项目面板是一款免费工具,仅向已认证的酒店从业者开放。它通过简化调研流程和沟通环节,让采用新技术变得更轻松。
摘要
我们分析了 260 条经验证的酒店经营者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的酒店类型和优先事项:
apaleo GmbH 在易用性以及客户支持方面表现出色,尤其适合机场与会议住宿设施(5.0/5)。
eviivo 在customer support and onboarding方面表现出色,尤其适合长住住宿设施(4.8/5),并拥有收益管理模块以及客户关系管理等独家功能。
基于 HTR 上 260 条经验证的酒店经营者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | 起价 $900/月 | 起价 $700/月 |
| 经验证的评价 | 30 | 230 |
在分析了 260 条经验证的评价后,apaleo GmbH 用户最看重其 频繁更新和社区参与, 定制化和灵活性, open api and integration,而 eviivo 用户则强调 customer support and onboarding, 易于使用和日常操作, 报告和分析。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
频繁更新和社区参与
▾
|
+
Customer support and onboarding
▾
|
|
+
定制化和灵活性
▾
|
+
易于使用和日常操作
▾
|
|
+
Open API and Integration
▾
|
+
报告和分析
▾
|
|
+
App Store and Third-Party Integrations
▾
|
+
多物业集中管理
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
报告功能
▾
|
−
界面、自定义和移动/访问限制
▾
|
|
−
团体和预订管理
▾
|
−
定价、费率方案和年度费率变动
▾
|
|
−
发票和账单工作流程
▾
|
|
各产品在不同酒店规模、类型和区域的 酒店运营软件(PMS) 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店经营者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #44 7 条评价 | #15 62 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #26 19 条评价 | #21 24 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #43 1 条评价 | #23 7 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #13 3 条评价 | #20 2 条评价 |
按酒店类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #31 16 条评价 | #17 48 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #44 4 条评价 | #15 41 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #42 4 条评价 | #18 23 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #20 9 条评价 | #10 22 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #37 2 条评价 | #15 41 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #18 26 条评价 | #4 168 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #37 2 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #33 1 条评价 |
Apaleo GmbH and eviivo address distinctly different hotel operational needs despite both serving as property management systems. Apaleo excels as an API-first, open PMS platform targeted at hotel and serviced apartment groups that want to build customized tech stacks. In contrast, eviivo offers a more all-in-one booking and management platform favored by small to mid-sized independent hotels, B&Bs, and vacation rentals. Apaleo's core strength is flexibility and integration depth across 122 verified partners, while eviivo provides 14 unique built-in features aimed at simplifying daily operations like guest messaging and revenue management.
Both platforms solve the fundamental challenge of centralizing reservations, billing, and guest communications to reduce manual workload and improve operational efficiency. Apaleo’s open architecture supports complex, group-level operations and customization, while eviivo targets properties seeking an intuitive, ready-to-use system with strong OTA connectivity and mobile management. The choice hinges on a hotel’s size, technical resources, and operational complexity.
If your property is a boutique or branded hotel group operating in Europe or North America and values full control over integrations and workflow customization, apaleo GmbH is the superior choice, supported by its 4.8 overall rating across 30 reviews and 122 verified integrations. Apaleo’s API-first design suits hotels with IT resources to build tailored solutions, underscored by case studies like citizenM’s rapid rollout of 7,500 rooms in 8 weeks.
Conversely, if you manage a small to medium-sized hotel, B&B, or vacation rental portfolio across 23 countries, including Central America, eviivo’s 4.6 overall rating based on 230 reviews and built-in tools such as guest CRM, messaging, and revenue management modules provide a ready-to-go system that reduces setup time and supports mobile operations. Its strong channel manager integration with major OTAs like Booking.com and Airbnb fits properties relying heavily on online distribution. However, eviivo’s last six months rating dropped to 4.1 from 4.6 overall, indicating recent users report slightly lower satisfaction. In segments with fewer than 10 reviews, such as extended stay, data is insufficient to recommend definitively.
