The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 27 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 On premise and Integrated Payment Terminal & Card Reader.
Resly 表现出色 ,拥有独特功能如 Centralized Messaging and Payment Requests.
基于 HTR 上 27 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $300/mo | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 27 | 0 |
在分析了 27 条经验证的评价后,Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) 用户最看重其 易于使用且界面直观, 预订和前台管理, 产品稳定性和可靠性,而 Resly 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
易于使用且界面直观
▾
|
|
|
+
预订和前台管理
▾
|
|
|
+
产品稳定性和可靠性
▾
|
|
|
+
详细全面的报告
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
技术支持质量
▾
|
|
|
−
与第三方平台集成
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #74 0 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #74 0 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #19 2 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 | #72 1 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 | #51 2 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #67 0 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 | #48 1 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #44 0 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #27 1 条评价 | — |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is vital for your hotel’s efficiency and guest satisfaction. Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) and Resly are two options that target different hotel segments, but they differ significantly in maturity, user feedback, and feature depth. ASI, with over 26 recent reviews, offers a proven, well-rated platform, while Resly’s limited reviews and regional focus make it a less tested choice. Your decision hinges on your hotel’s size, complexity, and growth plans.
ASI PMS has been serving hotels worldwide for over 26 years, boasting a strong presence in multiple regions and a high review count of 26 recent reviews. Its core strengths include ease of use, stability, and extensive integrations, which are backed by a 4.88/5 ease-of-use rating and a 4.73/5 customer support rating. Conversely, Resly, founded in 2020 with no recent reviews, claims to simplify management rights and short-term holiday letting but lacks the validation of a large review base. Resly’s limited regional reach and absence of recent feedback make its long-term reliability uncertain.
Both platforms aim to streamline hotel operations but diverge in their target markets. ASI excels in multi-property management, operational analytics, and integration with third-party platforms, making it suitable for larger or growing hotels. Resly’s focus on management rights and holiday letting may appeal to boutique or short-term rental operators, but its lack of reviews raises questions about maturity and support. Are you comfortable with a proven system or willing to try a newer platform with limited feedback?
If your hotel needs a comprehensive, scalable system with robust integrations and extensive reporting, go with ASI. Its proven track record, with more than 7,000 customers and a 97% likelihood to recommend, confirms reliability and satisfaction among hotels of various sizes.
If your hotel primarily manages holiday rentals or management rights, and you prefer a simplified, intuitive interface, Resly might seem attractive. However, with no recent reviews and only two verified integrations, Resly’s offerings are less validated for larger or more complex operations.
For hotels planning growth, multi-property management, or requiring advanced revenue tools, ASI is the safer choice. For smaller, short-term-focused properties with minimal complexity, Resly could be a consideration—yet the lack of detailed feedback limits confidence.
Based on current data, ASI PMS’s ease-of-use rating of 4.88/5 and review comments highlight an intuitive, user-friendly interface. Users mention its straightforward workflow, especially for front desk operations, check-in/out, and reporting, which simplifies staff training. The onboarding process is rated 4.69/5, with users describing it as smooth and supportive.
Resly offers a simplified, easy-to-navigate platform tailored to property management rights and holiday rentals, but it lacks detailed usability ratings or recent reviews to confirm its ease of use. Without user feedback, it's uncertain how well Resly performs in day-to-day operations compared to ASI.
Edge: ASI.
ASI offers a broader feature set—38 shared features with Resly, plus 9 unique functionalities like multi-lingual support, cloud and on-premise options, automated night audit, integrated payment terminals, and revenue management. These features support larger, more complex hotel environments with varied needs.
Resly, with only 7 unique features, includes centralized messaging, guest app, online checkout, GDPR, and SOC2 compliance, mainly suited for short-term rentals and management rights. Its feature depth is limited and tailored for simplicity rather than extensive operational complexity.
Edge: ASI.
