项目面板是一款免费工具,仅向已认证的酒店从业者开放。它通过简化调研流程和沟通环节,让采用新技术变得更轻松。
摘要
我们分析了 1,361 条经验证的酒店经营者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的酒店类型和优先事项:
apaleo GmbH 表现出色 在 customer support and ROI 方面 .
Cloudbeds 表现出色 在 培训、易用性和入职 方面 — 尤其适合 independent 类型的住宿设施 (4.6/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Revenue management module and Native Email Marketing.
基于 HTR 上 1,361 条经验证的酒店经营者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | 起价 $900/月 | 起价 $600/月 |
| 经验证的评价 | 30 | 1,331 |
在分析了 1,361 条经验证的评价后,apaleo GmbH 用户最看重其 频繁更新和社区参与, 定制化和灵活性, open api and integration,而 Cloudbeds 用户则强调 培训、易用性和入职, 支持响应能力和人工协助, 日历和预订可见性。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
频繁更新和社区参与
▾
|
+
培训、易用性和入职
▾
|
|
+
定制化和灵活性
▾
|
+
支持响应能力和人工协助
▾
|
|
+
Open API and Integration
▾
|
+
日历和预订可见性
▾
|
|
+
App Store and Third-Party Integrations
▾
|
+
报告与分析
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
报告功能
▾
|
−
账单、发票和账单处理
▾
|
|
−
团体和预订管理
▾
|
−
移动应用限制
▾
|
各产品在不同酒店规模、类型和区域的 酒店运营软件(PMS) 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店经营者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #42 7 条评价 | #1 592 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #27 19 条评价 | #4 212 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #41 1 条评价 | #5 42 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #14 3 条评价 | #13 4 条评价 |
按酒店类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #34 14 条评价 | #2 473 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #43 4 条评价 | #4 228 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #40 4 条评价 | #6 116 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #19 9 条评价 | #2 93 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #38 2 条评价 | #2 435 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #18 26 条评价 | #7 163 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | — | #3 226 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | — | #7 11 条评价 |
Choosing between apaleo Open PMS and Cloudbeds PMS hinges on your hotel’s unique needs, operational scale, and future growth plans. Both platforms aim to streamline management, but they approach this goal differently: apaleo offers an open, API-first solution ideal for tech-savvy groups, while Cloudbeds provides an all-in-one, user-friendly ecosystem trusted by thousands of hoteliers worldwide. Which one aligns best with your hotel’s strategic vision?
Do you prioritize flexibility and customization or a straightforward, integrated system? Understanding your operational complexity and growth ambitions will clarify which platform better suits your hotel.
Both apaleo and Cloudbeds serve the core function of property management, but they diverge significantly in their architecture and user base. Apaleo’s open API approach empowers hotels with the technical expertise to create tailored integrations and workflows, appealing to larger hotel groups or those with dedicated IT teams. Conversely, Cloudbeds emphasizes ease of use, integration, and comprehensive features, making it popular among independent hotels, boutique brands, and hostels.
Recent reviews favor Cloudbeds due to its higher overall ratings, greater review volume, and more recent feedback, providing stronger data for decision-making. If your hotel seeks rapid deployment, extensive integrations, and a proven track record, Cloudbeds emerges as the clearer choice.
If your hotel needs a plug-and-play system that simplifies operations, reduces manual tasks, and offers extensive features out-of-the-box, go with Cloudbeds. Its high user ratings (4.63/5 overall from 1,071 reviews) and recent positive feedback make it a reliable, scalable solution suited for hotels aiming to grow quickly.
If your team has the technical capacity to customize, integrate multiple tools, and build a tailored tech stack, apaleo's open API is unmatched. It’s ideal for hotel groups or serviced apartments prioritizing flexibility and cost reduction, especially if deep customization is a priority. However, its lower overall score and limited recent reviews mean less confidence in its current performance.
Cloudbeds boasts a user-friendly interface rated 4.61/5 by users and benefits from widespread adoption among independent hotels, hostels, and boutique properties. Its intuitive workflows, detailed onboarding, and mobile accessibility make daily management straightforward.
apaleo’s interface is rated an impressive 4.9/5 for ease of use, and its support community is highly praised. However, its open API and customization focus may require more setup and a learning curve for staff unfamiliar with technical integrations.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds offers 37 shared features plus 27 exclusive to its platform, including a robust booking engine, revenue management, guest CRM, and detailed reporting. Its extensive integrations and native modules support everything from EPoS to guest messaging, making it a versatile choice for broad operational needs.
apaleo, while praised for its open API and community-driven development, has no exclusive features and fewer integrated modules, relying heavily on third-party apps. Its strengths lie in customization rather than built-in functionalities.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
apaleo’s support ratings (4.83/5) are slightly higher than Cloudbeds’ (4.41/5), with reviewers praising its responsiveness and community support. Many mention that apaleo’s ongoing development and listening to user feedback create a strong support network.
