The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 27 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) and Native Email Marketing.
Lodgit Hotelsoftware GmbH 表现出色 ,拥有独特功能如 EPoS.
基于 HTR 上 27 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $300/mo | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 27 | 0 |
在分析了 27 条经验证的评价后,Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) 用户最看重其 易于使用且界面直观, 预订和前台管理, 产品稳定性和可靠性,而 Lodgit Hotelsoftware GmbH 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
易于使用且界面直观
▾
|
|
|
+
预订和前台管理
▾
|
|
|
+
产品稳定性和可靠性
▾
|
|
|
+
详细全面的报告
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
技术支持质量
▾
|
|
|
−
与第三方平台集成
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #74 0 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #74 0 条评价 | #75 0 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #19 2 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 | #72 1 条评价 | #79 0 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 | #51 2 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #67 0 条评价 | #69 0 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 | #48 1 条评价 | #53 0 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #44 0 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 | — | #56 0 条评价 |
| 亚太 | #27 1 条评价 | — |
Choosing between ASI PMS by Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) and Lodgit Desk Hotelsoftware hinges on your hotel’s specific operational needs and growth ambitions. ASI is a cloud-based, feature-rich property management system with over 26 recent reviews, making it a clear leader in terms of user feedback and ongoing support. Lodgit Desk, while simpler and more cost-effective, has little recent review activity and fewer features, which may limit scalability. Do you prioritize extensive functionality and proven support, or simplicity and affordability?
Both ASI and Lodgit Desk aim to streamline hotel management, but they diverge significantly in scope and sophistication. ASI's platform offers extensive modules like automated room assignments, real-time reporting, integrated payment terminals, and online check-in, all designed for mid-size to large hotels. Lodgit Desk, on the other hand, provides a straightforward booking calendar and communication tools, ideal for small properties or those seeking basic management. Given the more recent reviews and higher overall rating, ASI clearly demonstrates stronger ongoing support and development.
Are you looking for a scalable, feature-packed system or a simple, budget-friendly solution? If your hotel needs robust automation and detailed analytics, ASI is likely the better fit. Conversely, Lodgit Desk suits properties that prioritize ease of use over advanced features — but with limited recent market presence, it may struggle to support growth.
If your hotel requires a comprehensive property management system that handles reservations, billing, housekeeping, and revenue management across multiple properties, go with ASI. It is designed for hotels aiming to scale, with advanced integrations, real-time reporting, and a user interface rated at 4.88/5 by current users.
If you operate a small hotel, guesthouse, or hostel that needs a straightforward booking calendar, quick correspondence, and low-cost management, Lodgit Desk is more suitable. Its simple interface and modules like online booking and basic communication tools are geared for properties with limited complexity.
Given ASI’s recent review count of 26, a high NPS score of 9.69/10, and more recent user feedback, it’s the stronger recommendation for hotels seeking a long-term solution. Lodgit Desk’s limited reviews and small team make it better suited for very small operations or those testing basic management.
Both systems claim user-friendliness, but ASI’s UI has been rated at 4.88/5 based on recent reviews, indicating a highly intuitive experience. Users highlight its straightforward workflows, easy onboarding, and quick adaptation across departments. Support for staff training and remote access also contribute positively.
Lodgit Desk, while simple in design, has no recent review data to validate ease of use. Its classic reservation book interface might be familiar to small operators, but lacking recent feedback means it’s difficult to confirm ongoing usability.
Edge: ASI PMS.
ASI offers an extensive suite of 31 features exclusive to the platform, including centralized user management, cloud hosting, automated space optimization, integrated ID scanning, online check-in, real-time status updates, revenue management, and mobile apps. Its features support large-scale operations, automation, and revenue optimization.
Lodgit Desk provides just one unique feature: an integrated EPoS system, with the rest focused on basic reservation management, such as offers, invoices, and communication templates. With only 16 shared features, Lodgit’s feature set is significantly less comprehensive.
Edge: ASI PMS.
