The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 131 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
ASA Hotelsoftware 表现出色 ,拥有独特功能如 Payment processing and On premise.
CiHMS 表现出色 在 operational efficiency 方面 — 尤其适合 Resorts 类型的物业 (0.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Channel Manager and Integrated CRS.
基于 HTR 上 131 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $1,000/mo | From $900/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 11 | 120 |
在分析了 131 条经验证的评价后,ASA Hotelsoftware 用户最看重其 ,而 CiHMS 用户则强调 operational efficiency, 高级报告, 任务和资源管理。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
Operational Efficiency
▾
|
|
|
+
高级报告
▾
|
|
|
+
任务和资源管理
▾
|
|
|
+
基于云的可访问性
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
高级报告
▾
|
|
|
−
用户培训和入职
▾
|
|
|
−
移动功能
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #49 4 条评价 | #45 8 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #43 6 条评价 | #20 31 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #4 43 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | — | #4 31 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #61 1 条评价 | #15 65 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #51 2 条评价 | #10 83 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #59 1 条评价 | #15 40 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #39 2 条评价 | #17 15 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | — | #65 0 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #27 11 条评价 | #58 2 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | — | #6 117 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #24 1 条评价 |
Choosing between ASA Hotelsoftware and CiHMS requires understanding how each platform addresses your hotel's specific needs. Both aim to streamline operations, improve guest experiences, and boost revenue, but they approach these goals differently. ASA Hotelsoftware excels in usability, feature richness, and support, while CiHMS offers extensive automation, multi-channel management, and affordability. Your choice hinges on whether you prioritize a highly-rated, user-friendly system or a more comprehensive, flexible platform.
Does your team need a proven, intuitive solution with a strong support network, or does your hotel benefit more from advanced automation and multi-channel capabilities? Let's compare these options to clarify which aligns best with your operational priorities.
ASA Hotelsoftware is a mature, highly-rated property management system with over 11 recent reviews, all of which praise its ease of use, versatile features, and excellent support. Its 5/5 overall rating and 100% likelihood to recommend reflect strong confidence from users in Europe, especially within resorts and inns.
Conversely, CiHMS has a broader global presence with 101 reviews, but a 0/5 rating indicates widespread dissatisfaction or inconsistent performance among users. Although it offers advanced functionalities like multi-channel reservations and automation, recent reviews reveal issues with system stability, slowdowns during peak times, and less user satisfaction.
Given the more recent reviews and higher overall ratings, ASA Hotelsoftware provides a more reliable and user-friendly experience today. Is your hotel looking for a trusted, highly-rated platform, or are you willing to accept potential instability for more features?
If your hotel needs an easy-to-use, versatile property management system with proven support, go with ASA Hotelsoftware. Its 5/5 rating and extensive positive feedback underscore its reliability and simplicity, especially suited for resorts, inns, and smaller properties seeking straightforward operations.
If you require advanced automation, multi-channel distribution, and revenue management features—particularly for large, complex properties—CiHMS might appeal. Its affordability and broad feature set support chains and hotels with multiple sales channels, but recent user dissatisfaction should be a caution.
For hoteliers prioritizing support, stability, and proven user satisfaction, ASA Hotelsoftware is the safer choice. If your hotel can tolerate some instability for access to extensive channel management and automation, CiHMS could be considered, but its reviews raise concerns.
ASA Hotelsoftware boasts a very high ease-of-use rating (4.73/5), complemented by onboarding scores of 4.6/5 and straightforward reviews emphasizing its logical interface. Users mention that staff find it accessible, even for those new to PMS systems, and frequent updates are well-managed with dedicated support.
CiHMS also scores impressively for ease of use (4.9/5), with reviews citing an intuitive, lean UI and support for multi-platform access. However, some users report initial onboarding complexity due to the system's breadth and the need for additional training resources.
Edge: ASA Hotelsoftware, thanks to its slightly higher confidence in recent reviews and more consistent praise for usability.
ASA Hotelsoftware offers 17 features unique to it, including integrated payment processing, guest CRM, online check-in, guest app, and shift planning—features that support day-to-day hotel operations comprehensively. Its total feature count of 46 surpasses CiHMS, which has only 4 features exclusive to it, such as a channel manager and booking engine.
CiHMS excels in multi-channel reservation management and automation but lacks many of the guest engagement features found in ASA Hotelsoftware. Its strengths lie in advanced rate plan configuration and integration with distribution channels, but it offers fewer overall features.
Edge: ASA Hotelsoftware, with a broader suite of tools directly supporting hotel management and guest relations.
