The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
在分析了 891 条经验证的评价后,Amadeus 用户最看重其 ,而 Mews 用户则强调 ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
入职和支持
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
报告和分析
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #56 1 条评价 | #3 329 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #47 1 条评价 | #1 397 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #26 2 条评价 | #3 45 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #26 0 条评价 | #3 49 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #50 1 条评价 | #1 483 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #42 2 条评价 | #5 220 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #34 3 条评价 | #2 170 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #51 0 条评价 | #1 130 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #37 1 条评价 | #8 106 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #38 2 条评价 | #1 660 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #41 0 条评价 | #10 17 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | — | #28 8 条评价 |
In choosing a property management system, your hotel needs a solution that balances ease of use, feature set, support, and cost. Amadeus Property Management by Amadeus offers a traditional, comprehensive platform but with limited recent reviews and a lower overall rating. Conversely, Mews PMS by Mews boasts a significantly higher rating, recent review activity, and a broad suite of features. Which platform better aligns with your hotel’s operational goals?
Amadeus primarily targets midchain and independent hotels, emphasizing distribution integrations and property management capabilities. Mews, however, caters to a wide array of hotel types, especially boutique, lifestyle, and smaller chains, emphasizing automation, flexibility, and scalability. Do your hotel’s needs lean more toward distribution and core management, or toward innovation and automation?
Amadeus Property Management aims to serve hotels seeking a traditional, reliable platform with advanced distribution features. Its core strengths lie in distribution and property management, making it suitable for hotels with complex distribution needs or those already integrated into Amadeus's global network. However, its overall rating (2.5/5) and review volume (only 4 reviews) suggest limited recent customer validation.
Mews PMS, with a 4.62/5 overall rating from 758 reviews—98 of which are recent—demonstrates a vibrant, well-supported platform. It focuses heavily on automation, user experience, and integrations, making it ideal for modern hotels that prioritize operational agility. Are you looking for a system with proven, current user satisfaction? If so, Mews is the clear leader.
If your hotel needs a flexible, cloud-native system capable of automating reservations, guest communications, and daily operations, go with Mews. It’s especially suitable for boutique, lifestyle, and small to medium-sized hotels seeking scalability and digital guest experiences.
If your hotel relies heavily on distribution, complex channel management, or requires a traditional On-Premise solution, Amadeus could be a fit. However, for most hotels prioritizing ease, recent support, and modern features, Mews offers a more comprehensive and current solution.
Mews scores a 4.7/5 for ease of use, backed by a large pool of recent reviews praising its intuitive interface, modern design, and quick onboarding (average onboarding rating at 4.39/5). Customers report that staff adopt Mews easily, with many noting that staff learn the system in a matter of days.
Amadeus, with a 3.5/5 ease rating and only 4 reviews, has a less compelling recent user experience. Customers cite a straightforward setup but also highlight ongoing frustrations with customer support and software stability, especially in certain regions. Edge: Mews.
Mews offers a vast feature set, with 42 unique functionalities including guest CRM, online check-in, integrated payment terminals, mobile housekeeping apps, and automated space optimization. It also provides a flexible API and marketplace to extend capabilities.
Amadeus only offers 1 feature exclusive to its platform—On Premise deployment—limiting its adaptability. Shared features are limited to 17 core functionalities, primarily around property management and distribution.
Given the depth and variety of features, Mews is the clear winner. Edge: Mews.
Mews scores 4.27/5 for support, with recent reviews praising its rapid responsiveness, onboarding assistance, and proactive support teams. Many users highlight that support issues are addressed quickly, even when bugs arise, ensuring minimal disruption.
Amadeus, with a 3.63/5 support score and a single recent review, receives mixed feedback. Customers report inconsistent support, especially in regions like the Netherlands, with some citing no callbacks or unresolved issues over years. Edge: Mews.
Mews integrates with 336 verified partners, including over 1,000 integrations via its marketplace, covering channel managers, POS, revenue management, and more. Its open API allows extensive customization and connectivity, supporting diverse hotel tech stacks.
Amadeus offers 104 verified integrations, primarily focused on distribution and global reservation systems. While solid, its ecosystem is narrower and less dynamic than Mews.
For flexibility and future-proofing, Mews’s broad integrations give it a distinct advantage. Edge: Mews.
Mews enjoys a 4.64/5 rating from 679 reviews—most recent reviews confirm high satisfaction, especially among boutique, independent, and chain hotels. Hotels frequently praise its ease, automation, and support.
Amadeus’s rating is a modest 2.5/5, with only 4 reviews and a 78% likelihood to recommend. Its few recent reviews cite persistent issues and support frustrations, especially outside Europe.
Clearly, hoteliers rate Mews more positively. Edge: Mews.
Amadeus does not publicly list pricing, but it is generally priced on a quote basis, often involving implementation fees and ongoing charges. Mews charges a flat $900 monthly fee, with no implementation fees, making costs transparent and predictable.
If budget and transparency matter, Mews’s straightforward pricing model is an advantage. Amadeus’s custom quotes may vary significantly based on hotel size and needs.
Not ideal if your hotel prioritizes ease, automation, or modern guest experiences.
Not ideal if your hotel requires on-premise systems or complex distribution networks managed via legacy platforms.
Amadeus Property Management offers a traditional approach with distribution focus but limited recent validation, making it less appealing for modern, digitally driven hotels. Mews, with its high user ratings, extensive features, and broad integrations, aligns better with hotels aiming for operational agility and guest-centric innovation.
Choose Amadeus if your hotel needs heavy distribution support and is comfortable with legacy systems. But for most hotels seeking ease of use, scalability, and current support, Mews is the superior choice, especially given its recent surge in reviews and high satisfaction ratings.
If your hotel values automation, modern interfaces, and flexible integrations, Mews delivers faster time-to-value and ongoing support that adapts to your needs. Conversely, if your operational model depends on complex distribution channels and on-premise setups, Amadeus might still fit, but it’s less aligned with the digital-first landscape.
Final recommendation: Mews is the more reliable, modern, and well-supported platform for today’s hotel management needs.
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
虽然 Mews 提供了可靠的报表和分析功能,但一些评论指出,它需要更多可定制和灵活的报表功能。用户希望获得更细致的数据洞察,尤其是在预订和收入分析方面。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Amadeus Property Management 和 Mews PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Amadeus Property Management 提供 104 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Mews PMS 提供 335 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Mews PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 3.5/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Amadeus Property Management:否。Mews PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Amadeus 的 HT Score 为 0,Mews 的为 100。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问