The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #56 1 条评价 | #1 592 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #47 1 条评价 | #4 212 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #26 2 条评价 | #5 42 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #26 0 条评价 | #13 4 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #50 1 条评价 | #2 473 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #42 2 条评价 | #4 228 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #34 3 条评价 | #6 116 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #51 0 条评价 | #2 93 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #37 1 条评价 | #2 435 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #38 2 条评价 | #7 163 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #41 0 条评价 | #3 226 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | — | #7 11 条评价 |
Choosing between Amadeus Property Management by Amadeus and Cloudbeds PMS hinges on your hotel’s specific needs and operational scale. Both systems aim to streamline hotel management, but they diverge significantly in functionality, user experience, and market presence. Your decision should weigh the depth of features, integration capabilities, and user feedback—especially recent reviews—to determine which platform aligns best with your growth plans.
Amadeus offers a longstanding legacy with a focus on property management for midchain and independent hotels, while Cloudbeds provides a more modern, all-in-one ecosystem widely adopted by diverse property types. Which solution will serve your team more effectively in today’s competitive landscape?
Both Amadeus and Cloudbeds aim to simplify core hotel operations, but their approaches differ. Amadeus emphasizes property management with advanced distribution, mainly appealing to midchain and independent hotels seeking stability and scalability. Cloudbeds, on the other hand, integrates reservation, channel management, and revenue tools into a unified, cloud-based platform designed for ease and extensive connectivity.
Where Amadeus has a more traditional, feature-rich core—especially in distribution and advanced property management—Cloudbeds focuses on user-friendly interfaces and automation, ideal for properties prioritizing growth and rapid onboarding. Are you looking for a dependable system with a legacy of distribution strength, or a flexible, all-in-one platform that grows with your team?
If your hotel needs a mature property management solution with robust distribution and distribution integrations, go with Amadeus. Its market presence and feature depth make it suitable for luxury brands, branded hotels, and city center properties looking for reliability and detailed operational control.
If your hotel requires a scalable, easy-to-use platform with extensive integrations, real-time management, and a strong emphasis on guest experience, opt for Cloudbeds. It’s ideal for boutique hotels, hostels, and properties seeking to automate workflows, improve revenue, and expand without complexity. For large, multi-property groups with tech-savvy teams, Cloudbeds is the clear choice.
User reviews reveal Cloudbeds' interface is rated 4.61/5 for ease of use, with high marks for intuitive navigation and quick onboarding—especially among users new to hotel management systems. Its mobile app and real-time dashboards further enhance usability, with responsive support noted in recent reviews.
Amadeus scores 3.5/5 for ease of use, with some users reporting a steeper learning curve and less intuitive workflows, particularly in onboarding and daily tasks. While its setup is straightforward for some, others mention challenges in staff adoption due to its complexity. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds boasts 47 unique features—covering everything from inventory management, online check-in, guest messaging, and automated reminders to a mobile app and real-time reporting. Its extensive marketplace and API integrations enable tailored customization, making it highly versatile.
Amadeus offers 17 shared features plus one exclusive: on-premise deployment, which appeals to those needing or preferring local servers. Its core strengths include distribution, work order management, and preventative maintenance, but it lacks many of Cloudbeds’ integrations and automation tools. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds has a solid reputation for support, with recent review scores of 4.41/5 and comments praising their promptness and helpfulness. Customers frequently mention quick responses and ongoing assistance that smooths onboarding and daily use.
Amadeus’ support scores 3.63/5, with reviews citing inconsistent service, especially in certain regions like the Netherlands, where one reviewer described service as "terrible." Some users expressed frustration with unresolved issues after years of problems. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds leads with 190 verified partners, including integrations with popular booking channels, payment systems, and property tools. Its extensive marketplace supports third-party apps, automating and customizing operational workflows.
Amadeus offers 104 verified partners, mainly focusing on distribution and booking engines, with some exclusive integrations like Orange Hotel Marketing and Profitroom. While comprehensive, its ecosystem is narrower and less flexible than Cloudbeds’. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Recent reviews show Cloudbeds’ overall rating at 4.63/5, favored across all hotel segments, including boutique and independent properties. Its newer reviews are more recent and highly positive, emphasizing simplicity and support.
