The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 1,660 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Cloudbeds 表现出色 在 intuitiveness and ease of use 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (4.5/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Mobile optimized/responsive and Integrated Payment Terminal & Card Reader.
RMS 表现出色 在 支持团队 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Guest CRM and Ancillary revenue tracking.
在分析了 1,660 条经验证的评价后,Cloudbeds 用户最看重其 intuitiveness and ease of use, automation and efficiency, reservations and channel management,而 RMS 用户则强调 支持团队, 用户界面, operational streamlining。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
Intuitiveness and Ease of Use
▾
|
+
支持团队
▾
|
|
+
Automation and Efficiency
▾
|
+
用户界面
▾
|
|
+
Reservations and Channel Management
▾
|
+
Operational Streamlining
▾
|
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
+
OTA和渠道管理
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
Reservation Flexibility and Editing
▾
|
−
定制功能
▾
|
|
−
货币兑换和金融业务
▾
|
−
报表定制
▾
|
|
−
移动功能
▾
|
−
账单和发票
▾
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店管理软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #2 675 条评价 | #6 124 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #1 235 条评价 | #6 83 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #1 51 条评价 | #12 6 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #4 5 条评价 | #2 7 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #1 546 条评价 | #6 79 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #3 245 条评价 | #8 39 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #2 145 条评价 | #7 38 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #2 96 条评价 | #5 52 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #2 532 条评价 | #9 56 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #4 166 条评价 | #13 16 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #3 201 条评价 | #11 6 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | #3 13 条评价 | #13 1 条评价 |
Choosing between Cloudbeds HMS and RMS can significantly impact your hotel’s operations, guest experience, and revenue. Both platforms aim to streamline management and improve guest interactions, but they approach these goals differently. Cloudbeds offers a more integrated, user-friendly experience with a broader feature set and a larger, more recent review base. RMS emphasizes deep customization, real-time insights, and strong automation, but has a smaller, less recent review pool. Which will better serve your property’s unique needs?
Both Cloudbeds and RMS solve core hotel management challenges—reservation handling, distribution, and guest communication—but they differ in scope and approach. Cloudbeds provides an all-in-one platform with extensive integrations, automation, and a focus on scalability, making it suitable for diverse property types. RMS offers a robust, flexible system with powerful automation and detailed insights, tailored more for properties seeking deep customization.
While Cloudbeds boasts more reviews (1,219 vs. 224) and more recent feedback (76 reviews in the last six months vs. 25), RMS’s appeal lies in its customization and industry-specific tools for complex operations. Do you need a ready-to-use, intuitive system, or a highly adaptable platform that requires more setup?
If your hotel needs a straightforward, easy-to-implement platform with extensive integrations, Cloudbeds is the better choice. It suits properties from boutique hotels to hostels seeking centralized management, guest engagement tools, and automation with minimal fuss.
If your hotel demands a highly customizable system capable of managing multiple properties with complex needs—like advanced revenue management, detailed reporting, or specialized POS integrations—RMS is preferable. It’s better suited for medium-sized and larger properties that value flexibility and automation over simplicity.
In essence, properties prioritizing ease of use, rapid deployment, and comprehensive integration should pick Cloudbeds. Those needing tailored workflows, in-depth insights, and flexibility should lean toward RMS.
Cloudbeds’s user interface scores a 4.58/5, with many reviews praising its intuitive, mobile-optimized design that new staff can learn quickly. Onboarding is rated 4.41/5, reflecting a smooth start for most users, and staff adoption tends to be rapid.
In comparison, RMS’s UI scores 4.3/5, with some users reporting a steeper learning curve due to its depth and customization options. Onboarding is rated 4.14/5; while flexible, some users note that frequent updates and complex features can slow initial adoption.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds offers 57 shared features with 33 unique to it, including PMS connectivity, analytics dashboards, multi-lingual support, multi-currency management, guest profiles, native email marketing, and booking engine integrations. These features facilitate a unified, automated workflow across many hotel operations.
RMS provides 57 shared features as well but has only 17 exclusive ones, like guest CRM, ancillary revenue tracking, POS, and housekeepings. RMS’s strengths lie in its automation, real-time insights, and property-specific tools, but it lacks some of Cloudbeds’ broad integrations and marketing features.
In this comparison, Cloudbeds’s broader feature set gives it an edge for properties seeking an all-encompassing platform.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds’s support scores 4.38/5, with users highlighting quick, friendly responses and effective problem-solving. However, some mention occasional delays during busy periods or complex issues.
RMS outperforms slightly with a support rating of 4.52/5, with many reviews praising proactive, responsive service and helpful onboarding. Some clients note difficulties with software updates, but overall, support is seen as more consistent and attentive.
Edge: RMS.
Cloudbeds boasts 190 verified partners, including major OTAs, payment gateways, and property tools, with 62 shared partners like HiJiffy, GuestTraction, and Bookassist. Its extensive integrations allow properties to connect their PMS, channel manager, booking engine, and revenue tools effortlessly.
RMS has 112 verified partners, with 62 shared, including popular platforms like STR, Sage, and Criton. While RMS’s integration network is smaller, it focuses heavily on industry-specific tools, like POS and guest apps, for more tailored operations.
Cloudbeds’s broader integration ecosystem gives it a clear advantage for properties wanting a unified tech stack.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds’s overall rating is 4.62/5 based on 1,219 reviews, with recent feedback emphasizing its ease of use, automation, and reliable support. Hoteliers across segments like boutique hotels, hostels, and small resorts frequently praise its intuitive design and comprehensive features. The recent reviews (76 in the last 6 months) reinforce its popularity and continued relevance.
