The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 127 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 On premise and Lobby Kiosk.
roommaster 表现出色 在 客户支持 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (5.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Revenue Management Module and Native Email Marketing.
基于 HTR 上 127 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $300/mo | From $500/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 27 | 100 |
在分析了 127 条经验证的评价后,Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) 用户最看重其 易于使用且界面直观, 预订和前台管理, 产品稳定性和可靠性,而 roommaster 用户则强调 客户支持, 预订管理, 集中式数据管理。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
易于使用且界面直观
▾
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
|
+
预订和前台管理
▾
|
+
预订管理
▾
|
|
+
产品稳定性和可靠性
▾
|
+
集中式数据管理
▾
|
|
+
详细全面的报告
▾
|
+
云和移动访问
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
技术支持质量
▾
|
−
报告生成
▾
|
|
−
与第三方平台集成
▾
|
−
用户界面体验
▾
|
|
−
团体预订功能
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #74 0 条评价 | #30 26 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #74 0 条评价 | #13 54 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | — | #31 3 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #19 2 条评价 | #32 1 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #72 1 条评价 | #22 35 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #51 2 条评价 | #34 8 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #67 0 条评价 | #24 15 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #48 1 条评价 | #27 6 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #44 0 条评价 | #10 62 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #29 11 条评价 |
| 亚太 | #27 1 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | — | #27 0 条评价 |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) can significantly impact your hotel's daily operations, guest satisfaction, and revenue. Both Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) and roommaster address core hotel management needs, but they diverge in focus, features, and user feedback. ASI, with more recent reviews and a larger review count, provides a cloud-based platform praised for its ease of use and detailed reports. roommaster, while established and feature-rich, has fewer recent reviews but is favored in multi-property environments. Which one aligns better with your hotel’s priorities?
Both systems aim to streamline hotel operations but approach this differently. ASI emphasizes a user-friendly, cloud-based experience with intuitive reservation management, detailed analytics, and solid technical support. roommaster offers a comprehensive platform with over 270 reports, deep integrations, and broad functionality that caters well to multi-property chains. However, ASI’s more recent reviews highlight its quick support and easy onboarding, whereas roommaster’s feedback points to some issues with report generation and support accessibility. Do you prioritize simplicity or feature depth?
If your hotel needs a straightforward, cloud-based PMS that simplifies daily tasks and offers robust reporting, ASI is the better fit. Its high ease-of-use ratings (4.88/5) and recent review volume give confidence in its reliability and support. If your hotel requires extensive integrations, multi-property management, and modules like EPoS or guest feedback, roommaster’s 56 verified partners and 270+ reports make it appealing. For smaller or less complex properties, ASI’s streamlined interface can be more advantageous; larger chains may benefit from roommaster’s depth and customization.
ASI’s UI scores a notable 4.88/5, with users describing it as very intuitive and easy to teach to staff. Its onboarding process is rated 4.69/5, and recent reviews highlight minimal training time and quick adoption. Conversely, roommaster scores 4.22/5 for ease of use, with users mentioning some clunkiness, slower navigation, and a need for more help over the phone. While both are accessible, ASI’s interface and onboarding process have received more recent praise for their straightforward nature.
Edge: ASI PMS.
roommaster offers a broader suite of features, with 21 unique modules such as EPoS, booking engine, guest feedback, and revenue management. It also boasts 270+ reports for real-time insights. ASI provides eight exclusive features, including multi-lingual support, multi-currency, lobby kiosk, and housekeeping mobile app, but overall has fewer modules. If you need extensive operational tools and advanced integrations, roommaster’s feature set is more comprehensive. However, ASI’s core features excel in reservation management and reporting with less complexity.
Edge: roommaster PMS.
ASI’s support and onboarding are rated 4.73/5, with reviews highlighting prompt, professional assistance and a smooth onboarding experience. Users appreciate the quick resolution of technical issues and the support staff’s expertise. roommaster’s ratings are lower at 4.25/5, with some users describing inconsistent help availability and slow responses. Recent feedback suggests ASI’s support is more reliable and responsive, making it the preferred choice for hotels prioritizing customer service.
Edge: ASI PMS.
roommaster leads with 56 verified partners, including major integrations like SiteMinder, Channel Manager, and GuestRevu, supporting extensive third-party connectivity. Anand Systems Inc. has 18 verified partners, shared with roommaster, including prominent names like SHR Group and Cendyn. However, roommaster’s broader partner network allows for more extensive customization and connectivity, especially for larger operations seeking deep integration. If your hotel depends on diverse integrations, roommaster’s ecosystem gives it an edge.
Edge: roommaster PMS.