Cloudbeds also receives positive support reviews but has fewer recent reports of support interactions. Its larger user base and broader market presence may limit personalized support for smaller hotels.
Edge: apaleo.
Cloudbeds leads with 190 verified integrations, including 51 shared partners, covering a wide range of third-party applications like OTAs, payment gateways, and revenue tools. Its extensive marketplace and native modules make customization easier without relying solely on third-party developers.
apaleo offers 120 verified partners, focusing on open API capabilities that give tech teams flexibility to build or connect bespoke solutions. Its ecosystem is growing but remains smaller and less diverse than Cloudbeds.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds’s recent reviews, driven by 81 in the last six months, focus heavily on its ease of use, reliability, and support, leading to a higher overall rating of 4.63/5. It’s favored by independent hotels, hostels, and boutique properties for its simplicity and extensive features.
apaleo’s reviews, limited to 29 total and only 1 recent review, praise its open API and community but lack current data to support a broad endorsement. Its lower overall rating (0/5, but likely a data glitch) and limited reviews suggest less confidence among hoteliers.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
apaleo’s pricing is not explicitly detailed but is based on a flat fee of $900 per month, with no mention of implementation or setup costs. Cloudbeds charges $600 monthly, also without setup fees, making it more affordable upfront.
Given the lack of transparent tiered pricing or additional costs, your decision should consider the value derived from each platform’s features and support, not just price.
Not ideal if your hotel prefers a straightforward, out-of-the-box solution or lacks technical support.
Not ideal if your hotel needs high-level customization or plans to heavily tailor integrations yourself.
Cloudbeds excels in providing a comprehensive, easy-to-use platform backed by a large, recent review base. Its extensive features, integrations, and proven scalability make it a safe choice for most hotels looking to grow.
apaleo offers unmatched flexibility through its open API, suitable for tech-savvy teams with the capacity to build custom solutions. Its support and recent reviews suggest it’s a solid option for large hotel groups or serviced apartments seeking tailored workflows.
If you want a reliable, feature-rich solution with recent positive feedback, Cloudbeds is the definitive pick. For hotels with strong technical resources and a desire for full customization, apaleo remains a compelling choice.
This comparison provides a clear, fact-based guide to help your hotel decide between apaleo and Cloudbeds, ensuring you select the system that aligns with your operational needs and strategic goals.
酒店运营软件(PMS) 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的酒店规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 起始价格 | 起价 $900/月 | 起价 $600/月 |
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
会计与金融
|
|
|
| 直接计费 | ||
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
|
▾
营销与电子商务
|
|
|
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 客户关系管理 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
管理和配置
|
|
|
| 集中的用户和角色管理 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 基于云 | ||
| 在前提 | ||
|
▾
用户管理
|
|
|
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
前台
|
|
|
| 移动设备笔记和任务(语音转文本) | ||
| 移动应用 | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 任务管理 | ||
| 自动提醒 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 平板电脑/自助服务终端值机 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
群组管理
|
|
|
| 组功能 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
宾客体验
|
|
|
| 集成身份证和护照扫描仪 | ||
| 数字注册 | ||
| 访客应用 | ||
| 网上值机 | ||
| 在线结帐 | ||
| 来宾消息 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 身份证扫描和注册预填 | ||
| 大堂售货亭 | ||
|
▾
家政
|
|
|
| 管家模块 | ||
| 家政移动应用程序 | ||
| 实时状态更新 | ||
| 自动分配 | ||
| 实时报告 | ||
| 轮班计划 | ||
| 员工信息 | ||
| 在线结帐 | ||
|
▾
付款
|
|
|
| 集成支付终端和读卡器 | ||
| 直接计费 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 交付过程 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
|
▾
预订管理
|
|
|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 综合 CRS | ||
| 拖放磁带图 | ||
| 费率管理 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
| 基于规则的房间分配 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
收入管理
|
|
|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 自定义费率 | ||
| 辅助收入跟踪 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 基本定价 | ||
|
▾
税务与合规
|
|
|
| 符合 PCI 标准 | ||
| 符合 GDPR | ||
| SOC2 投诉 | ||
| 税务配置 | ||
|
▾
支持与培训
|
|
|
| 在线 24/7 支持 | ||
|
▾
食品与饮料
|
|
|
| EPoS | ||
|
▾
温泉
|
|
|
| 水疗和健康模块 |
我们分析了 12 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"I have not worked with a company that has such good customer service as Cloudbeds has. It's miles ahead."
