The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #56 1 条评价 | #45 8 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #47 1 条评价 | #20 31 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #26 2 条评价 | #4 43 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #26 0 条评价 | #4 31 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #50 1 条评价 | #15 65 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #42 2 条评价 | #10 83 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #34 3 条评价 | #15 40 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #51 0 条评价 | #17 15 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | #37 1 条评价 | #65 0 条评价 |
| 欧洲 | #38 2 条评价 | #58 2 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #41 0 条评价 | #6 117 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #24 1 条评价 |
When comparing Amadeus Property Management by Amadeus and CiHMS by CiHMS, you're evaluating two distinct property management solutions designed to streamline hotel operations. Both aim to enhance efficiency, guest satisfaction, and revenue, but they diverge significantly in features, user experience, and market focus. Amadeus offers a long-established platform with broad distribution capabilities, while CiHMS emphasizes automation and operational ease with a lean interface. Which solution aligns better with your hotel’s current needs?
Amadeus’s system is more mature, with a global presence and a larger ecosystem, but it struggles with recent reviews and overall hotel ratings. Conversely, CiHMS’s newer platform boasts a high user satisfaction rate and a significantly higher number of recent reviews, making its real-world performance more reliable for current hotel management needs. Are you prepared to prioritize recent user feedback and support quality?
Both products tackle core hotel management issues—reservation handling, housekeeping, and revenue tracking—but they approach these differently. Amadeus’s platform integrates advanced distribution channels and guest CRM, offering comprehensive demand management for mid-sized to large hotels. CiHMS, however, emphasizes automation, multi-channel reservation management, and real-time data, aiming to reduce manual tasks.
Amadeus’s strengths lie in distribution and global reach, making it a suitable choice if your hotel prioritizes broad market connectivity. CiHMS’s focus on automation and operational efficiency, especially with its real-time reporting and task management features, makes it a better fit if your team seeks to reduce manual workload and improve day-to-day operations. Given their review scores and recent feedback, which of these priorities aligns better with your current hotel strategy?
If your hotel requires a robust, integrated system for distribution, guest relationship management, and extensive reporting, go with Amadeus. It's particularly suited for properties with complex distribution needs or those already integrated into global booking channels.
If your hotel needs a more intuitive, easy-to-learn system focused on automating operations, improving staff productivity, and offering real-time data, choose CiHMS. It’s ideal for hotels looking to modernize operations without the complexity or steep learning curve associated with Amadeus.
Given the higher review count and recent reviews—over 100 for CiHMS versus just 4 for Amadeus—it's clear CiHMS’s performance and support are more current and better proven. Which core needs do you prioritize: distribution and global reach, or operational simplicity?
Amadeus scores a 3.5/5 for ease of use, with a moderate onboarding experience and mixed user feedback. Some users find the interface somewhat dated and the learning curve steep, especially for staff unfamiliar with complex PMS systems. Support ratings are moderate, with reviewers citing issues in service, especially outside their core regions.
CiHMS, however, shines with a 4.9/5 rating for ease of use, boasting a modern interface and intuitive navigation that most users find straightforward. The onboarding process is highly rated, and users frequently comment on how quickly staff adopt the system.
Edge: CiHMS.
Amadeus offers 15 shared features, including core reservation, housekeeping, and billing functions, plus three unique features like guest CRM and payment processing. Its ecosystem also supports advanced distribution and channel management, catering to midchain and larger hotels.
CiHMS features 18 exclusive features—such as a booking engine, mobile app, integrated ID scanner, EPoS, and automated space optimization—that enhance operational automation and guest engagement. Its real-time status updates, task management, and ancillary revenue tools add considerable value.
While Amadeus's distribution and CRM features are notable, CiHMS’s broader set of automation and operational management tools provide more immediate day-to-day benefits.
Edge: CiHMS.
Customer support ratings favor CiHMS significantly, with a score of 4.92/5 compared to Amadeus’s 3.63/5. Users frequently praise CiHMS’s support responsiveness, professionalism, and proactive assistance, with reviews citing quick issue resolution and helpful onboarding.
Amadeus’s support ratings are more mixed, with some users experiencing delays or inconsistent responses, especially outside Europe and North America. A review highlights a property in the Netherlands facing ongoing service issues with no resolution after six years.
