The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 34 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Amadeus 表现出色 ,拥有独特功能如 On premise and Guest CRM.
MISTER BOOKING 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Ancillary revenue tracking and Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc).
基于 HTR 上 34 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 4 | 30 |
在分析了 34 条经验证的评价后,Amadeus 用户最看重其 ,而 MISTER BOOKING 用户则强调 支持质量, 可定制的功能, 人体工程学和设计。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
支持质量
▾
|
|
|
+
可定制的功能
▾
|
|
|
+
人体工程学和设计
▾
|
|
|
+
运营效率
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
报告生成
▾
|
|
|
−
预订引擎
▾
|
|
|
−
连接问题
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #56 1 条评价 | #33 14 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) | #47 1 条评价 | #45 4 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #26 2 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #26 0 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #50 1 条评价 | #40 10 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #42 2 条评价 | #35 7 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | #34 3 条评价 | #46 3 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 | #51 0 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | #37 1 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #38 2 条评价 | #19 25 条评价 |
| 亚太 | #41 0 条评价 | #36 1 条评价 |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) often hinges on your hotel’s size, operational complexity, and specific feature needs. Both Amadeus Property Management and Misterbooking aim to streamline hotel operations, but they serve different hotel profiles and user expectations.
Amadeus offers a long-established, enterprise-grade system with deep distribution integrations but struggles with recent reviews and user satisfaction. Misterbooking, by contrast, benefits from a larger, more recent review base and higher user ratings, especially in ease of use and support. How do these differences impact your choice?
Amadeus Property Management, founded in 1987 and used mainly by midchain and independent hotels, emphasizes distribution strength and scalability. It offers core property management features with notable extras like guest CRM and automated night audits but is criticized for poor recent reviews and limited support, especially in Europe and North America.
Misterbooking, established in 2003, appeals to a broad spectrum of hotels, from hostels to boutique and branded properties. It boasts a high user rating of 4.78/5, with recent reviews praising its simplicity, support, and integrated booking engine. Notably, Misterbooking’s recent reviews far outnumber Amadeus’s, giving it a stronger current reputation.
Both products aim to improve operational efficiency, but Misterbooking’s user satisfaction and recent performance make it the more reliable choice today. Which product aligns better with your hotel’s needs and expectations?
If your hotel needs deep distribution capabilities, advanced reporting, and a globally recognized brand, Amadeus is suitable, particularly if your team is comfortable with complex systems and can handle its steeper learning curve. It’s a fit for hotels that prioritize distribution, on-premise management, and guest CRM functionality.
If your hotel values ease of use, rapid onboarding, and a strong support network, Misterbooking is clearly better. It’s ideal for independent, boutique, or smaller hotels that want a cost-effective, scalable solution with an integrated booking engine, online check-in, and automated guest communication. The choice hinges on your operational priorities: distribution power or user experience.
Misterbooking scores 4.71/5 in ease of use, with reviews highlighting its intuitive interface, straightforward setup, and simple reservation management. Users report that staff onboard quickly and find the platform user-friendly, even for less tech-savvy team members.
Amadeus, meanwhile, scores 3.5/5, with reviews mentioning a steeper learning curve and occasional complexity that can challenge staff adoption. Its interface is described as functional but not particularly modern or ergonomic, which can slow down daily operations.
Edge: Misterbooking.
Amadeus offers 18 exclusive features, including automated night audits, guest CRM, and advanced distribution integrations. Its core strengths lie in distribution channels and on-premise management, making it suitable for larger hotels with complex needs.
Misterbooking surpasses Amadeus with 26 features, including a booking engine, ancillary revenue tracking, guest messaging, online check-in, real-time status updates, automated reminders, payment requests, and PCI/GDPR compliance. Its feature set is more comprehensive for operational automation and direct guest engagement.
Edge: Misterbooking.
