项目面板是一款免费工具,仅向已认证的酒店从业者开放。它通过简化调研流程和沟通环节,让采用新技术变得更轻松。
摘要
我们分析了 592 条经验证的酒店经营者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的酒店类型和优先事项:
Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) 在易于使用且界面直观方面表现出色,尤其适合机场与会议住宿设施(0.0/5),并拥有在前提以及访客通信(短信)等独家功能。
HOTELTIME 在工作流程效率与易用性方面表现出色,尤其适合赌场住宿设施(5.0/5),并拥有客户关系管理以及客人资料等独家功能。
基于 HTR 上 592 条经验证的酒店经营者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | 起价 $300/月 | 起价 $600/月 |
| 经验证的评价 | 29 | 563 |
在分析了 592 条经验证的评价后,Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) 用户最看重其 易于使用且界面直观, 预订和前台管理, 产品稳定性和可靠性,而 HOTELTIME 用户则强调 工作流程效率与易用性, 支持与响应速度, 预订与房态管理。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
易于使用且界面直观
▾
|
+
工作流程效率与易用性
▾
|
|
+
预订和前台管理
▾
|
+
支持与响应速度
▾
|
|
+
产品稳定性和可靠性
▾
|
+
预订与房态管理
▾
|
|
+
详细全面的报告
▾
|
+
报告与分析
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
技术支持质量
▾
|
−
账单、发票和会计
▾
|
|
−
与第三方平台集成
▾
|
−
客人档案与客人数据管理
▾
|
|
−
房价管理与定价控制
▾
|
|
各产品在不同酒店规模、类型和区域的 酒店运营软件(PMS) 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店经营者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #35 14 条评价 | #5 224 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #33 12 条评价 | #3 238 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #44 1 条评价 | #3 51 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #19 2 条评价 | #8 7 条评价 |
按酒店类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #53 3 条评价 | #4 248 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #52 2 条评价 | #3 246 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #30 8 条评价 | #4 145 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #48 1 条评价 | #4 49 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #50 24 条评价 | #52 4 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #61 1 条评价 | #2 384 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #36 2 条评价 | #5 117 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | — | #1 21 条评价 |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is crucial for your hotel’s operational efficiency, guest experience, and revenue growth. Both Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) and HOTELTIME aim to simplify hotel management; however, they differ significantly in their market presence, user reviews, and feature sets. Your decision should hinge on which platform aligns best with your hotel’s size, complexity, and strategic objectives. So, which PMS is the better fit for your property?
Both ASI and HotelTime are cloud-based PMS options designed to improve hotel operations, but their core strengths vary. ASI has a longstanding reputation with over 26 years in the industry and a focus on stability, detailed analytics, and comprehensive reservation management. HotelTime, on the other hand, boasts a more extensive global presence, with over 650 properties across 20+ countries, offering a broad set of features tailored for diverse property types.
While ASI scores higher on ease of use and has a more dedicated user base, HotelTime’s recent reviews indicate higher overall satisfaction, especially from larger and more complex properties. If your team seeks a system with proven stability and detailed reporting, ASI might be appealing. But if you prioritize a platform that’s widely adopted, easy to scale, and highly rated by peers, HotelTime is the stronger contender.
Are you ready to prioritize stability and detailed analytics, or do you need broad adoption and feature diversity?
If your hotel needs a straightforward, easy-to-use PMS focused on daily operations, front desk management, and detailed reporting, ASI is the clear choice. Its feature set, especially around reservations, billing, and operational analytics, is well-suited for small to mid-sized hotels that value stability and simplicity.
Conversely, if your property is larger or requires a fully integrated, multi-department platform supporting POS, spa, and extensive third-party integrations, HotelTime fits better. Its broader reach, more recent positive reviews, and comprehensive features make it ideal for hotels aiming to scale and diversify their operations.
For hotels prioritizing detailed reports, stability, and a trusted vendor, go with ASI. For those seeking extensive integration, multi-property management, and a high user satisfaction rating, choose HotelTime.
Based on user ratings, ASI scores slightly higher for ease of use at 4.88/5 compared to HotelTime’s 4.66/5. Recent reviews highlight ASI’s intuitive interface and simple onboarding process, praised for enabling staff to quickly adopt and operate the system. Support from ASI is noted as responsive, with praise for training and troubleshooting.
HotelTime also features a user-friendly interface, with many users describing it as “simple,” especially once staff are trained. However, some mention initial challenges in mastering advanced modules, which can slow onboarding.
Edge: ASI.
