The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 68 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
ASA Hotelsoftware 表现出色 ,拥有独特功能如 Revenue management module and On premise.
Counter 表现出色 在 用户界面和可用性 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Channel Manager and Booking Engine.
基于 HTR 上 68 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $1,000/mo | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 11 | 57 |
在分析了 68 条经验证的评价后,ASA Hotelsoftware 用户最看重其 ,而 Counter 用户则强调 用户界面和可用性, 客户支持, 自动化功能。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
用户界面和可用性
▾
|
|
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
|
|
+
自动化功能
▾
|
|
|
+
平台集成
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
错误问题
▾
|
|
|
−
报告和收入管理
▾
|
|
|
−
价格
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #49 4 条评价 | #26 28 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #43 6 条评价 | #46 4 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | — | #32 2 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #31 1 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #61 1 条评价 | #31 16 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 | #51 2 条评价 | #44 4 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | #59 1 条评价 | #43 4 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #39 2 条评价 | #32 5 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #25 8 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #27 11 条评价 | #20 25 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #16 4 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #11 2 条评价 |
As you evaluate property management systems for your hotel, ASA Hotelsoftware and Counter stand out as strong contenders. Both aim to streamline operations, improve guest experience, and boost occupancy, but they approach these goals differently. ASA Hotelsoftware offers a comprehensive, feature-rich platform tailored for full-service hotels, while Counter provides a lightweight, user-friendly solution designed specifically for hostels and small properties.
Your decision hinges on your property type, operational complexity, and specific feature needs. Which platform aligns best with your hotel’s unique requirements?
Both ASA Hotelsoftware and Counter are designed to manage reservations, check-ins, and guest data, but their scope and depth vary significantly. ASA’s platform includes modules for revenue management, guest communication, and digital registration, making it suitable for larger, more complex hotels. In contrast, Counter emphasizes ease of use, automation, and mobile management, ideal for hostels and small to mid-sized properties.
While ASA has a broader feature set and more extensive integrations, it’s primarily focused on hotels in Europe with a need for advanced management tools. Counter’s strengths lie in its straightforward interface and automation, which help staff manage daily tasks more efficiently.
The key question: Does your hotel need a full-featured PMS with advanced modules, or a simple yet effective system that gets the basics done well?
If your hotel requires a solution that handles multiple departments, offers detailed reporting, and supports complex pricing strategies, ASA Hotelsoftware is the better pick. It’s ideal for resorts, larger boutique hotels, and properties in Europe that need modules like revenue management, guest communication, and integrated ID scanner.
On the other hand, if you operate a hostel or a small hotel that values ease of use, automation, and affordable features, Counter is the clear choice. Its mobile-friendly interface, POS integration, and simple booking management suit properties with limited staff and a focus on quick, smooth operations.
In summary, choose ASA if you need depth and scalability; opt for Counter if you prioritize simplicity and rapid deployment.
Based on recent reviews, ASA Hotelsoftware scores a 4.73/5 for ease of use, with users praising its logical layout and helpful onboarding process. Users also note that staff find it straightforward to learn, especially with initial training. However, some mention that the system’s breadth can make navigation initially overwhelming.
Counter slightly edges out at 4.6/5, with users describing it as "very friendly," "easy to understand," and requiring minimal training. Its mobile interface and simple calendar management make daily tasks quick and intuitive, especially for hostel staff managing multiple platforms.
Edge: ASA Hotelsoftware, for its slightly higher usability rating and more extensive onboarding resources.
ASA Hotelsoftware offers 29 features exclusive to its platform, including modules for spa & wellness, revenue management, integrated ID & passport scanning, online check-in, and a guest app. It also supports automation like real-time status updates, task management, and GDPR compliance, making it suitable for hotels with complex operations.
Counter provides only two features exclusive to its platform: a channel manager and a booking engine. While it lacks the depth of ASA, it covers essential automation, POS integration, and contactless check-in, focusing on core hostel needs.
Edge: ASA Hotelsoftware, with its extensive suite of advanced, hotel-specific features.
