The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 1,478 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Amenitiz 表现出色 在 直观的设计和易用性 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Guest CRM and Tablet/Kiosk Check-in.
Cloudbeds 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (4.5/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Mobile optimized/responsive and Revenue management module.
在分析了 1,478 条经验证的评价后,Amenitiz 用户最看重其 直观的设计和易用性, 可定制的网站模板, 与 ota 同步,而 Cloudbeds 用户则强调 ease of use and staff adoption, reservations and booking flexibility, 客户支持和入职协助。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
直观的设计和易用性
▾
|
+
Ease of use and staff adoption
▾
|
|
+
可定制的网站模板
▾
|
+
Reservations and booking flexibility
▾
|
|
+
与 OTA 同步
▾
|
+
客户支持和入职协助
▾
|
|
+
培训和教程
▾
|
+
信道管理和OTA同步
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
客户支持响应能力
▾
|
−
报告和分析
▾
|
|
−
发票功能
▾
|
−
性能、稳定性和漏洞
▾
|
|
−
法律合规问题
▾
|
−
客户沟通和客户关系管理
▾
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店管理软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #24 16 条评价 | #2 675 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #27 4 条评价 | #1 235 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #20 1 条评价 | #1 51 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | — | #4 5 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #27 8 条评价 | #1 546 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #28 5 条评价 | #3 245 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #26 4 条评价 | #2 145 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #24 2 条评价 | #2 96 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #39 1 条评价 | #2 532 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #8 38 条评价 | #4 166 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | — | #3 201 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | — | #3 13 条评价 |
When choosing between Amenitiz by Amenitiz and Cloudbeds HMS by Cloudbeds, you're evaluating two platforms designed to streamline hotel management. Both address core operational needs like reservations, distribution, and guest communication, but they diverge significantly in features, market presence, and user experience. Given recent review data, one product stands out as the more reliable and comprehensive choice for your hotel.
Are you prioritizing a platform with a broader feature set, better support, and proven scalability? Or are you seeking a more budget-friendly, easy-to-implement solution with a focus on direct bookings? Let's compare both to find the best fit.
Amenitiz, launched in 2017 and based in Barcelona, offers an all-in-one platform tailored mainly to independent hotels, B&Bs, and vacation rentals. It boasts a simplified interface, customizable websites, and a focus on direct bookings, with a high customer satisfaction score of 4.8/5 on Trustpilot. However, its review count is only 38, with recent activity zero, which limits confidence in current support and reliability.
Cloudbeds, founded in 2012 in San Diego, commands a global presence with over 1,200 reviews and a 4.62/5 rating. Its platform is renowned for its integration capabilities, automation, and scalability, serving properties from small hostels to large resorts. The company has demonstrated consistent innovation and a proven track record with awards and case studies. Given the recent surge in Cloudbeds reviews—76 in the past six months—its data is more current and trustworthy.
While Amenitiz excels in website customization and direct booking enhancements, Cloudbeds offers a broader feature set and stronger support. Do you need a flexible, all-encompassing system? Or is a niche, user-friendly solution more suitable? The choice hinges on your property’s scale and operational complexity.
If your hotel needs a comprehensive, scalable management platform that integrates reservations, revenue management, and guest experience tools, Cloudbeds is the clear choice. Its extensive partner network and multi-property support make it ideal for growing or multi-site hotels.
On the other hand, if your hotel primarily seeks a simple, budget-conscious system to boost direct bookings and manage basic operations, Amenitiz could work. Its focus on website customization and easy reservation management appeals to small, independent operators with limited tech needs.
Given Cloudbeds’ dominant market presence and recent review volume, it’s better suited for hotels aiming for long-term growth and operational sophistication. Amenitiz may be more appropriate for boutique hotels or vacation rentals prioritizing quick setup and direct booking improvements.
Amenitiz scores a 4.09/5 for ease of use, with a straightforward, intuitive interface praised by users for its simplicity. Many reviews mention that staff training is quick, and the platform feels designed for hoteliers with limited tech experience.
Cloudbeds, slightly higher at 4.58/5, is also praised for its user-friendly design, with a modern interface that speeds onboarding. Users highlight its ease of navigation and reliable mobile app, which facilitates remote management. Some users note that Cloudbeds’ extensive features require initial training but ultimately lead to smoother daily operations.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds offers 49 shared features plus 41 unique ones, totaling a robust suite including revenue management, automated night audits, group bookings, multi-currency support, and advanced analytics. Its features support large, complex properties and multi-property operations.