ASI offers 47 features, including unique tools like automated assignments, shift planning, and SMS guest communication, which are absent in HotelTime. HotelTime provides 55 features, with notable additions like EPoS, guest profiles, and a spa & wellness module. Both platforms share 43 features, but HotelTime’s extra modules support more departments and guest engagement avenues.
HotelTime’s broader feature set, especially in POS and guest CRM, enhances operational scope for larger, multi-service properties. ASI’s focus on reservation, reporting, and stability makes it more suitable for hotels prioritizing operational efficiency.
Edge: HotelTime.
Both platforms are praised for reliable support, with user ratings of 4.73/5. ASI’s reviews highlight prompt resolution and professional staff, though some users report delays during peak times. HotelTime’s support is similarly rated highly, with users noting quick responses and helpful onboarding.
Recent reviews from HotelTime customers emphasize ongoing support and improvements over time, especially for larger properties with complex needs. ASI’s long-standing reputation and detailed support documentation continue to be valued.
Edge: ASI.
HotelTime boasts 58 verified integrations, surpassing ASI’s 18. Shared partners include key industry players like SiteMinder, Cendyn, and TrustYou. Unique integrations such as Profitroom, RevControl, and Umi Digital give HotelTime an edge for properties needing extensive third-party connectivity.
While ASI’s integrations are more limited, they include essential platforms like OTAs and payment gateways. If seamless, wide-ranging integrations are vital, HotelTime’s ecosystem is more extensive.
Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime enjoys a higher overall rating of 4.83/5 based on 433 reviews, with recent reviews in the last six months reinforcing its strong reputation. Hotels across various segments, including resorts and city-center properties, consistently praise its ease of use and functionality.
ASI’s user base is smaller, with only 26 reviews, all rated 0/5, which might indicate outdated or non-representative feedback. The recent surge in HotelTime’s reviews underscores its growing popularity and trust among hoteliers.
Edge: HotelTime.
ASI offers a straightforward pricing model at $300 for the system, with no additional fees or trial options. HotelTime’s base price is $600, also without a trial, making it more expensive initially but potentially more feature-rich or scalable.
Your choice may depend on your budget and property size; ASI’s lower entry price appeals to small hotels, while HotelTime’s higher fee might reflect its broader features and larger market.
ASI PMS offers a stable, user-friendly solution with a strong focus on operational analytics and daily management. Its limited integration scope and smaller user base make it ideal for smaller properties or those seeking simplicity.
HotelTime, with its larger user base, extensive features, and broad integrations, caters well to larger, more complex hotels and chains that need flexibility and a comprehensive platform. Its higher ratings and recent positive reviews suggest it’s currently gaining popularity among hoteliers.
If your hotel needs a proven, straightforward PMS with detailed reports and stability, go with ASI. If you want a scalable, feature-rich platform with extensive integrations and a high user rating, HotelTime is your best choice.
酒店运营软件(PMS) 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的酒店规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 起始价格 | 起价 $300/月 | 起价 $600/月 |
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
会计与金融
|
|
|
| 直接计费 | ||
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
|
▾
营销与电子商务
|
|
|
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 客户关系管理 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
管理和配置
|
|
|
| 集中的用户和角色管理 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 基于云 | ||
| 在前提 | ||
|
▾
用户管理
|
|
|
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
前台
|
|
|
| 移动设备笔记和任务(语音转文本) | ||
| 移动应用 | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 任务管理 | ||
| 自动提醒 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 平板电脑/自助服务终端值机 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
群组管理
|
|
|
| 组功能 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
宾客体验
|
|
|
| 集成身份证和护照扫描仪 | ||
| 数字注册 | ||
| 访客应用 | ||
| 网上值机 | ||
| 在线结帐 | ||
| 来宾消息 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 身份证扫描和注册预填 | ||
| 大堂售货亭 | ||
|
▾
家政
|
|
|
| 管家模块 | ||
| 家政移动应用程序 | ||
| 实时状态更新 | ||
| 自动分配 | ||
| 实时报告 | ||
| 轮班计划 | ||
| 员工信息 | ||
| 在线结帐 | ||
|
▾
付款
|
|
|
| 集成支付终端和读卡器 | ||
| 直接计费 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 交付过程 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
|
▾
预订管理
|
|
|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 综合 CRS | ||
| 拖放磁带图 | ||
| 费率管理 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
| 基于规则的房间分配 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
收入管理
|
|
|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 自定义费率 | ||
| 辅助收入跟踪 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 基本定价 | ||
|
▾
税务与合规
|
|
|
| 符合 PCI 标准 | ||
| 符合 GDPR | ||
| SOC2 投诉 | ||
| 税务配置 | ||
|
▾
支持与培训
|
|
|
| 在线 24/7 支持 | ||
|
▾
食品与饮料
|
|
|
| EPoS | ||
|
▾
温泉
|
|
|
| 水疗和健康模块 |
我们分析了 9 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"We needed a system that removed our dependency on remote desktop and made daily operations simpler for the team. ASI 7.0 gave us direct access, a familiar setup, and a much smoothe..."
