The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 77 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
apaleo GmbH 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) and Integrated Payment Terminal & Card Reader.
Infor 表现出色 在 易于使用 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Guest profiles and Guest CRM.
基于 HTR 上 77 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $900/mo | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 30 | 47 |
在分析了 77 条经验证的评价后,apaleo GmbH 用户最看重其 频繁更新和社区参与, 定制化和灵活性, open api and integration,而 Infor 用户则强调 易于使用, 报告, 一体化。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
频繁更新和社区参与
▾
|
+
易于使用
▾
|
|
+
定制化和灵活性
▾
|
+
报告
▾
|
|
+
Open API and Integration
▾
|
+
一体化
▾
|
|
+
App Store and Third-Party Integrations
▾
|
+
家政模块
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
报告功能
▾
|
−
支持
▾
|
|
−
团体和预订管理
▾
|
−
易于使用
▾
|
|
−
更新问题
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #42 7 条评价 | #44 8 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #27 19 条评价 | #25 24 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #41 1 条评价 | #19 9 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #14 3 条评价 | #24 2 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #34 14 条评价 | #28 24 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #43 4 条评价 | #23 26 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #40 4 条评价 | #29 8 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #19 9 条评价 | #31 6 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #38 2 条评价 | #22 20 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #18 26 条评价 | #24 17 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #28 1 条评价 |
Choosing between Apaleo Open PMS and Infor HMS hinges on your hotel’s specific needs. Both systems aim to streamline operations and enhance guest experiences, but they approach these goals differently. Apaleo’s open API-first platform emphasizes customization and flexibility, while Infor offers a comprehensive, cloud-based solution with a focus on automation and integrated modules. How do your operational priorities align with these strengths?
Both Apaleo and Infor serve as core property management systems, yet they differ in their core philosophies. Apaleo’s strength lies in its open API, allowing hotels to build or connect custom applications tailored to their unique workflows. Conversely, Infor provides a more traditional, all-in-one cloud platform with pre-integrated modules like revenue management and housekeeping.
When it comes to updates and support, Apaleo receives high praise for its frequent updates, community engagement, and user-friendly onboarding, supported by a community of over 29 recent reviews. Infor, with 46 reviews, offers stable support and a broad feature set but has mixed reviews concerning update disruptions and user interface aesthetics. Does your hotel need a flexible, developer-friendly platform or a robust, all-in-one system?
If your property values customization, rapid deployment, and a flexible tech stack, Apaleo is your ideal choice. Its API-driven architecture empowers you to integrate third-party tools easily, reducing reliance on vendor-specific solutions and improving operational agility.
On the other hand, if your hotel prioritizes comprehensive functionality, including revenue management and detailed reporting out-of-the-box, Infor is preferable. Its scalable, cloud-based platform suits larger operations seeking centralized data and robust automation features. For hotels that want tailored integrations with a focus on innovation, Apaleo leads. For those requiring a broad, integrated ecosystem, Infor is the safer bet.
Apaleo scores an impressive 4.9/5 for ease of use, with reviews highlighting its simple, friendly interface and quick onboarding process. Users report that even non-technical staff can adapt easily, and the platform's open API reduces the need for extensive training.
Infor’s user rating of 3.88/5 reflects a generally intuitive system, but some users note that its interface can look outdated and requires a learning curve. Frequent updates sometimes introduce bugs, which can hinder staff adoption and create frustration.
Edge: Apaleo.
Apaleo offers 21 features exclusive to its platform, including integrated CRS, automated space optimization, online check-in/out, digital registration, and a channel manager. Its 16 shared features with Infor make it a highly versatile system.
Infor’s unique features include guest profiles, a CRM, and revenue management modules, which are absent in Apaleo. While Infor’s feature set is extensive, many reviews emphasize that Apaleo's open API enables further customization, making it more adaptable for specialized operational needs.
Edge: Apaleo.
Apaleo’s support is highly rated at 4.83/5, with reviews praising its quick, helpful responses and community-driven improvements. Users appreciate the proactive communication, especially during onboarding and updates.
Infor’s support scores 4.04/5, with reviews noting responsiveness but also occasional delays during software updates. Some users mention issues with bugs and disruptions during updates, which can impact daily operations.
Edge: Apaleo.
Apaleo boasts 120 verified partners, slightly surpassing Infor’s 113. Both platforms share 46 integrations, including major partners like HQ Revenue, Profitroom, and Lighthouse. Apaleo’s broader ecosystem includes specialized partners like hotelkit, Bookboost, and The Data Appeal Company, enhancing its customization potential.
Infor’s integrations are robust, with notable partners including Trevo, Omnibees, and Zaplox. While its partner network is slightly smaller, it covers key operational tools, especially in revenue and channel management.