Amenitiz provides five unique features like guest CRM, gift vouchers, integrated ID scanning, POS, and customizable websites. While these features serve smaller hotels well, they lack the depth and breadth Cloudbeds provides.
Given the detailed feature count and recent reviews praising automation and revenue tools, Cloudbeds has a decisive edge here.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Amenitiz’s support scores 3.99/5, with reviews citing delays and difficulty in getting quick responses. Some users report frustration with support responsiveness and issues with troubleshooting, especially during onboarding.
Cloudbeds outperforms with a 4.38/5 support rating. Users repeatedly praise its fast, friendly, and professional assistance, with many reviews emphasizing support as a key factor in their satisfaction. Recent testimonials cite quick resolution times and helpful onboarding.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds’ integration ecosystem includes 190 verified partners, covering PMS, channel managers, POS, revenue management, and more. Its extensive network supports seamless connectivity with major OTAs, payment gateways, and property systems.
Amenitiz has only five verified integrations, including Lightspeed and CheKin, limiting its extensibility. While sufficient for small operations, it doesn’t match Cloudbeds’ versatility or scope.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds’ overall rating of 4.62/5 comes from 1,219 reviews, with recent activity strongly supporting its reliability. Its diverse property types, from boutique hotels to hostels, rate it highly for scalability and support.
Amenitiz’s 0.5/5 rating is primarily based on 38 reviews, many of which are negative and recent. The most recent reviews highlight significant issues, making its current performance less trustworthy.
Given the volume and recency, Cloudbeds’ ratings are more representative of its quality.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Amenitiz’s base price is $200/month with no free trial or implementation fees, making it appealing for small operators on a tight budget. Cloudbeds charges $500/month, with no trial, reflecting its more extensive features and enterprise focus.
Cost aside, consider the value derived from each platform’s capabilities and support.
Not ideal if you need multi-property support, advanced revenue management, or extensive integrations.
Not ideal if your operation is very small, with minimal tech requirements, or budget-constrained.
Cloudbeds is the more versatile and reliable platform, with a comprehensive feature set, extensive integrations, and a strong support reputation. Its recent review activity confirms its ongoing commitment to innovation and customer satisfaction.
If your hotel needs a scalable, all-in-one management solution that can grow with you, Cloudbeds is the clear choice. It’s particularly suited to properties looking for automation, detailed analytics, and multi-property support.
Amenitiz remains a solid option for very small hotels or vacation rentals focused on website customization and direct bookings, but its limited recent data and feature scope make it less suitable for larger or more complex operations. If you prioritize long-term growth and operational efficiency, Cloudbeds is the more dependable investment.
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
会计与金融
|
|
|
| 多币种 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 直接计费 | ||
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、账单等) | ||
| 自动化夜间审计 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
|
▾
营销与电子商务
|
|
|
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 团体预订引擎 | ||
| 网站开发 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、账单等) | ||
| 宾客沟通(短信) | ||
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 宾客资料 | ||
| 客户关系管理 | ||
|
▾
管理和配置
|
|
|
| 多种语言 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 集中用户和角色管理 | ||
|
▾
用户管理
|
|
|
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 客人反馈管理 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、账单等) | ||
| 宾客资料 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
|
▾
前台
|
|
|
| 客人反馈管理 | ||
| 家政 | ||
| 物业管理系统 | ||
| 自动化夜间审计 | ||
| 移动设备笔记和任务(语音转文本) | ||
| 移动应用程序 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 任务管理 | ||
| 自动提醒 | ||
| 宾客资料 | ||
| 平板电脑/自助值机 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
群组管理
|
|
|
| 组功能 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
宾客体验
|
|
|
| 客人反馈管理 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 集成身份证和护照扫描仪 | ||
| 数字注册 | ||
| 访客应用程序 | ||
| 网上值机 | ||
| 网上结账 | ||
| 宾客留言 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、账单等) | ||
| 平板电脑/自助值机 | ||
|
▾
家政
|
|
|
| 家政 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
| 客房服务手机应用程序 | ||
| 实时状态更新 | ||
| 自动分配 | ||
| 实时报告 | ||
| 轮班规划 | ||
| 员工信息 | ||
| 网上结账 | ||
|
▾
付款
|
|
|
| 多币种 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
| 直接计费 | ||
| 自动提醒 | ||
| 集成支付终端和读卡器 | ||
|
▾
预订管理
|
|
|
| 评分购物模块 | ||
| 物业管理系统 | ||
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 综合 CRS | ||
| 拖放式磁带图 | ||
| 费率管理 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
| 自动分配 | ||
| 基于规则的房间分配 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、账单等) | ||
|
▾
收入管理
|
|
|
| 评分购物模块 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 定价情报 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 自定义费率 | ||
| 辅助收入跟踪 | ||
| 基本定价 | ||
|
▾
税务与合规
|
|
|
| 符合 PCI 标准 | ||
| 符合 GDPR 规定 | ||
| SOC2投诉 | ||
| 税务配置 | ||
|
▾
支持与培训
|
|
|
| 全天候在线支持 | ||
|
▾
食品与饮料
|
|
|
| 销售点 | ||
|
▾
Other
|
|
|
| 无限频道(无需额外费用) |
我们分析了 10 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"I have not worked with a company that has such good customer service as Cloudbeds has. It's miles ahead."