Apaleo leads in ease of use with a 4.9 rating compared to eviivo's 4.5, and onboarding scores of 4.8 versus 4.4. Reviewers praise apaleo's clean, intuitive interface that new staff grasp quickly, reducing training time and accelerating adoption. The system’s sophistication does not come at the cost of usability, as hoteliers emphasize straightforward setup achievable within hours for those with IT knowledge.
Eviivo users also find the platform intuitive, highlighting the mobile app’s ease for on-the-go management and the simplicity of daily operations like booking flow and housekeeping access. However, some reviewers mention a desire for improved interface customization and navigation speed. The larger review volume for eviivo (230 versus 30) confirms consistent usability, but apaleo’s higher ease of use ratings and onboarding experiences demonstrate a smoother learning curve for its user base.
Edge: apaleo GmbH.
Eviivo offers 14 unique features that apaleo lacks, including a native revenue management module, booking engine, guest CRM, email marketing, centralized guest messaging with SMS, a guest app, shift planning, employee messaging, automated reminders, tablet/kiosk check-in, and an integrated EPoS system. These built-in capabilities streamline front desk workflows by centralizing guest communications and enabling mobile and contactless check-in, reducing manual coordination and improving guest engagement for hotels without extensive IT support.
Apaleo does not have proprietary equivalents for these features but compensates with an open API-first architecture and an extensive App Store containing 122 verified integrations that provide similar or enhanced capabilities through third-party solutions. This approach allows hotels to tailor their feature set precisely to their needs but requires technical resources.
Given eviivo’s significant count of hotel-relevant features not present in apaleo, particularly those impacting guest interaction and internal collaboration directly, eviivo holds the feature edge.
Edge: eviivo.
Apaleo’s customer support rating of 4.8 and onboarding rating of 4.8 exceed eviivo’s 4.4 in both categories. Reviewers of apaleo consistently commend the responsiveness and helpfulness of the support team, with particular appreciation for the active user community and ongoing development responsiveness. Hoteliers highlight how support accelerates implementation and reduces downtime.
Eviivo users acknowledge good support that is generally knowledgeable and proactive, with positive experiences during onboarding and training. However, some reviews mention challenges in reaching support promptly during critical issues, as reported in a few negative cases involving forced migration complications.
Though eviivo has a larger review sample, the statistically significant rating advantage combined with qualitative feedback gives apaleo the support edge.
Edge: apaleo GmbH.
Apaleo boasts 122 verified integration partners versus eviivo’s 35, with 17 shared partners including major names like Profitroom, D-Edge, RoomPriceGenie, and PriceLabs. Apaleo’s exclusive integrations cover advanced revenue management tools (Right Revenue, HQ revenue), housekeeping (hotelkit), and bespoke reporting platforms, which benefit hotels seeking sophisticated operational control and analytics.
Eviivo integrates with booking and channel management platforms critical for OTA synchronization, such as Hotelchamp, eRevMax, Tripadvisor, and guest communication tools like Asksuite. These integrations support small to medium properties focused on direct-to-OTA workflows.
The 249% larger integration ecosystem of apaleo provides hotels with substantially more options to customize and expand their tech stack, critical for properties needing specialized functionality or wishing to avoid vendor lock-in.
Edge: apaleo GmbH.
Overall, apaleo and eviivo share similar overall ratings: 4.8/5 for apaleo (30 reviews) and 4.6/5 for eviivo (230 reviews). Both receive strong recommendation likelihoods (97% for apaleo, 93% for eviivo). However, eviivo’s last six months rating has declined to 4.1/5 from 4.6 overall, based on 25 recent reviews, suggesting a recent dip in user satisfaction.
By segment, apaleo scores highest in boutique hotels (4.9/5 from 16 reviews), city center hotels (4.9/5 from 12 reviews), and extended stay/serviced apartments (4.8/5 from 9 reviews). Eviivo earns strong marks for bed & breakfasts and inns (4.7/5 from 111 reviews), vacation rentals & villas (4.7/5 from 78 reviews), and boutique hotels (4.7/5 from 48 reviews). Eviivo also shows ratings for larger segments like luxury hotels (4.8/5 from 41 reviews) and limited service hotels (4.8/5 from 36 reviews), though some subsegments have fewer than 10 reviews, limiting confidence.
