The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #13 80 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #32 15 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | — | #46 1 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #39 0 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #14 65 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #12 53 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #21 17 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #8 26 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #27 7 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #25 13 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #20 3 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #13 2 条评价 |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) for your hotel hinges on several factors, including ease of use, features, support, and overall value. AmicHotel and Preno aim to serve similar needs but diverge significantly in their offerings and market presence. While AmicHotel promises comprehensive management tools, it lacks recent reviews and user feedback, raising questions about its current performance. Preno, on the other hand, boasts a strong reputation backed by recent, detailed reviews from active users, making it the more reliable choice for most hoteliers today.
What key aspects matter most to your hotel’s success: simplicity, features, or support?
Both AmicHotel and Preno tackle core hotel management challenges—booking, guest management, and billing—but they do so differently. AmicHotel’s features appear limited, and its reviews are nonexistent, which suggests a lack of recent user validation. Preno, with its high review count and recent positive feedback, demonstrates ongoing product development and customer satisfaction.
AmicHotel’s zero-star rating indicates no current user feedback, making it impossible to gauge effectiveness or satisfaction. Preno’s 4.73-star rating from over 140 reviews, with recent activity in the last six months, offers a clearer picture of how hotels perceive its value. Would you prefer a product with proven, current user approval or one that’s largely untested?
If your hotel needs a proven, feature-rich PMS with continuous support and active development, Preno is the clear choice. It’s especially suitable for hotels that require integrations with channel managers, accounting software like Xero, or need a mobile-friendly platform.
Conversely, if your hotel is seeking a basic management solution without a substantial feature set or recent references, AmicHotel might appear as an option—however, the lack of recent reviews casts doubt on its current effectiveness. For most hotels prioritizing reliability and recent customer feedback, Preno offers a safer, more scalable solution.
Preno’s user interface consistently earns high marks, with a 4.78/5 ease of use rating based on recent reviews. Users praise its intuitive layout and straightforward navigation, which reduces staff training time and accelerates onboarding. Support staff are also noted for responsiveness, contributing to a smooth transition.
AmicHotel, with a 0/5 rating for ease of use and no recent reviews, provides no evidence of a user-friendly experience. Its lack of feedback hampers understanding of how well staff adopt the system or how easy it is to navigate.
Edge: Preno.
Preno offers 30 unique features, including payment processing, booking engine, channel management, guest CRM, revenue management, and mobile app capabilities. These functions support multi-property management, automation, and real-time reporting, streamlining hotel operations.
AmicHotel presents no additional features beyond basic management functions, and its website or reviews do not list any specific capabilities. This makes Preno the more complete, versatile choice—especially if you value automation and integrations.
Edge: Preno.
Preno’s reviews highlight its excellent support, with a 4.8/5 rating for customer service and recent testimonials praising its responsiveness. Hoteliers mention how Preno’s team helps resolve issues promptly, facilitating smooth onboarding and daily operations.
AmicHotel’s support ratings are nonexistent, and without user reviews or feedback, it’s impossible to gauge its customer service quality. Given the importance of reliable support in hotel management, Preno’s proven track record makes it the preferable option.
Edge: Preno.
Preno integrates with 17 verified partners, including Xero, SiteMinder, Revinate, TrustYou, and HelloShift. These integrations enable easy automation, channel management, and guest feedback collection, vital for modern hotels.
AmicHotel has no listed verified integrations, which limits its ability to connect with other essential tools. If your hotel depends on a connected tech stack, Preno’s extensive integration options clearly advantage it.
Edge: Preno.
Preno’s reviews are recent and plentiful, with a 4.73/5 overall rating based on 144 reviews, and a Net Promoter Score of 9.53/10. Hoteliers from diverse segments like boutique hotels, motels, and B&Bs highly praise its ease of use, support, and features.
AmicHotel, lacking any recent reviews or ratings, cannot be evaluated on user satisfaction. The absence of current feedback makes Preno the more trusted product for modern hotel operations.
Edge: Preno.
AmicHotel’s pricing details are unavailable, suggesting it may lack a transparent or standard pricing model. Preno charges a flat rate of $800 per month, with no setup fees or trial options, offering predictable ongoing costs.
Without clear pricing data from AmicHotel, your decision should lean toward Preno, which provides transparent, predictable pricing aligned with its comprehensive feature set and support.
Hotels that might consider AmicHotel are:
Not ideal if your hotel:
Hotels suited to Preno include:
Not ideal if your hotel:
Preno and AmicHotel serve different hotel management needs, but the current market favors Preno due to its active user base and recent reviews. AmicHotel’s lack of recent feedback makes it difficult to recommend confidently.
If your hotel values a proven, feature-rich, and well-supported platform, Preno is the clear choice. It offers extensive integrations, high user satisfaction, and ongoing development, making it a reliable partner for your hotel’s growth.
Choose Preno if you want an intuitive, flexible, and well-supported PMS. If your hotel only needs basic management tools with minimal future growth plans, then AmicHotel might suffice, but be aware of its unverified current status.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Preno is frequently commended for its intuitive and clean interface, which makes it simple to navigate. Users across various tech skill levels find it... Preno is frequently commended for its intuitive and clean interface, which makes it simple to navigate. Users across various tech skill levels find it easy to learn and use, which reduces the time and cost associated with staff training.
支持团队通常因其响应迅速、乐于助人而备受赞誉,尽管一些评论指出,他们可能会出现延迟,尤其是在周末或繁忙时段。响应速度和与支持人员的直接联系至关重要。
Preno’s seamless integration with channel managers like SiteMinder allows for real-time updates and has been attributed to eliminating double bookings... Preno’s seamless integration with channel managers like SiteMinder allows for real-time updates and has been attributed to eliminating double bookings. Users commend this functionality for improving operational efficiency and enhancing bookings management.
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Preno 的报告功能褒贬不一,一些用户对其易用性感到满意,而另一些用户则希望获得更深入的分析,以便做出更明智的战略决策。一些用户表示需要定制报告功能。
尽管一些用户对 Preno 的功能表示赞赏,但也有人呼吁其移动应用功能更加强大。评论表明,增强移动应用的离线功能和更丰富的功能将提升其可用性,尤其对于经常出... 尽管一些用户对 Preno 的功能表示赞赏,但也有人呼吁其移动应用功能更加强大。评论表明,增强移动应用的离线功能和更丰富的功能将提升其可用性,尤其对于经常出差的管理人员而言。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。AmicHotel 和 Preno 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。AmicHotel 提供 1 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Preno 提供 17 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Preno 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
AmicHotel:否。Preno:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。AmicHotel 的 HT Score 为 0,Preno 的为 80。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问