ASI’s recent reviews focus on ease of use, quick onboarding, and stability, with a 97% likelihood to recommend, though it has fewer reviews (26). roommaster’s 83 reviews, primarily from multi-property clients, rate it highly for operational control, with a 91% recommendation rate. Hotel segments like boutique and independent hotels tend to favor ASI for its simplicity, while larger chains value roommaster’s extensive features and integrations. Given the more recent and numerous reviews, roommaster’s ratings are slightly higher, but ASI’s growing reputation emphasizes its user satisfaction.
Edge: roommaster PMS.
ASI is priced at a $300 base fee, with no freemium or monthly per-room charges, making it predictable and straightforward. roommaster costs $500 upfront, with no ongoing monthly or implementation fees. The higher cost reflects its broader feature set and more extensive integrations, but ASI’s lower entry price can be attractive for smaller hotels or those seeking simplicity.
ASI PMS and roommaster serve different hotel operational needs. ASI stands out in ease of use, recent reviews, and support, making it suitable for properties that value simplicity and quick deployment. roommaster, with its extensive features, integrations, and focus on large or multi-property hotels, appeals to operations demanding depth and customization.
If your hotel needs a straightforward, cloud-hosted system to streamline daily tasks with reliable support, go with ASI. For larger, more complex operations requiring detailed control and broad integrations, roommaster is the more appropriate choice. Your decision should hinge on your hotel’s size, complexity, and operational priorities.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $300/mo | From $500/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,ASI PMS 和 roommaster PMS 共享 39 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| EPoS | ||
| 在前提 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 大堂售货亭 | ||
| 拖放磁带图 | ||
| 物业管理系统 | ||
| 辅助收入跟踪 | ||
| 销售点 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 频道管理员 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 17 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 5 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"We needed a system that removed our dependency on remote desktop and made daily operations simpler for the team. ASI 7.0 gave us direct access, a familiar setup, and a much smoothe..."
"From my point of view as an asset manager that has the responsibility to tell the owners about their investment, roommaster gives me all that information. It's easy to report and e..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We’re an independent hotel surrounded by giants, but roomMaster gave us the tools we needed to stand tall alongside them."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
用户一致称赞ASI拥有友好直观的界面,能够简化预订管理流程,简化日常操作。对于没有酒店行业经验的用户来说,它尤其方便易用。
ASI 系统在管理前台任务和预订方面表现出色,提供各种工具来提高入住/退房流程和房间分配的效率。
ASI系统以其稳健可靠的性能而备受赞誉,确保了持续稳定的运行。尤其在运行需求较高的环境中,该系统更显优势。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
ASI的技术支持因其响应迅速、解决问题高效而广受好评,尽管也有部分用户反映响应时间有所延迟。培训方面的专业性和乐于助人也备受赞誉。
反复出现的批评意见强调了与第三方平台(特别是会计和库存管理平台)更好地集成能力的必要性,这可以简化更广泛的业务流程。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
虽然有些用户体验到了优质的客户支持,但也有一些用户反映服务存在不一致之处。他们认为,需要提升客服人员的专业水平和对用户问题的理解,才能提供更令人满意的... 虽然有些用户体验到了优质的客户支持,但也有一些用户反映服务存在不一致之处。他们认为,需要提升客服人员的专业水平和对用户问题的理解,才能提供更令人满意的服务体验。
预订管理被认为是RoomMaster的一大优势,用户普遍认为它操作简便、高效,能够妥善管理包括团体预订在内的各种预订。然而,部分用户也指出,RoomMaster在房间分配... 预订管理被认为是RoomMaster的一大优势,用户普遍认为它操作简便、高效,能够妥善管理包括团体预订在内的各种预订。然而,部分用户也指出,RoomMaster在房间分配列表和团体入住登记方面仍有改进空间。
RoomMaster从分散的人工操作方式转向集中式数据管理,因其减少错误、提高酒店运营可靠性而备受赞誉。用户非常欣赏将所有预订、宾客信息和财务数据集中在一个安全... RoomMaster从分散的人工操作方式转向集中式数据管理,因其减少错误、提高酒店运营可靠性而备受赞誉。用户非常欣赏将所有预订、宾客信息和财务数据集中在一个安全平台上的做法,这显著提升了工作流程效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
RoomMaster的报告生成功能虽然实用,但仍被认为有待改进。用户希望在创建和导出报告方面获得更高的效率和效果,这表明改进功能可以简化分析任务。
一些用户指出需要改进用户体验,尤其强调需要消除重复性任务,例如频繁登录,这会影响日常使用该软件的流畅性。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。ASI PMS 和 roommaster PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。ASI PMS 提供 18 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 roommaster PMS 提供 56 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。ASI PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 4.1/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
ASI PMS:否。roommaster PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) 的 HT Score 为 77,roommaster 的为 83。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问