Customer support ratings favor Counter, with a 4.96/5 compared to ASA’s 4.73/5. Reviewers highlight Counter’s responsiveness, with mentions of “fast, helpful support” and “support team always reachable,” especially praising team members Evelyn and Max.
ASA’s support is also highly rated, but some users note that certain matters could be addressed faster, though they appreciate having dedicated contact persons. Both vendors support onboarding well, but Counter’s recent reviews suggest more consistent rapid responses.
Edge: Counter, for its slightly higher support rating and more recent positive feedback.
ASA Hotelsoftware boasts 49 verified partners, including major players like Fairmas, RateBoard, and Vingcard, offering extensive integration options across various hotel operations. This broad network allows seamless synchronization with revenue systems, channel managers, and other hotel tech.
Counter has 7 verified partners, including Stripe, Goki, and Cloudbeds, mainly focused on payment processing, channel management, and access control. While these integrations are valuable, they are fewer in number and less diverse compared to ASA.
Edge: ASA Hotelsoftware, with a significantly wider array of verified integrations.
Reviews in the last six months show that Counter’s average rating is 4.75/5 based on 52 recent reviews, compared to ASA’s perfect 5/5 from 11 reviews. However, ASA’s reviews are mostly from larger hotels and resorts, with high praise for its feature set and reliability.
Counter is favored by hostel operators and small properties for its simplicity, automation, and support. Hotels in Europe tend to rate ASA slightly higher, while hostels, especially in North America and beyond, prefer Counter’s ease of use.
Edge: Counter, because of its larger review base and recent ratings.
ASA Hotelsoftware charges a flat base fee of $1,000, with no mention of additional implementation fees or monthly charges. Its pricing suggests it’s aimed at properties seeking a comprehensive, high-capacity solution.
Counter’s pricing is not publicly listed, but reviews imply it is free or very affordable, especially since it’s marketed as a free PMS for hostels. Additional features like the booking engine or channel manager may have extra costs, but overall it’s positioned as a budget-friendly option.
Not ideal if your property is small, needs only basic management, or operates in regions with limited ASA support.
Not ideal if your property requires extensive modules like revenue management, detailed reporting, or multi-department management.
ASA Hotelsoftware is a robust solution suited for larger, complex hotels needing advanced features, integrations, and scalability. Its broad module set and European presence make it ideal for resorts and boutique hotels looking for a comprehensive management platform.
Counter excels for small properties, hostels, and properties prioritizing ease of use, automation, and rapid deployment. Its focus on simplicity and mobile functionality makes it a favorite among budget-conscious hoteliers and hostel operators.
If your hotel belongs to a larger or more complex segment, ASA’s extensive features and integrations provide stronger value. For smaller, more agile properties or hostels, Counter offers an efficient, cost-effective alternative.
In conclusion, choose ASA if you need a full-scale, multi-department management system with extensive regional support. Opt for Counter if your priority is simplicity, automation, and quick onboarding—especially if you operate a hostel or small hotel in a region where Counter’s support network is strong.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $1,000/mo | — |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,ASA Hotel Software 和 Counter 共享 17 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 在前提 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 数字注册 | ||
| 水疗和健康模块 | ||
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 集成身份证和护照扫描仪 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 频道管理员 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 19 项功能存在差异。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单... 酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单性而著称。
Counter 的支持团队因其响应迅速和乐于助人而经常受到称赞。Evelyn 和 Max 等员工因其专业精神而受到特别表扬。然而,有人担心某些时区的支持速度较慢。
用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率... 用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
几位酒店老板提到系统中存在持续存在的错误,尤其是超额预订、床位显示和取消预订时的系统错误等问题。这些错误对日常运营和客人体验产生了负面影响。
酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企... 酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企业而言。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
这取决于您的需求。ASA Hotel Software 和 Counter 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。ASA Hotel Software 提供 49 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Counter 提供 7 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。ASA Hotel Software 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 4.6/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
ASA Hotel Software:否。Counter:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。ASA Hotelsoftware 的 HT Score 为 0,Counter 的为 17。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问