ASI’s support ratings are high—4.73/5—based on recent reviews emphasizing prompt and professional assistance. Users mention that support staff resolve issues quickly and provide helpful training, though some note response times could be slightly improved.
Resly’s support experience remains unreviewed, with no recent feedback to assess its responsiveness or quality. Given ASI’s established presence, its support infrastructure is more reliable and proven.
Edge: ASI.
ASI integrates with 18 verified partners, including major platforms like SiteMinder, Duetto, and Cendyn, supporting comprehensive third-party connectivity. Shared integrations include RoomPriceGenie, but ASI’s broader partner network facilitates smoother operations for larger hotels.
Resly offers only 2 verified integrations, with Goki being the only shared partner. Its limited integrations suggest it may restrict your hotel’s ability to connect with other essential systems or expand operational capabilities.
Edge: ASI.
ASI’s reviews, with 26 recent entries, reflect a predominantly positive sentiment, emphasizing ease of use, support, and reporting. The 97% likelihood to recommend and a 4.88/5 ease rating demonstrate strong satisfaction across property types, including larger hotels.
Resly’s lack of recent reviews makes it impossible to gauge current user sentiment, though its regional focus suggests it may be better suited for specific markets or property types.
Edge: ASI.
ASI’s base price is $300 per month, with no freemium or trial options listed. This cost aligns with its extensive feature set and proven reputation, making it a predictable investment for hotels seeking reliability.
Resly does not disclose pricing details, which could indicate a custom quote model. The absence of transparent pricing complicates comparison and may be a barrier for smaller hotels or those on tight budgets.
Not ideal if your hotel is very small, short-term focused, or primarily a single property with simple needs.
Not ideal if your hotel needs multi-property management, advanced analytics, or regional support outside Asia-Pacific.
ASI PMS is a mature, highly-rated system trusted by thousands of hotels worldwide, offering a broad feature set, extensive integrations, and proven support. Its 26 recent reviews and high ratings make it a clear choice for hotels seeking reliability and scalability.
Resly, while promising for niche markets like holiday rentals, remains largely unreviewed and regionally limited. Its lightweight feature set and lack of recent feedback suggest it’s more suitable for very small or specific operations, not larger or growing properties.
If your hotel values stability, comprehensive features, and support, ASI clearly leads. For smaller, management rights-focused properties with straightforward needs, Resly might be worth exploring, but caution is advised due to limited validation.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $300/mo | — |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,ASI PMS 和 Resly PMS 共享 38 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 付款请求 | ||
| 在前提 | ||
| 在线结帐 | ||
| 基于云 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 来宾消息 | ||
| 符合 GDPR | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
| 访客应用 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
| 集成支付终端和读卡器 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 4 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 1 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"We needed a system that removed our dependency on remote desktop and made daily operations simpler for the team. ASI 7.0 gave us direct access, a familiar setup, and a much smoothe..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
用户一致称赞ASI拥有友好直观的界面,能够简化预订管理流程,简化日常操作。对于没有酒店行业经验的用户来说,它尤其方便易用。
ASI 系统在管理前台任务和预订方面表现出色,提供各种工具来提高入住/退房流程和房间分配的效率。
ASI系统以其稳健可靠的性能而备受赞誉,确保了持续稳定的运行。尤其在运行需求较高的环境中,该系统更显优势。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
ASI的技术支持因其响应迅速、解决问题高效而广受好评,尽管也有部分用户反映响应时间有所延迟。培训方面的专业性和乐于助人也备受赞誉。
反复出现的批评意见强调了与第三方平台(特别是会计和库存管理平台)更好地集成能力的必要性,这可以简化更广泛的业务流程。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。ASI PMS 和 Resly PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。ASI PMS 提供 18 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Resly PMS 提供 2 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。ASI PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
ASI PMS:否。Resly PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) 的 HT Score 为 77,Resly 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您的房产情况量身定制的推荐方案