The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 69 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
ASA Hotelsoftware 表现出色 在 ease of use and ROI 方面 .
Maestro PMS 表现出色 在 客户支持 方面 — 尤其适合 independent 类型的物业 (3.8/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Tablet/Kiosk Check-in and Lobby Kiosk.
基于 HTR 上 69 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $1,000/mo | From $900/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 11 | 58 |
在分析了 69 条经验证的评价后,ASA Hotelsoftware 用户最看重其 ,而 Maestro PMS 用户则强调 客户支持, 报告灵活性, 可定制的功能。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
|
|
+
报告灵活性
▾
|
|
|
+
可定制的功能
▾
|
|
|
+
培训和文档
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
用户界面
▾
|
|
|
−
安全功能
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #49 4 条评价 | #41 7 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #43 6 条评价 | #18 35 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #12 11 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #10 4 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #61 1 条评价 | #25 26 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #51 2 条评价 | #20 31 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #59 1 条评价 | #38 5 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 | #39 2 条评价 | #38 2 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #12 53 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #27 11 条评价 | — |
Choosing between ASA Hotelsoftware and Maestro PMS hinges on your hotel’s specific needs and operational priorities. Both systems aim to streamline hotel management, but they differ significantly in their approach, features, and market presence. Your decision should be based on which platform aligns better with your property size, complexity, and growth plans. Are you looking for a straightforward solution or a highly customizable, multi-module system?
While ASA Hotelsoftware boasts a near-perfect review score, Maestro PMS’s broader feature set and larger user base make it a more established choice. But which system will deliver the most value for your hotel now and in the future?
With only 11 reviews, ASA Hotelsoftware's reviews are highly recent and overwhelmingly positive, scoring 5/5 and a perfect 10/5 NPS. Maestro PMS, with 56 reviews, has a solid 4.36/5 rating and an 8.8/5 NPS, but the reviews are less current.
Given the recency and volume of reviews, Maestro PMS’s larger user base and more feature-rich offering tip the scale in its favor. If you prioritize a solution with proven popularity and a broad feature set, Maestro is your best bet. But if ease of use and high satisfaction are your top criteria, ASA might still appeal.
ASA Hotelsoftware is ideal if your hotel needs a user-friendly, highly flexible platform for managing reservations, guest data, and daily operations. Its simple interface and straightforward onboarding suit small to medium resorts or properties where staff efficiency is a priority.
Maestro PMS suits larger, complex hotels or resorts that require extensive modules like channel management, booking engine, and integrated CRS. Its robust multi-property support and 20+ modules make it a go-to for multi-location groups and luxury resorts.
If your hotel is more boutique or independent, ASA’s simplicity can reduce training time. For multi-property or high-volume operations, Maestro's comprehensive features and integrations provide an advantage.
ASA Hotelsoftware scores a 4.73/5 for ease of use, thanks to its intuitive interface, search functionality, and straightforward workflows. Reviews mention that staff can learn the system quickly, with many praising its logical layout and minimal training requirements.
Maestro PMS has a 4.04/5 rating, with some reviewers noting that its modules can be cumbersome and navigation requires multiple clicks. Support agents are praised, but the UI's dated feel can pose challenges for new staff.
Edge: ASA Hotelsoftware.
ASA Hotelsoftware offers core hotel management features suitable for most properties but lacks specialized modules like channel management or booking engine. Maestro PMS exceeds with over 46 shared features plus 12 exclusive features, including channel management, integrated CRS, booking engine, and contactless check-in.
Maestro's breadth of 58 features provides advanced tools for large operations, while ASA's focus remains on basic, reliable management functions. For properties needing extensive automation and integrations, Maestro has a clear advantage.
Edge: Maestro PMS.
Both platforms excel in support quality, with ASA scoring 4.73/5 and Maestro 4.78/5. Reviews praise ASA’s dedicated contacts and prompt responses, though some mention limited support for complex issues.
Maestro’s support is routinely described as excellent, with 24/7 availability, quick issue resolution, and comprehensive onboarding. Users find Maestro's support team highly responsive, often resolving issues on first contact.
