The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
在分析了 218 条经验证的评价后,Amenitiz 用户最看重其 直观的设计和易用性, 可定制的网站模板, 与 ota 同步,而 innRoad 用户则强调 用户界面和可用性, 预订管理, 客户支持。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
直观的设计和易用性
▾
|
+
用户界面和可用性
▾
|
|
+
可定制的网站模板
▾
|
+
预订管理
▾
|
|
+
与 OTA 同步
▾
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
|
+
培训和教程
▾
|
+
自定义报告
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
客户支持响应能力
▾
|
−
系统性能和更新
▾
|
|
−
发票功能
▾
|
−
自定义报告
▾
|
|
−
法律合规问题
▾
|
−
定制
▾
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店管理软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #24 16 条评价 | #7 101 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #27 4 条评价 | #10 36 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #20 1 条评价 | #5 10 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #6 4 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #27 8 条评价 | #8 70 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #28 5 条评价 | #9 34 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #26 4 条评价 | #11 20 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #24 2 条评价 | #12 12 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #39 1 条评价 | #6 166 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #8 38 条评价 | #21 4 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #21 1 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #19 1 条评价 |
Choosing the right hotel management software is crucial for streamlining operations, increasing revenue, and enhancing guest experiences. Both Amenitiz and innRoad aim to serve these needs but diverge significantly in their approach and performance. Amenitiz offers a broader feature set with more recent reviews, while innRoad benefits from a larger, more active user base and higher overall ratings. So, which product aligns better with your hotel’s priorities?
Are you seeking a solution with a proven track record and extensive support, or one that offers more innovative features at a lower price? This comparison will help you decide.
Amenitiz and innRoad both target independent hoteliers but approach their offerings differently. Amenitiz emphasizes an all-in-one platform with a focus on direct booking growth, especially through website customization and smart pricing tools. Conversely, innRoad concentrates on operational efficiency, channel management, and seamless guest experiences, backed by a larger user base and more recent activity.
While Amenitiz aims to empower hoteliers with a flexible, feature-rich platform, its low rating (0.5/5) on Trustpilot—primarily due to recent reviews—raises concerns about support and reliability. innRoad, with a 4.7/5 rating from 137 reviews, provides proven support, stability, and more comprehensive integrations. Does a broader feature set and recent positive feedback outweigh Amenitiz’s innovative pricing tools and website capabilities?
If your hotel needs a straightforward, customizable website with built-in CRM and revenue tools, Amenitiz is the better fit. It’s designed for independent hotels and bed & breakfasts wanting to boost direct bookings, with features like integrated CRS and automated reminders that support marketing efforts.
However, if your hotel prioritizes reliable channel management, guest satisfaction, and operational automation, innRoad is the clear choice. Its proven track record in increasing occupancy and revenue, supported by a highly rated customer support team, makes it ideal for hotels seeking stability and growth.
Amenitiz boasts a high ease-of-use score (4.09/5) but struggles in recent reviews due to slow support and performance issues. Users find its website builder intuitive, and onboarding is generally smooth, yet website performance and support responsiveness appear inconsistent based on feedback.
innRoad scores slightly higher at 4.47/5, with users praising its user-friendly interface, simple reservation system, and quick onboarding process. Support is consistently rated highly, with many reviewers emphasizing the helpfulness of their support team.
Edge: innRoad.
Amenitiz offers 12 features exclusive to its platform, including multi-lingual support, payment requests, and a centralized messaging system—features that directly enhance guest engagement and revenue management. Its features focus heavily on website customization, CRM, and automated pricing.
innRoad provides 35 features unique to its system, such as housekeeper modules, automated night audits, Kiosk check-in, and extensive channel integrations. It also includes advanced revenue management, multi-currency support, and detailed reporting.
Edge: innRoad.
Amenitiz’s support scores 3.99/5, with reviews citing slow response times and frustrations during onboarding. Many users report delays in resolving issues, which hampers daily operations and diminishes trust.
innRoad’s support scores 4.48/5, with reviews frequently praising their 24/7 live support and dedicated onboarding advisors. Users describe the support as responsive, knowledgeable, and instrumental in their success.
Edge: innRoad.