RMS has a slightly lower rating of 4.56/5 from 224 reviews, with many users appreciating its customization, automation, and ability to handle complex multi-property portfolios. However, the smaller, less recent review set suggests it may have a narrower user base or less recent updates.
In this case, Cloudbeds’s larger, more recent review base and higher rating make it the preferred choice.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds charges a base price of $500 per month without additional implementation or setup fees, with no freemium or tiered plans. It’s transparent in pricing, making budget planning easier for most properties.
RMS’s base price is $700 per month, also without setup fees or tiers. It’s slightly more expensive, reflecting its depth of features and customization options.
Both platforms offer straightforward subscription models; however, Cloudbeds’s lower starting price offers better value for smaller or mid-sized properties.
Not ideal if your hotel requires highly tailored workflows or complex revenue management systems. Larger, multi-property groups with specialized needs might find RMS’s flexibility more suitable.
Not ideal if your hotel prefers an intuitive, plug-and-play solution or has limited technical resources. Small boutique hotels or properties seeking simplicity may find RMS’s complexity burdensome.
Cloudbeds offers a comprehensive, easy-to-use platform with extensive integrations and a large, recent review base. Its focus on simplifying hotel management makes it ideal for properties of various sizes looking for a reliable, all-in-one system that can grow with them.
RMS excels in customization, automation, and detailed insights, making it suitable for medium to large properties with complex needs and dedicated technical teams. Its smaller review pool and slightly higher price point suggest it’s best for hotels with specific operational demands.
If your hotel values ease, speed, and broad functionality, Cloudbeds is the clear winner. For highly tailored operations and data-driven control, RMS is the more suitable choice.
In conclusion, Cloudbeds’s more recent and higher number of reviews, along with its broader feature set, position it as the stronger option for most hotels today. Its intuitive design and extensive integrations make it easier to implement and scale. RMS remains a strong contender for hotels that need advanced customization and detailed analytics but may require a more complex setup process.
Choose Cloudbeds if you want a reliable, scalable platform that simplifies operations and supports your growth.
Choose RMS if your property demands deep customization, industry-specific tools, and detailed insights to optimize performance.
我们分析了 11 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"I have not worked with a company that has such good customer service as Cloudbeds has. It's miles ahead."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"The biggest benefit of Cloudbeds' platform is its flexibility. I can access reporting online from anywhere. Everything is smoother with Cloudbeds."
"When you manage 26 properties, speed and control are everything. With RMS, I can update rates, policies, or form letters instantly across the group. That kind of centralization let..."
"Cloudbeds is like if Apple made a property management system. The ease of use is super simple and straightforward for guests and our staff. It’s very intuitive and just makes sense..."
"RMS has helped us strengthen what makes The Nare special: our connection with guests. It gives our team the knowledge they need to offer a genuinely personal experience, and we see..."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Cloudbeds is consistently praised for its user-friendly interface, which helps quick onboarding and reduces training times. Even users new to hotel ma... Cloudbeds is consistently praised for its user-friendly interface, which helps quick onboarding and reduces training times. Even users new to hotel management software find it intuitive, making operations smoother and more consistent for staff across the board.
The platform's automation tools significantly enhance daily operations, automating repetitive tasks like rate updates and payment processing. This not... The platform's automation tools significantly enhance daily operations, automating repetitive tasks like rate updates and payment processing. This not only saves time but also minimizes human errors, resulting in increased productivity and a focus on improving guest experiences.
Cloudbeds excels in integrating reservations and channel management, centralizing OTA distributions while reducing overbookings and errors. Users appr... Cloudbeds excels in integrating reservations and channel management, centralizing OTA distributions while reducing overbookings and errors. Users appreciate the streamlined handling of bookings and distribution, which boosts operational efficiency and helps in maintaining optimal occupancy rates.
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
The ability to edit and restructure reservations is seen as area for improvement, with users desiring more flexibility. Suggestions include splitting... The ability to edit and restructure reservations is seen as area for improvement, with users desiring more flexibility. Suggestions include splitting bookings or rearranging stays, which would better accommodate real-time changes such as guest extensions or cancellations.
人们注意到货币转换的准确性存在问题,尤其是在多币种交易中。用户反映存在一些差异,影响了对账流程。改进货币转换配置可以简化财务管理。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
支持团队的响应速度和问题解决能力备受好评。客户高度赞赏他们积极主动地解决问题以及在系统操作方面提供的帮助。
RMS Cloud 以其用户友好的界面而著称,简化了操作流程,缩短了员工培训时间。这种简化对于高效运营至关重要,尤其是在快节奏的工作环境中。
RMS Cloud significantly streamlines hotel operations by integrating multiple aspects such as reservations, housekeeping, and maintenance. Users apprec... RMS Cloud significantly streamlines hotel operations by integrating multiple aspects such as reservations, housekeeping, and maintenance. Users appreciate its role in enabling real-time coordination among various departments, thereby enhancing efficiency and guest experience.
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
许多用户称赞该平台的自定义功能,允许他们调整入住流程和其他操作,以更好地满足自身需求。然而,一些评论指出,自定义报告功能需要改进。
尽管 RMS Cloud 提供多种报告,但用户反映报告自定义和访问某些设置方面存在困难。如果能改进这方面,就能简化生成可用于决策的实用信息的过程。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
这取决于您的需求。Cloudbeds HMS 和 RMS 共享许多核心 Hotel Management Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。Cloudbeds HMS 提供 189 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 RMS 提供 112 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Cloudbeds HMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 4.3/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Cloudbeds HMS:否。RMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Management Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Cloudbeds 的 HT Score 为 100,RMS 的为 86。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问