Neither product dominates decisively across all segments, but apaleo’s higher ratings in boutique and city center hotels contrast with eviivo’s broader adoption and solid scores in B&Bs and vacation rentals.
Edge: Even.
Apaleo is priced with a base fee of $900.00, while eviivo’s base price is $700.00. Neither product offers freemium models, nor monthly flat or per-room pricing, and neither charges an implementation fee. No free trials are available for either.
The $200 difference in base price favors eviivo for budget-conscious buyers, but without published details on what these base prices include, especially regarding user seats, integrations, or support levels, direct cost-effectiveness comparisons are limited. Hotels should consider total cost of ownership including third-party app subscriptions required by apaleo.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
The core difference between apaleo GmbH and eviivo lies in their approach to property management: apaleo offers an open, API-first platform designed for hotels and serviced apartments that demand extensive integration and customization. Eviivo delivers a more traditional all-in-one PMS with built-in guest communication, booking engine, and revenue management modules targeting small to mid-sized properties.
Choose apaleo GmbH if your property requires flexibility to build a tailored tech stack, values an extensive ecosystem of 122 verified integrations, and has the internal capacity to manage a customizable platform. Its higher ease of use and customer support ratings reinforce its suitability for operators prioritizing system sophistication and scalability.
Choose eviivo if you operate a smaller or multi-property portfolio seeking an intuitive, ready-to-use platform with strong channel management, native guest messaging, and mobile tools. Eviivo’s broader feature set out of the box and lower base price support faster deployment for teams wanting straightforward daily operations. However, be mindful of the recent dip in user satisfaction and potential limitations in advanced reporting.
Both platforms serve distinct hotel segments well; your choice depends on your property’s size, technical resources, and operational priorities.
酒店运营软件(PMS) 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的酒店规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 起始价格 | 起价 $900/月 | 起价 $700/月 |
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
会计与金融
|
|
|
| 直接计费 | ||
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
|
▾
营销与电子商务
|
|
|
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 客户关系管理 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
管理和配置
|
|
|
| 集中的用户和角色管理 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 基于云 | ||
| 在前提 | ||
|
▾
用户管理
|
|
|
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
前台
|
|
|
| 移动设备笔记和任务(语音转文本) | ||
| 移动应用 | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 任务管理 | ||
| 自动提醒 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 平板电脑/自助服务终端值机 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
群组管理
|
|
|
| 组功能 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
宾客体验
|
|
|
| 集成身份证和护照扫描仪 | ||
| 数字注册 | ||
| 访客应用 | ||
| 网上值机 | ||
| 在线结帐 | ||
| 来宾消息 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 身份证扫描和注册预填 | ||
| 大堂售货亭 | ||
|
▾
家政
|
|
|
| 管家模块 | ||
| 家政移动应用程序 | ||
| 实时状态更新 | ||
| 自动分配 | ||
| 实时报告 | ||
| 轮班计划 | ||
| 员工信息 | ||
| 在线结帐 | ||
|
▾
付款
|
|
|
| 集成支付终端和读卡器 | ||
| 直接计费 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 交付过程 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
|
▾
预订管理
|
|
|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 综合 CRS | ||
| 拖放磁带图 | ||
| 费率管理 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
| 基于规则的房间分配 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
收入管理
|
|
|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 自定义费率 | ||
| 辅助收入跟踪 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 基本定价 | ||
|
▾
税务与合规
|
|
|
| 符合 PCI 标准 | ||
| 符合 GDPR | ||
| SOC2 投诉 | ||
| 税务配置 | ||
|
▾
支持与培训
|
|
|
| 在线 24/7 支持 | ||
|
▾
食品与饮料
|
|
|
| EPoS | ||
|
▾
温泉
|
|
|
| 水疗和健康模块 |
我们分析了 13 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Because of the automation from the eviivo Suite, it saves me a huge amount of time. This time I can use on growing the business; working on the business instead of in the business...."
"One of the biggest impacts for us has been the vast array of implementation options available on Apaleo. We’re now able to think outside the box and customise solutions in ways we..."