Edge: CiHMS.
Amadeus boasts 104 verified partners, including industry giants like SiteMinder, Orange Hotel Marketing, and RevControl, giving it a significant advantage in connectivity and distribution. Its extensive partner network supports complex integrations catering to large hotel chains.
CiHMS has only 3 verified partners, with DerbySoft and Easyway being notable integrations. While this limits its ecosystem, the platform’s internal automation and reporting features compensate for fewer external integrations.
Edge: Amadeus.
CiHMS receives a much higher overall rating (81/100) and 98% likelihood to recommend, reflecting strong recent reviews. Hoteliers across various property types, especially resorts and city hotels, praise its ease of use and operational automation, with comments about improved efficiency and guest service.
Amadeus's ratings are lower, with an overall score of 2.5/5 and only 78% recommend, mainly due to inconsistent support and outdated interface feedback. Its reviews are sparse, and recent positive feedback is absent, reducing confidence in current performance.
Given the recency and volume of CiHMS reviews, it holds the higher reputation among hoteliers today.
Edge: CiHMS.
Amadeus does not publicly list pricing; it typically involves custom quotes based on hotel size and needs, which can be costly. Its implementation fees and monthly charges are not transparent, often making budgeting complex.
CiHMS charges a flat $900 monthly base fee, with no setup or implementation costs disclosed. While slightly on the higher side for smaller hotels, its transparent pricing and the absence of hidden fees make it easier to evaluate value.
If predictable costs matter most, CiHMS offers a clearer financial picture.
Not ideal if your hotel prioritizes ease of use, affordable pricing, or recent, positive support experiences.
Not ideal if your hotel requires broad distribution channels, extensive integrations, or is primarily a large international chain needing complex demand management.
Amadeus Property Management offers a feature-rich solution with a longstanding market presence, perfect for hotels with complex distribution needs and large-scale operations. However, its support issues and outdated reviews cast doubts on its current reliability for smaller or mid-sized properties.
CiHMS, meanwhile, excels in operational automation, ease of use, and recent positive feedback, making it a strong choice for hotels focused on streamlining daily tasks and maximizing staff efficiency. Its limited integrations and regional support are drawbacks but may be manageable depending on your hotel’s tech ecosystem.
If your hotel values recent reviews, high user satisfaction, and support quality, CiHMS is the safer choice today. For properties that need advanced distribution and multi-channel booking capabilities, Amadeus remains a contender, but with reservations about ongoing support and updates.
In summary, prioritize CiHMS if operational efficiency, ease of use, and recent user feedback are critical. Opt for Amadeus if your hotel depends heavily on distribution channels, global reach, and guest CRM integration.
我们分析了 2 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"CiHMS was able to fulfill the needs of loyalty management of The Hanoi Club & Residences. The team has perfectly adapted and customized CiHMS to match the specific needs with a 24/..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"I was impressed by CiHMS's capability to integrate all our properties into one cohesive system," said Mr. Nam Le, General Manager of Cityhouse. "The user-friendly interface and rob..."
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
CIHMS significantly enhances operational efficiency by automating tasks and ensuring streamlined communication across departments. This improvement re... CIHMS significantly enhances operational efficiency by automating tasks and ensuring streamlined communication across departments. This improvement reduces manual errors and saves time, which is especially crucial during busy periods.
用户非常欣赏 CIHMS 的全面报告功能,它能够深入分析绩效、收入和入住率。然而,许多用户希望进一步定制报告,以满足特定需求。
该软件因其任务分配功能而备受赞誉,支持客房服务等员工的独立管理。此功能简化了操作流程,并提高了各部门的生产力。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户非常欣赏 CIHMS 的全面报告功能,它能够深入分析绩效、收入和入住率。然而,许多用户希望进一步定制报告,以满足特定需求。
CIHMS 虽然用户友好,但由于系统功能繁多,初始培训和入职培训可能会比较复杂。用户建议使用更全面的培训资源和更详细的指南。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Amadeus Property Management 和 CiHMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Amadeus Property Management 提供 104 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 CiHMS 提供 3 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。CiHMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 3.5/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Amadeus Property Management:否。CiHMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Amadeus 的 HT Score 为 0,CiHMS 的为 81。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问