The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 预订引擎 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #22 11 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #15 36 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #7 26 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #9 6 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #17 32 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #12 41 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #10 34 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #14 11 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #7 39 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #19 14 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 ▾ | #16 10 条评价 | — |
| 中东 ▾ | #7 8 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Amadeus’s iHotelier® Booking Engine and RoomStay hinges on your hotel’s specific needs, priorities, and operational scale. While both aim to drive direct bookings, Amadeus offers a longstanding, feature-rich platform with extensive integrations and a solid market presence. RoomStay, on the other hand, is a newer and less-reviewed platform promising a seamless booking experience but currently lacks the depth of features and proven market traction. Which solution best aligns with your hotel’s goals?
Amadeus’s iHotelier® Booking Engine stands out for its robust feature set, with 34 exclusive features like pre- and post-stay emails, customizable add-ons, and multi-currency support. RoomStay, however, offers no unique features beyond its core booking engine, which limits its differentiation. Amadeus’s platform is designed around proven e-commerce best practices, aiming to maximize conversions and revenue.
In contrast, RoomStay's reviews and market presence are virtually nonexistent, with no recent feedback or ratings to support its effectiveness. Amadeus has accumulated 93 reviews with a solid 4.39/5 overall score, showing consistent user satisfaction, especially in ease of use and onboarding. RoomStay has no reviews or market data, making its actual performance and reliability uncertain.
Are you prepared to bet on an untested platform with no user reviews, or do you prefer an established product backed by years of hotel industry experience?
If your hotel needs a comprehensive booking engine with deep integration options, sophisticated marketing tools, and advanced reporting, Amadeus is the clear choice. Its extensive feature list and proven track record make it suitable for hotels seeking to boost direct bookings and revenue through tailored guest experiences.
If, however, your hotel’s primary focus is a simple, straightforward booking process and you are open to testing a newer platform, RoomStay might appeal. Still, without reviews, existing customers, or proven ROI data, it’s a riskier option.
For hotels prioritizing reliability, integration, and extensive feature support, Amadeus is the safer, more proven partner. If your hotel prefers a minimalist approach and is willing to experiment, RoomStay could be considered, but with caution.
Amadeus’s iHotelier® Booking Engine scores 4.25/5 on ease of use, reflecting its intuitive interface, responsive design, and straightforward onboarding. Its user reviews highlight how staff have found it accessible after initial training, supported by a strong onboarding process scoring 4.01/5.
RoomStay has no available user ratings or reviews, making it impossible to gauge its usability. Given the lack of feedback, there’s no evidence to suggest it provides a better or even comparable user experience.
Edge: Amadeus.
Amadeus’s platform offers 34 exclusive features that enhance booking, marketing, and revenue management, such as automated reporting, multi-lingual support, loyalty program integration, rate plan comparisons, and Google Hotel Ads bookings. These features allow your team to personalize guest interactions and optimize conversions effectively.
RoomStay provides no unique or advanced features beyond its core booking engine, limiting its ability to support sophisticated revenue strategies or marketing initiatives. Without additional features, it’s unlikely to meet the needs of hotels seeking to scale or differentiate their booking experience.
Edge: Amadeus.
Amadeus’s customer support is rated 3.22/5, with reviews indicating mixed experiences. Some hoteliers praise their dedicated account managers and responsiveness, but others report slow responses and difficulties resolving issues. Notably, some reviews mention that support can lag, especially during busy periods.
RoomStay has no reviews or support ratings, leaving its service quality an open question. Given Amadeus’s extensive industry presence and support infrastructure, it remains the more reliable choice, despite its mixed ratings.
Edge: Amadeus.
Amadeus boasts 104 verified partner integrations, including major channels like SiteMinder, Oracle Hospitality, and D-Edge, providing seamless connectivity with PMS, payment gateways, and distribution channels. These integrations facilitate efficient management and broader distribution.