Amadeus scores 2.5/5, with only four reviews—none recent—highlighting ongoing issues like poor service and limited satisfaction. The lack of recent feedback diminishes confidence in its current performance. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Amadeus does not publicly disclose its pricing, often quoting custom quotes based on hotel size and needs. This makes direct comparisons difficult, but it’s generally targeted at midchain and larger independent hotels with budgets for enterprise solutions.
Cloudbeds charges a flat $600 monthly fee, with no additional implementation or setup costs. Its transparent pricing model makes it easier for hotels to assess ROI and budget accordingly.
Cloudbeds emerges as the clear choice for most hoteliers today, especially given its strong recent reviews, higher ratings, and extensive feature set. It is a flexible, scalable platform that simplifies daily operations while supporting growth.
Amadeus remains a solid option for larger, distribution-focused hotels that need detailed control and prefer on-premise infrastructure. However, its limited recent reviews and lower satisfaction scores suggest it’s less suited for hotels seeking modern, user-friendly solutions.
In summary, if your hotel values ease, responsiveness, and extensive integration, Cloudbeds is the more reliable pick. For those with complex distribution needs and a focus on traditional property management, Amadeus might still hold appeal—but confirm its current support quality first.
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"I have not worked with a company that has such good customer service as Cloudbeds has. It's miles ahead."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"The biggest benefit of Cloudbeds' platform is its flexibility. I can access reporting online from anywhere. Everything is smoother with Cloudbeds."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Cloudbeds is like if Apple made a property management system. The ease of use is super simple and straightforward for guests and our staff. It’s very intuitive and just makes sense..."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Cloudbeds 因其直观且布局清晰的界面而备受赞誉,所有员工均可轻松上手,从而减少了对大量培训的需求。这种易用性对于日常运营尤为有利,例如管理预订和执行入住... Cloudbeds 因其直观且布局清晰的界面而备受赞誉,所有员工均可轻松上手,从而减少了对大量培训的需求。这种易用性对于日常运营尤为有利,例如管理预订和执行入住/退房流程。
Cloudbeds 的实施流程和后续支持褒贬不一。虽然其客户服务通常因其响应速度和协助性而获得高分,但要实现移动端和集成功能的完全一致,还需要更全面的支持才能更... Cloudbeds 的实施流程和后续支持褒贬不一。虽然其客户服务通常因其响应速度和协助性而获得高分,但要实现移动端和集成功能的完全一致,还需要更全面的支持才能更顺利地过渡。
Cloudbeds 通过将酒店管理系统 (PMS)、渠道管理和预订引擎集成于同一平台,提供了一套全面的解决方案。这减少了对多个系统的需求,最大限度地减少了人工操作,并... Cloudbeds 通过将酒店管理系统 (PMS)、渠道管理和预订引擎集成于同一平台,提供了一套全面的解决方案。这减少了对多个系统的需求,最大限度地减少了人工操作,并实现了实时同步运营。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Cloudbeds的预订流程简单高效,尤其是在入住和退房方面。这一特性大大减轻了管理负担,减少了错误,并提高了整体运营效率。系统的拖放功能尤其值得一提,因为它... Cloudbeds的预订流程简单高效,尤其是在入住和退房方面。这一特性大大减轻了管理负担,减少了错误,并提高了整体运营效率。系统的拖放功能尤其值得一提,因为它非常实用。
尽管 Cloudbeds 提供了强大的报表功能,但用户指出,其定制化程度不够高,因为量身定制的管理洞察对于战略决策至关重要。这在寻求更深入的分析和可视化功能的用... 尽管 Cloudbeds 提供了强大的报表功能,但用户指出,其定制化程度不够高,因为量身定制的管理洞察对于战略决策至关重要。这在寻求更深入的分析和可视化功能的用户中是一个普遍存在的问题。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Amadeus Property Management 和 Cloudbeds PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Amadeus Property Management 提供 104 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Cloudbeds PMS 提供 190 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Cloudbeds PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 3.5/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Amadeus Property Management:否。Cloudbeds PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Amadeus 的 HT Score 为 0,Cloudbeds 的为 100。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问