"Auf eviivo könnte ich heut gar nicht mehr drauf verzichten. Das Hotel ohne dieses Programm zu führen, scheint mir fast unmöglich, weil die Zeit, die ich jetzt erspart habe, die ich..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Aujourd’hui on a la possibilité de gérer l’ensemble de notre parc, que ce soit la tarification, le calendrier, la communication en un seul clic pour gérer plus de 50 appartements,..."
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
该平台致力于定期更新和社区参与,并广受好评,用户也非常重视平台对用户反馈和持续改进的关注。活跃的社区构建了一个支持网络,提升了用户体验。
用户高度评价 Apaleo 在定制化方面的优势,它支持定制化工作流程和流程自动化。这种灵活性有助于酒店创建完全符合其运营需求的系统,从而提高效率并改善宾客服务... 用户高度评价 Apaleo 在定制化方面的优势,它支持定制化工作流程和流程自动化。这种灵活性有助于酒店创建完全符合其运营需求的系统,从而提高效率并改善宾客服务。
Apaleo's open API is uniquely praised for enabling custom tech stacks and seamless integration with various systems, greatly enhancing efficiency and... Apaleo's open API is uniquely praised for enabling custom tech stacks and seamless integration with various systems, greatly enhancing efficiency and flexibility in operations. Reviewers appreciate the ability to create their own applications and tech ecosystems, significantly setting Apaleo apart from its competitors.
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
虽然用户重视基本的报告功能,但 Apaleo 的高级报告功能需求也十分明显。许多人发现当前的选项有限,因此不得不依赖其他工具进行更深入的分析。
Apaleo 的群组管理功能因其用户友好性而受到称赞,但一些评论指出仍有需要改进的地方,特别是在综合功能和直观性方面。
排名更高的方面
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
Reviews overwhelmingly praise eviivo's support, onboarding, and training teams for being responsive, knowledgeable, and proactive. Many users say this... Reviews overwhelmingly praise eviivo's support, onboarding, and training teams for being responsive, knowledgeable, and proactive. Many users say this hands-on help made setup smooth, helped them configure the system correctly, and reduced the burden on internal staff.
许多评论者认为 eviivo 简单易用、直观便捷,非常适合日常物业管理。他们表示,eviivo 简化了预订处理、预订流程和物业设置等日常工作,从而减少了管理时间,使... 许多评论者认为 eviivo 简单易用、直观便捷,非常适合日常物业管理。他们表示,eviivo 简化了预订处理、预订流程和物业设置等日常工作,从而减少了管理时间,使运营更加顺畅。
报表功能是用户经常提及的话题,他们希望能够查看基本的统计数据、账单和收入相关信息。然而,一些用户评论要求提供更深入的报表分析、更完善的筛选功能以及更灵... 报表功能是用户经常提及的话题,他们希望能够查看基本的统计数据、账单和收入相关信息。然而,一些用户评论要求提供更深入的报表分析、更完善的筛选功能以及更灵活的组级分析,以辅助会计和运营决策。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
不少用户希望增加自定义选项、提升界面美观度,并改善界面导航的灵活性。具体来说,他们希望加快登录速度、改进概览页面、增加自定义模板、增强网站自定义功能,... 不少用户希望增加自定义选项、提升界面美观度,并改善界面导航的灵活性。具体来说,他们希望加快登录速度、改进概览页面、增加自定义模板、增强网站自定义功能,并开发更完善的移动应用。
用户重视eviivo的费率规划功能,并指出该平台支持价格管理,但部分用户认为年度费率调整和规划/定价流程过于复杂。尤其是规模较小的运营商,他们更希望工作流程... 用户重视eviivo的费率规划功能,并指出该平台支持价格管理,但部分用户认为年度费率调整和规划/定价流程过于复杂。尤其是规模较小的运营商,他们更希望工作流程更简洁,减少不必要的选项。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Apaleo Open PMS 和 eviivo Suite™ PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Apaleo Open PMS 提供 122 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 eviivo Suite™ PMS 提供 35 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速上手。Apaleo Open PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 4.4/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按酒店规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Apaleo Open PMS:否。eviivo Suite™ PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店经营者客观比较酒店科技产品。apaleo GmbH 的 HT Score 为 79,eviivo 的为 88。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您酒店的情况量身定制的推荐