Amenitiz connects with 5 verified partners, including Lightspeed and CheKin, but lacks extensive third-party integration options. This limits flexibility for hotels relying on multiple tools.
innRoad boasts 34 verified partners, including major OTAs like Expedia, Booking.com, and integrations with QuickBooks and other tools. It offers comprehensive connectivity that simplifies operational workflows.
Edge: innRoad.
Amenitiz’s reviews are mostly negative, with a 0.5/5 overall rating, largely driven by recent support and performance issues. Its users in Bed & Breakfast and Inns segments are particularly dissatisfied.
innRoad’s 4.7/5 rating stems from 137 reviews, with high praise across all hotel types, especially independent and boutique hotels. Its steady positive feedback indicates consistent performance and support.
Edge: innRoad.
Amenitiz charges a flat $200 monthly fee, with no free trial or freemium options, making it more affordable upfront. However, its limited review data raises questions about ongoing value and support.
innRoad costs $600 per month but offers more extensive features, support, and integrations. There’s no mention of hidden fees or annual increases, which provides clarity for budgeting.
Edge: Amenitiz in price, but innRoad offers more value.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
InnRoad delivers a more stable, mature platform with higher user satisfaction, extensive integrations, and dedicated support, making it a safe choice for most independent hotels. Amenitiz, while more affordable and feature-rich in website tools, suffers from recent negative reviews and limited integrations.
Choose Amenitiz if your primary goal is boosting direct bookings through website customization and smart pricing, and you’re comfortable with potential support delays. Opt for innRoad if operational stability, channel management, and comprehensive guest tools are more important—its proven track record and recent reviews support this choice.
In summary, innRoad’s broader, more recent customer approval and feature set make it the better option for hotels seeking reliability and growth. Amenitiz may suit smaller properties prioritizing website control and pricing tools, but its current issues warrant caution.
我们分析了 6 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"In the first year, we had a 100% increase in revenue with innRoad and are about to see big growth in 2022 again. As far as using the product, I love the tape-chart and creating a r..."
"When we started looking for a booking system, we needed one that was simple, and easy to use and engage with; not only from our point of view but from our guests too. We’ve got a b..."
"My favorite part about innRoad is the great customer support staff that are very responsive and always helps me get any issues resolved in a timely manner."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Amenitiz 因其用户友好且直观的设计而受到称赞,酒店经营者和客人都可以轻松使用。这一特点对于日常管理任务来说非常受重视。
Amenitiz 的可定制网站模板旨在提高浏览者到预订者的转化率,受到高度赞誉。用户报告称直接预订量显著增加,这归功于模板的有效性。
用户对 Amenitiz 与各种 OTA 的同步功能表示赞赏,这有助于集中预订并避免超额预订。然而,在整合 Google、Expedia 和 VRBO 等一些主要平台时,存在一些问题。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
评论强调了对 Amenitiz 客户支持的重大担忧,描述了电子邮件回复延迟和周末无法提供服务的情况。用户报告称,由于支持无响应,他们感到沮丧。
酒店经营者对 Amenitiz 的发票系统表示不满,并指出其缺乏集成性和改进空间。这一主题对于一致的财务运营至关重要。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
虽然 Innroad 总体上是用户友好的,但 UI 和导航等某些方面可以更加直观。这些方面的改进将使新用户受益,并使日常操作更加高效。
Innroad 直观的预订管理系统简化了整个预订流程。它提供全面的数据访问,使员工能够高效地处理多房间预订和客人信息。
24/7 客户支持因其可用性和所提供帮助的质量而受到称赞。然而,一些用户报告称,偶尔会遇到沟通和解决速度方面的困难。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户提到频繁更新有时会降低系统性能,影响生产力。尽管更新带来好处,但建议更高效地推出并尽量减少干扰。
一些评论呼吁改进自定义报告功能。用户建议提供更详细、可自定义的报告选项,以便更深入地了解客户行为和运营指标。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Amenitiz 和 innRoad All-in-1 HMS 共享许多核心 Hotel Management Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。Amenitiz 提供 5 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 innRoad All-in-1 HMS 提供 34 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。innRoad All-in-1 HMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.5/5 对比 4.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Amenitiz:否。innRoad All-in-1 HMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Management Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Amenitiz 的 HT Score 为 40,innRoad 的为 27。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问