ASI’s customer support is rated at 4.73/5, with recent reviews praising its responsiveness and professionalism, even in complex issues. Users mention prompt technical assistance and effective onboarding processes, making it a dependable choice.
Lodgit Desk, however, has no recent reviews or ratings available, leaving its support quality uncertain. Given the size of the company (9 employees) and lack of recent feedback, support may not be as robust or responsive.
Edge: ASI PMS.
ASI features 18 verified integration partners, including major platforms like SiteMinder, Cendyn, Duetto, and RoomPriceGenie, enabling extensive connectivity with distribution, revenue, and accounting systems. These integrations facilitate automation and operational efficiency for larger properties.
Lodgit Desk offers no verified integrations currently, limiting its compatibility with third-party systems. This makes it less suitable for hotels looking to automate or expand their digital ecosystem.
Edge: ASI PMS.
ASI’s recent reviews reflect a high satisfaction level: a 97% likelihood to recommend based on 26 reviews, with an overall rating of 77.43/100. Hoteliers in larger or more complex properties praise its stability, detailed reporting, and support.
Lodgit Desk lacks recent review activity and ratings, making it impossible to gauge current user sentiment. Its small team and limited market presence suggest it appeals mainly to small properties or those seeking basic management tools.
Edge: ASI PMS.
ASI is priced at a flat rate of $300 per month, with no free version or trial available. This fee covers a wide array of features, making it a predictable investment for hotels seeking comprehensive management.
Lodgit Desk’s pricing is not publicly listed, which may indicate a customized quote based on hotel size and modules. Its lower complexity generally translates into lower costs, but the lack of transparent pricing makes direct comparison difficult.
Not ideal if your hotel is a small guesthouse with minimal management needs or if you lack the budget for a higher-priced system.
Not ideal if you plan to scale significantly or require extensive integrations and automation.
The core difference lies in scope: ASI is a comprehensive, scalable PMS with a proven track record, while Lodgit Desk offers a basic, budget-friendly solution. If your hotel aims for growth, automation, and detailed analytics, ASI provides more value and support, evidenced by its 26 recent reviews and high satisfaction ratings.
Choose ASI if you need a versatile system that can adapt as your hotel expands, with features that enhance operational efficiency and guest experience. Lodgit Desk is better suited if your property is small, with limited management needs and a focus on simplicity.
In conclusion, for most hotels seeking a reliable, feature-rich PMS backed by recent positive feedback, ASI is the clear choice. Lodgit Desk may serve well for very small operations, but its limited recent activity and features suggest it may not meet future growth demands.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $300/mo | — |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,ASI PMS 和 Lodgit Desk Hotelsoftware 共享 16 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| EPoS | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 基于云 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
| 集中的用户和角色管理 | ||
| 集成身份证和护照扫描仪 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 20 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 1 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"We needed a system that removed our dependency on remote desktop and made daily operations simpler for the team. ASI 7.0 gave us direct access, a familiar setup, and a much smoothe..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
用户一致称赞ASI拥有友好直观的界面,能够简化预订管理流程,简化日常操作。对于没有酒店行业经验的用户来说,它尤其方便易用。
ASI 系统在管理前台任务和预订方面表现出色,提供各种工具来提高入住/退房流程和房间分配的效率。
ASI系统以其稳健可靠的性能而备受赞誉,确保了持续稳定的运行。尤其在运行需求较高的环境中,该系统更显优势。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
ASI的技术支持因其响应迅速、解决问题高效而广受好评,尽管也有部分用户反映响应时间有所延迟。培训方面的专业性和乐于助人也备受赞誉。
反复出现的批评意见强调了与第三方平台(特别是会计和库存管理平台)更好地集成能力的必要性,这可以简化更广泛的业务流程。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。ASI PMS 和 Lodgit Desk Hotelsoftware 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。ASI PMS 提供 18 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Lodgit Desk Hotelsoftware 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。ASI PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
ASI PMS:否。Lodgit Desk Hotelsoftware:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) 的 HT Score 为 77,Lodgit Hotelsoftware GmbH 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您的房产情况量身定制的推荐方案