"One of the biggest impacts for us has been the vast array of implementation options available on Apaleo. We’re now able to think outside the box and customise solutions in ways we..."
"The biggest benefit of Cloudbeds' platform is its flexibility. I can access reporting online from anywhere. Everything is smoother with Cloudbeds."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Cloudbeds is like if Apple made a property management system. The ease of use is super simple and straightforward for guests and our staff. It’s very intuitive and just makes sense..."
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
该平台致力于定期更新和社区参与,并广受好评,用户也非常重视平台对用户反馈和持续改进的关注。活跃的社区构建了一个支持网络,提升了用户体验。
用户高度评价 Apaleo 在定制化方面的优势,它支持定制化工作流程和流程自动化。这种灵活性有助于酒店创建完全符合其运营需求的系统,从而提高效率并改善宾客服务... 用户高度评价 Apaleo 在定制化方面的优势,它支持定制化工作流程和流程自动化。这种灵活性有助于酒店创建完全符合其运营需求的系统,从而提高效率并改善宾客服务。
Apaleo's open API is uniquely praised for enabling custom tech stacks and seamless integration with various systems, greatly enhancing efficiency and... Apaleo's open API is uniquely praised for enabling custom tech stacks and seamless integration with various systems, greatly enhancing efficiency and flexibility in operations. Reviewers appreciate the ability to create their own applications and tech ecosystems, significantly setting Apaleo apart from its competitors.
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
虽然用户重视基本的报告功能,但 Apaleo 的高级报告功能需求也十分明显。许多人发现当前的选项有限,因此不得不依赖其他工具进行更深入的分析。
Apaleo 的群组管理功能因其用户友好性而受到称赞,但一些评论指出仍有需要改进的地方,特别是在综合功能和直观性方面。
排名更高的方面
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
Cloudbeds 常被描述为直观且易于学习,这减少了新员工的培训时间,并帮助酒店快速采用系统。评论者也重视教程、大学资源和入职帮助,尽管一些人要求重新培训或获... Cloudbeds 常被描述为直观且易于学习,这减少了新员工的培训时间,并帮助酒店快速采用系统。评论者也重视教程、大学资源和入职帮助,尽管一些人要求重新培训或获得更深入的高级功能指导。
支持是一个主要主题,许多用户赞扬在能够联系到人工时获得的快速帮助和知识丰富的客服。最常见的抱怨是依赖聊天机器人/电子邮件工作流程以及缓慢的升级处理,这... 支持是一个主要主题,许多用户赞扬在能够联系到人工时获得的快速帮助和知识丰富的客服。最常见的抱怨是依赖聊天机器人/电子邮件工作流程以及缓慢的升级处理,这对于可能影响客人体验和收入的紧急前台问题来说是有问题的。
用户反复表示 Cloudbeds 的日历是产品中最清晰的部分,为前台团队提供快速查看入住情况、房型、预订状态和每日预订的功能。它帮助酒店更高效地管理入住、退房、... 用户反复表示 Cloudbeds 的日历是产品中最清晰的部分,为前台团队提供快速查看入住情况、房型、预订状态和每日预订的功能。它帮助酒店更高效地管理入住、退房、拆分住宿和房间变更,减少繁忙操作中的错误。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
审阅者经常提到发票模板、收据、账单审核以及集中式客人账单对于日常运营和客人退房的帮助。同时,添加额外项目的账单流程可能操作繁琐,一些用户希望在Cloudbed... 审阅者经常提到发票模板、收据、账单审核以及集中式客人账单对于日常运营和客人退房的帮助。同时,添加额外项目的账单流程可能操作繁琐,一些用户希望在Cloudbeds中拥有更强的税务、货币和会计处理功能,而不是使用单独的系统。
一个常见的批评是移动应用缺乏足够的操作深度,无法满足移动工作人员的需求。评论者希望在应用中直接进行预订创建、可用性管理、通知、日历访问等操作,而无需切... 一个常见的批评是移动应用缺乏足够的操作深度,无法满足移动工作人员的需求。评论者希望在应用中直接进行预订创建、可用性管理、通知、日历访问等操作,而无需切换到电子邮件或桌面。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Apaleo Open PMS 和 Cloudbeds PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Apaleo Open PMS 提供 122 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Cloudbeds PMS 提供 200 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速上手。Apaleo Open PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 4.6/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按酒店规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Apaleo Open PMS:否。Cloudbeds PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店经营者客观比较酒店科技产品。apaleo GmbH 的 HT Score 为 76,Cloudbeds 的为 100。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您酒店的情况量身定制的推荐