RoomStay has only 7 verified partners, including Triptease, Adyen, and Stripe, with limited options for connectivity and fewer channels for distribution. Its smaller partner network restricts its ability to integrate into existing hotel tech stacks.
Edge: Amadeus.
Amadeus’s overall rating of 4.39/5 is based on 93 recent reviews, with independent hotels rating it 4.36/5 and branded hotels 4.5/5. Hotels of various sizes, especially those seeking reliability and extensive features, express satisfaction, citing revenue growth and ease of use.
RoomStay, lacking reviews altogether, provides no data on user satisfaction. Without recent ratings or customer feedback, it’s impossible to gauge how hoteliers perceive its value.
Edge: Amadeus.
Amadeus’s pricing details are not publicly disclosed; it operates on a custom quote basis, often involving a setup fee and monthly charges based on room count and feature usage. RoomStay also offers no publicly available pricing, indicating a likely custom quote model.
Both platforms’ costs can vary significantly depending on your hotel’s size and needs, but the lack of transparent pricing makes direct comparison difficult. Expect to negotiate terms with each vendor.
Not ideal if you prefer a free or very low-cost solution, or if your hotel is very small with minimal technical resources.
Not ideal if your hotel needs advanced marketing tools, extensive integrations, or proven track records.
Amadeus’s iHotelier® Booking Engine is a mature, feature-rich platform trusted by many hotels globally. Its extensive integrations, proven market presence, and robust feature set make it the ideal choice for hotels focused on maximizing direct bookings and revenue.
RoomStay offers an appealing, straightforward solution, but its lack of reviews, features, and market presence makes it a risky choice for most hotels. If your hotel can tolerate uncertainty and is willing to test a new platform, RoomStay might be worth exploring; otherwise, Amadeus’s proven track record provides peace of mind.
In summary, for most hotels, especially those wanting confidence backed by reviews and a comprehensive feature set, Amadeus is the recommended choice. Its extensive integrations, proven user satisfaction, and market reach make it the safer, more effective platform for driving direct bookings and revenue growth.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
TravelClick 因其易用性而受到酒店员工和最终用户的一致好评。其预订引擎被描述为直观的,有助于顺利处理预订和价格管理。这种用户友好性是一个关键的卖点。
许多酒店经营者称赞 TravelClick 能够通过先进的定价引擎、促销工具以及与各种渠道的更好整合来增加收入。他们提到了多费率显示、限时抢购和新的 Web 4.0 平台等... 许多酒店经营者称赞 TravelClick 能够通过先进的定价引擎、促销工具以及与各种渠道的更好整合来增加收入。他们提到了多费率显示、限时抢购和新的 Web 4.0 平台等功能,这些功能显著提高了直接预订量和总体收入。
人们对客户服务的看法褒贬不一。虽然一些用户称赞客户服务周到且乐于助人,但也有很多人抱怨响应速度慢、解决问题困难。这种不一致是潜在买家需要考虑的重要因素... 人们对客户服务的看法褒贬不一。虽然一些用户称赞客户服务周到且乐于助人,但也有很多人抱怨响应速度慢、解决问题困难。这种不一致是潜在买家需要考虑的重要因素。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
TravelClick 与各种系统(包括 PMS 和支付网关)的强大集成受到高度赞赏。许多评论都强调无缝连接支持各种功能,并通过统一界面简化管理。
尽管该系统具有诸多优势,但一些用户仍表示其可用性存在挑战,他们指出界面复杂,某些功能的学习难度较大。这种复杂性可能会妨碍系统的最佳使用,尤其是对于经验... 尽管该系统具有诸多优势,但一些用户仍表示其可用性存在挑战,他们指出界面复杂,某些功能的学习难度较大。这种复杂性可能会妨碍系统的最佳使用,尤其是对于经验不足的用户而言。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine 和 Roomstay 共享许多核心 Booking Engine 功能,但各有独特的能力。Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine 提供 104 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Roomstay 提供 7 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.3/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine:否。Roomstay:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Booking Engine 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Amadeus 的 HT Score 为 72,RoomStay 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问