The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 53 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Amadeus 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 independent 类型的物业 (4.9/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Reporting Dashboard and Guest profiles.
FelhőMatrac 表现出色 .
基于 HTR 上 53 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 53 | 0 |
在分析了 53 条经验证的评价后,Amadeus 用户最看重其 集成和可用性, 创新与更新, 分析和报告,而 FelhőMatrac 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
FelhőMatrac |
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
集成和可用性
▾
|
|
|
+
创新与更新
▾
|
|
|
+
分析和报告
▾
|
|
|
+
收入和定价策略
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
客户支持
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店预订软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
FelhőMatrac |
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #8 7 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #5 24 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #3 10 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #4 3 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
FelhőMatrac |
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #6 18 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #6 17 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #4 16 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #6 5 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
FelhőMatrac |
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #5 13 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #5 12 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #4 4 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #3 4 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Amadeus iHotelier® CRS and FelhőMatrac hinges on your hotel’s specific needs. Both aim to streamline reservations and distribution, but their approaches and maturity levels differ sharply. While FelhőMatrac appears to be an unestablished product with limited reviews, Amadeus dominates with a robust track record, extensive features, and widespread regional presence. Given the disparity in review data, Amadeus's more recent and numerous reviews make it the more reliable option for hotels seeking proven performance.
Amadeus offers a comprehensive Central Reservations System that automates distribution across multiple channels, helps manage inventory, and boosts revenue. FelhőMatrac, on the other hand, provides a basic reservation platform with no available reviews or detailed feature set, making it hard to assess its capabilities or reliability.
Amadeus's platform is designed for hotels of all sizes, from boutique properties to large chains, integrating with GDS, OTA channels, and PMS systems. FelhőMatrac’s lack of verified integrations and regional presence suggests its scope and scale are still limited, an important consideration if your hotel requires broad distribution or advanced analytics.
Given the more extensive review base and recent feedback, Amadeus clearly shows a track record of satisfying hotels, whereas FelhőMatrac's unverified claims leave its effectiveness uncertain. Which features matter most to your team — proven reliability or emerging options?
If your hotel needs a proven, full-featured CRS with extensive integrations and a global presence, go with Amadeus. It’s ideal for mid-sized to large hotels seeking a centralized system capable of managing reservations, rates, and distribution channels efficiently.
If, however, your hotel operates in a small or niche market and is looking for a basic reservation platform with minimal complexity, FelhőMatrac might appeal — but only if you can verify its performance and support. Since FelhőMatrac has no reviews or documented features, caution is advised.
For hoteliers prioritizing a trusted platform with solid customer feedback, Amadeus offers a clear advantage. Those seeking an uncomplicated tool with minimal investment should scrutinize FelhőMatrac further before deciding.
Amadeus’s platform scores highly for ease of use, with a 4.43/5 user rating, and many reviews praising its intuitive interface after initial training. Onboarding is rated 4.1/5, though some users note a learning curve initially, especially given the platform’s complexity.
FelhőMatrac has no available review scores or user feedback, leaving its usability and onboarding process unverified. Without user insights, it’s impossible to determine whether it’s as friendly or straightforward as Amadeus.
Edge: Amadeus.
Amadeus offers 18 exclusive features including booking engine, channel management, reporting dashboards, metasearch connectivity, RMS and PMS integrations, geotargeted pricing, dynamic pricing, guest profiles, and more. These capabilities enable comprehensive management of reservations, distribution, and revenue strategies.
FelhőMatrac does not list any specific features or integrations, making it difficult to evaluate its functionality. Its lack of distinct features compared to Amadeus suggests it’s a more basic platform at this stage.
Edge: Amadeus.
Amadeus’s support team is rated 4.15/5, with reviews describing them as helpful, responsive, and attentive. Many users appreciate the detailed onboarding and ongoing assistance, though some mention room for improvement in responsiveness and training clarity.
FelhőMatrac has no available reviews or ratings regarding support, support quality, or onboarding experiences. Its lack of feedback makes it impossible to assess whether it can meet your team’s customer service expectations.
Edge: Amadeus.
Amadeus boasts 104 verified integration partners, including major hotel PMS and distribution platforms like Opera, Priority Software, and RevControl. Its broad ecosystem supports extensive connectivity, helping streamline operations and distribution.
FelhőMatrac has zero verified integrations, limiting its ability to connect with other hotel management systems or distribution channels. If your hotel relies on multiple systems working together, this is a significant consideration.