ASA Hotelsoftware's support scores (4.73/5) and recent reviews highlight responsive, helpful customer service. Users appreciate the dedicated contacts and quick resolution of issues, although some wish for faster updates on certain matters.
CiHMS slightly outperforms with a 4.92/5 rating, with reviewers praising its support team's professionalism and timely assistance. Given the recent review count and positive feedback, CiHMS's support appears marginally more reliable.
Edge: CiHMS, based on the slightly higher support ratings and recent positive comments.
ASA Hotelsoftware boasts 49 verified partners, including major hospitality integrations like Onity, Vingcard, and Vax. Its extensive partner ecosystem covers key areas like revenue management, marketing, and guest communication.
CiHMS has only 3 verified partners, with integrations mainly limited to Channel Manager, DerbySoft, and Easyway. While these support basic operations, they do not match ASA Hotelsoftware's breadth.
Edge: ASA Hotelsoftware, for its larger partner network and more comprehensive integration options.
Recent reviews show ASA Hotelsoftware with a perfect 5/5 rating and a 100% likelihood to recommend, especially among resort hotels and inns. Hoteliers highlight its ease of use, flexibility, and excellent support.
CiHMS, despite a large review base, has a 0/5 overall rating, indicating widespread dissatisfaction. The recent reviews echo issues with system stability and limited satisfaction.
Edge: ASA Hotelsoftware, given its superior and more recent user ratings.
ASA Hotelsoftware costs $1,000 as a one-time base fee, with no specified subscription or implementation fees. Its pricing model is straightforward, but exact long-term costs may depend on additional modules or support.
CiHMS is priced at $900 upfront, with no mention of ongoing charges, but details on licensing or subscription are scarce. Both are similarly priced, making cost less of a differentiator.
Not ideal if...
Not ideal if...
In summary, ASA Hotelsoftware excels in reliability, ease of use, and support, making it ideal for properties that want a straightforward, trusted management system. Its extensive feature set and strong user ratings position it as the top choice for hotels prioritizing stability and guest relations.
CiHMS offers advanced automation, multi-channel management, and affordability, suitable for larger chains or hotels with complex distribution needs. However, its recent reviews warn of stability issues and less user satisfaction, which could impact daily operations.
If your hotel needs a proven, user-friendly platform backed by consistent positive reviews, ASA Hotelsoftware is the recommended pick. Choose CiHMS only if your property can tolerate possible system instability and you require its automation and distribution capabilities, especially for larger, multi-channel operations.
This detailed comparison should help your team make an informed decision aligned with your operational needs and guest service priorities.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $1,000/mo | From $900/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,ASA Hotel Software 和 CiHMS 共享 29 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 交付过程 | ||
| 在前提 | ||
| 客户关系管理 | ||
| 移动设备笔记和任务(语音转文本) | ||
| 符合 PCI 标准 | ||
| 综合 CRS | ||
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 集成支付终端和读卡器 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 频道管理员 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 9 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 2 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"CiHMS was able to fulfill the needs of loyalty management of The Hanoi Club & Residences. The team has perfectly adapted and customized CiHMS to match the specific needs with a 24/..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"I was impressed by CiHMS's capability to integrate all our properties into one cohesive system," said Mr. Nam Le, General Manager of Cityhouse. "The user-friendly interface and rob..."
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
CIHMS significantly enhances operational efficiency by automating tasks and ensuring streamlined communication across departments. This improvement re... CIHMS significantly enhances operational efficiency by automating tasks and ensuring streamlined communication across departments. This improvement reduces manual errors and saves time, which is especially crucial during busy periods.
用户非常欣赏 CIHMS 的全面报告功能,它能够深入分析绩效、收入和入住率。然而,许多用户希望进一步定制报告,以满足特定需求。
该软件因其任务分配功能而备受赞誉,支持客房服务等员工的独立管理。此功能简化了操作流程,并提高了各部门的生产力。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户非常欣赏 CIHMS 的全面报告功能,它能够深入分析绩效、收入和入住率。然而,许多用户希望进一步定制报告,以满足特定需求。
CIHMS 虽然用户友好,但由于系统功能繁多,初始培训和入职培训可能会比较复杂。用户建议使用更全面的培训资源和更详细的指南。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。ASA Hotel Software 和 CiHMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。ASA Hotel Software 提供 49 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 CiHMS 提供 3 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。CiHMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 4.7/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
ASA Hotel Software:否。CiHMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。ASA Hotelsoftware 的 HT Score 为 0,CiHMS 的为 81。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问