a mature product trusted by a broad segment, especially in North America and Europe, where most of its users operate. Amadeus’s advanced features like automated reporting, booking abandonment recapture, and loyalty integrations make it ideal for hotels looking to optimize revenue and market intelligence.
If your hotel values simplicity, quick deployment, and user-friendly interfaces, RateGain is the better pick. With only 21 reviews but a strong 4.71/5 ease-of-use rating and a recent 4.76/5 support score, it’s praised for swift updates and straightforward management. Its $400/month pricing is transparent, and it suits properties seeking immediate results without the complexity.
RateGain’s ease-of-use rating of 4.71/5 surpasses Amadeus’s 4.25/5, reflecting its more intuitive interface, quicker onboarding, and user-friendly dashboard. Hoteliers praise RateGain for quick staff training, simple navigation, and fast response times, making it ideal if your team is less experienced with technology.
Amadeus, with a slightly lower score, is often described as more complex, partly due to its broader feature set and integration depth. While its onboarding score is high at 4.01/5, some users note the initial learning curve. Edge: RateGain.
Amadeus offers 25 shared features plus 11 exclusive ones, including automated reporting, referral tracking, ADA compliance, and website integration—features that RateGain doesn’t provide. These advanced tools support sophisticated revenue management, marketing, and guest personalization strategies, making Amadeus more suitable for larger hotels or chains.
RateGain’s platform includes only three exclusive features: Facebook conversion tracking, meal plans, and gift vouchers. While these are useful, they are less comprehensive and cater more to straightforward booking needs. The clear advantage in features goes to Amadeus. Edge: Amadeus.
RateGain’s customer support and onboarding ratings stand out with scores of 4.76/5 and 4.65/5, respectively, and glowing reviews about its responsiveness and problem-solving. Hoteliers frequently mention support as a key strength, with comments like "support system, timely problem solving" and "support team is very responsive."
Amadeus scores a 3.22/5 in customer support, with some users citing slow response times and challenges in resolving issues quickly. Although their onboarding is rated well at 4.01/5, the support experience appears less consistent. Edge: RateGain.
Amadeus boasts 104 verified partners, including major hotel management and marketing solutions like Priority Software and Orange Hotel Marketing. It shares 28 integrations with RateGain, including popular systems like HotelTime, Cendyn, and RoomKey PMS, but also offers exclusive connections to tools like React Mobile and Hotello.
RateGain has 95 verified partners, with notable integrations like WuBook (Channel Manager) and GuestCentric. While slightly fewer, its partner network remains extensive and diverse, supporting various hotel tech stacks. Overall, Amadeus has a slight edge in total integrations, thanks to its broader partner ecosystem. Edge: Amadeus.
Amadeus’s 93 reviews and 4.39/5 score reflect a solid reputation, especially among independent and boutique hotels, which rate it at 4.36/5. The hotel segments most satisfied include resorts and city center hotels, with high praise for revenue tools and integration.
RateGain’s 21 reviews and 4.71/5 rating show a very high satisfaction level, particularly for ease of use and support. Its recent reviews highlight quick implementation and straightforward management, making it appealing for properties prioritizing simplicity. The higher rating favors RateGain, but the larger review count for Amadeus indicates more established trust. Edge: RateGain.
Amadeus does not publicly list pricing, indicating a customized quote based on property size and needs. It traditionally targets mid-to-large hotels with budgets for comprehensive solutions.
RateGain charges $400 per month, with no additional implementation or setup fees, making it transparent and accessible for small to medium hotels. The lack of public pricing for Amadeus suggests it might be a larger investment, while RateGain offers a straightforward monthly fee.
Not ideal if your hotel prefers minimal management or has a very limited budget, as Amadeus’s complexity can demand more dedicated staff.
Not ideal if your hotel needs deep integrations, advanced revenue tools, or operates in regions where Amadeus’s global reach is a better fit.
The core difference lies in scope and complexity. Amadeus provides a broad, feature-rich platform tailored for larger hotels or those with complex revenue and distribution needs. RateGain offers a streamlined, user-friendly booking engine that delivers quick results for properties valuing simplicity.
Choose Amadeus if your hotel needs advanced revenue management, extensive integrations, and market intelligence. It’s ideal for larger hotels or chains looking for a comprehensive system. RateGain is better suited for smaller hotels or independents seeking an easy-to-manage solution that quickly boosts direct bookings.
If your hotel already has a sophisticated tech stack and requires advanced features, Amadeus is your best option. For hotels prioritizing quick implementation and straightforward operation, RateGain is the safer, more cost-effective choice.
This detailed comparison aims to help you confidently choose the booking engine that aligns with your hotel’s size, segment, and strategic goals. Remember, more recent reviews and higher overall ratings typically indicate a more reliable and well-supported solution—these are strengths of Amadeus. However, if ease of use and quick deployment are your priority, RateGain’s high ratings make it a compelling option.
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine 和 RateGain Hotel Booking Engine 共享 25 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Facebook 转化跟踪 | ||
| 关税 | ||
| 忠诚度计划整合 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 符合 ADA 标准 | ||
| 紧急信息 | ||
| 膳食计划 | ||
| 自动报告 | ||
| 预订放弃重新获得 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 2 项功能存在差异。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
TravelClick 因其易用性而受到酒店员工和最终用户的一致好评。其预订引擎被描述为直观的,有助于顺利处理预订和价格管理。这种用户友好性是一个关键的卖点。
许多酒店经营者称赞 TravelClick 能够通过先进的定价引擎、促销工具以及与各种渠道的更好整合来增加收入。他们提到了多费率显示、限时抢购和新的 Web 4.0 平台等... 许多酒店经营者称赞 TravelClick 能够通过先进的定价引擎、促销工具以及与各种渠道的更好整合来增加收入。他们提到了多费率显示、限时抢购和新的 Web 4.0 平台等功能,这些功能显著提高了直接预订量和总体收入。
人们对客户服务的看法褒贬不一。虽然一些用户称赞客户服务周到且乐于助人,但也有很多人抱怨响应速度慢、解决问题困难。这种不一致是潜在买家需要考虑的重要因素... 人们对客户服务的看法褒贬不一。虽然一些用户称赞客户服务周到且乐于助人,但也有很多人抱怨响应速度慢、解决问题困难。这种不一致是潜在买家需要考虑的重要因素。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
TravelClick 与各种系统(包括 PMS 和支付网关)的强大集成受到高度赞赏。许多评论都强调无缝连接支持各种功能,并通过统一界面简化管理。
尽管该系统具有诸多优势,但一些用户仍表示其可用性存在挑战,他们指出界面复杂,某些功能的学习难度较大。这种复杂性可能会妨碍系统的最佳使用,尤其是对于经验... 尽管该系统具有诸多优势,但一些用户仍表示其可用性存在挑战,他们指出界面复杂,某些功能的学习难度较大。这种复杂性可能会妨碍系统的最佳使用,尤其是对于经验不足的用户而言。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine 和 RateGain Hotel Booking Engine 共享许多核心 Booking Engine 功能,但各有独特的能力。Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine 提供 104 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 RateGain Hotel Booking Engine 提供 95 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。RateGain Hotel Booking Engine 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 4.3/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine:否。RateGain Hotel Booking Engine:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Booking Engine 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Amadeus 的 HT Score 为 72,RateGain 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问