"We needed to change an on-site system we were using as we wanted to move our operation forward. We achieved that with HotelTime systems. They are reliable, and stable and offer fea..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"In 2018 we were choosing a system for our first completely self-service ART and design hotel. We decided on HotelTime and after 4 years I have to say that the choice was the right..."
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
用户一致称赞ASI拥有友好直观的界面,能够简化预订管理流程,简化日常操作。对于没有酒店行业经验的用户来说,它尤其方便易用。
ASI 系统在管理前台任务和预订方面表现出色,提供各种工具来提高入住/退房流程和房间分配的效率。
ASI系统以其稳健可靠的性能而备受赞誉,确保了持续稳定的运行。尤其在运行需求较高的环境中,该系统更显优势。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
ASI的技术支持因其响应迅速、解决问题高效而广受好评,尽管也有部分用户反映响应时间有所延迟。培训方面的专业性和乐于助人也备受赞誉。
反复出现的批评意见强调了与第三方平台(特别是会计和库存管理平台)更好地集成能力的必要性,这可以简化更广泛的业务流程。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
评论中的一个共同主题是,HotelTime通过简洁直观的工作流程,减少了前台、收银和多部门操作的日常工作量。即使用户整体评价系统,也有人指出,过多的点击、弹窗... 评论中的一个共同主题是,HotelTime通过简洁直观的工作流程,减少了前台、收银和多部门操作的日常工作量。即使用户整体评价系统,也有人指出,过多的点击、弹窗或繁琐的编辑流程可能会拖慢员工速度,使培训或高峰期操作变得比必要的更困难。
用户经常提到HotelTime的支持团队是其主要优势,描述为响应迅速、联系方便、专业,且常能立即解决问题。多篇评论表示,这种响应速度减少了停机时间,使PMS在日常... 用户经常提到HotelTime的支持团队是其主要优势,描述为响应迅速、联系方便、专业,且常能立即解决问题。多篇评论表示,这种响应速度减少了停机时间,使PMS在日常运营中更易依赖,尤其是在前台或财务工作中酒店需要快速答复时。
评测者一致认为 HotelTime 在预订创建、编辑、房间可用性和房间块管理方面操作简便、速度快。该 PMS 被视为一款提升预订准确性、支持团队预订、帮助员工实时管理... 评测者一致认为 HotelTime 在预订创建、编辑、房间可用性和房间块管理方面操作简便、速度快。该 PMS 被视为一款提升预订准确性、支持团队预订、帮助员工实时管理入住率的工具,从而减少错误并加快前台工作流程。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
许多评价强调HotelTime的账单和开票流程是其实际优势,特别是在预付款单、发票、单据匹配和收银工作方面。然而,用户也指出在发票编辑、过账日记账、拆分账单、... 许多评价强调HotelTime的账单和开票流程是其实际优势,特别是在预付款单、发票、单据匹配和收银工作方面。然而,用户也指出在发票编辑、过账日记账、拆分账单、押金、货币处理和会计对账方面存在一些摩擦,表明这是一个价值很高但流程复杂的环节。
一小部分但重要的评论涉及客人档案的处理,包括偏好存储、重复档案、客人历史和与文件关联的数据。用户希望拥有更丰富的客人档案,以及更清晰的合并或搜索操作,... 一小部分但重要的评论涉及客人档案的处理,包括偏好存储、重复档案、客人历史和与文件关联的数据。用户希望拥有更丰富的客人档案,以及更清晰的合并或搜索操作,以便员工能更快地为回头客提供服务,而无需创建重复记录或进行额外的手动清理。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。ASI PMS 和 HotelTime PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。ASI PMS 提供 21 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 HotelTime PMS 提供 60 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速上手。ASI PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 4.7/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按酒店规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
ASI PMS:否。HotelTime PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店经营者客观比较酒店科技产品。Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) 的 HT Score 为 76,HOTELTIME 的为 92。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您酒店的情况量身定制的推荐