The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 34 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) 表现出色 在 易于使用且界面直观 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Native Email Marketing and Guest Communication (SMS Messaging).
Kwentra 表现出色 ,拥有独特功能如 Payment Requests and Employee Messaging.
基于 HTR 上 34 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $300/mo | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 27 | 7 |
在分析了 34 条经验证的评价后,Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) 用户最看重其 易于使用且界面直观, 预订和前台管理, 产品稳定性和可靠性,而 Kwentra 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
易于使用且界面直观
▾
|
|
|
+
预订和前台管理
▾
|
|
|
+
产品稳定性和可靠性
▾
|
|
|
+
详细全面的报告
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
技术支持质量
▾
|
|
|
−
与第三方平台集成
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #74 0 条评价 | #68 1 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #74 0 条评价 | #50 3 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | — | #29 3 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #19 2 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 | #72 1 条评价 | #52 3 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 | #51 2 条评价 | #49 3 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #67 0 条评价 | #58 1 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 | #48 1 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #44 0 条评价 | #66 0 条评价 |
| 亚太 | #27 1 条评价 | — |
| 中东 ▾ | — | #9 6 条评价 |
Your hotel is weighing two property management systems: ASI PMS by Anand Systems Inc. and kwentra by Kwentra. Both aim to streamline operations, but they differ significantly in user base, features, and recency of feedback. While ASI boasts over 26 recent reviews and a strong reputation among diverse hotel types, Kwentra's reviews are fewer and older, yet it maintains high user satisfaction. Which system aligns better with your hotel's needs?
Both ASI PMS and Kwentra aim to simplify daily hotel operations, manage reservations, and improve guest communication. ASI offers a comprehensive, all-in-one platform that’s been serving the industry for over 26 years, with a focus on stability and detailed reporting. Kwentra, on the other hand, emphasizes integration of legacy systems into a cloud environment, with a strong presence in Europe and Asia Pacific. While ASI’s recent reviews highlight its usability and support, Kwentra’s older reviews praise its flexibility and report features. Do your priorities lean toward stability and detailed analytics or broader integration and flexibility?
If your hotel needs a proven, scalable PMS with a long track record and high satisfaction among multi-property operators, ASI is the clear choice. Its 26 recent reviews with a 97% likelihood to recommend demonstrate strong, current user confidence. Conversely, if your property is a resort or boutique looking to integrate legacy systems with cloud features and values high customization, Kwentra’s ecosystem might be appealing despite the limited recent feedback. Given the more recent reviews and higher overall rating, ASI’s platform is the safer, more reliable choice for most hotels.
Based on ratings, ASI scores 4.88/5 for ease of use, while Kwentra is close behind at 4.83/5. ASI’s reviews consistently praise its intuitive interface that simplifies check-ins, reservations, and daily tasks, especially for new staff. Kwentra’s user comments focus on its helpful support and flexible reporting, but its interface is less frequently described explicitly. The recent high satisfaction scores suggest both are user-friendly, but ASI’s longer track record of easy onboarding makes it slightly more trustworthy. Edge: ASI PMS.
ASI offers five exclusive features including native email marketing, shift planning, PCI compliance, guest SMS communication, and housekeeping mobile apps. Kwentra provides five different capabilities, notably EPoS, GDPR compliance, online checkouts, payment requests, and employee messaging. Both platforms share 42 core features, but ASI’s unique tools emphasize operational automation and guest engagement, whereas Kwentra’s focus is on integration and security. Given the breadth and recent positive reviews of ASI’s feature set, it likely offers more immediate value. Edge: ASI PMS.
Customer support ratings favor Kwentra slightly at 4.83/5 compared to ASI’s 4.73/5, supported by recent reviews praising Kwentra’s quick, helpful responses. ASI’s support is generally appreciated for professionalism but has some mentions of response delays. Both companies seem committed to client success, but Kwentra’s more recent reviews reflect a team that actively responds and improves the platform. If support responsiveness is your priority, Kwentra edges ahead.
Both products connect with 18 verified partners, including common integrations like SiteMinder. ASI has additional unique integrations with platforms like SHR Group, Cendyn, Duetto, and RoomPriceGenie, while Kwentra stands out with integrations such as Nonius, Vingcard, and Expedia. The choice depends on your existing systems—if you need specific partners like Yanolja or eRevMax, Kwentra might be preferable; otherwise, ASI’s broader network could be more advantageous. Edge: ASI PMS.
Recent reviews favor ASI, with a 4.88/5 ease of use rating and 97% likelihood to recommend based on 26 reviews, predominantly from diverse hotel segments. Kwentra’s reviews are fewer and older, but they consistently rate it 5/5, especially among resorts and boutique hotels. For current, detailed feedback, ASI’s broader and recent positive ratings provide a clearer picture of hotel satisfaction. Edge: ASI PMS.
ASI’s pricing starts at $300 per month, with no free tier or trial, making costs predictable for hotels seeking transparency. Kwentra does not disclose specific pricing, which could complicate budget planning. If price certainty is critical, ASI’s straightforward fee structure offers better clarity. For flexible budgeting, inquire directly with Kwentra, but ASI's transparent pricing makes it easier to evaluate ROI.
The core difference between these two systems lies in recency and breadth of user feedback. ASI’s 26 recent reviews with a 97% recommendation rate make it a more reliable, well-understood choice for hotels seeking stability and detailed reporting. Kwentra, despite fewer recent reviews, offers a flexible ecosystem suited for resorts and boutique properties, especially in Europe and Asia Pacific.
Choose ASI if your hotel values proven stability, detailed analytics, and extensive integrations backed by current reviews. Opt for Kwentra if you need a customizable platform with specific legacy integrations, regional support, and are comfortable with limited recent feedback. For most hotels looking for a dependable, scalable PMS, ASI remains the safer, more proven option.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $300/mo | — |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,ASI PMS 和 kwentra 共享 42 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| EPoS | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 员工信息 | ||
| 在线结帐 | ||
| 家政移动应用程序 | ||
| 符合 GDPR | ||
| 符合 PCI 标准 | ||
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 轮班计划 |
我们分析了 1 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"We needed a system that removed our dependency on remote desktop and made daily operations simpler for the team. ASI 7.0 gave us direct access, a familiar setup, and a much smoothe..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
用户一致称赞ASI拥有友好直观的界面,能够简化预订管理流程,简化日常操作。对于没有酒店行业经验的用户来说,它尤其方便易用。
ASI 系统在管理前台任务和预订方面表现出色,提供各种工具来提高入住/退房流程和房间分配的效率。
ASI系统以其稳健可靠的性能而备受赞誉,确保了持续稳定的运行。尤其在运行需求较高的环境中,该系统更显优势。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
ASI的技术支持因其响应迅速、解决问题高效而广受好评,尽管也有部分用户反映响应时间有所延迟。培训方面的专业性和乐于助人也备受赞誉。
反复出现的批评意见强调了与第三方平台(特别是会计和库存管理平台)更好地集成能力的必要性,这可以简化更广泛的业务流程。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。ASI PMS 和 kwentra 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。ASI PMS 提供 18 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 kwentra 提供 18 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。ASI PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 4.4/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
ASI PMS:否。kwentra:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) 的 HT Score 为 77,Kwentra 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问