"When we started looking for a booking system, we needed one that was simple, and easy to use and engage with; not only from our point of view but from our guests too. We’ve got a b..."
"The biggest benefit of Cloudbeds' platform is its flexibility. I can access reporting online from anywhere. Everything is smoother with Cloudbeds."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Cloudbeds is like if Apple made a property management system. The ease of use is super simple and straightforward for guests and our staff. It’s very intuitive and just makes sense..."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Amenitiz 因其用户友好且直观的设计而受到称赞,酒店经营者和客人都可以轻松使用。这一特点对于日常管理任务来说非常受重视。
Amenitiz 的可定制网站模板旨在提高浏览者到预订者的转化率,受到高度赞誉。用户报告称直接预订量显著增加,这归功于模板的有效性。
用户对 Amenitiz 与各种 OTA 的同步功能表示赞赏,这有助于集中预订并避免超额预订。然而,在整合 Google、Expedia 和 VRBO 等一些主要平台时,存在一些问题。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
评论强调了对 Amenitiz 客户支持的重大担忧,描述了电子邮件回复延迟和周末无法提供服务的情况。用户报告称,由于支持无响应,他们感到沮丧。
酒店经营者对 Amenitiz 的发票系统表示不满,并指出其缺乏集成性和改进空间。这一主题对于一致的财务运营至关重要。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
A major theme is that Cloudbeds is intuitive, easy to learn, and simple for staff with limited PMS experience to adopt quickly. Reviewers consistently... A major theme is that Cloudbeds is intuitive, easy to learn, and simple for staff with limited PMS experience to adopt quickly. Reviewers consistently link this usability to faster onboarding, less training time, and smoother daily operations for front desk teams.
Reviewers often praise how quickly they can create, change, and manage reservations, including check-ins, cancellations, room moves, and room blocks.... Reviewers often praise how quickly they can create, change, and manage reservations, including check-ins, cancellations, room moves, and room blocks. However, several also want more flexible handling of split stays, non-consecutive dates, second guests, and safer drag-and-drop editing to avoid accidental changes.
用户经常会提及支持质量,如果用户能快速联系到知识渊博的客服人员或在注册过程中获得帮助,通常会获得好评。负面评价则集中在响应速度慢、工单处理延迟以及用户... 用户经常会提及支持质量,如果用户能快速联系到知识渊博的客服人员或在注册过程中获得帮助,通常会获得好评。负面评价则集中在响应速度慢、工单处理延迟以及用户无法联系到在线客服或无法及时获得明确解决方案时的沮丧情绪上。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
报表功能是核心价值驱动因素,用户表示需要快速访问入住率、收入、客房服务、财务和管理报表,以支持决策。同时,许多用户希望获得更可定制、更细致、更准确的报... 报表功能是核心价值驱动因素,用户表示需要快速访问入住率、收入、客房服务、财务和管理报表,以支持决策。同时,许多用户希望获得更可定制、更细致、更准确的报表,尤其是在会计、税务、追加销售和多物业分析方面。
评论者多次提到 Cloudbeds 总体上稳定可靠,但仍有一些用户遇到加载缓慢、偶尔崩溃、故障或可能中断工作的行为等问题。最常见的问题包括页面加载缓慢、重复创建... 评论者多次提到 Cloudbeds 总体上稳定可靠,但仍有一些用户遇到加载缓慢、偶尔崩溃、故障或可能中断工作的行为等问题。最常见的问题包括页面加载缓慢、重复创建个人资料、移动端功能卡顿以及界面操作导致的意外更改。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Amenitiz 和 Cloudbeds HMS 共享许多核心 Hotel Management Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。Amenitiz 提供 5 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Cloudbeds HMS 提供 193 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Cloudbeds HMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 4.1/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Amenitiz:否。Cloudbeds HMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Management Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Amenitiz 的 HT Score 为 65,Cloudbeds 的为 100。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您的房产情况量身定制的推荐方案