Misterbooking’s customer support is highly rated at 4.79/5, with reviews emphasizing quick responsiveness, helpfulness, and a proactive support team. Users describe it as "easy and flexible" to work with and appreciate support availability even during weekends.
Amadeus’s support rating is 3.63/5, with some reviews citing long response times and unsatisfactory service, especially in certain regions. One user expressed frustration over persistent issues and lack of resolution after six years, indicating less reliable support.
Edge: Misterbooking.
Amadeus boasts 104 verified partners, including major booking, payment, and distribution platforms, ensuring extensive connectivity for large-scale, multi-channel hotels. Shared integrations include SiteMinder, RevControl, and Lightspeed.
Misterbooking, with 26 verified partners, offers strong integration with leading OTAs and booking engines like Expedia, Booking.com, and its own channel manager. While fewer in number, its integrations are recent and highly functional for small- to mid-sized hotels.
Edge: Amadeus.
Misterbooking’s recent reviews consistently rate it above 4.7/5, with many praising its user-friendly interface, support, and comprehensive features. Hoteliers in the boutique, hostel, and independent segments especially favor its ease and value.
Amadeus’s ratings are lower, with an overall score of 2.5/5 and recent reviews criticizing poor support and outdated interface. Larger hotel groups using Amadeus tend to be less satisfied with recent experiences.
Edge: Misterbooking.
Both products do not publicly list detailed pricing, but they operate on a custom quote basis without free tiers. Amadeus, being a long-established enterprise system, is likely more expensive and geared toward larger hotels.
Misterbooking is positioned as a cost-effective, affordable solution for small to mid-sized hotels, with transparent, competitive pricing models reflecting its value-focused approach.
Not ideal if your hotel prefers a simple, user-friendly system or has limited online distribution needs.
Not ideal if your hotel relies heavily on distribution channels or requires advanced enterprise features.
Amadeus Property Management provides a comprehensive, distribution-heavy platform suitable for larger hotels with complex needs. Its strengths lie in distribution, CRM, and automation but are hampered by mixed recent reviews and support issues.
Misterbooking offers a more recent, highly-rated alternative that excels in ease of use, support, and feature breadth for smaller or independent properties. Its integrated tools, affordability, and user satisfaction make it a safer choice for most hoteliers today.
If your hotel prioritizes a modern, supported, and highly rated PMS experience, Misterbooking is the clear leader. For larger, distribution-centric operations with complex needs, Amadeus remains a contender—but only if you can accept its support limitations.
In conclusion, for most hoteliers evaluating current options, Misterbooking’s recent reviews and higher ratings make it the more reliable and recommended choice at this time.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|---|
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Amadeus Property Management 和 Misterbooking (PMS) 共享 15 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 在前提 | ||
| 客户关系管理 | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
| 自动提醒 | ||
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 辅助收入跟踪 | ||
| 预订引擎 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 9 项功能存在差异。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
支持团队的响应能力和效率一再被强调。无论是通过电话还是其他方式,他们的可用性和快速解决问题的能力对用户来说都是一大优势。
用户看重的是能够根据特定需求定制自己的账户。这种灵活性使 Misterbooking 能够很好地适应各种酒店运营,并提高了用户满意度。
虽然该软件功能强大、效率高,但用户指出其设计和人体工程学方面还有待改进。建议包括让布局更加人性化,以及更新一些过时的页面。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
提到需要更高效、更详细的统计工具或报告。用户认为改进这些功能可以带来更好的运营洞察力和决策能力。
预订引擎存在一些批评,例如照片上传选项不足和限制管理。用户建议在这些方面进行改进,以进一步完善系统。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Amadeus Property Management 和 Misterbooking (PMS) 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Amadeus Property Management 提供 104 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Misterbooking (PMS) 提供 26 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Misterbooking (PMS) 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 3.5/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Amadeus Property Management:否。Misterbooking (PMS):否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Amadeus 的 HT Score 为 0,MISTER BOOKING 的为 14。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问