Edge: Apaleo.
Apaleo’s review score of 77.5/100, based on recent data, is significantly higher than Infor’s 21.9/100. With 29 recent reviews, Apaleo’s feedback is more current, and 97% of users recommend it.
In contrast, Infor’s 46 reviews are older, with many reviews mentioning issues like frequent bugs and a less intuitive interface. Hotel segments like serviced apartments and boutique hotels particularly favor Apaleo, while Infor’s performance is more mixed, especially for independent properties.
Edge: Apaleo.
Apaleo’s pricing starts at $900 per month, with no free tier, implementation fees, or hidden costs. Its straightforward flat-rate pricing simplifies budgeting for most hotels.
Infor does not publicly list its pricing, which suggests a customized quote based on hotel size and module needs. This can make comparison difficult, but typically, Infor is positioned as a premium, enterprise-grade solution with higher costs.
Edge: Apaleo.
Hotels that:
Not ideal if:
Hotels that:
Not ideal if:
The core difference is that Apaleo offers an open, customizable platform ideal for tech-savvy hotels and those needing flexibility. Infor delivers a broad, integrated suite suited for larger, more traditional hotel chains seeking streamlined automation and comprehensive modules.
Choose Apaleo if you value adaptability, ease of onboarding, and a community of developers. Opt for Infor if your hotel requires an all-in-one solution with a focus on automation, detailed reporting, and enterprise features.
For hotels prioritizing adaptability and recent positive reviews, Apaleo is the clear winner. If your operation warrants a full-service, scalable platform with extensive modules, Infor remains a solid choice—but consider that its reviews are older and more mixed.
In summary: If recent reviews matter most, Apaleo’s higher ratings, more current user feedback, and open architecture make it the preferred option. Infor’s extensive feature set is tempting but comes with reliability concerns and less recent positive feedback.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $900/mo | — |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Apaleo Open PMS 和 Infor HMS 共享 16 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 任务管理 | ||
| 在前提 | ||
| 实时状态更新 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 客户关系管理 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 综合 CRS | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
| 集成支付终端和读卡器 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 13 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 4 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"One of the biggest impacts for us has been the vast array of implementation options available on Apaleo. We’re now able to think outside the box and customise solutions in ways we..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
该平台致力于定期更新和社区参与,并广受好评,用户也非常重视平台对用户反馈和持续改进的关注。活跃的社区构建了一个支持网络,提升了用户体验。
用户高度评价 Apaleo 在定制化方面的优势,它支持定制化工作流程和流程自动化。这种灵活性有助于酒店创建完全符合其运营需求的系统,从而提高效率并改善宾客服务... 用户高度评价 Apaleo 在定制化方面的优势,它支持定制化工作流程和流程自动化。这种灵活性有助于酒店创建完全符合其运营需求的系统,从而提高效率并改善宾客服务。
Apaleo's open API is uniquely praised for enabling custom tech stacks and seamless integration with various systems, greatly enhancing efficiency and... Apaleo's open API is uniquely praised for enabling custom tech stacks and seamless integration with various systems, greatly enhancing efficiency and flexibility in operations. Reviewers appreciate the ability to create their own applications and tech ecosystems, significantly setting Apaleo apart from its competitors.
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
虽然用户重视基本的报告功能,但 Apaleo 的高级报告功能需求也十分明显。许多人发现当前的选项有限,因此不得不依赖其他工具进行更深入的分析。
Apaleo 的群组管理功能因其用户友好性而受到称赞,但一些评论指出仍有需要改进的地方,特别是在综合功能和直观性方面。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Infor HMS 普遍被认为易于导航,具有直观的多方面搜索选项。然而,一些用户发现用户界面缺乏美感,并认为它可以更直观。
报告功能经常被强调。用户喜欢标准报告和创建自定义报告的功能,这有助于进行详细的性能跟踪。然而,有些人发现更新会破坏报告格式和功能。
Infor HMS 因其与 Booking.com、HRS 和 Expedia 等预订平台的无缝集成而受到称赞。这大大减少了手动输入错误并提高了管理预订的效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Infor HMS 的支持团队因其响应能力和专业性而备受赞誉,这对于快速解决问题至关重要。用户对支持代表如何指导他们解决问题表示赞赏。
Infor HMS 普遍被认为易于导航,具有直观的多方面搜索选项。然而,一些用户发现用户界面缺乏美感,并认为它可以更直观。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Apaleo Open PMS 和 Infor HMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Apaleo Open PMS 提供 120 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Infor HMS 提供 113 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Apaleo Open PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 3.9/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Apaleo Open PMS:否。Infor HMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。apaleo GmbH 的 HT Score 为 78,Infor 的为 22。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问