Edge: Maestro PMS.
Maestro PMS offers 89 verified partners, significantly more than ASA's 49. Shared integrations include major providers like Vingcard and Onity. Maestro also supports integrations with systems like Criton, Curacity, and Zaplox, expanding its connectivity.
ASA's partnerships include key hospitality systems but lack the breadth of Maestro’s offerings. If seamless integration with multiple systems is critical, Maestro provides more options.
Edge: Maestro PMS.
ASA Hotelsoftware’s reviews are all recent and highly positive, with a perfect 5/5 rating and a 10/5 NPS, especially praised by resorts and boutique hotels. Maestro’s reviews, though more numerous, average 4.36/5 with a slightly lower NPS, reflecting some user concerns about UI and complexity.
Smaller, independent hotels and resorts tend to rate ASA higher due to its simplicity. Larger properties and chains give Maestro higher marks for functionality but note some usability hurdles.
Edge: ASA Hotelsoftware.
ASA's pricing is straightforward at $1,000 upfront, with no mention of ongoing fees or trial options. Maestro’s price starts at $900, with similar no-trial and no ongoing subscription details, but larger implementations may incur additional costs.
Both solutions are similarly priced, but ASA’s flat fee might appeal to properties seeking predictable expenses. Maestro’s broader feature set could justify slightly higher investment for larger hotels.
Not ideal if your hotel requires extensive automation, integrations, or multi-property support.
Not ideal if your hotel is small, independent, or prefers a simplified system.
Core Difference: ASA Hotelsoftware is a straightforward, highly-rated system focused on ease of use and high guest satisfaction. Maestro PMS offers a comprehensive, multi-module platform with extensive integrations and customization options.
When to choose ASA: If your hotel values simplicity, quick onboarding, and high review scores in recent feedback, ASA is the better pick. Its specialization in core hotel management functions can reduce training and boost staff productivity.
When to choose Maestro: For larger properties or multi-property groups that need deep functionality, extensive modules, and integrations, Maestro is more suitable. Its broader feature set and support network provide flexibility for complex operations.
Final recommendation: If your hotel is small to medium or independent, go with ASA Hotelsoftware for its ease and recent high praise. If your operation is complex, multi-location, or requires advanced automation, Maestro PMS provides a wider array of features and integrations to meet your needs.
This comparison aims to provide clarity and support your decision-making process. Both options are capable, but your hotel’s size, complexity, and growth plans should guide the ultimate choice.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $1,000/mo | From $900/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,ASA Hotel Software 和 Maestro PMS (Northwind) 共享 46 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 大堂售货亭 | ||
| 平板电脑/自助服务终端值机 | ||
| 综合 CRS | ||
| 自动提醒 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 频道管理员 |
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Maestro PMS 提供出色的客户支持,许多用户都称赞其通过各种渠道提供的快速有效的帮助。这种支持文化有利于迅速解决问题。
用户对 Maestro PMS 生成自定义报告的灵活性表示赞赏,这有助于做出数据驱动的决策。然而,一些人指出,需要更详细的帮助菜单和更方便地访问特定类型的报告。
定制化是一大优势,无论是报告、特定物业需求模块还是运营灵活性。Maestro PMS 允许进行大量定制,这有助于高效满足独特的业务需求。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
虽然该系统提供了强大的功能,但一些用户指出,其用户界面略显过时,可以通过现代化来改善用户体验,特别是对于新员工而言。
安全性是一项强大的功能,具有本地解决方案选项并遵守 GDPR 等法规。用户还建议使用 2FA 和反向代理等增强功能来提高在线安全性。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。ASA Hotel Software 和 Maestro PMS (Northwind) 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。ASA Hotel Software 提供 49 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Maestro PMS (Northwind) 提供 89 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。ASA Hotel Software 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 4.1/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
ASA Hotel Software:否。Maestro PMS (Northwind):否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。ASA Hotelsoftware 的 HT Score 为 0,Maestro PMS 的为 70。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问