Edge: Amadeus.
Amadeus’s overall rating of 4.57/5 comes from 52 reviews, with recent feedback indicating consistent satisfaction and an 87% likelihood to recommend. Hotels across segments — from independent to branded — frequently praise its reliability and feature set.
FelhőMatrac has no reviews, making it impossible to gauge user satisfaction. Without recent or any reviews, the confidence in its performance remains unverified.
Edge: Amadeus.
Amadeus does not publish specific pricing details; their model is typically custom quoted based on hotel size and needs. It does not offer a freemium or trial option, indicating an enterprise-level investment.
FelhőMatrac’s pricing is also not publicly available, and with no reviews or detailed info, assessing its value requires direct contact. It’s likely a lower-cost or emerging product, but without clear data, comparisons are limited.
Not ideal if you’re a small boutique hotel or a property with minimal distribution needs, as the platform’s complexity may be overwhelming.
Not recommended if your hotel depends heavily on channel management, GDS, or advanced revenue management tools, given the lack of verified features and reviews.
Amadeus’s iHotelier CRS offers a well-established, feature-rich platform trusted by hundreds of hotels worldwide. Its extensive integrations, proven support, and recent review data make it the safer choice for hotels seeking reliability and scalability.
FelhőMatrac appears to be a nascent product with no available reviews or documented features. While it might serve small hotels with minimal needs, its unverified status and limited market presence suggest it’s not yet ready for hotels requiring proven systems and broad distribution capabilities.
If your hotel values proven performance, comprehensive features, and support, Amadeus is the clear choice. Conversely, if you’re exploring basic reservation tools and have very limited distribution needs, FelhőMatrac warrants further investigation, but proceed cautiously.
酒店预订软件 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
FelhőMatrac |
|---|
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Amadeus – iHotelier® Central Reservations System (CRS) 和 FelhőMatrac 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
FelhőMatrac |
|---|---|---|
| 元搜索连接 | ||
| 内容管理 | ||
| 呼叫中心功能 | ||
| 报告仪表板 | ||
| 渠道管理和OTA分销 | ||
| 预订引擎 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 6 项功能存在差异。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
TravelClick 因与各种渠道、GDS 和 Opera 等 PMS 系统无缝集成而受到称赞。然而,人们对复杂的 OTA Sync 实现以及平台需要变得更加用户友好表示担忧。一些评论强... TravelClick 因与各种渠道、GDS 和 Opera 等 PMS 系统无缝集成而受到称赞。然而,人们对复杂的 OTA Sync 实现以及平台需要变得更加用户友好表示担忧。一些评论强调了较长的集成时间和一些需要改进的可用性挑战。
对于平台的创新和持续更新,人们的评价褒贬不一。一些用户对平台频繁的改进和新功能表示赞赏,而另一些人则认为,某些方面(如 iHotelier CRS)需要进行更重大的... 对于平台的创新和持续更新,人们的评价褒贬不一。一些用户对平台频繁的改进和新功能表示赞赏,而另一些人则认为,某些方面(如 iHotelier CRS)需要进行更重大的更新,才能保持与时俱进和直观。
TravelClick 中的分析和报告工具因其跟踪绩效和做出明智决策的能力而受到酒店经营者的高度重视。用户强调详细的商业智能报告和市场情报功能是战略制定的关键组成... TravelClick 中的分析和报告工具因其跟踪绩效和做出明智决策的能力而受到酒店经营者的高度重视。用户强调详细的商业智能报告和市场情报功能是战略制定的关键组成部分。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
TravelClick 的客户支持普遍受到好评,因为它乐于助人、专业且高效。一些评论指出了支持团队的响应能力和乐于助人,但也提到了回复延迟和培训不足。评论还强调了... TravelClick 的客户支持普遍受到好评,因为它乐于助人、专业且高效。一些评论指出了支持团队的响应能力和乐于助人,但也提到了回复延迟和培训不足。评论还强调了在各个地区提供本地支持和更多培训选项的必要性。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Amadeus – iHotelier® Central Reservations System (CRS) 和 FelhőMatrac 共享许多核心 Hotel Reservations Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。Amadeus – iHotelier® Central Reservations System (CRS) 提供 104 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 FelhőMatrac 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Amadeus – iHotelier® Central Reservations System (CRS) 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.4/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Amadeus – iHotelier® Central Reservations System (CRS):否。FelhőMatrac:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Reservations Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Amadeus 的 HT Score 为 79,FelhőMatrac 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问